Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,583
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,583 results for “morphometrics”
Figure 14 in A morphometric approach to conch ontogeny of Cymaclymenia and related genera (Ammonoidea, Late Devonian)
Figure 14. Cross sections (A–I; all × 1.5) and ontogenetic trajectories (J–M) of Cymaclymenia subvexa n. sp. from the Anti-Atlas of Morocco. (A) Paratype MB.C.22647.1 (Korn 2009 Coll.) from Madène el Mrakib. (B) Paratype MB.C.22686.1 (Wendt Coll.) from Khorb et Attil. (C) Paratype MB.C.22675 (Wendt Coll.) from Bou Ifarherioun. (D) Paratype MB.C.22636.2 (Korn 1998 Coll.) from Madène el Mrakib. (E) Paratype MB.C.22682 (Wendt Coll.) from Taourirt. (F) Paratype MB.C.22686.2 (Wendt Coll.) from Khorb et Attil. (G) Paratype MB.C.22683.1 (Wendt Coll.) from Taourirt. (H) Paratype MB.C.22684.1 (Wendt Coll.) from Taourirt. (I) Paratype MB.C.22636.3 (Korn 1998 Coll.) from Madène el Mrakib. (J) Conch width index (ww / dm). (K) Umbilical width index (ww / wh). (L) Whorl width index (uw / dm). (M) Whorl expansion rate (WER).
Figure 26 in A morphometric approach to conch ontogeny of Cymaclymenia and related genera (Ammonoidea, Late Devonian)
Figure 26. Cross sections (A, C; all × 1.5), photograph (B; × 1.0) and ontogenetic trajectories (D–G) of Cymaclymenia carnata n. sp. from the Anti-Atlas of Morocco. (A, B) Holotype MB.C.22654 (Kullmann Coll.) from Aguelmous. (C) Paratype MB.C.22645 (Korn 2009 Coll.) from Madène el Mrakib. (D) Conch width index (ww / dm). (E) Umbilical width index (ww / wh). (F) Whorl width index (uw / dm). (G) Whorl expansion rate (WER).
Fig. 7 in Morphological disparity of early ammonoids: A geometric morphometric approach to investigate conch geometry
Fig. 7. Evolution of the relative contribution of ammonoid superfamilies to diversity and disparity (mean squared Euclidean distance to the centroid) through the Early and Middle Devonian; based on the analysis of the whorl profiles. A. Relative contribution of ammonoid superfamilies to diversity (sampled-in-bin). B. Fluctuations of the mean squared Euclidean distance to the centroid (black line with grey area showing the confidence intervals computed after 1000 bootstraps) and sampled-in-bin diversity (blue bars). C. Relative contribution of ammonoid superfamilies to disparity (mean squared Euclidean distance to the centroid). See Fig. 2 for interval labels.
Fig. 9 in Morphological disparity of early ammonoids: A geometric morphometric approach to investigate conch geometry
Fig. 9. Evolution of the relative contribution of ammonoid superfamilies to diversity and disparity (mean squared Euclidean distance to the centroid) through the Early and Middle Devonian ammonoid zones (biozones numbered from 1 to 30, see Fig. 2); based on the analysis of the whorl profiles. A. Relative contribution of ammonoid superfamilies to diversity (sampled-in-bin). B. Fluctuations of the mean squared Euclidean distance to the centroid (black line with grey area showing the confidence intervals computed after 1000 bootstraps) and sampled-in-bin diversity (blue bars). C. Relative contribution of ammonoid superfamilies to disparity (mean squared Euclidean distance to the centroid).
Fig. 6 in Morphological disparity of early ammonoids: A geometric morphometric approach to investigate conch geometry
Fig. 6. Evolution of the morphospace occupation through the seven intervals constituting the Early and Middle Devonian, showing the distribution of ammonoid superfamilies; based on the analysis of the whorl profiles (on each diagram, the horizontal axis corresponds to PC1 and the vertical axis to PC2). See Fig. 2 for interval labels.
Fig. 11 in Morphological disparity of early ammonoids: A geometric morphometric approach to investigate conch geometry
Fig. 11. Variations of the convex hull area computed for PC1 and PC2, based on the analysis of the whorl profiles through the Early and Middle Devonian. Comparison of the measured values with the expected values given diversity, computed by applying the null model of Whalen et al. (2020). A. Fluctuations computed at the interval resolution. B. Fluctuations computed at the biozone resolution. See Fig. 2 for interval labels and biozones.
