Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
13,618
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
13,618 results for “biology”
Agriculture - General: biological diversity 4
<p>The records in this dataset are general marine and coastal records of different taxonomic groups submitted to the National Biodiversity Data Centre. National Biodiversity Data Centre (2018). Coastal and Marine Species Database. Occurrence dataset <a href="https://doi.org/10.15468/oynwkx">https://doi.org/10.15468/oynwkx</a> accessed via GBIF.org</p>
Agriculture - General: biological diversity 3
<p>Data on the distribution of Irish CWR species. Data on key ITPGRA species were compiled in 2010 from the National Parks and Wildlife Service, the National Herbarium, and the National Vegetation Database. The database also includes recent CWR data collected under projects funded by DAFM (Genetic Heritage Ireland 2009-2010; and the National Biodiversity Data Centre 2011 & 2012). National Biodiversity Data Centre (2016). Irish Crop Wild Relative Database. Occurrence dataset <a href="https://doi.org/10.15468/lohime">https://doi.org/10.15468/lohime</a> accessed via GBIF.org</p>
Agriculture - General: biological diversity
<p>The records in this dataset are general records of different taxonomic groups submitted to the National Biodiversity Data Centre. This provides a temporary facility to store and make available data submitted to the Centre, until such time as subsets of the data can be added to a recognised national database. National Biodiversity Data Centre (2016). General Biodiversity Records from Ireland. Occurrence dataset <a href="https://doi.org/10.15468/w8q1jm">https://doi.org/10.15468/w8q1jm</a> accessed via GBIF.org</p>
Agriculture - General: biological diversity 2
<p>The records in this dataset are general records of different taxonomic groups submitted to the National Biodiversity Data Centre. This provides a temporary facility to store and make available data submitted to the Centre, until such time as subsets of the data can be added to a recognised national database. National Biodiversity Data Centre (2016). General Biodiversity Records from Ireland. Occurrence dataset <a href="https://doi.org/10.15468/w8q1jm">https://doi.org/10.15468/w8q1jm</a> accessed via GBIF.org</p>
Agriculture - General: biological diversity 5
<p>Dataset of Invasive species - initial compilation of aquatic invasive species National Biodiversity Data Centre (2016). National Invasive Species Database. Occurrence dataset <a href="https://doi.org/10.15468/pkjqbk">https://doi.org/10.15468/pkjqbk</a> accessed via GBIF.org</p>
Supporting data and codes for: A new biological species in the Mercurialis annua polyploid complex: functional divergence in inflorescence morphology, hybrid sterility and possible introgression
<p>This GitHub repository includes R codes and datasets for the paper: A new biological species in the Mercurialis annua polyploid complex: functional divergence in inflorescence morphology, hybrid sterility and possible introgression</p>
Preprints in biology as a fraction of the biomedical literature
<p>These data and chart present an approximate calculation of the proportion of preprints in biology when compared to publications in PubMed, based on monthly figures and incorporating monthly preprint submissions (or counts) across a selection of servers relevant to biology. </p> <p>Version 1.0 of these data represents data from January 2007 until May 31, 2019 for preprint servers: arXiv q-bio, Nature Precedings, F1000Research*, PeerJ Preprints*, bioRxiv**, Winnower*, <a href="http://preprints.org">preprints.org</a>, Wellcome Open Research*. </p> <p>* Counts may not be specific to biology preprints only; ** Counts may include all versions posted that month, so may be an overestimate for version 1 submissions.</p> <p>From January 2019, data has been gathered manually by the authors, as per the methods described in the .csv here, and is included here in 'Preprints_per_month_direct_2019-01to05.csv'. Until December 2018, monthly preprint submissions data are based on those contributed by Jordan Anaya (ORCID: <a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6166-4113">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6166-4113</a>) for PrePubMed, source: <a href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OmnesRes/prepub/master/analyses/preprint_data.txt">https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OmnesRes/prepub/master/analyses/preprint_data.txt</a>; Github repository: <a href="https://github.com/OmnesRes/prepub">https://github.com/OmnesRes/prepub</a>; website: <a href="http://www.prepubmed.org/">http://www.prepubmed.org</a>). Data are not included here, they are provided from the source linked above under MIT license associated with the website code: <a href="https://github.com/OmnesRes/prepub/blob/master/LICENSE">https://github.com/OmnesRes/prepub/blob/master/LICENSE</a>.