Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,103
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,103 results for “moisture”
GPM_API - Global Hourly Soil Moisture from GPM IMERG Data - 2016
<p><strong># GPM_API 2016</strong></p> <p>GPM_API data root: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6489998">https://zenodo.org/record/6489998</a></p> <p><strong># Related article:</strong></p> <p>Ramsauer, T., & Marzahn, P. (2023). Global Soil Moisture Estimation based on GPM IMERG Data using a Site Specific Adjusted Antecedent Precipitation Index. <em>International Journal of Remote Sensing</em>, 44(2), 542-566.</p> <p>Article: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351</a></p> <p>Free PDF: <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/6VHQ7JCCJXSPAMG3PVIG/full?target=10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351">www.tandfonline.com/eprint/6VHQ7JCCJXSPAMG3PVIG/full?target=10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351</a></p>
GPM_API - Global Hourly Soil Moisture from GPM IMERG Data - 2018
<p><strong># GPM_API 2018</strong></p> <p>GPM_API data root: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6489998">https://zenodo.org/record/6489998</a></p> <p><strong># Related article:</strong></p> <p>Ramsauer, T., & Marzahn, P. (2023). Global Soil Moisture Estimation based on GPM IMERG Data using a Site Specific Adjusted Antecedent Precipitation Index. <em>International Journal of Remote Sensing</em>, 44(2), 542-566.</p> <p>Article: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351</a></p> <p>Free PDF: <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/6VHQ7JCCJXSPAMG3PVIG/full?target=10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351">www.tandfonline.com/eprint/6VHQ7JCCJXSPAMG3PVIG/full?target=10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351</a></p>
GPM_API - Global Hourly Soil Moisture from GPM IMERG Data - 2017
<p><strong># GPM_API 2017</strong></p> <p>GPM_API data root: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6489998">https://zenodo.org/record/6489998</a></p> <p><strong># Related article:</strong></p> <p>Ramsauer, T., & Marzahn, P. (2023). Global Soil Moisture Estimation based on GPM IMERG Data using a Site Specific Adjusted Antecedent Precipitation Index. <em>International Journal of Remote Sensing</em>, 44(2), 542-566.</p> <p>Article: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351</a></p> <p>Free PDF: <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/6VHQ7JCCJXSPAMG3PVIG/full?target=10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351">www.tandfonline.com/eprint/6VHQ7JCCJXSPAMG3PVIG/full?target=10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351</a></p>
GPM_API - Global Hourly Soil Moisture from GPM IMERG Data - 2020
<p><strong># GPM_API 2020</strong></p> <p>GPM_API data root: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6489998">https://zenodo.org/record/6489998</a></p> <p><strong># Related article:</strong></p> <p>Ramsauer, T., & Marzahn, P. (2023). Global Soil Moisture Estimation based on GPM IMERG Data using a Site Specific Adjusted Antecedent Precipitation Index. <em>International Journal of Remote Sensing</em>, 44(2), 542-566.</p> <p>Article: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351</a></p> <p>Free PDF: <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/6VHQ7JCCJXSPAMG3PVIG/full?target=10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351">www.tandfonline.com/eprint/6VHQ7JCCJXSPAMG3PVIG/full?target=10.1080/01431161.2022.2162351</a></p>
IODP Expedition 379 Moisture and Density
Moisture and density (MAD) data were acquired on ~10 mL sediment or rock samples by measuring three out of four material parameters: wet (saturated) mass, wet volume, dry mass, and/or dry volume after 24 h drying in a convection oven at 105 degrees C. From the moisture and volume measurements, the following phase relationships are calculated: wet and dry water content, wet bulk density, dry bulk density, grain density, porosity, and void ratio. The combination of measurements is defined by the submethod chosen: A, B, C, or D. Wet (A, B, or C) and dry (A, B, C, or D) mass is determined using motion-compensated balances. Wet volume is determined either by helium pycnometry (A) or by the sample's geometric dimensions using calipers (A or D). Dry volume (C or D) is measured by helium pycnometry. Submethods A and B are not recommended by IODP. Submethod C is suitable for saturated materials such as fine-grained sediments. Submethod D is suitable for unsaturated porous material such as certain limestones and basalts.
