Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
186
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
186 results for “disjunct distributions”
Fig. 4 in Resurrection of the Comoran fish scale gecko Geckolepis humbloti Vaillant, 1887 reveals a disjunct distribution caused by natural overseas dispersal
Fig. 4 The skulls of Geckolepis humbloti (ZSM 81/2006 and ZSM 80/ 2010) in a dorsal, b ventral, and c lateral view. Length of bar = 1 mm. See Supplementary A3 for PDF-embedded interactive 3D models of these skulls
Fig. 1 in Resurrection of the Comoran fish scale gecko Geckolepis humbloti Vaillant, 1887 reveals a disjunct distribution caused by natural overseas dispersal
Fig. 1 Results of the molecular genetic analysis of Geckolepis. The maximum likelihood tree is based on 12S and ND4 sequences. Only closely related outgroups are shown. Support values of 1000 bootstrap repeats are given below nodes. TB Tsingy de Bemaraha, AN Anjouan, GC Grand Comoro, MA Mayotte, Mo Mohéli. All representatives of the taxonomically unresolved Geckolepis maculata complex are named Geckolepis maculata in the tree
FIGURE 1 in Nuclear and plastid DNA data confirm that Sedum tosaense (Crassulaceae) has a disjunct distribution between Pacific mainland Japan and Jeju Island, Korea
FIGURE 1. Habit of Sedum tosaense. A. Plant in Kochi Prefecture, Japan (8 December 2012). B. Plant on Jeju Island, Korea (6 July 2013). Bars = 3 cm.
FIGURE 3 in Nuclear and plastid DNA data confirm that Sedum tosaense (Crassulaceae) has a disjunct distribution between Pacific mainland Japan and Jeju Island, Korea
FIGURE 3. Maximum clade credibility tree using multispecies coalescent analysis based on ITS and cpDNA data. The numerals beside branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) (upper). Clade depth indicates the mean nodal age (million years) (lower) and nodes with PP ≥ 0.90 are annotated with the 95% highest posterior density intervals for node ages by bars.
FIGURE 2 in Nuclear and plastid DNA data confirm that Sedum tosaense (Crassulaceae) has a disjunct distribution between Pacific mainland Japan and Jeju Island, Korea
FIGURE 2. Map showing two distribution areas of Sedum tosaense: Kochi, Shikoku District, Japan and Jeju Island, Korea.
FIGURE 4 in New records and distribution modeling of Gryne orensis (Sørensen) (Opiliones: Cosmetidae) support the Mesopotamian-Yungas disjunction in subtropical Argentina
FIGURE 4. Overlay of two binary MAXENT models, one built with the default dataset (45 points, AUC: 0.975), the second with record at Caimancito (a) deleted (44 points, AUC: 0.977); shared areas by the two models (overlap) are displayed in light red; areas lost with the smallest dataset are shown in dark red. Blue dots: training records, yellow dots in province of Chaco: tentative records at El Impenetrable (not used in this model).
FIGURE 3 in New records and distribution modeling of Gryne orensis (Sørensen) (Opiliones: Cosmetidae) support the Mesopotamian-Yungas disjunction in subtropical Argentina
FIGURE 3. Binary distribution models built with BIOCLIM (A) and MAXENT (B), showing the region around the Semiarid Chaco. Maps are overlaid to display changes of the default model (intense red) when points at El Impenetrable are added in the dataset (one at a time): light red, area added with Villa Río Bermejito (1); orange, area added with Las Hacheras (2); yellow, area added with Fuerte Esperanza (3). White dots: localities of the default dataset; blue dots: tentative records at El Impenetrable (numbers as referred to above). Crosses in 3A: localities sampled in the dry Chaco that yielded negative results for Mesopotamian harvestmen.
FIGURE 2 in New records and distribution modeling of Gryne orensis (Sørensen) (Opiliones: Cosmetidae) support the Mesopotamian-Yungas disjunction in subtropical Argentina
FIGURE 2. Potential distribution model of Gryne orensis: median values of the 20-replicates run with MAXENT (default dataset, random test percentage 20%); thresholds displayed are the average of the 20 replicates (average training AUC 0.9762). In the random selection of training points, Caimancito was used in 17/20 runs, Carandazinho in 14/20 runs. Suitability levels: green: 0.15–0.36; yellow: 0.36–0.58; orange: 0.58–0.72; red: above 0.72. Grey: areas below the default threshold (equal training sensitivity plus specificity); darker grey: suitability above 0.112 (maximum training sensitivity plus specificity); medium grey: above 0.0801 (minimum training presence). Blue dots: training records; red dots in province of Chaco: tentative records at El Impenetrable (not used in this model).
