Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,751
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
1,751 results for “molecular phylogenetics”
Fig. 11. Lemurpediculus tsinamanpesotsae, A in Molecular phylogenetics of the sucking louse genus Lemurpediculus (Insecta: Phthiraptera), ectoparasites of lemurs, with descriptions of three new species
Fig. 11. Lemurpediculus tsinamanpesotsae, A: Ventral head of male Holotype, B: Thoracic sternal plate of Holotype male, C: Genitalia of male Holotype, D: Subgenital plate of female Allotype. Abbreviations: ae, anterior endomere; aen, aedeagal endomere; ba, basal apodeme; p, paramere; pe, posterior endomere; ps, pseudopenis.
Fig. 9. Lemurpediculus gerpi, A in Molecular phylogenetics of the sucking louse genus Lemurpediculus (Insecta: Phthiraptera), ectoparasites of lemurs, with descriptions of three new species
Fig. 9. Lemurpediculus gerpi, A: Ventral head of male Holotype, B: Thoracic sternal plate of Holotype male, C: Genitalia of male Holotype. Abbreviations: ae, anterior endomere; aen, aedeagal endomere; ba, basal apodeme; p, paramere; pe, posterior endomere; ps, pseudopenis.
Fig. 4 in Prevalence, molecular characterisation and phylogenetic analyses of hydatid cysts and cysticercus tenuicollis isolates and first report of E. canadensis (G6/G7) in wild boars in Bingol province, Türkiye
Fig. 4. Haplotype network of G1/G3 haplotypes identified on the basis of partial nad5 gene (628 bp). The G1 isolates obtained in this study (Hap01-Hap04), G3 isolates (Hap05, Hap06). Hatch marks represent the number of mutations between the haplotypes and the size of circle corresponds to the frequency of each haplotype in the population. Haplotypes formed by the isolates obtained in this study are marked with an asterisk.
Fig. 3. Haplotype network for E in Prevalence, molecular characterisation and phylogenetic analyses of hydatid cysts and cysticercus tenuicollis isolates and first report of E. canadensis (G6/G7) in wild boars in Bingol province, Türkiye
Fig. 3. Haplotype network for E. canadensis (G6/G7) using cox1 gene (616 bp) sequences of different countries. The E. canadensis (G6/G7) isolate obtained in this investigation (Hap_01) and the sequences identified as G7 in the Genbank database were utilized. Circle size relative to haplotype data set frequency. Each hatch mark is representative of one nucleotide change. Haplotypes formed by the isolates obtained in this study are marked with an asterisk.
Fig. 1 in Prevalence, molecular characterisation and phylogenetic analyses of hydatid cysts and cysticercus tenuicollis isolates and first report of E. canadensis (G6/G7) in wild boars in Bingol province, Türkiye
Fig. 1. Hydatid cyst image obtained from the lung (A) and liver (B) and C. tenuicollis (C,D) image obtained from its mesentery of wild boar.
Fig. 2. Haplotype network constructed using cox1 in Prevalence, molecular characterisation and phylogenetic analyses of hydatid cysts and cysticercus tenuicollis isolates and first report of E. canadensis (G6/G7) in wild boars in Bingol province, Türkiye
Fig. 2. Haplotype network constructed using cox1 (744 bp) gene sequences of T. hydatigena. Seven haplotypes formed by the T. hydatigena isolates obtained in this study: (Hap 1-Hap 7). Circle size relative to haplotype data set frequency. Each hatch mark is representative of one nucleotide change. Haplotypes formed by the isolates obtained in this study are marked with an asterisk.
Linked collectors and determiners for: A cybertaxonomic revision of the new dung beetle tribe Parachoriini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) and its phylogenetic assessment using molecular and morphological data.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "A cybertaxonomic revision of the new dung beetle tribe Parachoriini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) and its phylogenetic assessment using molecular and morphological data". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/7e33ec7d-211b-4042-8d07-344364ee805d">https://bionomia.net/dataset/7e33ec7d-211b-4042-8d07-344364ee805d</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/7e33ec7d-211b-4042-8d07-344364ee805d">https://gbif.org/dataset/7e33ec7d-211b-4042-8d07-344364ee805d</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Fig. 4 in Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa
Fig. 4. Bayesian majority-rule consensus tree of the full combined nuclear (ITS, PHYC) and chloroplast (accD-psaI, matK, trnS-trnG) datasets for Phyllanthus and related genera; posterior probabilities (PP) are displayed at the nodes; infrageneric classification follows Bouman & al. (2018a); subgenera are given above colored clades, sections to the right. Outgroups and some ingroup genera are collapsed (see full tree in suppl. Fig. S10). Manuscript names of new undescribed species are indicated with an asterisk.
