Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig 5 in Integrαted Tαxonomy Reveαls Hidden Diversity in Northern Austrαliαn Fishes: A New Species of Seαmoth (Genus Pegasus)

Fig 5. Ventral view of tail from mid-tail ring IV to mid tail ring VII. Caudolateral plate keels at intersects of tail rings. (A) Pegasus tetrabelos (CSIRO H 7665–01); (B) Pegasus volitans (CSIRO H 6649–02). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149415.g005

Fig 3 in Integrαted Tαxonomy Reveαls Hidden Diversity in Northern Austrαliαn Fishes: A New Species of Seαmoth (Genus Pegasus)

Fig 3. Lateral view of dorsal ridge. (A) Pegasus tetrabelos (CSIRO H 7665–01); (B) Pegasus volitans (CSIRO H 6649–02). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149415.g003

Fig 11 in Integrαted Tαxonomy Reveαls Hidden Diversity in Northern Austrαliαn Fishes: A New Species of Seαmoth (Genus Pegasus)

Fig 11. Pegasus volitans (CSIRO H 7665–02, 116 mm PCL). (A) dorsal; (B) lateral; and (C) ventral views. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149415.g011

Fig 10 in Integrαted Tαxonomy Reveαls Hidden Diversity in Northern Austrαliαn Fishes: A New Species of Seαmoth (Genus Pegasus)

Fig 10. Molecular species identification of Pegasus species using Genetic treeML trees. (A) sequences from the 16S gene; (B) sequences from the COI gene. Trees are based on the K2 evolutionary distance model and are shown here with mined Pegasus and Eurypegasus sequences from GenBank. The trees are shown here with an E. draconis outgroup. Bootstrap support values (following 1000 replicates) are shown above the nodes. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149415.g010

Fig 9 in Integrαted Tαxonomy Reveαls Hidden Diversity in Northern Austrαliαn Fishes: A New Species of Seαmoth (Genus Pegasus)

Fig 9. Trawl sites from the Torres Strait and Great Barrier Reef surveys. Sites where Pegasus tetrabelos (red dots) and Pegasus volitans (yellow dots) were recorded; black dots refer to those sites where Pegasus specimens were not captured. Map generated in QGIS using Natural Earth 1:10,000,000 data (www. naturalearthdata.com). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149415.g009

Fig 8 in Integrαted Tαxonomy Reveαls Hidden Diversity in Northern Austrαliαn Fishes: A New Species of Seαmoth (Genus Pegasus)

Fig 8. Map showing the collection locations of the material examined. Pegasus volitans specimens indicated by yellow dots and Pegasus tetrabelos specimens indicated by black (holotype) and red (paratypes) dots. Map generated in QGIS using Natural Earth 1:10,000,000 data (www.naturalearthdata.com). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149415.g008

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2013View details →

Fig. 3 in The roles of marginal lagoons in the maintenance of genetic diversity in the Brazilian migratory fishes Prochilodus argenteus and P. costatus

Fig. 3. Dendrogram representing the chord genetic distance among sampling groups of Prochilodus costatus. ABAr = rio Abaeté at rainy season; PAR = rio Paracatu lagoons; SFR = rio São Francisco lagoons; TMDd = Três Marias Dam at dry season; TMDr = Três Marias Dam at rainy season.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2013View details →

Fig. 2 in The roles of marginal lagoons in the maintenance of genetic diversity in the Brazilian migratory fishes Prochilodus argenteus and P. costatus

Fig. 2. Dendrogram representing the chord genetic distance among sampling groups of Prochilodus argenteus. ABAr = rio Abaeté at rainy season; CAR = rio Carinhanha lagoons; JEQ = rio Jequitaí lagoons; PAR = rio Paracatu lagoons; SFR = rio São Francisco lagoons; URU = rio Urucuia lagoons; VEL = rio das Velhas lagoons; TMDd = Três Marias Dam at dry season; TMDr = Três Marias Dam at rainy season.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2013View details →

Fig. 1 in The roles of marginal lagoons in the maintenance of genetic diversity in the Brazilian migratory fishes Prochilodus argenteus and P. costatus

Fig. 1. Map showing the central portion of the rio São Francisco basin and the distribution of the samples of Prochilodus argenteus (yellow) and of P. costatus (black). The circles represent marginal lagoons from tributaries, squares represent marginal lagoons from the rio São Francisco, and triangles represent places in the mainstream rio São Francisco in the Três Marias region. ABA = rio Abaeté; CAR = rio Carinhanha lagoons; JEQ = rio Jequitaí lagoons; PAR = rio Paracatu lagoons; SFR = rio São Francisco lagoons; URU = rio Urucuia lagoons; VEL = rio das Velhas lagoons; TMD = Três Marias Dam.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Fig. 4 in Fish diversity of the Kokcha River in Badakhshan Province, Afghanistan

Fig. 4. Hunted fish of the Kokcha River in Badakhshan Province Рис. 4. ПромысΛовая рыба реки Кокча в провинции БаÃахшан