Fig. 5 in Morphological disparity of early ammonoids: A geometric morphometric approach to investigate conch geometry
Fig. 5. Diagrams showing the morphospace occupation observed for the three stages constituting the Early and Middle Devonian (A–C), with level contours and density curves; based on the analysis of the whorl profiles. The grey dots correspond to the data recorded for the entire studied time interval (Early and Middle Devonian); the black dots refer to the data recorded for each of the studied stage (respectively, Emsian, Eifelian, and Givetian). The colours refer to the density of the data in the morphospace; the red-yellowwhite gradient indicates the decreasing density of occupied areas. Compare also with density curves (in grey) above and to the right of the diagrams.
Fig. 4 in Morphological disparity of early ammonoids: A geometric morphometric approach to investigate conch geometry
Fig. 4. Morphospace occupation observed for the Early and Middle Devonian, based on the analysis of the whorl profiles, with representative examples of shapes. The first two axes explain 95.7% of the variance.
Fig. 3. Ammonoid morphology and dataset. A in Morphological disparity of early ammonoids: A geometric morphometric approach to investigate conch geometry
Fig. 3. Ammonoid morphology and dataset. A. Morphology of an ammonoid; as an example, the outline of the whorl profile taken at the maximum conch diameter is highlighted by a thick black line (modified from De Baets et al. 2010). B. Dataset analysed here; compilation of drawings of whorl profile outlines corresponding to Early and Middle Devonian ammonoids from Morocco.
Fig. 8 in Morphological disparity of early ammonoids: A geometric morphometric approach to investigate conch geometry
Fig. 8. Disparity and diversity fluctuations through the Early and Middle Devonian; based on the analysis of the whorl profiles. A. Sum of ranges (black line with grey area showing the confidence intervals) and sampled-in-bin diversity (blue bars). B. Sum of variances (black line with grey area showing the confidence intervals) and sampled-in-bin diversity (blue bars). C. Average displacement (black line with grey area showing the confidence intervals) and sampled-in-bin diversity (blue bars). Confidence intervals (error bars) are computed after 1000 bootstraps. See Fig. 2 for interval labels.
Fig. 1 in Morphological disparity of early ammonoids: A geometric morphometric approach to investigate conch geometry
Fig. 1. Simplified geological map of Morocco (modified from Klug 2002b). The square shows the area where Early and Middle Devonian ammonoids are reported (Tafilalt and Ma'der basins).
Fig. 2 in Morphological disparity of early ammonoids: A geometric morphometric approach to investigate conch geometry
Fig. 2. Stratigraphic scheme for the Early and Middle Devonian of the Anti-Atlas of Morocco, showing the distribution of superfamilies through time. Ammonoid biozonation from (Klug 2002a; Aboussalam and Becker 2011; Bockwinkel et al. 2015; Becker et al. 2019). Absolute ages from the Geological Time Scale v. 5.0 (Walker et al. 2018). "Sobolewia sp. nov." and "Afromaenioceras sp. nov" have been introduced by Becker et al. (2004), and Lunupharciceras sp. nov." by Aboussalam and Becker (2011); these new taxa have not yet been formally described but they are mentioned in several studies where they are used to establish the biozonation (e.g., Becker et al. 2004; Aboussalam and Becker 2011).
Fig. 10 in Morphological disparity of early ammonoids: A geometric morphometric approach to investigate conch geometry
Fig. 10. Disparity and diversity fluctuations through the Early and Middle Devonian ammonoid zones (biozones numbered from 1 to 30, see Fig. 2); based on the analysis of the whorl profiles. A. Sum of ranges (black line with grey area showing the confidence intervals) and sampled-in-bin diversity (blue bars). B. Sum of variances (black line with grey area showing the confidence intervals) and sampled-in-bin diversity (blue bars). C. Average displacement black line with grey area showing the confidence intervals) and sampled-in-bin diversity (blue bars). Confidence intervals (error bars) are computed after 1000 bootstraps.