IODP Expedition 371 Moisture and Density
Moisture and density (MAD) data were acquired on ~10 mL sediment or rock samples by measuring three out of four material parameters: wet (saturated) mass, wet volume, dry mass, and/or dry volume after 24 h drying in a convection oven at 105 degrees C. From the moisture and volume measurements, the following phase relationships are calculated: wet and dry water content, wet bulk density, dry bulk density, grain density, porosity, and void ratio. The combination of measurements is defined by the submethod chosen: A, B, C, or D. Wet (A, B, or C) and dry (A, B, C, or D) mass is determined using motion-compensated balances. Wet volume is determined either by helium pycnometry (A) or by the sample's geometric dimensions using calipers (A or D). Dry volume (C or D) is measured by helium pycnometry. Submethods A and B are not recommended by IODP. Submethod C is suitable for saturated materials such as fine-grained sediments. Submethod D is suitable for unsaturated porous material such as certain limestones and basalts.
IODP Expedition 360 Moisture and Density
Moisture and density (MAD) data were acquired on ~10 mL sediment or rock samples by measuring three out of four material parameters: wet (saturated) mass, wet volume, dry mass, and/or dry volume after 24 h drying in a convection oven at 105 degrees C. From the moisture and volume measurements, the following phase relationships are calculated: wet and dry water content, wet bulk density, dry bulk density, grain density, porosity, and void ratio. The combination of measurements is defined by the submethod chosen: A, B, C, or D. Wet (A, B, or C) and dry (A, B, C, or D) mass is determined using motion-compensated balances. Wet volume is determined either by helium pycnometry (A) or by the sample's geometric dimensions using calipers (A or D). Dry volume (C or D) is measured by helium pycnometry. Submethods A and B are not recommended by IODP. Submethod C is suitable for saturated materials such as fine-grained sediments. Submethod D is suitable for unsaturated porous material such as certain limestones and basalts.
IODP Expedition 397 Moisture and Density
Moisture and density (MAD) data were acquired on ~10 mL sediment or rock samples by measuring three out of four material parameters: wet (saturated) mass, wet volume, dry mass, and/or dry volume after 24 h drying in a convection oven at 105 degrees C. From the moisture and volume measurements, the following phase relationships are calculated: wet and dry water content, wet bulk density, dry bulk density, grain density, porosity, and void ratio. The combination of measurements is defined by the submethod chosen: A, B, C, or D. Wet (A, B, or C) and dry (A, B, C, or D) mass is determined using motion-compensated balances. Wet volume is determined either by helium pycnometry (A) or by the sample's geometric dimensions using calipers (A or D). Dry volume (C or D) is measured by helium pycnometry. Submethods A and B are not recommended by IODP. Submethod C is suitable for saturated materials such as fine-grained sediments. Submethod D is suitable for unsaturated porous material such as certain limestones and basalts.
