Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,620
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,620 results for “Molecular Phylogeny”
FIGURE 11 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)
FIGURE 11. Morphology of A–C. Halofilum helgolandicum SAG 2.95 and D–G. H. ramosum SAG 2050 grown on 1/2SWES medium.
FIGURE 8 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)
FIGURE 8. Morphology of Paulbroadya petersii SAG 2240 grown on SWES medium. A, B. general view of plants, C–G. morphology of filaments in two-weeks of growth.
FIGURE 4 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)
FIGURE 4. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Pseudendoclonium strains grown on 3NBBM medium. A. ULVO-21, B. ULVO-29, C. ULVO-26, D. SAG 2237, E. SAG 467-2, F. CCAP 415/1.
FIGURE 19 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)
FIGURE 19. Morphology of Rhexinema edaphica ULVO-10 grown on MiEB12 medium. A–E. cells packets and rudimentary branching, F,G. single cells and packets surrounded by common mucilage contrasted by indian ink.
FIGURE 13 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)
FIGURE 13. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Ctenocladus strains grown on 3NBBM medium. A,B. ULVO-16, C. ULVO-18, D,E. ULVO-24, F. SAG 467-1.
FIGURE 1 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)
FIGURE 1. Molecular phylogeny of the Ulvophyceae based on SSU rDNA sequence comparisons. The phylogenetic tree shown was inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on a data set of 1770 aligned positions of 106 taxa using PAUP 4.0b10. For the analysis, the GTR+I+G (base frequencies: A 0.23760, C 0.22733, G 0.28379, T 0.25128; rate matrix A-C 1.0063, A-G 2.3095, A-T 1.3005, C-G 0.7427, C-T 4.0954, G-T 1.0000) with the proportion of invariable sites (I = 0.5552) and gamma shape parameter (G = 0.4527) was chosen, which was calculated as the best model by Modeltest 3.7. The branches in bold are highly supported in all analyses (Bayesian values> 0.95 calculated with PHASE and MrBayes; bootstrap values> 70% calculated with PAUP using maximum likelihood, neighbor-joining, maximum parsimony and RAxML using maximum likelihood). The sister group of the Oltmannsiellopsis-clade was chosen as outgroup. The clade designations was given after the represented genera. The strains originally assigned as Dilabifilum and Pseudendoclonium basiliense are marked with * and # behind the accession number, respectively. The generic names after taxonomic revision are given in white boxes.
FIGURE 16 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)
FIGURE 16. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Rhexinema strains grown on MiEB12 medium. A. R. paucicellularis SAG 463-1, B. SAG 29.93, C. SAG 8.90, D. SAG 466-2; E. R. planctonica UTEX 1570, F,G. R. sancta-tomea ACOI 592.
FIGURE 15 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)
FIGURE 15. Morphology of Planophila bipyrenoidosa A–I. ULVO-1 and J–Q. ULVO-55 grown on 3NBBM medium. A–C. settled zoospores and sporangium, D–I. cell packets, J. settled zoospores, K–Q. variety of vegetative cells.
FIGURE 12 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)
FIGURE 12. Morphology of Ctenocladus circinnatus CCMP 2158 grown on 1/2SWES medium, two-weeks old cultures.
FIGURE 10 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)
FIGURE 10. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Halofilum strains grown on SWES medium. A. H. salinum SAG 1.95, B. H. helgolandicum SAG 2.95, C. H. ramosum SAG 2050, D. H. ramosum SAG 2235; E. H. ramosum ULVO-19, F. ULVO-28.
FIGURE 9 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)
FIGURE 9. Morphology of Lithotrichon pulchrum SAG 2038 grown on 1/2SWES medium. A, B. general view of plants, C–E. young plants, F–H. packets and short filaments, I. packets and settled zoospores.
