Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 3 in New discoveries of the genus Thuricola Kent, 1881 (Ciliophora, Peritrichia, Vaginicolidae), with descriptions of three poorly known species from China

Fig. 3. Photomicrographs of Thuricola obconica from life (A–N) and after protargol staining (O–S). (A) Narrow side view of an individual with two zooids. (B) Narrow side view of an individual with single zooid. (C) Wide side view of an individual with two zooids. (D, E) Narrow side view of different individuals. (F–H) Narrow side view of different curved loricas. (I) Anterior portion of body, arrow marks contractile vacuole. (J) Posterior portion, arrowhead marks junctional membrane around the inner stalk. (K) Posterior portion, arrow marks the expanded lorica base, arrowheads mark the junctional membrane. (L) Wide side view of lorica, arrowhead marks the junctional membrane. (M) Narrow side view of anterior portion of lorica, arrow marks valve. (N) Detail of pellicle, arrowhead marks aboral trochal band. (O–Q) Ciliature of three specimens, arrow marks trochal band. (R) Oral ciliature, arrow marks the epistomial membrane 2. (S) Detail of infundibular polykineties 1–3. EM1, epistomial membrane 1; G, germinal kinety; H, haplokinety; Ma, macronucleus; P1–3, infundibular polykineties 1–3. Scale bars = 100 μm (A–H); 50 μm (O–Q).

Fig. 2 in New discoveries of the genus Thuricola Kent, 1881 (Ciliophora, Peritrichia, Vaginicolidae), with descriptions of three poorly known species from China

Fig. 2. Morphology and ciliature of Thuricola obconica. (A) Narrow side view of an individual with two zooids. (B) Narrow side view of an individual with single zooid. (C) Narrow side view of an individual with single zooid, to show macronucleus. (D) Wide side view of an individual with two zooids. (E) Wide side view of lorica. (F–H) Narrow side view of different curved lorica. (I) Base of lorica. (J) Detail of pellicle, to show the transverse striations and trochal band. (K) Model pattern of oral ciliature. (L) Macronucleus after protargol staining. (M) Oral ciliature. (N) Detail of infundibular polykineties. (O) T. obconica from Kahl (1933). (P) T. obconica from Kahl (1935). (Q) T. obconica from Bock (1952). (R) T. kamptostoma from Bock (1952) (synonym of T. obconica). (S) T. obconica from Biernacka (1963) (pos- sible misidentification). (T) T. obconica from Küsters (1974) (probably misidentified). (U) T. obconica from Shen & Gu (2016). EM1–2, epistomial membrane 1–2; G, germinal kinety; H, haplokinety; JM, junctional membrane; LB, lorica base; Ma, macronucleus; Po, polykinety; P1–3, infundibular polykineties 1–3; TB, trochal band; Val, valve. Scale bars = 100 μm (A, B, D); 50 μm (E–H, L, O–U).

Fig. 6 in Morphology of Three Aloricate Choreotrich ciliates, Including Description of a New Species Parastrombidinopsis costalis sp. n. (Ciliophora, Choreotrichia), and phylogeny of the genus Parastrombidinopsis

Fig. 6. Drawings and photomicrographs of Parastrombidinopsis minima from life (A, E–G) and after protargol staining (B–D, H–M). (A, F, G) Views of three individuals showing the body shape. (B, C) Ventral and dorsal views of the same specimen showing the ciliature. (D, H, I) Detail of collar membranelles; the arrows mark the ventral gap. (E) From Tsai et al. (2008). (J) Somatic ciliature. (K) An early divider; arrowhead marks the oral primordium. (L, M) Ventral and dorsal views of same specimen showing the ciliature. CM, collar membranelles; E, endoral membrane; SK, somatic kinety. Scale bars: 25 μm.

Fig. 7 in Morphology of Three Aloricate Choreotrich ciliates, Including Description of a New Species Parastrombidinopsis costalis sp. n. (Ciliophora, Choreotrichia), and phylogeny of the genus Parastrombidinopsis

Fig. 7. Bayesian-Inference tree inferred from SSU rRNA gene sequences, indicating the polygenetic positions of species of the genus Parastrombidinopsis. Numbers at the nodes represent support values in the following order: BI posterior probabilities and ML bootstrap values. Disagreements in topology between the BI and ML trees are indicated by a hyphen. Nodes that were well supported (1.00 BI; 100% ML) are represented by filled circles. Bar = 5 substitutions per 100 nucleotide positions. Species sequenced in the present study are shown in bold type.

Fig. 4 in Morphology of Three Aloricate Choreotrich ciliates, Including Description of a New Species Parastrombidinopsis costalis sp. n. (Ciliophora, Choreotrichia), and phylogeny of the genus Parastrombidinopsis

Fig. 4. Parastrombidinopsis pelagica (Fauré-Fremiet, 1924) comb. n. from life (A–D, F) and after protargol staining (E, G–I). (A, B) Ventral views of two individuals. (C) Swimming pattern. (D) Different individuals to show the variations in body shape. (E) Detail of oral membranelles. (F) From Fauré-Fremiet (1924). (G, H) Ventral and dorsal views of the same specimen showing the ciliature. (I) Lateral view of a specimen. CM, collar membranelles; Ma, macronucleus; Mi, micronucleus; SK, somatic kinety. Scale bars: 50 μm.