Fig. 3 in Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa
Fig. 3. Molecular phylogenetic relationships of tribe Phyllantheae, simplified from Fig. 4 showing genera and subgenera. Colouring of clades follows Fig. 4, and paraphyly is highlighted with a red-white triangle (). Several morphological characters and character states are shown: B, branching non-phyllanthoid (), sub-phyllanthoid () or phyllanthoid (); D, disc present (), absent () or when both variations occur in the clade (); A, androphore filaments free (), fused () or when both are present (), whorled stamens (); F, fruit capsules (), berries (), or when both are present (); S, average stamens number.
Fig. 2 in Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa
Fig. 2. Schematic design for the marker PHYC (A), accD-psaI (B) and trnS-trnG (C) spacer with newly designed primers indicated by arrowheads. Number behind primer names indicates approximate nucleotide position within the marker including insertions in the matrix. PHYC figure adapted from Samuel & al. (2005).
Fig. 1 in Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa
Fig. 1. Major characters of Phyllanthus and the related genera Breynia and Glochidion. A, Habit of the herbaceous P. tenellus (P. subg. Tenellanthus); B, Habit of P. watsonii (P. subg. Eriococcus); C, Habit and fruits of P. emblica (P. subg. Emblica); D, Non-phyllanthoid branching in P. myrtellus; note the leaves subtending lateral branches (P. subg. Macraea); E, Sub-phyllanthoid branching in a young plant of P. glaucus, lateral branches are deciduous (P. subg. Kirganelia); F, Phyllanthoid branching and phylloclades in P. arbucula (P. subg. Xylophylla); G, Young capsules of P. myrtellus (P. subg. Macraea); H, Dehisced capsule of P. juglandifolius (P. subg. Xylophylla); I, Berries on a specialized leafless branchlet of P. microcarpus (P. subg. Kirganelia); J, Capsules of G. eriocarpum with orange arillate seeds exposed in some (Glochidion); K, Staminate flowers of P. pulcher (P. subg. Eriococcus); L, Pistillate flowers of P. pulcher (P. subg. Eriococcus); M, Flowers of P. mimosoides (P. subg. Xylophylla); N, Flowers of P. arbuscula (P. subg. Xylophylla); O, Staminate flower of P. cf. poilanei (P. subg. Phyllanthodendron); P, Pistillate flower of B. androgyna (Breynia). — Photos: A, C–G, I–M & O by R.W. Bouman; B © R.-Y. Yu; H by J.S. Strijk; N © M.S. Nuraliev.
Figure 2. Majority rule consensus tree for the 16S in Genus Baseodiscus (Nemertea: Heteronemertea): Molecular identification of a new species in a phylogenetic context
Figure 2. Majority rule consensus tree for the 16S rRNA data resulting from the Bayesian analysis (model GTR+G+I), 1,000,000 generations. Numbers refer to posterior probabilities.
Figure 1 in Genus Baseodiscus (Nemertea: Heteronemertea): Molecular identification of a new species in a phylogenetic context
Figure 1. Parsimony tree based on the 16S rRNA data with bootstrap support values from 5000 replicates (heuristic search, random additions, five replicates).
Figure 11 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis
Figure 11. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis viridis (ZSM 574/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.
Figure 10 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis
Figure 10. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis tasymena (ZSM 527/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.
Figure 7 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis
Figure 7. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis sibilans (ZSM 557/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.
Figure 3 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis
Figure 3. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis madagascariensis (ZSM 519/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.
Figure 4 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis
Figure 4. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis albilabris (ZSM 588/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.
Figure 5 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis
Figure 5. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis pyrrhus (ZSM 580/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view; (c) oral disc.
Figure 6 in Molecular identification, description, and phylogenetic implications of the tadpoles of 11 species of Malagasy treefrogs, genus Boophis
Figure 6. Drawings of the tadpole of Boophis marojezensis (ZSM 523/2004). (a) Dorsal view; (b) lateral view, note that the hindlimb has been removed from the specimen for better visibility of structures; (c) oral disc.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.