Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
859
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
859 results for “neobiota”
Supplementary material 1 from: Zieritz A, Armas B, Aldridge D (2014) Registry of non-native species in the Two Seas region countries (Great Britain, France, Belgium and the Netherlands). NeoBiota 23: 65-80. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.23.5665
Registry of non-native species in the Two Seas region countries (Great Britain, France, Belgium and the Netherlands): Explanation note: The MS Excel file contains two worksheets:
Supplementary material 1 from: Trueman M, Standish R, Orellana D, Cabrera W (2014) Mapping the extent and spread of multiple plant invasions can help prioritise management in Galapagos National Park. NeoBiota 23: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.23.7800
Index of vegetation classes and results on the distribution of invasive plants from the spatial database of canopy plant densities over the National Park on Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos: Explanation note: This document contains an index to the vegetation classes featured in the spatial database. It also has an additional table of results on the distribution of invasive plants in the canopy in each historical vegetation type, and in each density category.
Supplementary material 1 from: Thomsen M, Wernberg T, Olden J, Byers J, Bruno J, Silliman B, Schiel D (2014) Forty years of experiments on aquatic invasive species: are study biases limiting our understanding of impacts? NeoBiota 22: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.22.6224
List of reviewed references.: Explanation note: References are divided into general (G), freshwater (F), aquatic (FM) or marine (M) journals. References with an asterisk (*) did not replicate or pseudo-replicated either treatment and/or control plots.
Supplementary material 1 from: Zilletti B, Capdevila-Argüelles L (2014) Halting Biological Invasions in Europe: from Data to Decisions. A message from NEOBIOTA 2012. NeoBiota 21: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.21.7289
Time to act! Biological invasions need a strong European legal framework urgently!: Explanation note: Resolution adopted by the participants of the "7th European Conference on Biological Invasions" of the European Working Group on Biological Invasions - NEOBIOTA.
Supplementary material 1 from: Hajek AE, Henry JC, Standley CR, Foelker CJ (2017) Comparing functional traits and abundance of invasive versus native woodwasps. NeoBiota 36: 39-55. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.36.14953
Supplementary material 1 from: Hajek AE, Henry JC, Standley CR, Foelker CJ (2017) Comparing functional traits and abundance of invasive versus native woodwasps. NeoBiota 36: 39-55. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.36.14953
Supplementary material 1 from: Cardarelli E, Musacchio A, Montagnani C, Bogliani G, Citterio S, Gentili R (2018) Ambrosia artemisiifolia control in agricultural areas: effect of grassland seeding and herbivory by the exotic leaf beetle Ophraella communa. NeoBiota 38: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.38.23562
Tables S1–S2, Figures S1–S2 : Explanation note: Table S1. Soil characteristics in the three investigated sites; Table S2. O. communa density on non-target species throughout summer 2015; Figure S1. A. artemisiifolia soil seed bank in the three sites; Figure S2. A. artemisiifolia traits in experimental plots.
Supplementary material 4 from: Hagen BL, Kumschick S (2018) The relevance of using various scoring schemes revealed by an impact assessment of feral mammals. NeoBiota 38: 37-75. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.38.23509
Detailed SEICAT assessments (Table S4) : Explanation note: A summary of the impact assessment using the Socio-Economic Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (SEICAT). Impact scores, from highest to lowest are Massive (MV), Major (MR), Moderate (MO), Minor (MN) and Minimal Concern (MC). Full reference details are given in Appendix 2. Region indicates whether the impact was found on islands or the mainland.
Supplementary material 2 from: Hagen BL, Kumschick S (2018) The relevance of using various scoring schemes revealed by an impact assessment of feral mammals. NeoBiota 38: 37-75. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.38.23509
Detailed GISS assessments (Table S2) : Explanation note: Details of the environmental and socio-economic impact assessment using the Generic Impact Scoring System (GISS). Full reference details are given in Appendix 2. Region indicates whether the impact was found on islands or the mainland.
Supplementary material 1 from: Hagen BL, Kumschick S (2018) The relevance of using various scoring schemes revealed by an impact assessment of feral mammals. NeoBiota 38: 37-75. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.38.23509
Differences between scoring schemes (Table S1) : Explanation note: Scoring differences for GISS, EICAT and SEICAT. This table was adapted from Kumschick et al. (2016) and Bacher et al. (2017). The numbers in the top column refer to the GISS scoring classifications, whereas the terms 'massive' to 'minimal concern' refer to EICAT and SEICAT scoring classifications.