</p> <p>A live version of these data and the chart are available from this GSheet: <a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bkGEcfQcL0LpIanVqNHci1ZFY6oVNGz7IQbEugzkqkU/edit?usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bkGEcfQcL0LpIanVqNHci1ZFY6oVNGz7IQbEugzkqkU/edit?usp=sharing</a>. Between version updates here, please refer to this sheet for updated counts and method updates e.g. to include more servers and ensure only version 1 submissions are counted.</p> <p>For more information, please contact naomi.penfold@asapbio.org.</p> <p>When presenting these data and/or chart, please attribute to ASAPbio (https://asapbio.org, twitter: @ASAPbio_).</p>
Larval dispersal histogram data used for ATLAS deliverable D1.6: Biologically realistic Lagrangian dispersal and connectivity
<p>Larval dispersal histogram data for ATLAS deliverable D1.6 "Biologically realistic Lagrangian connectivity" (https://www.eu-atlas.org/resources/atlas-partners-document-area/atlas-deliverables/455-d1-6-biologically-realistic-lagrangian-connectivity/file). Tar archive files are ordered by ATLAS case study source region and with folders by larval behaviour type. The numbered behaviour types are described in deliverable D1.6. Each netcdf histogram file, e.g. hists_age_21.nc, contains the histogram for larvae of a single age in 5-day steps, from 00 (0 days) to 37 (185 days).</p> <p>Within each file histogram file, particle counts in each Viking20 model grid-cell are contained in a 4-d array with dimensions (launch month, lauch year, model gridsquare y index, model gridsquare x index). The Viking20 grid in the North Atlantic is the ORCA tripolar grid. Details of the model mesh are in the included file viking20_mesh_mask.tgz</p> <p>Histograms are in netcdf files:</p> <p>============================</p> <p>$ ncdump -h hists_age_00.nc<br> netcdf hists_age_00 {<br> dimensions:<br> coordinate = 4 ;<br> coordinate_1 = 50 ;<br> coordinate_2 = 1719 ;<br> coordinate_3 = 1784 ;<br> variables:<br> int64 coordinate(coordinate) ;<br> coordinate:units = "month" ;<br> coordinate:long_name = "Launch month" ;<br> int64 coordinate_1(coordinate_1) ;<br> coordinate_1:units = "year" ;<br> coordinate_1:long_name = "Launch year" ;<br> int64 coordinate_2(coordinate_2) ;<br> coordinate_2:units = "index" ;<br> coordinate_2:long_name = "J index" ;<br> int64 coordinate_3(coordinate_3) ;<br> coordinate_3:units = "index" ;<br> coordinate_3:long_name = "I index" ;<br> int64 data(coordinate, coordinate_1, coordinate_2, coordinate_3) ;<br> data :long_name = "particle count" ;</p> <p>// global attributes:<br> :Conventions = "CF-1.6" ;<br> }</p> <p>==========================================</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
DATA: As-deposited and dewetted Cu layers on plasma treated glass: adhesion study and its effect on biological response
<p>Dataset contains data related to improving the adhesion of nanosized copper films to a glass substrate. </p>
Data and code related to "Difficult control is related to instability in biologically inspired Boolean networks"
<p>This repository contains data and code related to the publication "Difficult control is related to instability in biologically inspired Boolean networks" by Bryan C. Daniels and Enrico Borriello.</p> <p>The python code in the `isolated_fixed_points_code` directory can be used to recreate all results in the paper. See the README.md file in the `isolated_fixed_points_code` directory for more information about how to run the code.</p> <p>The files `240916_cell_collective_ck_and_isolated_fp_data.csv`, `240916_iowa_database_ck_and_isolated_fp_data.csv`, and `240916_random_ck_and_isolated_fp_data.csv` contain data about the networks analyzed in the paper, including the number of attractors and mean control kernel size of each network.</p>
Embryo and larval biology of the deep-sea octocoral Dentomuricea aff. meteor
<p>The study focuses on the early life stages of the species <em>Dentomuricea</em> aff. <em>meteor</em>, a common deep-sea octocoral in the Azores. The objective was to describe the embryo and larval development, survival and swimming behaviour of early life stages of the target species, under two temperature regimes, corresponding to the minimum and maximum temperatures in its natural environment during the spawning season (13 °C and 15°C). Embryo and larval development were monitored closely and revealed faster developmental rates under 15°C . Survival counts were performed throughout embryo and larval development, but were not statistically different between temperatures. Moreover, swimming behaviour was assessed by means of video recordings, revealing a higher larval swimming speed at 15°C. Additional data on larval behaviour are provided, including settlement and metamorphosis rates which were low for both temperatures. Our results showcase how small temperature fluctuations can affect embryo and larval characteristics, potentially impacting larval dispersal and success.</p>