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Fig. 2 in Fish diversity of the Kokcha River in Badakhshan Province, Afghanistan

Fig. 2. Fish species documented in the Kokcha River, Badakhshan Province: 1 — Schizothorax curvifrons (Order Cypriniformes, Family Cyprinidae); 2 — Salmo trutta (Order Salmoniformes, Family Salmonidae); 3 — Glyptothorax cavia (Order Siluriformes, Family Sisoridae); 4 — Paracobitis longicauda (Order Cypriniformes, Family Nemacheilidae) Рис. 2. ВиÃы рыб, отмеченные в реке Кокча, провинция БаÃахшан: 1 — Schizothorax curvifrons (Order Cypriniformes, Family Cyprinidae); 2 — Salmo trutta (Order Salmoniformes, Family Salmonidae); 3 — Glyptothorax cavia (Order Siluriformes, Family Sisoridae); 4 — Paracobitis longicauda (Order Cypriniformes, Family Nemacheilidae)

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Рис. 1. Карта-схема района иссΛеΑования и места сбора материаΛа: 1 — район косы НюкΛя; 2 — бухта Гертнера; 3 — бухта Батарейная; 4 — бухта Нагаева; 5 — Амахтонский заΛив, вбΛизи устья р. Армань in Species diversity and dominant species of the littoral area fishes of Tauysk bay, the Sea of Okhotsk

Рис. 1. Карта-схема района иссΛеΑования и места сбора материаΛа: 1 — район косы НюкΛя; 2 — бухта Гертнера; 3 — бухта Батарейная; 4 — бухта Нагаева; 5 — Амахтонский заΛив, вбΛизи устья р. Армань

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Рис. 2.Соотношение виΑов рыб на ΛитораΛи Тауйской губы: А — по их зоогеографической принаΑΛежности; Б — по принаΑΛежности к ихтиоцену. Обозначения см. в табΛице 1 Fig. 2. Ratio of fish species in the littoral zone of Tauysk Bay: А — according to their zoogeographic affiliation; Б — by belonging to the ichthyocene. Designations are similar to those in Table 1. in Species diversity and dominant species of the littoral area fishes of Tauysk bay, the Sea of Okhotsk

Рис. 2.Соотношение виΑов рыб на ΛитораΛи Тауйской губы: А — по их зоогеографической принаΑΛежности; Б — по принаΑΛежности к ихтиоцену. Обозначения см. в табΛице 1 Fig. 2. Ratio of fish species in the littoral zone of Tauysk Bay: А — according to their zoogeographic affiliation; Б — by belonging to the ichthyocene. Designations are similar to those in Table 1.

Fig. 3 in Global diversity of fish parasitic isopod crustaceans of the family Cymothoidae

Fig. 3. Representative cymothoid forms. Mothocya (A); Olencira (B); Norileca (C); Anilocra (D); Nerocila (E); Telotha (F); Cymothoa (G); Cinusa (H); Ceratothoa (I); Agarna (J, K). Scale bars = 5 mm.

Fig. 2 in Global diversity of fish parasitic isopod crustaceans of the family Cymothoidae

Fig. 2. Different attachment sites of cymothoids. External or scale attaching (A), flesh-burrowing (B) buccal dwelling (C, E, F) and gill attaching (D).

Fig. 4 in Global diversity of fish parasitic isopod crustaceans of the family Cymothoidae

Fig. 4. Number of marine Cymothoidae in biogeographic regions (Marine Ecoregions of the World). Data from Poore and Bruce (2012).

Fig. 1 in Global diversity of fish parasitic isopod crustaceans of the family Cymothoidae

Fig. 1. Absolute numbers and cumulative percentage of species of Cymothoidae (373) published per decade since Linnaeus (1758). Data from the World List of Marine, Freshwater and Terrestrial Isopod Crustaceans hosted by the Smithsonian and at the WoRMS database (Schotte et al., 1995 onwards).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 3 in Alien freshwater fish parasites from South Africa: Diversity, distribution, status and the way forward

Fig. 3. Maps indicating the South African distribution records for (A) Atractolytocestus huronensis Anthony, 1958; (B) Acolpenteron ureteroecetes Fischthal and Allison, 1940; (C) Dactylogyrus extensus Mueller and Van Cleave, 1932, Dactylogyrus minutus Kulwiec, 1927 and Dactylogyrus lamellatus Achmerow, 1952; (D) Gyrodactylus kherulensis Ergens, 1974.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Alien freshwater fish parasites from South Africa: Diversity, distribution, status and the way forward

Fig. 1. Maps indicating the South African distribution records for (A) Ichthyophthirius multifiliis Fouquet, 1876; (B) Apiosoma piscicola (Blanchard, 1885); (C) Chilodonella hexasticha (Kiernik, 1909) and Chilodonella piscicola (Zacharias, 1894); (D) Schyzocotyle (Bothriocephalus) acheilognathi (Yamaguti, 1934).