FIGURE 1 in New records and distribution modeling of Gryne orensis (Sørensen) (Opiliones: Cosmetidae) support the Mesopotamian-Yungas disjunction in subtropical Argentina
FIGURE 1. Locality records (red dots) and predicted distribution of Gryne orensis built with the default dataset (n=45). Map displays the overlay of models obtained with BIOCLIM (green; true-false, full extension) and MAXENT (light blue; single run, binary), overlapping areas in dark blue. White outline: Humid Chaco and Paraná flooded savanna; grey outline: Pantanal (ecoregions according to Olson et al. 2001). Selected localities: a. Caimancito, b. Carandazinho, c. Posadas, d. Vuelta de Obligado, e. Villa Constitución-Villa del Medio-San Nicolás, f. Santa Fe (2 points)-Madrejón Don Felipe, g. Riacho de Oro (type locality), h. El Colorado, i. Pirané. Yellow dots in province of Chaco indicate the three tentative localities for El Impenetrable: Villa Río Bermejito (1), Las Hacheras (2) and Fuerte Esperanza (3).
Fig. 3 in What Caused the Disjunct Distributions of the Lachnaia tristigma Species-Group (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on the Iberian Peninsula?
Fig. 3. Potential distributions of Lachnaia gallaeca (a, b), Lachnaia pseudobarathraea (c, d), and Lachnaia tristigma (e, f) during the Last Glacial Maximum as estimated from Bioclim (a, c, e) and Domain (b, d, f) models.
Fig. 2 in What Caused the Disjunct Distributions of the Lachnaia tristigma Species-Group (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on the Iberian Peninsula?
Fig. 2. Climatic niches of Lachnaia gallaeca (red dots), Lachnaia pseudobarathraea (green dots), and Lachnaia tristigma (blue dots), as represented in two Principal Components Analysis axes (first axis (RC1) is correlated with precipitation; second axis (RC2) is correlated with temperature) for the core (a) and extended (b) datasets.
Fig. 1 in What Caused the Disjunct Distributions of the Lachnaia tristigma Species-Group (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on the Iberian Peninsula?
Fig. 1. Known records for Lachnaia gallaeca (red dots), Lachnaia pseudobarathraea (green dots), and Lachnaia tristigma (blue dots), using the core (a) and extended (b) datasets.
Figure 11 in Morphology and phylogeny of Dicellophilus, a centipede genus with a highly disjunct distribution (Chilopoda: Mecistocephalidae)
Figure 11. Phylogeny of Dicellophilus: most-parsimonious tree obtained by the cladistic analysis of the complete data set (Table 1). At each node, the bootstrap values are indicated above, and the Bremer index values are indicated below and underscored; at each node of the in-group, the range of variation of the bootstrap values obtained in the alternative analyses, including a single out-group species each time, is indicated in square brackets. The character changes reconstructed under DelTran optimization are mapped onto the clades by means of rectangles: the code number of the character is indicated above, and the acquired state is indicated below; the changes reconstructed under both DelTran and AccTran optimization are in bold; full rectangles indicate non-homoplastic changes, empty rectangles indicate homoplastic changes.
Figure 10 in Morphology and phylogeny of Dicellophilus, a centipede genus with a highly disjunct distribution (Chilopoda: Mecistocephalidae)
Figure 10. Geographical distribution and phylogenetic relationships of the species of Dicellophilus. The shaded areas indicate the established populations; stars indicate either occasional or dubious records. The dotted line indicates the 40 °N parallel of latitude.
Figure 9 in Morphology and phylogeny of Dicellophilus, a centipede genus with a highly disjunct distribution (Chilopoda: Mecistocephalidae)
Figure 9. Dicellophilus carniolensis (A–C, G–I) and Dicellophilus pulcher (D–F, J–L). A, D, maxillary complex, ventral view (detached from head). B, E, forcipules and anterior part of coxosternum, dorsal view (head removed). C, F, last leg-bearing segment and terminal segments, female, ventral view. G, J, forcipular tarsungulum, dorsal view. H, K, margin of forcipular tarsungulum, dorsal view. I, L, basal part of forcipular tarsungulum with basal tubercle, dorsal view. Arrowheads: a, telopodite of maxillae II; b, telopodite of maxillae I; c, medial projection of maxillae I; d, metameric pore of maxillae II; e, foraminal process of maxillae II; f, condylar process of forcipular coxosternum; g, cerrus; h, sternum of last leg-bearing segment; i, macropore; j, basal tubercle on forcipular tarsungulum. SEM micrographs: A, D. carniolensis, ♀, 48-mm long, from Valdobbiadene, Italy; B, D. carniolensis, ♀, 55-mm long, from Volovec, Ukraine; C, D. carniolensis, ♀, 51-mm long, from Mara, Romania; D–F, J–L, D. pulcher, ♀, 38-mm long, from Shiobara, Japan; G–I, D. carniolensis, ♀, 55-mm long, from Sighetu Marmaţiei, Romania; the detailed data for the specimens are presented in the Material and methods.