Spectrum data for calculation of biological effectiveness of proton beams
<p>Datasets used in Bellinzona, E.V.; Grzanka, L.; Attili, A.; Tommasino, F.; Friedrich, T.; Krämer, M.; Scholz, M.; Battistoni, G.; Embriaco, A.; Chiappara, D.; Cirrone, G.A.P.; Petringa, G.; Durante, M.; Scifoni, E. Biological Impact of Target Fragments on Proton Treatment Plans: An Analysis Based on the Current Cross-Section Data and a Full Mixed Field Approach. <em>Cancers</em> <strong>2021</strong>, <em>13</em>, 4768. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13194768</p>
Soil biological, chemical and physical parameters and herbage yield in a field experiment with organic and inorganic fertilizers on peat grassland in the Netherlands
<p>To evaluate the performance of organic and inorganic fertilizers for regeneration of ecosystem services in peat grasslands with biodiversity goals, we carried out a field experiment in the western peat district in the Netherlands. The fertilizers tested represent the current practice and potential alternatives for regenerative grassland management on drained peat.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Experimental setup</strong></p> <p>The field experiment (2013 – 2015) was conducted on a permanent grassland on peat soil (Terric Histosol; SOM 56 g 100 g<sup>−1</sup> and pH<sub>KCl</sub> of 4.5 in 0-10 cm) at the experimental dairy farm at Zegveld (the Netherlands). In March 2013, a randomized block experiment (six blocks) was laid out with six fertilizer treatments and a control treatment (no fertilizer: “Contr”). The fertilizer used were: conventional dairy cattle slurry manure (“Slurry”), mature compost of kitchen and garden waste (“Comp”), dairy cattle farmyard manure (“FYM”), solid fraction of the cattle slurry manure (“SFrac”, obtained by pressurized filtration), inorganic N fertilizer (“IF”; calcium ammonium nitrate, 27% N) and a combination of inorganic N fertilizer and sawdust (“IF+SD”). Plot size was 4 × 10 m; for the Slurry treatment plots were 5.2 × 10 m. Slurry was applied by slit injection, the other fertilizers were applied by hand. Target application rate was 120 kg total N ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, divided in two applications per year (February/March and May). This is relatively low for conventional grasslands but usual for grasslands with biodiversity goals (Kleijn et al., 2004). The amount of C<sub>total</sub> applied in Comp was taken for the rate of sawdust to be applied. All plots were fertilized with 200 kg K<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (applications in March and May) (Commissie Bemesting Grasland en Voedergewassen, 2019). Fertilizer application quantities and organic matter and nutrient inputs are provided in Fertilizer_intput.csv (dataset).</p> <p>The grassland had an history of conventional management with mainly cutting, winter grazing with sheep and a normal fertilization regime with both slurry manure and inorganic fertilizer. The normal cutting and grazing regime was continued in the first two years of the experiment; during 2015, the monitoring year, the plots were not grazed and only cut for herbage measurements.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Measurements</strong></p> <p>From April to October 2015, soil and aboveground measurements were carried out. Most soil parameters were measured in October. Earthworms and insect larvae are an important food source for meadow birds during the pre-breeding period in spring (Galbraith, 1989) and were therefore sampled in April. Soil moisture and penetration resistance were measured both in April and October.</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Soil biological parameters</em></p> <p>Earthworms and insect larvae were sampled in the top soil layer in two soil cubes (20 × 20 × 20 cm) per plot. Earthworms were hand-sorted, counted, weighed and fixed in alcohol prior to identification. Both adults and juveniles were identified to species (Sims and Gerard, 1985; Stöp-Bowitz, 1969) and classified into functional groups (Bouché, 1977). Crane flies (Tipulidae; leatherjackets) or click beetles (Elateridae; wireworms) larvae were counted.