Fig. 5 in New discoveries of the genus Thuricola Kent, 1881 (Ciliophora, Peritrichia, Vaginicolidae), with descriptions of three poorly known species from China

Fig. 5. Photomicrographs of Thuricola kellicottiana in vivo (A–P) and after protargol staining (Q–T). (A–C) Narrow side view of individuals with two zooids (A, B) and single zooid (C). (D) Wide side view of a single zooid individual. (E–G) Narrow side views of different individuals, arrowheads mark contractile vacuoles. (H) Detail of pellicle, to show the transverse striations. (I) Narrow side view of lorica, arrowhead marks the valve spine. (J–L) Wide side view of lorica, arrows mark junctional membrane, arrowheads mark valve spine. (O) Narrow side view of anterior portion of lorica, arrows mark valves, arrowheads marks valve spine. (P) Posterior portion, arrows mark the bulge in the lorica, arrowhead marks junctional membrane around the inner stalk. (Q, R) Ciliature of two specimens, arrowhead marks trochal band. (S) Oral ciliature, arrow marks epistomial membrane 2. (T) Detail of infundibular polykinety 1–3, arrow marks epistomial membrane 2. G, germinal kinety; H, haplokinety; Ma, macronucleus; P1–3, infundibular polykineties 1–3. Scale bars = 100 μm.

Fig. 3 in Morphology of Three Aloricate Choreotrich ciliates, Including Description of a New Species Parastrombidinopsis costalis sp. n. (Ciliophora, Choreotrichia), and phylogeny of the genus Parastrombidinopsis

Fig. 3. Photomicrographs of Parastrombidinopsis costalis sp. n. from life (A–F, J) and after protargol staining (G–I, K–N), (A–E, G–J, L, M) from Zhuhai population, and (F, K, N) from Sanya population. (A–C) Ventral-left, ventral, left-lateral views of one individual, arrows mark the dorsal ridge. (D, E) Ventral-left, ventral-right views of one individual; arrows mark the dorsal ridge. (F) Ventral-right view of one individual, arrow marks the dorsal ridge. (G, H) Ventral and dorsal views of one specimen, showing the somatic ciliature. (I) Ventral view of oral ciliature; arrow marks buccal membranelle. (J) Bases of oral membranelles; arrow marks buccal membranelle. (L) An early divider; arrow marks the oral primordium. (M) Two macronuclei. (K, N) Ventral and dorsal views of one specimen, showing the somatic ciliature. CM, collar membranelles; Ma, macronucleus; SK, somatic kinety. Scale bars: 25 μm (A, D); 20 μm (F); 3 μm (J).

Fig. 2 in Morphology of Three Aloricate Choreotrich ciliates, Including Description of a New Species Parastrombidinopsis costalis sp. n. (Ciliophora, Choreotrichia), and phylogeny of the genus Parastrombidinopsis

Fig. 2. Parastrombidinopsis costalis sp. n. of Zhuhai population from life (A–D) and after protargol staining (E–G). (A, B) Ventral and left lateral views of representative individuals; arrows mark the dorsal ridges. (C) Apical view, showing collar membranelles and body shape; arrow marks the dorsal ridge. (D) Locomotion. (E) Oral ciliature. (F, G) Ventral and dorsal views of the same specimen. BM, buccal membranelle; CM, collar membranelles; E, endoral membrane; SK, somatic kinety. Scale bars: 25 μm.

Fig. 1 in Morphology of Three Aloricate Choreotrich ciliates, Including Description of a New Species Parastrombidinopsis costalis sp. n. (Ciliophora, Choreotrichia), and phylogeny of the genus Parastrombidinopsis

Fig. 1. Satellite photograph of South-East China (A) and pictures of sampling sites (B–E). (A) The position of Zhanjiang, Zhuhai, Haikou and Sanya. (B) Coastal waters off Zhanjiang. (C) Coastal waters off Zhuhai. (D) Brackish waters in Haikou. (E) Mangrove wetland in Sanya.