Supplementary material 3 from: Hagen BL, Kumschick S (2018) The relevance of using various scoring schemes revealed by an impact assessment of feral mammals. NeoBiota 38: 37-75. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.38.23509
Detailed EICAT assessments (Table S3) : Explanation note: A summary of the impact assessment using the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT). Impact scores, from highest to lowest are Massive (MV), Major (MR), Moderate (MO), Minor (MN) and Minimal Concern (MC). Full reference details are given in Appendix 2. Region indicates whether the impact was found on islands or the mainland.
Supplementary material 4 from: Magona N, Richardson DM, Le Roux JJ, Kritzinger-Klopper S, Wilson JRU (2018) Even well-studied groups of alien species might be poorly inventoried: Australian Acacia species in South Africa as a case study. NeoBiota 39: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.39.23135
Details of the forestry trial at Damara Farm, South Africa, that included many species of wattles not previously recorded from South Africa :
Supplementary material 3 from: Magona N, Richardson DM, Le Roux JJ, Kritzinger-Klopper S, Wilson JRU (2018) Even well-studied groups of alien species might be poorly inventoried: Australian Acacia species in South Africa as a case study. NeoBiota 39: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.39.23135
Records of naturalised populations of wattles as per the Southern African Plant Invaders Atlas (date accessed: January 2017) :
Supplementary material 1 from: Magona N, Richardson DM, Le Roux JJ, Kritzinger-Klopper S, Wilson JRU (2018) Even well-studied groups of alien species might be poorly inventoried: Australian Acacia species in South Africa as a case study. NeoBiota 39: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.39.23135
Molecular and morphological assessments for the identity of Australian Acacia species collected in South Africa: a) from naturalised populations not previously assessed; and b) from Damara Farm near Malmesbury in South Africa :
Supplementary material 2 from: Magona N, Richardson DM, Le Roux JJ, Kritzinger-Klopper S, Wilson JRU (2018) Even well-studied groups of alien species might be poorly inventoried: Australian Acacia species in South Africa as a case study. NeoBiota 39: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.39.23135
South African herbarium accession numbers for specimens that were not available online at http://newposa.sanbi.org as of 1 March 2018 :
Supplementary material 6 from: Lommen STE, Jongejans E, Leitsch-Vitalos M, Tokarska-Guzik B, Zalai M, Müller-Schärer H, Karrer G (2018) Time to cut: population models reveal how to mow invasive common ragweed cost-effectively. NeoBiota 39: 53-78. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.39.23398
Stochastic population growth for alternative seed bank scenarios (graphic results, population dynamics) :
Supplementary material 2 from: Yazlık A, Pergl J, Pyšek P (2018) Impact of alien plants in Turkey assessed by the Generic Impact Scoring System. NeoBiota 39: 31-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.39.23598
List of references : Explanation note: List of references used for scoring the impact of the studied species.
Supplementary material 1 from: Yazlık A, Pergl J, Pyšek P (2018) Impact of alien plants in Turkey assessed by the Generic Impact Scoring System. NeoBiota 39: 31-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.39.23598
Distribution of alien species assessed in this study : Explanation note: Distribution in Turkey of the alien species studied using the grid system according to Davis (1965–1985, 1988).
Supplementary material 8 from: Lommen STE, Jongejans E, Leitsch-Vitalos M, Tokarska-Guzik B, Zalai M, Müller-Schärer H, Karrer G (2018) Time to cut: population models reveal how to mow invasive common ragweed cost-effectively. NeoBiota 39: 53-78. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.39.23398
r-cost curves for different seed survival scenarios and reference data sets (graphic results, population dynamics) :
Supplementary material 3 from: Yazlık A, Pergl J, Pyšek P (2018) Impact of alien plants in Turkey assessed by the Generic Impact Scoring System. NeoBiota 39: 31-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.39.23598
Scoring of the impact : Explanation note: Scoring of environmental and socioeconomi impact. File contains values (Impact score) and categories in which these scores are assigned (Impact type), with source references.
Supplementary material 2 from: Dickey JWE, Cuthbert RN, Rea M, Laverty C, Crane K, South J, Briski E, Chang X, Coughlan NE, MacIsaac HJ, Ricciardi A, Riddell GE, Xu M, Dick JTA (2018) Assessing the relative potential ecological impacts and invasion risks of emerging and future invasive alien species. NeoBiota 40: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.40.28519
Table S2. Summary of the GB online survey outlining which of the four species of turtle was being sold :
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.