</p> <p>Phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) were measured in October. PLFA were extracted from 4 g of fresh soil (Palojärvi, 2006), and analyzed by gas chromatography (Hewlett-Packard, USA). PLFA i15:0, a15:0, 15:0, i16:0, 16:1ω9, i17:0, a17:0, cy17:0, 18:1ω7 and cy19:0 were chosen to represent bacteria and PLFA 18:2ω6 was used as a marker of saprotrophic fungi (Hedlund, 2002). The neutral lipid fatty acid (NLFA) 16:1ω5 occurs in storage lipids of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and was used as marker of AMF (Vestberg et al., 2012). PLFA i15:0, a15:0, i16:0, i17:0 and a17:0 were used as a measure of Gram-positive bacteria, and cy17:0 and cy19:0 for Gram-negative bacteria. PLFA 10Me16:0, 10Me17:0 and 10Me18:0 represented actinomycetes.</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Soil chemical parameters</em></p> <p>A soil sample from the 0−10 cm layer (c. 50 randomly taken soil cores) per experimental plot was collected in October (auger diameter 2.3 cm; Eijkelkamp grass plot sampler, Giesbeek, the Netherlands), was sieved (1 cm mesh size) and homogenized. One sub-sample was taken for analysis of hot water extractable carbon (HWC) according to Ghani et al. (2003) and one for chemical analysis. Prior to analysis of soil acidity (pH<sub>KCl</sub>), soil organic matter (SOM), total carbon (C<sub>total</sub>), total nitrogen (N<sub>total</sub>), total phosphorus (P<sub>total</sub>) and ammonium-lactate extractable P (P<sub>AL</sub>) by Eurofins Agro (Wageningen, the Netherlands), the sub sample was dried at 40°C. Soil pH<sub>KCl</sub> was measured according to NEN-ISO 10390 2005. SOM was determined by loss-on-ignition (NEN 5754 2005). C<sub>total</sub> was measured by incineration at 1150°C, and determination of the CO<sub>2</sub> produced by an infrared detector (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, Mich., USA). For N<sub>total</sub>, evolved gasses after incineration were reduced to N<sub>2</sub> and measured with a thermal-conductivity detector (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, Mich., USA). P<sub>total</sub> was analysed with Fleishmann acid (Houba et al., 1997). P<sub>AL</sub> is used to assess the P supply capacity of grassland soils (Reijneveld et al., 2014) and was determined according to Egnér et al. (1960) (NEN 5793).</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Soil physical parameters</em></p> <p>Soil moisture was determined in April and October in a homogenized 0−10 cm soil sample after drying at 105°C for 24 hrs. Moisture content was expressed as percentage of fresh soil weight.</p> <p>Penetration resistance was measured (April and October) with a penetrologger (Eijkelkamp, Giesbeek, the Netherlands; cone of 2.0 cm<sup>2</sup> penetration surface and 60° apex angle. Penetration resistance was expressed as an average of 7 penetrations per plot and per soil layer of 0−10, 10−20, and 20−30 cm.</p> <p>Soil structure and rooting density were assessed in October in the 0−10 cm and 10−25 cm layers. The percentage of crumbs, sub-angular blocky elements and angular blocky elements was estimated by one experienced person as described by Peerlkamp (1959) and Shepherd (2000), Root density was estimated by scoring visible roots (score 1–10; 1 for no roots and 10 for above average).</p> <p>Water infiltration rate was measured in October at three spots per experimental plot in 5 of the 6 blocks (35 plots). A PVC pipe (15 cm high, 15 cm diameter) was pushed into the soil to a depth of 10 cm. 500 ml water was poured into each pipe and the infiltration time was recorded. If the infiltration time exceeded 15 min, the remaining water volume was estimated to calculate the infiltration rate (mm min<sup>−1</sup>).</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Grass yield and botanical composition</em></p> <p>Grass dry matter (DM) and N yield were determined during 2015 with a Haldrup plot harvester (J. Haldrup a/s, Løgstør, Denmark). The four harvest dates were May 15, June 29, August 19 and September 30. Fresh biomass, DM content (70°C for 24 hrs) and total N content (Kjeldahl) were determined for each harvest. Herbage DM yield (Mg DM ha<sup>−1</sup>) and herbage N yield (kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) were calculated. Apparent N recovery (ANR; kg N.kg N<sup>−1</sup>) was calculated as (N yield<sub>(fertilized)</sub> – N yield<sub>(non-fertilized)</sub>)/(N fertilization rate) (Vellinga and André, 1999).</p> <p>In June 2015, botanical composition was measured by visually estimating the relative soil cover of the sward and the proportion of each species therein (Sikkema, 1997).