Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 5 in Evidence of hybrid origin for Tachyphonus nattereri Pelzeln, 1870 (Aves: Thraupidae)

FIGURE 5. Comparison of the rump patch between T. c. madeirae (left; NMW 69243—Borba, Rio Madeira, Amazonas, Brazil) and the holotype of T. nattereri (right, NMW 16338—Villa Maria [= Cáceres], Mato Grosso, Brazil).

FIGURE 3 in Evidence of hybrid origin for Tachyphonus nattereri Pelzeln, 1870 (Aves: Thraupidae)

FIGURE 3. Comparison between the bill shape of the holotype of Tachyphonus nattereri (above in both pictures; NMW 16338—Villa Maria [= Cáceres], Mato Grosso, Brazil) and a male T. c. madeirae (below, left; NMW 69243—Borba, Rio Madeira, Amazonas, Brazil) and the purported female of T. nattereri (below, right; NMW 16339—Salto do Jirau, Rondônia, Brazil).

FIGURE 1 in Evidence of hybrid origin for Tachyphonus nattereri Pelzeln, 1870 (Aves: Thraupidae)

FIGURE 1. Graphic representation of PC1 scores of a Principal Component Analysis of morphometric variables measured from specimens of Tachyphonus l. luctuosus (white circles) T. c. madeirae (gray circles), and the holotype and putative female of T. nattereri (triangles). Each symbol represents one specimen.

FIGURE 4 in Evidence of hybrid origin for Tachyphonus nattereri Pelzeln, 1870 (Aves: Thraupidae)

FIGURE 4. From left to right, males of Tachyphonus luctuosus nitidissimus (NMW 2832—Bugaba, Chiriquí, Panamá), Tachyphonus l. luctuosus (NMW 69215—Villa Maria [= Cáceres], Mato Grosso, Brazil), Tachyphonus nattereri (Holotype, NMW 16338—Villa Maria [= Cáceres], Mato Grosso, Brazil), Tachyphonus cristatus madeirae (NMW 69243—Borba, Rio Madeira, Amazonas, Brazil), and Tachyphonus c. brunneus (NMW 86987—"Bahia", Brazil).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →

Concentrated Hybrid Solar Panel Real Measurements in Switzerland

<h3>Measurements of concentrated hybrid solar panel</h3> Datasheet of the hybrid PV panel (<a title="Datasheet" href="https://cdn.enfsolar.com/Product/pdf/Crystalline/55adc587c2506.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Here</a>) These measurements have taken place in Granges, Valais, Switzerland in longitude: 7.4649965° and latitude: 46.2647793° with three flat mirrors that concentrated the sun's reflection on one hybrid panel. The PV-T and each mirror length (L) : 1 m The distance between the mirrors (D) : 1.5 m The distance between the mirrors and PV-T (F) : 10 m

Surface chemistry dictates the enhancement of luminescence and stability of InP QDs upon c-ALD ZnO hybrid shell growth

Indium phosphide quantum dots (InP QDs) are a promising example of RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) compliant light-emitting materials. However, they suffer from low quantum yield and instability upon processing under ambient conditions. Colloidal atomic layer deposition (c-ALD) has been recently proposed as a methodology to grow hybrid materials including QDs and organic/inorganic oxide shells, which possess new functions compared to the as-synthesized QDs. Here, we demonstrate that ZnO shells can be grown on InP QDs obtained via two synthetic routes, which are the classical sylilphosphine-based and the more recently developed aminophosphine-based one. We find that the ZnO shell increases the photoluminescence emission significantly only in the case of aminophosphine-based InP QDs. We rationalize this result with the different chemistry involved in the nucleation step of the shell and the resulting surface defect passivation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the ZnO shell prevents degradation of the InP QD suspension under ambient conditions by avoiding moisture induced ligand displacement from their surface. Overall, this study proposes c-ALD as a methodology for the synthesis of alternative InP-based core@shell QDs and provides insight into the surface chemistry that results in both enhanced photoluminescence and stability required for application in optoelectronic devise and bio-imaging.