FIGURE 29 in New circumscription of Cryptanthus and new Cryptanthoid genera and subgenera (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae) based on neglected morphological traits and molecular phylogeny
FIGURE 29. Fruits and persistent sepals of the Cryptanthoid complex. A. Cryptanthus acaulis (Leme 3812). B. Cryptanthus correiaaraujoi (Leme 2704). C. Cryptanthus dianae (Leme 1172). D. Hoplocryptanthus glaziovii (Leme 1545). E. Hoplocryptanthus schwackeanus (Leme 4250). F. Hoplocryptanthus ferrarius (Leme 6544). G. Hoplocryptanthus vidaliorum (Leme 7606). H. Hoplocryptanthus caracensis (Leme 1853). I. Rokautskyia whitmanii (Leme 5209). J. Rokautskyia odoratissima (Leme 5207). K. Rokautskyia scaposa (Leme 5213). L. Forzzaea sp. nov. (Leme 9082). M. Forzzaea sp. nov. (Leme 9080). N. Orthophytum vasconcelosianum (Leme 8673). O. Orthophytum santaritense (Leme 8945). P. Lapanthus duartei (Leme 8995). Q. Lapanthus itambensis (Leme 9064). R. Sincoraea heleniceae (Leme 4908). S. Orthophytum roseolilacinum (Leme 8885). T. Orthophytum aff. diamantinense (Leme 9079). U. Orthophytum cearense (Leme 7700). V. Orthophytum horridum (Leme 2051). Bars = 5 mm.
FIGURE 28. Pollen. A in New circumscription of Cryptanthus and new Cryptanthoid genera and subgenera (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae) based on neglected morphological traits and molecular phylogeny
FIGURE 28. Pollen. A. Orthophytum diamantinense (Leme 5835). B. Orthophytum mello-barretoi (Leme 7243). C. Orthophytum graomogolense (Leme 7175). D. Orthophytum glabrum (Leme 3281). E. Orthophytum conquistense (Leme 6024). F. Orthophytum benzingii (Leme 3661). G. Orthophytum zanonii (Leme 5935). H. Orthophytum vagans (Leme 5952). I. Orthophytum pseudovagans (Leme 7028). J. Orthophytum compactum (Leme 5604). K. Sincoraea hatschbachii (Leme 5332). L. Sincoraea ophiurioides (Leme 2282). M. Sincoraea amoena (Leme 6548). N. Lapanthus duartei (Leme 8995). O. Lapanthus itambensis (Leme 9064). Bars = 10 µm.
FIGURE 27. Pollen. A in New circumscription of Cryptanthus and new Cryptanthoid genera and subgenera (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae) based on neglected morphological traits and molecular phylogeny
FIGURE 27. Pollen. A. Cryptanthus acaulis (Leme 3812). B. Cryptanthus bromelioides (Leme 016-B). C. Cryptanthus marginatus (Leme 290). D. Hoplocryptanthus schwackeanus (Leme 4250). E. Hoplocryptanthus glaziovii (Leme 1545). F. Hoplocryptanthus lavrasensis (Leme 6112). G. Forzzaea leopoldo-horstii (Leme 9084). H. Forzzaea sp. nov. (Leme 9082). I. Forzzaea sp. nov. (Leme 9085). J. Rokautskyia pseudoscaposa (Leme 5218). K. Rokautskyia microglazioui (Leme 157). L. Rokautskyia latifolia (Leme 5520). M. Orthophytum vasconcelosianum (Leme 8673). N. Orthophytum santaritense (Leme 8945). O. Orthophytum roseolilacinum (Leme 8885). Bars = 10 µm.
FIGURE 26 in New circumscription of Cryptanthus and new Cryptanthoid genera and subgenera (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae) based on neglected morphological traits and molecular phylogeny
FIGURE 26. Simple-imbricate stigma type: A. Rokautskyia sanctaluciae (Leme 6699); B. R. roberto-kautskyi (Leme 5210). C. R. odoratissima (Leme 5207). D. R. latifolia (Leme 5220). E. R. pseudoscaposa (Leme 5218). F. R. microglazioui (Leme 1619). G. R. whitmanii (Leme 5209). H. R. leuzingerae (Leme 1620). I. R. leuzingerae (Leme 1620). Optical images: bars = 1 mm; SEM images: F, G, I, bars = 200 µm; H, bar = 50 µm.
FIGURE 25 in New circumscription of Cryptanthus and new Cryptanthoid genera and subgenera (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae) based on neglected morphological traits and molecular phylogeny
FIGURE 25. Simple-erect (SE) and simple-patent (SP) stigma types: A. Forzzaea leopoldo-horstii (SE, Leme 9084); B. Forzzaea sp. nov. (SP, Leme 9082); C. Forzaea sp. nov. (SP, Leme 9085); D. Orthophytum santaritense (SE, Leme 8945); E. Orthophytum vasconcelosianum (SP, Leme 8673); F. Sincoraea amoena (SE, Leme 6548); G. Sincoraea aff. heleniceae (SE, Leme 4908); H. Forzzaea leopoldo-horstii (SE, Leme 8427); I. Orthophytum vasconcelosianum (SP, Leme 8673); J. Sincoraea burle-marxii (SE, Leme 3821); K. Sincoraea humilis (SE, Leme 7196). Optical images: bars = 1 mm; SEM images: bars = 200 µm.