Fig. 4 in Sexual dimorphism and morphometrics in two populations of the Neotropical freshwater turtle Mesoclemmys vanderhaegei (Testudines, Chelidae)
Fig. 4. Multidimensional distribution of females (F) and males (M) of Mesoclemmys vanderhaegei (Bour, 1973), using the seven variables selected by the best model. In this ranking we present information about 64 sexed individuals captured in ParQue Nacional da Chapada dos GuimarÃes (PNCG) and in EstaÇÃo Ecológica Serra das Araras (EESA), Brazil.
Fig. 3 in Sexual dimorphism and morphometrics in two populations of the Neotropical freshwater turtle Mesoclemmys vanderhaegei (Testudines, Chelidae)
Fig. 3. Multidimensional distribution of females (F) and males (M) of Mesoclemmys vanderhaegei (Bour, 1973), using eight morphometric variables commonly measured in chelonians in EstaÇÃo Ecológica Serra das Araras (EESA), Brazil.
Fig. 1 in Sexual dimorphism and morphometrics in two populations of the Neotropical freshwater turtle Mesoclemmys vanderhaegei (Testudines, Chelidae)
Fig. 1. Measured morphometric variables of the individuals of Mesoclemmys vanderhaegei (Bour, 1973). Head: Head width (HW); Head length (HL); Interorbital width (IOW); Tympanum-snout length (TSL); Tympanum length (TYL); Tympanum width (TW). Carapace: Nuchal scute length (NL); Carapace length (CL); Maximum carapace width (MCW); Central carapace width (CCW); Length of third central scute (LC3); Width of third central scute (WC3). Shell: Maximum carapace height (MHS). Plastron: Maximum plastron length (MPL); Mid-ventral suture length plastron (MVSL); Maximum plastron width (MPW); Anterior lobe width (ALW); Posterior lobe width (PLW); Width of left and right gular scutes (WGS); Length of left gular scute (LGS); Left gular scute length (GSL); Intergular scute width (IG); Left pectoral scute width (PSW); Left pectoral scute length (PEL); Left abdominal scute length (ASL); Left abdominal scute width (ASW); Maximum bridge length (MBL); Minimum bridge length (MBL2); Left anal scute width (ANSW); Left anal scute length (ANSL); Internal diagonal of anal scute (IDS); Carapace anal plastron terminal distance (CPD). Tail: Precloacal length (PCL); Tail length (TL).
Fig. 2 in Sexual dimorphism and morphometrics in two populations of the Neotropical freshwater turtle Mesoclemmys vanderhaegei (Testudines, Chelidae)
Fig. 2. Multidimensional distribution of females (F) and males (M) of Mesoclemmys vanderhaegei (Bour, 1973), using eight morphometric variables commonly measured in chelonians in ParQue Nacional da Chapada dos GuimarÃes (PNCG), Brazil.
Figure 9 in A morphometric approach to conch ontogeny of Cymaclymenia and related genera (Ammonoidea, Late Devonian)
Figure 9. Ontogenetic pathways of six cymaclymeniid species in the morphospace calculated with morphometric data: (A) Procymaclymenia ebbighauseni n. sp., (B) Cymaclymenia subvexa n. sp., (C) Cymaclymenia formosa n. sp., (D) Cymaclymenia lambidia n. sp., (E) Cymaclymenia carnata n. sp. and (F) Postclymenia calceola n. sp.
Fig. 6 in Pattern Of Genetic And Morphometric Differentiation In Maculinea Nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) In The Carpathian Basin
Fig. 6. The results of AMOVA computed on the genetic data and hierarchical ANOVA of the morphometric data. A = AMOVA of both regions together. B = AMOVA of the two regions separately. C = Hierarchical ANOVA of both regions together. D = Hierarchical ANOVA of the two regions separately. The patterns of the columns are consistent in all charts. BR: between region component of variance (dark grey); BP: variation among the populations within the regions (black); BS: variation among the samples/generations within the populations (white); WS: within sample compo-
Fig. 4 in Pattern Of Genetic And Morphometric Differentiation In Maculinea Nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) In The Carpathian Basin
Fig. 4. UPGMA dendrogram constructed using CAVALLI-SFORSA & EDWARDS chord distances with a Maculinea teleius sample (3tKv) as out group. Bootstrap values were obtained using 2000 replicates
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.