FIGURE 6. Maximum Likelihood tree for Rhinoclemmys melanosterna, R. diademata, R. funerea, R. punctularia and R in Complex phylogeography in Rhinoclemmys melanosterna: conflicting mitochondrial and nuclear evidence suggests past hybridization (Testudines: Geoemydidae)

FIGURE 6. Maximum Likelihood tree for Rhinoclemmys melanosterna, R. diademata, R. funerea, R. punctularia and R. nasuta, based on 3620 bp of nuclear DNA (partial Rag 1, Rag 2, C-mos, R35 and ODC genes). Support values along branches are thorough bootstrap values> 50. Bold branches are supported by posterior probabilities> 0.95 in Bayesian analyses. Note the monophyly of R. melanosterna; lineages I–IV are distributed in the western part, lineages VI and VII in the eastern part of the range.

FIGURE 5. Maximum Likelihood tree for Rhinoclemmys melanosterna, R. diademata, R. funerea, R. punctularia and R in Complex phylogeography in Rhinoclemmys melanosterna: conflicting mitochondrial and nuclear evidence suggests past hybridization (Testudines: Geoemydidae)

FIGURE 5. Maximum Likelihood tree for Rhinoclemmys melanosterna, R. diademata, R. funerea, R. punctularia and R. nasuta, based on 2050 bp of mitochondrial DNA (partial cyt b, 12S and 16S genes). Support values along branches are thorough bootstrap values> 50. Bold branches are supported by posterior probabilities of 1.0 in Bayesian analyses (no other branches had support values equal to or greater than 0.95). Note the polyphyly of R. melanosterna.

FIGURE 4 in Complex phylogeography in Rhinoclemmys melanosterna: conflicting mitochondrial and nuclear evidence suggests past hybridization (Testudines: Geoemydidae)

FIGURE 4. Geographical variation of head pattern in Rhinoclemmys melanosterna. Figured turtles are: (a) MTD T 4885, Cazuela, Lorica, Córdoba, Colombia; (b) MTD T 4888, Sicara, Lorica, Córdoba, Colombia; (c) MTD T 4726, Montelibano, Córdoba, Colombia; (d) MTD T 4569, Qda. Carmelo, Caucasia, Antioquia, Colombia; (e) MTD T 9167, Ladrilleros, Valle del Cauca, Colombia; (f) MTD T 9171, Ciénaga de Barbacoas, Antioquia, Colombia; (g) MTD T 4565, Caño Grande, Cesar, Colombia; F = R. funerea; D = R. diademata; P = R. punctularia. Colour of ranges of R. funerea, R. melanosterna and R. diademata correspond to Figure 1. Roman numerals indicate mitochondrial clades of R. melanosterna, coloured circles symbolize different colours of head stripes. Symbols without Roman numerals refer to specimens described by Medem (1962); vouchers are in the collection of the Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Bogotá, Colombia (see text).

FIGURE 3 in Complex phylogeography in Rhinoclemmys melanosterna: conflicting mitochondrial and nuclear evidence suggests past hybridization (Testudines: Geoemydidae)

FIGURE 3. Parsimony network of cyt b haplotypes of Rhinoclemmys melanosterna, including sequences of R. diademata, R. funerea and R. punctularia, based on an alignment of 1060 bp length. Circle size indicates haplotype frequency. Missing node haplotypes are shown as small black circles. Each line connecting haplotypes corresponds to one mutational step, if not otherwise indicated by bold numbers. Stippled connections were not established under the 95% criterion. Haplotype codes refer to Appendix I.

FIGURE 1 in Complex phylogeography in Rhinoclemmys melanosterna: conflicting mitochondrial and nuclear evidence suggests past hybridization (Testudines: Geoemydidae)

FIGURE 1. Approximate ranges of Rhinoclemmys melanosterna and the allied species R. funerea, R. diademata and R. punctularia (top; based on Rueda-Almonacid et al. 2007) and sampling sites for R. melanosterna (bottom; red dots). Stippled line separates the distribution of the two clusters of mitochondrial haplotypes of R. melanosterna; Roman numerals indicate haplotypes. Inset: Female R. melanosterna from Cangrejo, Córdoba (Colombia).

FIGURE 2. Maximum Likelihood tree for cyt b in Complex phylogeography in Rhinoclemmys melanosterna: conflicting mitochondrial and nuclear evidence suggests past hybridization (Testudines: Geoemydidae)

FIGURE 2. Maximum Likelihood tree for cyt b haplotypes (1060 bp) of Rhinoclemmys melanosterna, including sequences of the other eight Rhinoclemmys species. Haplotype codes correspond to Figure 3 and Appendix I (see there for GenBank accession numbers). Support values along branches are thorough bootstrap values> 50. Bold branches are supported by posterior probabilities> 0.95 in Bayesian analyses. Root length shortened by 75%. Note the polyphyly of R. melanosterna.