Temperature moisture interactions soil respiration experiment
<p>These files are from a soil incubation experiment looking at combined effects of temperature and moisture on soil C fluxes. They are prepared for model run and model-data comparison. Description of the data, e.g units, is not in the files themselves.</p> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/da1986ad-a035-41ee-b08e-8ed654e9f84f/mtdata_model_input.csv">mtdata_model_input.csv</a></p> <p>Contains model input for simulating the experimental setup.</p> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/da1986ad-a035-41ee-b08e-8ed654e9f84f/mtdata_co2.csv">mtdata_co2.csv</a></p> <p>Contains the measured data with averages and standard deviation of three replicates samples for treatment.</p> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/da1986ad-a035-41ee-b08e-8ed654e9f84f/site_Closeaux.csv">site_Closeaux.csv </a></p> <p>Containts soil properties required as model input.</p> <p> </p>
Fuzzy modelling and mapping soil moisture in Germany, link to research data and scientific software
<p>Research data and scientific software related to spatio-temporal estimations of ecological soil moisture with available data covering the whole territory of Germany and the Kellerwald National Park (Hesse). Temporal trends of modelled soil moisture for the time period 1961–2070 were statistically analyzed. Soil moisture changes (drying-out) at both national and regional levels were mapped.</p>
Global Soil Moisture Agricultural Drought Index (SMADI)
<p><br> This repository contains the global Soil Moisture Agricultural Drought Index (SMADI) spanning from June 2010 to December 2015 at fortnightly (bi-weekly) rate. The product is gridded in a 0.05deg Climate Modeling Grid.<br> <br> The data are provided in Matlab format (.mat). Each file is a 3600x7200 matrix size, where 3600 is the number of pixels in Latitude coordinates and 7200 to Longitude coordinates, both in the WGS84 system. The center-pixel coordinates are variables "Latitude" and "Longitude". No data values (NaN) correspond to pixels where the retrieval was not possible.<br> <br> <br> SMADI is computed using satellite time series of MODIS Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI, computed from daily reflectances MOD09CMG v.6), MODIS Land Surface Temperature (LST, product MOD11C1 v.6), and SMOS BEC L3 soil moisture data v2.0 (which corresponds to SMOS L2 v.620, average of ascending and descending orbits). <br> <br> The IGBP land cover (MODIS MOD12C1 product) is used prior to SMADI calculation to select only grassland and cropland/natural vegetation mosaic pixels as representative of the primary agro-ecosystems.</p>
ArcGIS Map Packages and GIS Data for: A Geospatial Method for Estimating Soil Moisture Variability in Prehistoric Agricultural Landscapes, Gillreath-Brown et al. (2019)
<p><strong>ArcGIS Map Packages and GIS Data for Gillreath-Brown, Nagaoka, and Wolverton (2019)</strong></p> <p>**When using the GIS data included in these map packages, please cite all of the following:</p> <blockquote> <p>Gillreath-Brown, Andrew, Lisa Nagaoka, and Steve Wolverton. A Geospatial Method for Estimating Soil Moisture Variability in Prehistoric Agricultural Landscapes, 2019. PLoSONE 14(8):e0220457. <a href="http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220457">http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220457</a></p> <p>Gillreath-Brown, Andrew, Lisa Nagaoka, and Steve Wolverton. ArcGIS Map Packages for: A Geospatial Method for Estimating Soil Moisture Variability in Prehistoric Agricultural Landscapes, Gillreath-Brown et al., 2019. Version 1. Zenodo. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2572018">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2572018</a></p> </blockquote> <p><strong>OVERVIEW OF CONTENTS</strong></p> <p>This repository contains map packages for Gillreath-Brown, Nagaoka, and Wolverton (2019), as well as the raw digital elevation model (DEM) and soils data, of which the analyses was based on. The map packages contain all GIS data associated with the analyses described and presented in the publication. The map packages were created in ArcGIS 10.2.2; however, the packages will work in recent versions of ArcGIS. (Note: I was able to open the packages in ArcGIS 10.6.1, when tested on February 17, 2019). The primary files contained in this repository are:</p> <ul> <li>Raw DEM and Soils data <ul> <li>Digital Elevation Model Data (Map services and data available from U.S. Geological Survey, National Geospatial Program, and can be downloaded from the <a href="https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/">National Elevation Dataset</a>) <ul> <li><strong>DEM_Individual_Tiles</strong>: Individual DEM tiles prior to being merged (1/3 arc second) from USGS National Elevation Dataset.