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Data files</strong></p> <ul> </ul> <p> </p> <p><em><strong>Data_soil_grass.csv</strong></em></p> <p><em>Content:</em></p> <p>Dataset with soil biological (earthworms, microbial PLFA), soil chemical, soil physical parameters, herbage dry matter and N yields, and botanical parameters.</p> <p><em>Column names and units:</em></p> <ul> <li>plot: Experimental plot number (1-42)</li> <li>treatment: Treatment code (see text)</li> <li>block: Block number (1-6)</li> <li>EW_species_number: Earthworm - number of species</li> <li>EW_totalnumber: Earthworm - total number per m2</li> <li>EW_epigeic: Earthworm - number of epigeic adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_endogeic: Earthworm - number of endogeic adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_adults: Earthworm - number of adults per m2</li> <li>EW_juveniles: Earthworm - number of juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_epigeic: Earthworm - number of epigeic adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_endogeic: Earthworm - number of endogeic adults per m2</li> <li>EW_juven_epigeic: Earthworm - number of epigeic juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_juven_endogeic: Earthworm - number of endogeic juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_L_rubellus: Earthworm - number of L. rubellus adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_A_chlorotica: Earthworm - number of A. chlorotica adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_A_caliginosa: Earthworm - number of A. caliginosa adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_O_lacteum: Earthworm - number of O. lacteum adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_A_rosea: Earthworm - number of A. rosea adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_O_cyaenum: Earthworm - number of O. cyaneum adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_L_castaneus: Earthworm - number of L. castaneus adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_D_rubida: Earthworm - number of D. rubida adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_L_rubellus: Earthworm - number of L. rubellus adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_A_chlorotica: Earthworm - number of A. chlorotica adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_A_caliginosa: Earthworm - number of A. caliginosa adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_O_lacteum: Earthworm - number of O. lacteum adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_A_rosea: Earthworm - number of A. rosea adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_O_cyaenum: Earthworm - number of O. cyaneum adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_L_castaneus: Earthworm - number of L. castaneus adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_D_rubida: Earthworm - number of D. rubida adults per m2</li> <li>EW_juven_L_rubellus: Earthworm - number of L. rubellus juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_juven_A_chlorotica: Earthworm - number of A. chlorotica juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_juven_A_caliginosa: Earthworm - number of A. caliginosa juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_non_determined: Earthworm - number of non determined individuals per m2</li> <li>EW_total_biomass: Earthworm - total fresh biomass per m2</li> <li>Leatherjackets: number of leatherjackets per m2</li> <li>Wireworms: number of wireworms per m2</li> <li>TOTmicrPLFA: total microbial PLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>bactPLFA: bacterial PLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>saprofungPLFA: saprotrophic fungal PLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>Fung_bactPLAF_ratio: ratio of fungal to bacterial PLFA</li> <li>GramPLUSplfa: gram positive PLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>GramMINplfa: gram negative PLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>ratioGram_PLUS_MIN: ratio of gram positive to gram negative PLFA</li> <li>AMFsporNLFA: AMF spores NLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>ActinomPLFA: Actinomycetes PLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>ShannonPLFA: PLFA shannon diversity index</li> <li>SOM: soil organic matter in g.100 g-1 dry soil</li> <li>Ctotal: total C in g.100 g-1 dry soil</li> <li>HWC: hot water extractable C in μg.100 g-1 dry soil</li> <li>Ntotal: total N in g.100 g-1 dry soil</li> <li>Ptotal: total P2O5 in mg.100 g-1 dry soil</li> <li>P_AL: total P-AL in mg.100 g-1 dry soil</li> <li>pH_KCl: pH-KCl</li> <li>CN_ratio: C:N ratio</li> <li>C_SOM: C:SOM ratio</li> <li>Soilmoisture_April: soil moisture content in April in g.100g-1 fresh soil</li> <li>Penetrationresistance_April_cm010: