Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 1 from: Chen Q, Dai Y-C (2019) Two new species of Fuscoporia (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) from southern China based on morphological characters and molecular evidence. MycoKeys 61: 75-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.46799

Figure 1 Phylogenetic positions of Fuscoporia and the new species within the Hymenochaetaceae inferred from the nLSU sequences. Topology is from MP tree and statistical values (MP/BI/ML) are indicated for each node that simultaneously received BS from ML and MP not below 75%, and BPP from BI not below 0.9. Names of new species are in bold.

Supplementary material 3 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

: Data type: multimedia

Supplementary material 1 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

: Data type: occurrence

Figure 6 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

Figure 6 Association network between lichen mycobionts of P. omphalodes group (i.e. Parmelia discordans, P. omphalodes and P. pinnatifida) and photobiont OTUs. The line width is proportional to the number of specimens forming the association with the particular OTU. SUn1 and SUn2 represent unnamed lineages of Trebouxia belonging to clade S.

Figure 3 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

Figure 3 Haplotype network showing relationships between ITS rDNA sequences from Parmelia discordans and P. omphalodes. The names of species are followed with herbarium numbers of specimens or GenBank Accession Numbers. Mutational changes are presented as numbers in brackets near lines between haplotypes.

Supplementary material 2 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

: Data type: multimedia

Figure 2 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

Figure 2 Phylogenetic placement of Trebouxia photobionts from selected Parmelia spp., based on Bayesian analysis of the ITS rDNA dataset. Posterior probabilities and maximum likelihood bootstrap values are shown near the internal branches. Newly generated sequences are in bold, with collecting numbers preceding the species names. Representative Trebouxia OTUs, as described in Leavitt et al. (2015), were downloaded from Dryad database (Dryad Digital Repository, Leavitt et al. 2015). Clades with photobionts from Parmelia discordans, P. omphalodes and P. pinnatifida are highlighted.

Figure 5 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

Figure 5 AParmelia discordans, with marginal and laminal pseudocyphellae, laminal pseudocyphellae mostly not connected with marginal ones (S F-252494) BP. omphalodes, with marginal and laminal pseudocyphellae, laminal pseudocyphellae mostly not connected with marginal ones (S F-252845) CP. pinnatifida, with marginal pseudocyphellae (UGDA L-24298) DP. pinnatifida, with marginal and laminal pseudocyphellae, laminal pseudocyphellae starting predominantly from pseudocyphellae formed at the edge of lobes (S F-239397). Scale bars: 200 μm (A, B, D), 150 μm (C).

Figure 7 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

Figure 7 Distribution of suitable niches of P. discordans (A), P. omphalodes (B) and P. pinnatifida (C) in the Northern Hemisphere.

Figure 4 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

Figure 4 Localities of Parmelia discordans (red), P. omphalodes (blue) and P. pinnatifida (green) used in ENM analysis.

Figure 10 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

Figure 10 Principal components analysis (PCA) of P. discordans (red), P. omphalodes (blue) and P. pinnatifida (green), based on the bioclimatic factors from individuals.

Figure 1 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

Figure 1 Phylogenetic relationships of Parmelia discordans, P. omphalodes and P. pinnatifida, based on Bayesian analysis of the ITS rDNA dataset. Posterior probabilities and maximum likelihood bootstrap values are shown near the internal branches. Newly generated sequences are described with herbarium numbers following the species names. GenBank Accession numbers of sequences downloaded from GenBank follow the species names. Clades with Parmelia discordans, P. omphalodes and P. pinnatifida are highlighted.

Supplementary material 4 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

: Data type: multimedia

Figure 9 from: Ossowska E, Guzow-Krzemińska B, Kolanowska M, Szczepańska K, Kukwa M (2019) Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts. MycoKeys 61: 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175

Figure 9 Distribution of suitable niches of P. discordans (A), P. omphalodes (B) and P. pinnatifida (C) in Eurasia.

Figure 4 from: Li L, Tan Y-H, Meng H-H, Ma H, Li J (2020) Two new species of Alseodaphnopsis (Lauraceae) from southwestern China and northern Myanmar: evidence from morphological and molecular analyses. In: Jin X-H, Xia N-H, Tan Y-H (Eds) Plant diversity of Southeast Asia-II. PhytoKeys 138: 27-39. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.138.38569

Figure 4 Alseodaphnopsis putaoensisA habitat B branchlet with immature fruit C branchlet with immature fruit, immature and mature fruits. Photographed by Lang Li.

