Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 3 in Adding one more to the list: A new species of Eniochobothrium (Cestoda: Lecanicephalidea) from the Oman cownose ray in South Africa

Fig. 3. Maximum likelihood phylogram based on partial sequences of the large subunit 28S rRNA gene. Nodal support is shown as posterior probability and bootstrap. GenBank accession number precedes species name. Branch length scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site. (//) Branch length reduced to one time the scale bar; (///) branch length reduced to two times the scale bar. Squares represent Posterior Probability values while circles represent Bootstrap values.

Fig. 4 in Adding one more to the list: A new species of Eniochobothrium (Cestoda: Lecanicephalidea) from the Oman cownose ray in South Africa

Fig. 4. Maximum likelihood phylogram based on partial sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (mtCOI) gene. Nodal support is shown as posterior probability and bootstrap. GenBank accession number precedes species name. Branch length scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site. (//) Branch length reduced to one time the scale bar. Squares represent Posterior Probability values while circles represent Bootstrap values.

Fig. 2 in Adding one more to the list: A new species of Eniochobothrium (Cestoda: Lecanicephalidea) from the Oman cownose ray in South Africa

Fig. 2. Scanning electron micrographs of an immature specimen of Eniochobothrium acostae n. sp. from the South-western Indian Ocean off Scottburgh and Richards Bay, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. A, entire strobila; B, scolex; C, genital pore; D, trough formed by non-reproductive proglottids of the anterior strobila.

Fig. 1 in Adding one more to the list: A new species of Eniochobothrium (Cestoda: Lecanicephalidea) from the Oman cownose ray in South Africa

Fig. 1. Line drawings of Eniochobothrium acostae n. sp. from the South-western Indian Ocean off Scottburgh and Richards Bay, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. A, outline of entire cestode; B, mature proglottid; C, early gravid proglottid; D, trough formed by non-reproductive proglottids of the anterior strobila; E, scolex; F, terminal genitalia; G, cocoon with eggs. Abbreviations: c (cirrus); cs (cirrus sac); ex (excretory canal); gp (genital pore); isv (internal seminal vesicle); ot (ootype); ov (ovary); t (testes); u (uterus); vd (vas deferens); vf (vitelline follicle).

Figure 2 in The taxonomic catalog of the Brazilian fauna: Dermaptera and Phasmatodea (Insecta), with commentaries on species list, types, authorship and distribution

Figure 2. Data on species authorship of Dermaptera: (A) demography in relation to nationality; (B) ranking of authors who described the highest numbers of earwig species, from first to last: Carlos Moreira in first place; Malcom Burr and Carl August Dohrn tied in second; Alan Brindle in third; Jean Guillaume Audinet-Serville, Alfredo Borelli, Samuel Scudder, Carl Stål, and Henrik Steinmann tied in fourth; Auguste de Bormans, William Kirby, and Joaquim Machado Filho tied in fifth.

Figure 5 in The taxonomic catalog of the Brazilian fauna: Dermaptera and Phasmatodea (Insecta), with commentaries on species list, types, authorship and distribution

Figure 5. Distribution of the publications of Phasmatodea species across time. Time gap* = period of time that had no descriptions of species; species cluster** = high amounts of species described clustered in a short period of time, between time gaps.

Figure 4 in The taxonomic catalog of the Brazilian fauna: Dermaptera and Phasmatodea (Insecta), with commentaries on species list, types, authorship and distribution

Figure 4. Distribution of the publications of Dermaptera species across time. Time gap* = period of time that had no descriptions of species.

Figure 3 in The taxonomic catalog of the Brazilian fauna: Dermaptera and Phasmatodea (Insecta), with commentaries on species list, types, authorship and distribution

Figure 3. Data on species authorship of Phasmatodea: (A) demography in relation to nationality; (B) ranking of authors who described the highest numbers of walking-sticks species, from first to last: Ludwig Redtenbacher, Salvador de Toledo Piza Jr., John O. Westwood, Karl Brunner-von Wattenwyl, and Raphael A. Heleodoro.