FIGURE 30 in New circumscription of Cryptanthus and new Cryptanthoid genera and subgenera (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae) based on neglected morphological traits and molecular phylogeny
FIGURE 30. Seeds of the Cryptanthoid complex (number of depicted seeds not corresponding to seed number per fruit). A. Cryptanthus pickelii (Leme 5057). B. Cryptanthus sinuosus (Leme 2868). C. Cryptanthus beuckeri (Leme 7341). D. Hoplocryptanthus schwackeanus (Leme 4250). E. Hoplocryptanthus regius (Leme 7507). F. Hoplocryptanthus glaziovii (Leme 4348). G. Rokautskyia scaposa (Leme 5213). H. Rokautskyia whitmanii (Leme 5209). I. Rokautskyia odoratissima (Leme 5216). J. Forzzaea sp. nov. (Leme 9082). K. Forzzaea sp. nov. (Leme 9080). L. Orthophytum vasconcelosianum (Leme 8673). M. Orthophytum roseolilacinum (Leme 8885). N. Orthophytum aff. diamantinense (Leme 9079). O. Lapanthus duartei (Leme 8995). P. Lapanthus itambensis (Leme 9064). Q. Orthophytum leprosum (Leme 7897). R. Orthophytum estevesii (Leme 5923). Bars = 3mm.
FIGURE 24 in New circumscription of Cryptanthus and new Cryptanthoid genera and subgenera (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae) based on neglected morphological traits and molecular phylogeny
FIGURE 24. Simple-dilated stigma type: A. Orthophytum macroflorum (Leme 6001). B. Orthophytum sucrei (Leme 345). C. Orthophytum striatifolium (Leme 6530). D. Orthophytum boudetianum (Leme 7087). E. Orthophytum vagans (Leme 5952). F. Orthophytum aff. graomogolense (Leme 7436). G. Orthophytum mello-barretoi (Leme 7243). H. Orthophytum diamantinense (Leme 5728). I. Orthophytum diamantinense (Leme 8472). J. Orthophytum lanuginosum (Leme 7713). K. Orthophytum boudetianum (Leme 7087). L. Orthophytum piranianum (Leme 7189). Optical images: bars = 1 mm; SEM images: I–K, bars = 100 µm; L, bar = 20 µm.
FIGURE 23 in New circumscription of Cryptanthus and new Cryptanthoid genera and subgenera (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae) based on neglected morphological traits and molecular phylogeny
FIGURE 23. Conduplicate-spiral (CS) and cylindric-distent (CD) stigma types: A. Orthophytum roseolilacinum (CS, Leme 8885). B. Hoplocryptanthus regius (CD, Leme 7507). C. Hoplocryptanthus aff. ferrarius (CD, Leme 6888). D. Hoplocryptanthus glaziovii (CD, Leme 4348). E. Hoplocryptanthus caracensis (CD, Leme 1853). F. Hoplocryptanthus vidaliorum (CD, Leme 7606). G. Hoplocryptanthus glaziovii (CD, Leme 4348). H. Hoplocryptanthus glaziovii (CD, Leme 4348). I. Hoplocryptanthus vidaliorum (CD, Leme 7606). J. Hoplocryptanthus regius (CD, Leme 7507). Optical images: bars = 1 mm; SEM images: bars = 100 µm.
FIGURE 22 in New circumscription of Cryptanthus and new Cryptanthoid genera and subgenera (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae) based on neglected morphological traits and molecular phylogeny
FIGURE 22. Conduplicate-patent stigma type: A. Cryptanthus bromelioides (Leme 016-B). B. Cryptanthus diamantinensis (Leme 3812). C. Cryptanthus maritimus (Leme 1582). D. Cryptanthus aff. acaulis (Leme 4858). E. Cryptanthus ruthae (Leme 8756). F. Cryptanthus sp. nov. (Leme 8902). G. Cryptanthus maritimus (Leme 2011). H. Cryptanthus sinuosus (Leme 2868). I. Cryptanthus beuckeri (Leme 7341). J. Lapanthus duartei (Leme 8995). K. Lapanthus itambensis (Leme 9064). L. Lapanthus duartei (Leme 8995). Optical images: bars = 1 mm; SEM images: bars = 200 µm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.