Figure 1 from: Li L, Tan Y-H, Meng H-H, Ma H, Li J (2020) Two new species of Alseodaphnopsis (Lauraceae) from southwestern China and northern Myanmar: evidence from morphological and molecular analyses. In: Jin X-H, Xia N-H, Tan Y-H (Eds) Plant diversity of Southeast Asia-II. PhytoKeys 138: 27-39. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.138.38569

Figure 1 Bayesian consensus tree of ITS + LEAFY intron II combined dataset. MP bootstrap (BS ≥ 50%) and Bayesian posterior probability (PP ≥ 0.95) values are shown above branches. Act. = Actinodaphne, Al. = Alseodaphne, Als.= Alseodaphnopsis, Deh. = Dehaasia, Lin. = Lindera, Lit. = Litsea, Mac. = Machilus, Neo. = Neolitsea, Not. = Nothaphoebe, Pho. = Phoebe.

Figure 3 from: Li L, Tan Y-H, Meng H-H, Ma H, Li J (2020) Two new species of Alseodaphnopsis (Lauraceae) from southwestern China and northern Myanmar: evidence from morphological and molecular analyses. In: Jin X-H, Xia N-H, Tan Y-H (Eds) Plant diversity of Southeast Asia-II. PhytoKeys 138: 27-39. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.138.38569

Figure 3 Alseodaphnopsis maguanensisA outer perianth lobe (inside view) B inner perianth lobe (inside view) C third whorl stamen D pistil E flowering branch F second whorl stamen G staminode H first whorl stamen I flower (lateral view). Illustration by Ling Wang from Mo et al. (2017b).

Figure 2 from: Li L, Tan Y-H, Meng H-H, Ma H, Li J (2020) Two new species of Alseodaphnopsis (Lauraceae) from southwestern China and northern Myanmar: evidence from morphological and molecular analyses. In: Jin X-H, Xia N-H, Tan Y-H (Eds) Plant diversity of Southeast Asia-II. PhytoKeys 138: 27-39. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.138.38569

Figure 2 Alseodaphnopsis maguanensisA habitat B branchlet with inflorescences C branchlet with mature fruit, immature fruit. Photographed by Lang Li.

Figure 3 from: Barroso CX, Pereira de Freitas JE, Matthews-Cascon H, Arruda Bezerra LE, da Cruz Lotufo TM (2020) Molecular evidences confirm the taxonomic separation of two sympatric congeneric species (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Neritidae, Neritina). ZooKeys 904: 117-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.904.46790

Figure 3 Colour patterns of shells, opercula, and radulae of the Neritina virginea and Neritina meleagris analysed. The red arrows highlight the differences between the leading edges of colour patterns of both species: N. virginea has the leading edges outlined in heavy black, while N. meleagris has the leading edge outlined in white or black and white. ANeritina virginea_1 BNeritina virginea_2 CNeritina virginea_3 DNeritina virginea_4 ENeritina meleagris_1 FNeritina meleagris_2 GNeritina meleagris_3 HNeritina meleagris_4 I ventral view of shell of Neritina virgineaJ operculum (outer and inner views) of Neritina virgineaK ventral view of shell of Neritina meleagrisL operculum (outer and inner views) of Neritina meleagrisM radula of Neritina virginea (SEM), with rachidian tooth enlarged in the upper left quadrant N radula of Neritina meleagris (SEM), with rachidian tooth enlarged in the upper left quadrant. Abbreviations: l1 first lateral tooth, l4 fourth lateral tooth, m marginal teeth, r rachidian tooth. The specimens with the number "1" are from Camocim beach (Ceará State, NE Brazil) and those with numbers "2", "3", and "4" are from Barra Grande beach (Piauí State, NE Brazil). The numbered specimens of N. virginea (1, 2, 3, and 4) and N. meleagris (1, 2, 3, and 4) are the same specimens used in the phylogenetic analysis of Figure 1. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A–L); 100 μm (M, N).

Figure 2 from: Barroso CX, Pereira de Freitas JE, Matthews-Cascon H, Arruda Bezerra LE, da Cruz Lotufo TM (2020) Molecular evidences confirm the taxonomic separation of two sympatric congeneric species (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Neritidae, Neritina). ZooKeys 904: 117-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.904.46790

Figure 2 Statistical parsimony network analysis (TCS algorithm) based on 64 partial mitochondrial COI sequences (347 bp). This analysis included specimens of Neritina meleagris and Neritina virginea from the Caribbean and Brazilian Provinces. Size of the circle is proportional to frequency of the haplotype and colours inside the circles designate geographical locations to which the samples belong. Black circles correspond to hypothetical haplotypes. The number of mutational steps is indicated by dashes on branches. We highlighted the 36 mutational steps that separate the two species haplotypes.