Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 23 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 23. Detailed map of the Rio Juruá at Sacado and Seringal Condor (localities 5 and 6), illustrating position of camp relative to major habitat types, secondary trap lines (bold numbered and lettered lines) and placement of terra firme and várzea standardized lines (see text for further details). Not drawn to scale.

Fig. 13 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 13. Rank abundances of the 10 most common trees (as identified by local common name) by forest type: A, terra firme forest; B, várzea forest; C, terra firme forest trees in várzea forest; and D várzea forest trees in terra firme forest. Six hundred trees were censused in each forest type on each side of the river. Data from Lower Central Region sites only.

Fig. 18 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 18. Detailed map of the Rio Juruá at Igarapé Porongaba (localities 1 and 2), illustrating position of camp relative to major habitat types secondary trap lines (bold numbered lines) and placement of terra firme and várzea standardized lines. Capoeira is secondary regrowth of human disturbed forest; tabôca is regrown bamboo forest following a major bloom approximately 5–7 years previous to our sampling; roçado is active garden plots (see text for further details). Not drawn to scale.

Fig. 6 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 6. View of the edge of flooded várzea forest at Colocação ViraVolta (locality 14) in the Mouth Region of the Rio Jurua´. The photograph was taken by M. N. F. da Silva in early June 1992, during the end of the highwater season.

Fig. 26 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 26. Details of the placement of the standardized sample lines in the várzea forest on the left bank at Igarapé Nova Empresa (locality 8) and in the terra firme forest at Penedo, right bank (locality 7). Mata baixa is lowstature forest growing in an area with prolonged annual inundation. Distances (in meters) from the edge of the river are noted.

Fig. 9 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 9. Average understory density plotted against mean withintransect variance (A) or mean amongtransect variance (B). At each site, understory density was measured at 15 points spaced at 20 m intervals along each of three parallel 280 m transects.

Fig. 5 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 5. View of the interior of várzea forest at Barro Vermelho (locality 12) in the Lower Central Region of the Rio Jurua´. The photograph was taken in October 1991 during the dry season. Note the open forest with extensive leaf litter but few understory plants. Photograph by J. L. Patton.

Fig. 21 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 21. Details of the placement of the standardized sample lines in the terra firme forest on the left bank at Sobral (locality 4) and in várzea forest at Nova Vida, right bank (locality 3). Distances (in meters) from the edge of the river are noted.

Fig. 16 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 16. Attempt to salvage the CoróCoró after it sank following a collision with a submerged log on February 3, 1992, approximately 2 km below the community of Ocidente (locality b), in the headwaters of the Rio Jurua´. Photograph taken by M. N. F. da Silva.

Fig. 12 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 12. Rank abundance of the 34 most common tree families in (A) terra firme forest and their corresponding abundances in (B) várzea forest (n = 1200 trees in each). Families: 1, Leguminosae; 2, Moraceae; 3, Lecythidaceae; 4, Sapotaceae; 5, Myristicaceae; 6, Palmae; 7, Chrysobalanaceae; 8, Burseraceae; 9, Musaceae; 10, Violaceae; 11, Lauraceae; 12, Euphorbiaceae; 13, Sterculiaceae; 14, Elaeocarpaceae; 15, Humiriaceae; 16, Annonaceae; 17, Vochysiaceae; 18, Meliaceae; 19, Ochinaceae; 20 Rubiaceae; 21, Melastomataceae; 22, Guttiferae; 23, Apocynaceae; 24, Malpighiaceae; 25, Combretaceae; 26, Tiliaceae; 27, Nyctaginaceae; 28, Celastraceae; 29, Myrtaceae; 30, Anacardiaceae; 31, Sapindaceae; 32, Simaroubaceae; 33, Bombacaeae; and 34, Olacaceae.

Fig. 3 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 3. View of the Rio Juruá at Sobral (locality 4) in the Headwaters Region, looking east towards the right bank. The photograph was taken in March 1992, during the height of the rainy season. Note the lack of an exposed beach covered with grass, as in fig. 2, above; rather, the river meets, and sometimes penetrates, the edge of a narrow band of Cecropia with várzea forest just behind. The Rio Juruá is approximately 25 m wide at this point. Photograph by J. L. Patton.

Fig. 25 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 25. Detailed map of the Rio Juruá at Penedo (locality 7), illustrating major habitat types, secondary trap lines (bold numbered and lettered lines) and placement of terra firme standardized lines (see text for further details). Not drawn to scale. The várzea standard lines were placed at Igarapé Nova Empresa (locality 8), on the left bank approximately 1.5 to 2 km upriver.

Fig. 2 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 2. View of the Rio Juruá at Seringal Condor (locality 6) in the Upper Central Region, looking south towards the right bank. The photograph was taken in September 1991, during the dry season. An extensive sand bar covered with grass is exposed, behind which is a thick stand of Cecropia some 50 m in depth before the edge of várzea forest is encountered. The beach grass is a seasonally ephemeral community, but is the primary habitat of Oligoryzomys microtis. The Rio Juruá is approximately 30 m wide at this point. Photograph by J. L. Patton.

Fig. 19 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 19. Details of the placement of the standardized sample lines in the várzea forest on the left bank opposite Porongaba (locality 2) and in the terra firme forest at Igarapé Porongaba, right bank (locality 1). Distances (in meters) from the edge of the river are noted.

Fig. 8 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 8. View of a fallow garden at Penedo (locality 7) in the Upper Central Region of the Rio Jurua´ Didelphis marsupialis, Oryzomys perenensis, and Proechimys cuvieri were especially common in this habitat. Photograph by J. L. Patton in late August 1991.

Fig. 20 in Mammals Of The Rio Juruá And The Evolutionary And Ecological Diversification Of Amazonia

Fig. 20. Detailed map of the Rio Juruá at Sobral (locality 4), indicating the position of camp relative to major habitat types, secondary trap lines (bold letters) and placement of terra firme and várzea standardized lines (see text for further details). Nova Vida (locality 3) was directly across the river. Not drawn to scale.

Fig. 4 in Isotopic Niche Differentiation Among Mammals From A Rainforest In Peninsular Malaysia

Fig. 4. Differences (mean ± SE) in δ15N (A: F = 17.316; P <0.001) and δ13C (B: F = 19.100; P <0.001) in individuals classified into 3, 48 3, 48 different dietary lifestyle. Tamhane pairwise comparison post-hoc groups membership indicated by a, b, and c.

Fig. 2 in Isotopic Niche Differentiation Among Mammals From A Rainforest In Peninsular Malaysia

Fig. 2. Differences (mean ± SE) in δ 15N (A) and δ13C (B) identified in hair samples from eight mammalian species of a tropical rainforest in Peninsular Malaysia. Mouse-deer samples that could not be classified to species level were coded as mouse-deer.

Fig. 3 in Isotopic Niche Differentiation Among Mammals From A Rainforest In Peninsular Malaysia

Fig. 3. Differences (mean ± SE) in δ15N (A: F = 10.046; P <0.001) and δ13C (B: F = 5.728; P = 0.006) among taxa classified into 2, 48 2, 48 different habitat types. Tukey's multiple comparison post-hoc groups membership indicated by a and b.

Fig. 1 in Isotopic Niche Differentiation Among Mammals From A Rainforest In Peninsular Malaysia

Fig. 1. δ15N and δ13C values in hair samples from eight mammalian species of a tropical rainforest in Peninsular Malaysia. The numbers in parentheses indicate sample sizes. Mouse-deer samples that could not be classified to species level were coded as mouse-deer.