Figure 8 in Morphology and phylogeny of Dicellophilus, a centipede genus with a highly disjunct distribution (Chilopoda: Mecistocephalidae)
Figure 8. Dicellophilus carniolensis (A–C) and Dicellophilus pulcher (D–F). A, D, apical sensillum on antennal article XIV. B, E, clypeus and labrum, ventral view (maxillae removed). C, F, medial part of labrum, ventral view (maxillae removed). Arrowheads: a, antennal apical sensillum; b, lateral margin of clypeus; c, anterior ala; d, thickened line between anterior and posterior ala; e, posterior ala; f, fold on posterior ala; g, mid-piece of labrum; h, marginal hair-like projections. SEM micrographs: A, D. carniolensis, ♀, 51-mm long, from Mara, Romania; B–C, D. carniolensis, ♀, 55-mm long, from Volovec, Ukraine; D–F, D. pulcher, ♀, 38-mm long, from Shiobara, Japan; the detailed data for the specimens are presented in the Material and methods.
Figure 7 in Morphology and phylogeny of Dicellophilus, a centipede genus with a highly disjunct distribution (Chilopoda: Mecistocephalidae)
Figure 7. Dicellophilus carniolensis (A, C–J) and Dicellophilus pulcher (B). A, forcipular segment, ventral view (head detached). B, forcipular tarsungula, anterodorsal view. C, poison gland pore of the left forcipular tarsungulum, dorsal view. D, E, margin of forcipular tarsungulum, ventral view. F, terminal segments of a juvenile, ventral view. G, terminal segments of an adult male, ventral view. H, terminal segments of an adult female, ventral view. I, terminal segments of an adult male, lateral view. J, tip of a last pair leg. Arrowheads: a, tarsungulum; b, trochanteropraefemur; c, pore of poison gland; d, macropore; e, anal pore; f, suture between sternum and pleurites basal to the gonopods; g, gonopod; h, spinous tubercle on the tip of a last leg. SEM micrographs: A, I, D. carniolensis, ♂, 46-mm long, from Volovec, Ukraine; B, D. pulcher, ♀, 38-mm long, from Shiobara, Japan; C, D. carniolensis, ♀, 55-mm long, from Volovec, Ukraine; D, E, D. carniolensis, ♀, 55-mm long, from Sighetu Marmaţiei, Romania; F, D. carniolensis, juvenile, 14-mm long, from Mara, Romania; G, J, D. carniolensis, ♂, 45-mm long, from Mara, Romania; H, D. carniolensis, ♀, 51-mm long, from Mara, Romania; the detailed data for the specimens are presented in the Material and methods.
Figure 4. Dicellophilus limatus. A in Morphology and phylogeny of Dicellophilus, a centipede genus with a highly disjunct distribution (Chilopoda: Mecistocephalidae)
Figure 4. Dicellophilus limatus. A, head, dorsal view. B, right part of the maxillary complex, ventral view (detached from head). C, anterior part of head, dorsal view. D, clypeus and labrum, ventral view (maxillae removed). E, left antennal articles III–V, dorsal view. F, internal margin of left forcipule, dorsal view. G, last leg-bearing segment of an adult female, ventral view. H, left telopodite and medial projection of maxillae I, dorsal view (detached from head). I, left condylar process of forcipular coxosternum, dorsal view (head removed). Microscopic photographs and line drawings: A, B, E, ♀, 49-mm long, from Berkeley, California; C, D, F–H, ♀, 68-mm long, from Berkeley, California; the detailed data for the specimens are presented in the Material and methods.
Figure 2. Dicellophilus anomalus. A in Morphology and phylogeny of Dicellophilus, a centipede genus with a highly disjunct distribution (Chilopoda: Mecistocephalidae)
Figure 2. Dicellophilus anomalus. A, head, dorsal view. B, right part of the maxillary complex, ventral view (detached from head). C, anterior part of head, dorsal view. D, clypeus and labrum, ventral view (maxillae removed). E, left antennal articles III–V, dorsal view. F, internal margin of left forcipule, dorsal view. G, last leg-bearing segment of an adult female, ventral view. H, left telopodite and medial projection of maxillae I, dorsal view (detached from head). I, left condylar process of forcipular coxosternum, dorsal view (head removed). Microscopic photographs and line drawings: ♀, 45-mm long, from Pacific Grove, California; the detailed data for the specimen are presented in the Material and methods.
Figure 1. Dicellophilus carniolensis. A in Morphology and phylogeny of Dicellophilus, a centipede genus with a highly disjunct distribution (Chilopoda: Mecistocephalidae)
Figure 1. Dicellophilus carniolensis. A, habitus of a living specimen (M. Cesen, Italy, 25 May 2008, photo by L. Bonato). B, brooding female coiled around an egg clutch (M. Grappa, Italy, 18 June 2006, photo by L. Bonato).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.