penetration resistance in April in 10-20 cm in Newton</li> <li>Penetrationresistance_April_cm1020: penetration resistance in April in 20-30 cm in Newton</li> <li>Penetrationresistance_April_cm2030: penetration resistance in April in 0-10 cm in Newton</li> <li>Soilmoisture_October: soil moisture content in October in g.100g-1 fresh soil</li> <li>Penetrationresistance_October_cm010: penetration resistance in October in 10-20 cm in Newton</li> <li>Penetrationresistance_October_cm1020: penetration resistance in October in 20-30 cm in Newton</li> <li>Penetrationresistance_October_cm2030: penetration resistance in October in 0-10 cm in Newton</li> <li>crumb_struct_cm010: percentage of crumb elements in 0-10 cm</li> <li>round_struct_cm011: percentage of sub-angular elements in 0-10 cm</li> <li>rootdensity_cm010: score (1-10) of root density in 0-10 cm</li> <li>crumb_struct_cm1025: percentage of crumb elements in 10-25 cm</li> <li>round_struct_cm1025: percentage of sub-angular elements in 10-25 cm</li> <li>sharp_struct_cm1025: percentage of angular elements in 10-25 cm</li> <li>rootdensity_cm1025: score (1-10) of root density in 10-25 cm</li> <li>water_infiltration: water infiltration rate in mm per minute</li> <li>DM_yield_year: total herbage dry matter yield in kg.ha-1 per year</li> <li>DM_yield_H1: herbage dry matter yield of harvest 1 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>DM_yield_H2: herbage dry matter yield of harvest 2 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>DM_yield_H3: herbage dry matter yield of harvest 3 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>DM_yield_H4: herbage dry matter yield of harvest 4 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>N_yield_year: total herbage N yield in kg.ha-1 per year</li> <li>N_yield_H1: herbage N yield of harvest 1 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>N_yield_H2: herbage N yield of harvest 2 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>N_yield_H3: herbage N yield of harvest 3 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>N_yield_H4: herbage N yield of harvest 4 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>DMperc_yield_year: herbage dry matter content (per year; weighed average over the 4 harvests) in g.100g-1 fresh weight</li> <li>DMperc_yield_H1: herbage dry matter content of harvest 1 in g.100g-1 fresh weight</li> <li>DMperc_yield_H2: herbage dry matter content of harvest 2 in g.100g-1 fresh weight</li> <li>DMperc_yield_H3: herbage dry matter content of harvest 3 in g.100g-1 fresh weight</li> <li>DMperc_yield_H4: herbage dry matter content of harvest 4 in g.100g-1 fresh weight</li> <li>Ncontent_yield_year: herbage N content (per year; weighed average over the 4 harvests) in g.kg-1 dry matter</li> <li>Ncontent_yield_H1: herbage N content of harvest 1 in g.kg-1 dry matter</li> <li>Ncontent_yield_H2: herbage N content of harvest 2 in g.kg-1 dry matter</li> <li>Ncontent_yield_H3: herbage N content of harvest 3 in g.kg-1 dry matter</li> <li>Ncontent_yield_H4: herbage N content of harvest 4 in g.kg-1 dry matter</li> <li>fresh_yield_H1: herbvage fresh yield of harvest 1 in Mg.ha-1</li> <li>ANR: apparent N recovery in kg N.kg N-1</li> <li>productive_grasses: cover percentage of L. perenne and P trivialis</li> <li>monocotyledons: cover percentage of monocotyledons</li> <li>dicotyledons: cover percentage of dicotyledons</li> <li>plant_species: number of plant species</li> <li>monocot_species: number of monocotyledon species</li> <li>dicot_species: number of dicotyledon species</li> <li>Lolium_perenne: plant cover %</li> <li>Poa_trivialis: plant cover %</li> <li>Phleum_pratense: plant cover %</li> <li>Elytrigia_repens: plant cover %</li> <li>Poa_annua: plant cover %</li> <li>Agrostis_stolonifera: plant cover %</li> <li>Holcus_lanatus: plant cover %</li> <li>Alopecurus_pratensis: plant cover %</li> <li>Alopecurus_geniculatus: plant cover %</li> <li>Trifolium_repens: plant cover %</li> <li>Taraxacum_officinale: plant cover %</li> <li>Ranunculus_arvensis: plant cover %</li> <li>Rumex_obtusifolius: plant cover %</li> <li>Rumex_crispus: plant cover %</li> <li>Ranunculus_acris: plant cover %</li> <li>Stellaria_media: plant cover %</li> <li>Cardamine_pratensis: plant cover %</li> <li>Bellis_perennis: plant cover %</li> <li>Rumex_acetosa: plant cover %</li> <li>Ranunculus_sceleratus: plant cover %</li> <li>Polygonum_aviculare: plant cover %</li> <li>Capsella_bursa-pastoris: plant cover %</li> <li>Glechoma_hederacea: plant cover %</li> <li>Geranium_molle: plant cover %</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><em><strong>Fertilizer_input.csv</strong></em></p> <p><em>Content:</em></p> <p>Application quantities of fertilizers and ash, organic matter, C and mineral inputs, and fertilizer C:N ratio. Total N input is the sum of mineral N (Nmin) and organic N (Norg). Average values per hectare and per year over the years 2013−2015.