Fig. 102 in Jumping spiders (Salticidae) of Uganda - revised list, new species and distributional data

Fig. 102. Vicirionessa ignota sp. nov. A, C. Holotype, ♀ (ZFMK 2959). B, D–G. Paratype, ♀ (ZFMK 3034). A–B. General appearance. C–E. Epigyne. F. Dissected epigyne, dorsal view. G. Internal structure of epigyne.

Fig. 101 in Jumping spiders (Salticidae) of Uganda - revised list, new species and distributional data

Fig. 101. Tusitala ugandensis sp. nov., holotype, ♀ (FSCA). A. General appearance. B. Chelicera. C–D, Epigyne. E. Internal structure of epigyne.

Fig. 99 in Jumping spiders (Salticidae) of Uganda - revised list, new species and distributional data

Fig. 99. Thyenula munda (Peckham & Peckham, 1903), ♀ (MRAC 236 083). A. General appearance. B. Epigyne.

Fig. 98 in Jumping spiders (Salticidae) of Uganda - revised list, new species and distributional data

Fig. 98. Thyene verdieri (Berland & Millot, 1941). A–B. ♂ (ZFMK 2920). A. Palpal organ, ventral view. B. Palpal organ, lateral view. C–D. ♀ (ZFMK 2879). C. Epigyne. D. Internal structure of epigyne.

Fig. 97 in Jumping spiders (Salticidae) of Uganda - revised list, new species and distributional data

Fig. 97. Thyene verdieri (Berland & Millot, 1941). A–E. ♂ (ZFMK). A. General appearance. B. Palpal organ, ventral view. C. Palpal organ, ventrolateral view. D. Palpal organ, lateral view. E. Palpal organ, dorsal view. F. ♀, epigyne (ZFMK).

Fig. 96 in Jumping spiders (Salticidae) of Uganda - revised list, new species and distributional data

Fig. 96. Thyene perfecta sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (ZFMK 2876). A. General appearance. B–C. Palpal organ, ventral view. D–E. Palpal organ, ventrolateral view.

Fig. 104 in Jumping spiders (Salticidae) of Uganda - revised list, new species and distributional data

Fig. 104. Vicirionessa peckhamorum (Lessert, 1927), ♀ (NHM). A. General appearance. B–C. Epigyne. D. Internal structure of epigyne.

Fig. 95 in Jumping spiders (Salticidae) of Uganda - revised list, new species and distributional data

Fig. 95. Thyene mutica (Simon, 1902), ♂ (MRAC 219 527). A. General appearance. B. Palpal organ, ventral view. C. Palpal organ, lateral view.

Fig. 94 in Jumping spiders (Salticidae) of Uganda - revised list, new species and distributional data

Fig. 94. Thyene masindi sp. nov. A–B. Paratype, ♂ (ZFMK 2914). A. Palpal organ, ventral view. B. Palpal organ, lateral view. C–E. Paratype, ♀ (ZFMK 2976). C. Epigyne. D. Internal structure of epigyne, ventral view. E. Internal structure of epigyne, dorsal view.

Fig. 92 in Jumping spiders (Salticidae) of Uganda - revised list, new species and distributional data

Fig. 92. Thyene blaisei (Simon, 1902), ♂ (NHM). A. General appearance. B–C. Palpal organ, ventral view. D. Palpal organ, ventrolateral view. E. Palpal organ, lateral view.

Fig. 91 in Jumping spiders (Salticidae) of Uganda - revised list, new species and distributional data

Fig. 91. Thyene australis Peckham & Peckham, 1903, ♀ (NHM). A. Epigyne. B. Internal structure of epigyne.

Fig. 100 in Jumping spiders (Salticidae) of Uganda - revised list, new species and distributional data

Fig. 100. Tomomingi keinoi (Prószyński & Żabka, 1983). A. ♂, palpal organ, ventral view (MRAC). B–E. ♀ (MRAC 244 992). B. General appearance of female. C–D. Epigyne. E. Internal structure of epigyne.