</li> <li><strong>DEMs_Merged</strong>: DEMs were combined into one layer. Individual watersheds (i.e., Goodman, Coffey, and Crow Canyon) were clipped from this combined DEM. </li> </ul> </li> <li> Soils Data (Map services and data available from <a href="https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/natural-resources-conservation-service-web-soil-survey">Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey</a>, U.S. Department of Agriculture) <ul> <li><strong>Animas-Dolores_Area_Soils</strong>: Small portion of the soil mapunits cover the northeastern corner of the Coffey Watershed (CW).</li> <li><strong>Cortez_Area_Soils</strong>: Soils for Montezuma County, encompasses all of Goodman (GW) and Crow Canyon (CCW) watersheds, and a large portion of the Coffey watershed (CW).</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>ArcGIS Map Packages <ul> <li><strong>Goodman_Watershed_Full_SMPM_Analysis</strong>: Map Package contains the necessary files to rerun the SMPM analysis on the full Goodman Watershed (GW).</li> <li><strong>Goodman_Watershed_Mesa-Only_SMPM_Analysis</strong>: Map Package contains the necessary files to rerun the SMPM analysis on the mesa-only Goodman Watershed.</li> <li><strong>Crow_Canyon_Watershed_SMPM_Analysis</strong>: Map Package contains the necessary files to rerun the SMPM analysis on the Crow Canyon Watershed (CCW).</li> <li><strong>Coffey_Watershed_SMPM_Analysis</strong>: Map Package contains the necessary files to rerun the SMPM analysis on the Coffey Watershed (CW).</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>For additional information on contents of the map packages, please see see "Map Packages Descriptions" or open a map package in ArcGIS and go to "properties" or "map document properties."</p> <p><strong>LICENSES</strong></p> <p>Code: <a href="http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT">MIT</a> year: 2019 <br> Copyright holders: Andrew Gillreath-Brown, Lisa Nagaoka, and Steve Wolverton</p> <p><strong>CONTACT</strong></p> <p><strong>Andrew Gillreath-Brown, PhD Candidate, RPA</strong><br> <a href="https://anthro.wsu.edu/">Department of Anthropology</a>, Washington State University<br> <a href="mailto:andrew.brown1234@gmail.com">andrew.brown1234@gmail.com</a> – Email<br> <a href="https://andrewgillreathbrown.wordpress.com/">andrewgillreathbrown.wordpress.com</a> – Web</p>
Soil moisture for Limestone
<p>Pixel values represent the surface soil moisture content (in m3m-3*100) of, approximately, the top 5 cm of soil. The retrieval was based on Sentinel-1 time-series and a Support Vector Machine based approach. L. Pasolli, C. Notarnicola, G. Bertoldi, L. Bruzzone, R. Remelgado, F. Greifeneder, G. Niedrist, S. Della Chiesa, U. Tappeiner, and M. Zebisch, “Estimation of Soil Moisture in Mountain Areas Using SVR Technique Applied to Multiscale Active Radar Images at C-Band,” Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 262–283, 2015.</p>
Soil moisture for Peneda-Geres
<p>Pixel values represent the surface soil moisture content (in m3m-3*100) of, approximately, the top 5 cm of soil. The retrieval was based on Sentinel-1 time-series and a Support Vector Machine based approach. L. Pasolli, C. Notarnicola, G. Bertoldi, L. Bruzzone, R. Remelgado, F. Greifeneder, G. Niedrist, S. Della Chiesa, U. Tappeiner, and M. Zebisch, “Estimation of Soil Moisture in Mountain Areas Using SVR Technique Applied to Multiscale Active Radar Images at C-Band,” Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 262–283, 2015.</p>
Soil moisture for Montado
<p>Pixel values represent the surface soil moisture content (in m3m-3*100) of, approximately, the top 5 cm of soil. The retrieval was based on Sentinel-1 time-series and a Support Vector Machine based approach. L. Pasolli, C. Notarnicola, G. Bertoldi, L. Bruzzone, R. Remelgado, F. Greifeneder, G. Niedrist, S. Della Chiesa, U. Tappeiner, and M. Zebisch, “Estimation of Soil Moisture in Mountain Areas Using SVR Technique Applied to Multiscale Active Radar Images at C-Band,” Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 262–283, 2015.</p>
Soil moisture for Sierra Nevada