FIGURE 7. Maximum Likelihood tree for Rhinoclemmys melanosterna, R. diademata, R. funerea, R. punctularia and R in Complex phylogeography in Rhinoclemmys melanosterna: conflicting mitochondrial and nuclear evidence suggests past hybridization (Testudines: Geoemydidae)

FIGURE 7. Maximum Likelihood tree for Rhinoclemmys melanosterna, R. diademata, R. funerea, R. punctularia and R. nasuta, based on the supermatrix of 2050 bp of mitochondrial DNA (partial cyt b, 12S and 16S genes) concatenated with 3620 bp of nuclear DNA (partial Rag 1, Rag 2, C-mos, R35 and ODC genes). Support values along branches are thorough bootstrap values> 50. Bold branches are supported by posterior probabilities of 1.0 in Bayesian analyses (no other branches had support values equal to or greater than 0.95; for further explanation see text). Root length shortened by 80%. Note the weak support for the monophyly of R. melanosterna and most other clades.

Data from: Comparison of priority rules, machine allocation, and stage allocation strategies for hybrid flow shop instances using combinatorial logic and a standard trace format

datsets.zip contains benchmark data by Ruiz et al. (2008), Naderi et al.(2010), and Wittwock (1988). The according publications are listed in the related works section. The instances are publicly available under unclear license.results.zip contains computational results for the aforementioned benchmarks using the algorithms described in "Comparison of priority rules, machine allocation, and stage allocation strategies for hybrid flow shop instances using combinatorial logic and a standard trace format". The data is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

GTnum GEST-PRO #PratiquesHybrides - Enseigner en contexte hybride. Plan de gestion de données

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

Underlying dataset of Experts and Machines against Bullies: A Hybrid Approach to Detect Cyberbullies

YouTube data collection for cyberbullying studies. Citation:M. Dadvar, R.B. Trieschnigg and F.M.G. de Jong,  Experts and Machines Against Bullies: A Hybrid Approach to Detect Cyberbullies. In 27th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence,  University of Waterloo, Montréal, Canada, 2014

FIGURE 4 in Morphological differentiation in giant salamanders, Andrias japonicus, A. davidianus, and their hybrids (Urodela, Cryptobranchidae), and its taxonomic implications

FIGURE 4. The typical color pattern of the two species of giant salamanders and their hybrid. Andrias japonicus (upper), A. davidianus (middle), and first filial hybrid individual (lower).

FIGURE 3 in Morphological differentiation in giant salamanders, Andrias japonicus, A. davidianus, and their hybrids (Urodela, Cryptobranchidae), and its taxonomic implications

FIGURE 3. Box plots of ratio of HW to SVL (A), ratio of VTW to SVL (B), and ratio of TAL to SVL (C) of Andrias japonicus (JM, males; JF, females), A. davidianus (DM, males; DF, females), and their hybrids (HM, males; HF, females). (* P <0.05; ** P <0.01; *** P <0.001; ns, P ≥ 0.05).

FIGURE 2 in Morphological differentiation in giant salamanders, Andrias japonicus, A. davidianus, and their hybrids (Urodela, Cryptobranchidae), and its taxonomic implications

FIGURE 2. Scatter plots of CAN1 and CAN2 (A), and box plots of CAN1(B) of Andrias japonicus (JM, males; JF, females), A. davidianus (DM, males; DF, females), and their hybrids (HM, males; HF, females). In scatter plots (A), circles show plots of A. japonicus, diamonds show A. davidianus, and triangles show hybrids; closed symbols show males and open symbols show females. (* P <0.05; ** P <0.01; *** P <0.001; ns, P ≥ 0.05).

FIGURE 1 in Morphological differentiation in giant salamanders, Andrias japonicus, A. davidianus, and their hybrids (Urodela, Cryptobranchidae), and its taxonomic implications

FIGURE 1. Morphological character dimensions. (A) Ventral view of the whole specimen; (B) dorsal view of the head; (C) left lateral view of the head; (D) palatal view of the upper jaw; (E) dorsal view of the left hand; (F) dorsal view of the left foot; (G) left lateral view of the tail; (H) dorsal view of the head showing tubercles; (I) ventral view of the head showing tubercles. Roman numerals indicate digit numbers.