</p> <p><em>Column names and units:</em></p> <ul> <li>Treatment: Treatment code (see text)</li> <li>Fertilizer_fresh: Applied fertilizer in Mg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year (fresh weight)</li> <li>Fertilizer_DM: Applied fertilizer in Mg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year (dry matter weight); for IF+SD this is the sum of 2.72 Mg sawdust + 0.45 Mg N fertilizer</li> <li>Ash: Mineral fraction in kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year</li> <li>OM: Organic matter in kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year</li> <li>C: Total C in kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year</li> <li>Nmin: Mineral N in kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year</li> <li>Norg: Organic N in kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year</li> <li>P2O5: kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year</li> <li>C_N_ratio: C:N ratio</li> </ul>
MALDI MS Data and Metadata from "A biological reading of a palimpsest"
<p>Spectra in mzML format along with the metadata associated with it:</p> <ul> <li>The mzML file names follow the following format UoCXX_Y.mzML, where UoCXX is the sample name and Y is the replicate number (1, 2 or 3)</li> <li>uoc_metadata.csv file contains species, book and quire number associated with each spectra file. It is used in the data analysis in <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7406297">doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7406297</a></li> <li>Dataset S1.xlsx contains extended metadata with the results of the visual analysis of the parchment.</li> </ul>
The raw data of Souma, Katano, Doi et al. "Comparing environmental DNA with whole pond survey to estimate the total biomass of fish species in ponds" in Freshwater Biology
<p>The raw data of Souma, Katano, Doi, Takahara, and Minamoto. "Comparing environmental DNA with whole pond survey to estimate the total biomass of fish species in ponds" in Freshwater Biology.</p>
Processed data to regenerate figures in Noecker et al, "Systems biology elucidates the distinctive metabolic niche filled by the human gut microbe Eggerthella lenta"
<p>This archive contains the processed source data for the publication by Noecker et al, "Systems biology elucidates the distinctive metabolic niche filled by the human gut microbe <em>Eggerthella lenta</em>" (2023, in review). Data tables underlying each figure panel are included, except for the following panels:</p> <ul> <li>Figure S1A: Source data is in Table S1 of the publication</li> <li>Figure 6D: Source data can be found at NCBI GEO accession GSE212420 (supplementary counts data matrix)</li> </ul> <p>Raw metabolomics data can also be found at Metabolomics Workbench accession PR001620.</p> <p>Methods used to summarize these data and generate the figures are described in the manuscript Materials and Methods and figure captions. Code to generate all figures is also available at www.github.com/turnbaughlab/2022_Noecker_ElentaMetabolism and 10.5281/zenodo.7779454.</p>
A mapping of keywords from published papers on alien squirrels to biological invasion research themes
<p><strong>Context</strong></p> <p>This dataset was used to produce the worldl and the graphs in the editorial to the research topic <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/29270/ecology-impact-and-management-of-squirrel-invasions"><em>Ecology, impact and management of squirrel invasions</em></a> (La Morgia et al. 2023).</p> <p><strong>Contents of the dataset</strong></p> <p>The dataset contains the keywords of papers since 2000 harvested with a Web of Science search (performed on 29/05/2023) using the advanced search string TS=(invasive squirrel) OR TI=(invasive squirrel) OR AB=(invasive squirrel). We screened the search results, excluding papers irrelevant to alien squirrels, for example, papers on computer science or physiology, medical or other aspects without any bearing to conservation science. To do this, we checked the abstract and keywords of the papers. Out of the 401 initial papers, after this first screening, we kept 217 in this dataset. The keywords of these papers were manually assigned to alien squirrel research topics by the authors of this dataset (using an own categorisation) and then mapped to the seven broad themes of invasive alien species research of <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-023-03067-7">Stevenson et al. (2023)</a>: </p> <ol> <li>Ecosystems: topics which discuss a