<p>Pixel values represent the surface soil moisture content (in m3m-3*100) of, approximately, the top 5 cm of soil. The retrieval was based on Sentinel-1 time-series and a Support Vector Machine based approach. L. Pasolli, C. Notarnicola, G. Bertoldi, L. Bruzzone, R. Remelgado, F. Greifeneder, G. Niedrist, S. Della Chiesa, U. Tappeiner, and M. Zebisch, “Estimation of Soil Moisture in Mountain Areas Using SVR Technique Applied to Multiscale Active Radar Images at C-Band,” Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 262–283, 2015.</p>
Soil moisture for Gran Paradiso
<p>Pixel values represent the surface soil moisture content (in m3m-3*100) of, approximately, the top 5 cm of soil. The retrieval was based on Sentinel-1 time-series and a Support Vector Machine based approach. L. Pasolli, C. Notarnicola, G. Bertoldi, L. Bruzzone, R. Remelgado, F. Greifeneder, G. Niedrist, S. Della Chiesa, U. Tappeiner, and M. Zebisch, “Estimation of Soil Moisture in Mountain Areas Using SVR Technique Applied to Multiscale Active Radar Images at C-Band,” Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 262–283, 2015.</p>
Soil moisture for Har Ha`Negev
<p>Pixel values represent the surface soil moisture content (in m3m-3*100) of, approximately, the top 5 cm of soil. The retrieval was based on Sentinel-1 time-series and a Support Vector Machine based approach. L. Pasolli, C. Notarnicola, G. Bertoldi, L. Bruzzone, R. Remelgado, F. Greifeneder, G. Niedrist, S. Della Chiesa, U. Tappeiner, and M. Zebisch, “Estimation of Soil Moisture in Mountain Areas Using SVR Technique Applied to Multiscale Active Radar Images at C-Band,” Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 262–283, 2015.</p>
Soil moisture for Lake Ohrid
<p>H-SAF H109 Metop ASCAT</p> <p>The soil moisture product represents the water content in the upper soil layer (< 2 cm) in relative units between totally dry conditions (0%) and total water capacity (100%). The time series are available on a discrete global grid (DGG) with a spatial resolution of 25 km (grid spacing 12.5 km). The temporal sampling rate is irregular (every 1-2 days) and depends on the latitude. Each surface soil moisture estimate has an associated noise value, indicating the uncertainty. The soil moisture product has not been pre-filtered, meaning that a masking of invalid measurements (e.g. frozen ground, snow cover) by the user is highly recommended before further processing.</p>
DATASET : Thresholds of fire response to moisture and fuel load differ between tropical savannas and grasslands across continents
<p><strong>Abstract </strong></p> <p><strong>Aim:</strong> An emerging framework for tropical ecosystems states that fire activity is either ‘<em>fuel build-up limited</em>’ or ‘<em>fuel moisture limited</em>’ i.e. as you move up along rainfall gradients, the major control on fire occurrence switches from being the amount of fuel, to the moisture content of the fuel. Here we used remotely sensed datasets to assess whether interannual variability of burned area is better explained by annual rainfall totals driving fuel build-up, or by dry season rainfall driving fuel moisture.</p> <p><strong>Location:</strong> Pantropical savannas and grasslands</p> <p><strong>Time period:</strong> 2002-2016</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> We explored the response of annual burned area to interannual variability in rainfall. We compared several linear models to understand how <em>fuel moisture </em>and <em>fuel build-up effect </em>(accumulated rainfall during 6 and 24 months prior to the end of the burning season respectively) determine the interannual variability of burned area and explore if tree cover, dry season duration and human activity modified these relationships.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Fuel and moisture controls on fire occurrence in tropical savannas varied across continents. Only 24% of South American savannas were <em>fuel build-up limited</em> against 61% of Australian savannas and 47% of African savannas. On average, South America switched from fuel limited to moisture limited at 500 mm yr<sup>-1</sup>, Africa at 800 mm yr<sup>-1</sup> and Australia at 1000 mm yr<sup>-1 </sup>of mean annual rainfall.</p> <p><strong>Main conclusions:</strong> In 42% of tropical savannas (accounting for 41% of current area burned) increased drought and higher temperatures will not increase fire, but there are savannas, particularly in South America, that are likely to become more flammable with increasing temperatures. These findings highlight that we cannot transfer knowledge of fire responses to global change across ecosystems/regions – local solutions to local fire management issues are required, and different tropical savanna regions may show contrasting responses to the same drivers of global change.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.