Fig. 7 in New discoveries of the genus Thuricola Kent, 1881 (Ciliophora, Peritrichia, Vaginicolidae), with descriptions of three poorly known species from China

Fig. 7. Photomicrographs of Thuricola folliculata in vivo (A–M) and after protargol staining (N–Q). (A–E) Narrow side views of different individuals with two zooids (A–C, E) and single zooid (D), arrows mark contractile vacuole. (F, G) Wide side views of lorica, arrows mark the junctional membrane. (H, I) Narrow side views of lorica, arrows in H mark valves, arrowheads in H mark posterior bulge of lorica, arrowheads in (I) mark anterior bulge of lorica. (J, K) Aperture of lorica. (L) Posterior portion of lorica, arrowheads mark junctional membrane. (M) Detail of pellicle, to show the transverse striations, arrow marks the aboral trochal band. (N, O) Ciliature of two specimens. (P, Q) Oral ciliature. EM1–2, epistomial membrane 1–2; G, germinal kinety; H, haplokinety; Ma, macronucleus; P1–3, infundibular polykineties 1–3; TB, trochal band. Scale bars = 100 μm.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2013View details →

Figs. 13-17 in Contribution to the knowledge of the click-beetles (Coleoptera¡ Elateridae) from Kurdistan Region - Iraq, with description of three new species.

Figs. 13-17.- Habitus in total or partial view. 13.- Idotarmonides bicolor Platia & Gudenzi. 14.- Agriotes kurdistanus n. sp. 15.- Agriotes duhokensis n. sp. 16.- Cardiophorus carnosus Platia & Gudenzi. 17.- Dicronychus truncatus n. sp.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in New report of the exotic species Megalurothrips usitatus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) infesting three commercial legumes in Nayarit, Mexico

Fig. 1. (A) Adult female of Megalurothrips usitatus; (B) thrips-infested flowers of Phaseolus vulgaris; (C) common bean inflorescence infested with thrips; (D) twisted and deformed pods of cowpeas; (E) inflorescence of jicama infested by thrips; (F) brown coloration produced by thrips feeding.

Figure 8. – A in Review of Butis (Teleostei: Butidae) from Indo-Pacific islands with description of three new species

Figure 8. – A: Butis koilomatodon, BMNH 1894.1.19.35 (female, 56 mm SL), Malaysia (Photo L. Goodayle, BMNH); B: Butis koilomatodon, Timaka River, Papua New Guinea (Photo G. Allen).

Figure 5. – A in Review of Butis (Teleostei: Butidae) from Indo-Pacific islands with description of three new species

Figure 5. – A: Butis butis, MNHN 2022-0233, neotype (male, 55.2 mm SL), India (Photo P. Keith); B: Butis butis, Hamilton's original, unpublished illustration (from Britz, 2019); C: Butis butis, Fly River, Papua New Guinea (Photo G. Allen); D: Butis butis, MNHN 2022-0213 (male, 95 mm SL), Solomon, tag 17612 (Photo P. Keith).

Figure 4. – A in Review of Butis (Teleostei: Butidae) from Indo-Pacific islands with description of three new species

Figure 4. – A: Butis amboinensis, neotype, RMNH.PISC.85037 (77.5 mm SL), Indonesia (Photo F. Loggen, RMNH); B: Butis amboinensis, in MNHN 2005-1897 (74,4 mm SL), Vanuatu (Photo P. Keith); C: Butis amboinensis, MNHN 2022-0237 (67 mm SL), New Caledonia, tag RTNC_053 (Photo N. Charpin); D: Butis amboinensis, Kolobangara, Solomon (Photo C. Lord).

Figure 2 in Review of Butis (Teleostei: Butidae) from Indo-Pacific islands with description of three new species

Figure 2 (see also following page). – A: Bayesian tree of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit (COI; 452 bp) for sequenced specimens of Butis. Numbers at each node represent posterior probabilities. B: Barcoding NJ K2P tree of the COI gene (196 bp) for sequenced specimens of Butis including the holotype of Butis humeralis from the MNHN collection. Numbers at each node represent bootstrap values. C, D: Barcoding NJ K2P trees of the 12S and the 16S genes (129 and 270 bp respectively) for sequenced specimens of Butis collected during the 19th century from the MNHN collection including a paratype of B. audebertae (MNHN A-1503). Numbers at each node represent bootstrap values. [A high resolution version is available online.]

Figure 11. – Butis abdoui n in Review of Butis (Teleostei: Butidae) from Indo-Pacific islands with description of three new species

Figure 11. – Butis abdoui n. sp., paratype in MNHN 2005-0231 (male, 83.2 mm SL), Mayotte, Ouvoveni (Photo P. Keith).

Figure 1. – A in Review of Butis (Teleostei: Butidae) from Indo-Pacific islands with description of three new species

Figure 1. – A: The different patterns of interorbital scales (IOS); head in dorsal view. B: Size of the jaw; head in lateral view. C: Auxiliary scales on flanks.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Figure 8. – A in Review of Giuris (Teleostei: Eleotridae) from Indo-Pacific islands, with description of three new species

Figure 8. – A: Giuris margaritaceus, male; Choiseul, Solomon Islands (Photo P. Keith). B: G. margaritaceus, male; Santa Isabel, Solomon Islands (Photo P. Keith). C: G. margaritaceus, male; MNHN 2020-0135, New Britain, Papua New Guinea; tag 17729; LS 94 mm (Photo P. Keith). D: G. margaritaceus, female; Kolobangara, Solomon Islands (Photo C. Lord).