specific region, or biome, or focused on a particular species strongly associated with one ecosystem type;</li> <li>Monitoring: topics regarding all aspects of monitoring, including detection, identification, and distributional mapping;</li> <li>Management and decision-making: topics discussing the management and socio-political aspects of invasion science, such as prevention, control, and policy;</li> <li>Interactions: topics discussing the interactions with native species, or the effects of those interactions</li> <li>Assessing change: topics focused on studying and analysing temporal and ecological change;</li> <li>Traits: topics that explored the characteristics of alien squirrels;</li> <li>Invasion mechanisms: topics discussing dispersal pathways and drivers of spread.</li> </ol> <p><strong>Dataset description</strong></p> <p>Every row (N = 1275) in the comma-separated .csv represents one original keyword with reference to the paper in which that keyword appears and mapped to the research topics on invasive squirrels and the broad themes in invasion biology research. The .csv contains the following fields:</p> <ul> <li>ID: a unique ID assigned to the combination of an original keyword and the corresponding paper harvested from the WoS search</li> <li>original_keyword: the original keywords associated with the paper (WoS search)</li> <li>keyword_topic: categorization of original keywords into topics related to invasive squirrel research by La Morgia et al. (2023)</li> <li>mapped_category: mapping to one of the seven broad themes of invasive alien species research of <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-023-03067-7">Stevenson et al. (2023)</a> as listed and described above</li> <li>authors: author(s) of the paper (WoS search)</li> <li>year: publication year of paper (WoS search)</li> <li>title: title of the paper (WoS search)</li> <li>journal: full journal name (WoS search)</li> <li>doi: full doi of the paper (WoS search)</li> </ul> <p><strong>Potential applications of the dataset</strong></p> <p>This dataset can be used to reproduce the graphs in La Morgia et al. (2023) or to perform more in-depth review or analysis of the literature on alien squirrel invasions. For more information and graph code, we refer to <a href="https://github.com/Vale-LaMo/squirrels">this GitHub repository</a>.</p>
Different facets of the same niche: integrating citizen science and scientific survey data to predict biological invasion risk under multiple global change drivers
<p>Raw data (occurrences and environmental predictors) used in the manuscript "Different facets of the same niche: integrating citizen science and scientific survey data to predict biological invasion risk under multiple global change drivers"</p>
Data and code: Kuipers et al. (2023) Land use diversification may mitigate on-site land use impacts on mammal popultions and assemblages. Global Change Biology
<p>Zip folder conaining the data and code that support the findings of <em>Kuipers et al. (2023) Land use diversification may mitigate on-site land use impacts on mammal popultions and assemblages. Global Change Biology.</em></p> <p>The <em>Data_code.zip</em> folder contains four subfolders with the following files:</p> <ul> <li>Data_raw <ul> <li>AgriDiv_data.csv</li> <li>AgriDiv_metadata.docx</li> <li>Species_data.csv</li> <li>Species_metadata.docx</li> <li>Landscape_data.csv</li> <li>Landscape_metadata.docx</li> </ul> </li> <li>Data_derived <ul> <li>RIA_RSR_effect_sizes.csv</li> <li>MSA_effect_sizes.csv</li> </ul> </li> <li>Data_output <ul> <li>Response_estimation.csv</li> </ul> </li> <li>R_scripts <ul> <li>01_Effect_size_calculation.R</li> <li>02_Null_model_analysis.R</li> <li>03_Model_selection.R</li> <li>04_Model_analysis.R</li> <li>05_Response_estimation.R</li> <li>06_Figures.R</li> <li>README.md</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
Identification of factors determining the process of aggregation/agglomeration of metal oxide nanoparticles in a biological medium
<p>The model allows to identify factors determining the process of aggregation/agglomeration of metal oxide nanoparticles in a biological medium and to verify the importance of ion adsorption and protein adsorption in this process. </p> <p>Model confirms the significant effect of protein adsorption on the hydrodynamic diameter of metal oxide particles in the biological medium, and does not confirm the significant effect of ion adsorption in this process. It’s an example of modeling the properties of nanoparticles, where apart from the descriptors describing the structure of nanoparticles, there are also parameters characterizing the medium.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.