Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
191
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
191 results for “open research”
Data from: In an age of open access to research policies: physician and public health NGO staff research use and policy awareness
Introduction: Through funding agency and publisher policies, an increasing proportion of the health sciences literature is being made open access. Such an increase in access raises questions about the awareness and potential utilization of this literature by those working in health fields. Methods: A sample of physicians (N=336) and public health non-governmental organization (NGO) staff (N=92) were provided with relatively complete access to the research literature indexed in PubMed, as well as access to the point-of-care service UpToDate, for up to one year, with their usage monitored through the tracking of web-log data. The physicians also participated in a one-month trial of relatively complete or limited access. Results: The study found that participants' research interests were not satisfied by article abstracts alone nor, in the case of the physicians, by a clinical summary service such as UpToDate. On average, a third of the physicians viewed research a little more frequently than once a week, while two-thirds of the public health NGO staff viewed more than three articles a week. Those articles were published since the 2008 adoption of the NIH Public Access Policy, as well as prior to 2008 and during the maximum 12-month embargo period. A portion of the articles in each period was already open access, but complete access encouraged a viewing of more research articles. Conclusion: Those working in health fields will utilize more research in the course of their work as a result of (a) increasing open access to research, (b) improving awareness of and preparation for this access, and (c) adjusting public and open access policies to maximize the extent of potential access, through reduction in embargo periods and access to pre-policy literature.
Researcher views on Open Science
<p>Responses to a questionaire from a group of researchers on Open Science</p>
Dataset - Clustering Semantic Predicates in the Open Research Knowledge Graph
<p>This dataset has been created for implementing a content-based recommender system in the context of the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG). The recommender system accepts research paper's title and abstracts as input and recommends existing predicates in the ORKG semantically relevant to the given paper.</p> <p> </p> <p>The paper instances in the dataset are grouped by ORKG comparisons and therefore the <strong><em>data.json</em></strong> file is more comprehensive than <strong><em>training_set.json</em></strong> and <strong><em>test_set.json.</em></strong></p> <p> </p> <p><strong><em>data.json</em></strong></p> <p>The main JSON object consists of a list of comparisons. Each comparisons object has an ID, label, list of papers and list of predicates, whereas each paper object has ID, label, DOI, research field, research problems and abstract. Each predicate object has an ID and a label. See an example instance below.</p> <pre><code class="language-json">{ "comparisons": [ { "id": "R108331", "label": "Analysis of approaches based on required elements in way of modeling", "papers": [ { "id": "R108312", "label": "Rapid knowledge work visualization for organizations", "doi": "10.1108/13673270710762747", "research_field": { "id": "R134", "label": "Computer and Systems Architecture" }, "research_problems": [ { "id": "R108294", "label": "Enterprise engineering" } ], "abstract": "Purpose \u2013 The purpose of this contribution is to motivate a new, rapid approach to modeling knowledge work in organizational settings and to introduce a software tool that demonstrates the viability of the envisioned concept.Design/methodology/approach \u2013 Based on existing modeling structures, the KnowFlow toolset that aids knowledge analysts in rapidly conducting interviews and in conducting multi\u2010perspective analysis of organizational knowledge work is introduced.Findings \u2013 This article demonstrates how rapid knowledge work visualization can be conducted largely without human modelers by developing an interview structure that allows for self\u2010service interviews. Two application scenarios illustrate the pressing need for and the potentials of rapid knowledge work visualizations in organizational settings.Research limitations/implications \u2013 The efforts necessary for traditional modeling approaches in the area of knowledge management are often prohibitive. This contribution argues that future research needs ..." }, .... ], "predicates": [ { "id": "P37126", "label": "activities, behaviours, means [for knowledge development and/or for knowledge conveyance and transformation" }, { "id": "P36081", "label": "approach name" }, .... ] }, .... ] }</code></pre> <p> </p> <p><strong><em>training_set.json </em></strong>and<strong><em> test_set.json</em></strong></p> <p>The main JSON object consists of a list of training/test instances. Each instance has an instance_id with the format (comparison_id X paper_id) and a text. The text is a concatenation of the paper's label (title) and abstract. See an example instance below.</p> <p>Note that test instances are not duplicated and do not occur in the training set. Training instances are also not duplicated, BUT training papers can be duplicated in a concatenation with different comparisons.</p> <pre><code class="language-json">{ "instances": [ { "instance_id": "R108331xR108301", "comparison_id": "R108331", "paper_id": "R108301", "text": "A notation for Knowledge-Intensive Processes Business process modeling has become essential for managing organizational knowledge artifacts. However, this is not an easy task, especially when it comes to the so-called Knowledge-Intensive Processes (KIPs). A KIP comprises activities based on acquisition, sharing, storage, and (re)use of knowledge, as well as collaboration among participants, so that the amount of value added to the organization depends on process agents' knowledge. The previously developed Knowledge Intensive Process Ontology (KIPO) structures all the concepts (and relationships among them) to make a KIP explicit. Nevertheless, KIPO does not include a graphical notation, which is crucial for KIP stakeholders to reach a common understanding about it. This paper proposes the Knowledge Intensive Process Notation (KIPN), a notation for building knowledge-intensive processes graphical models." }, ... ] }</code></pre> <p> </p> <p><strong>Dataset Statistics:</strong></p> <table align="center"> <thead> <tr> <th scope="col">-</th> <th scope="col">Papers</th> <th scope="col">Predicates</th> <th scope="col">Research Fields</th> <th scope="col">Research Problems</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>Min/Comparison</td> <td>2</td> <td>2</td> <td>1</td> <td>0</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Max/Comparison</td> <td>202</td> <td>112</td> <td>5</td> <td>23</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Avg./Comparison</td> <td>21,54</td> <td>12,79</td> <td>1,20</td> <td>1,09</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Total</td> <td>4060</td> <td>1816</td> <td>46</td> <td>178</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Dataset Splits:</strong></p> <table align="center"> <thead> <tr> <th scope="col">-</th> <th scope="col">Papers</th> <th scope="col">Comparisons</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>Training Set</td> <td>2857</td> <td>214</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Test Set</td> <td>1203</td> <td>180</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p>
Supplementary material 4 from: Meier N, Urfer K, Haraldseide H, Vårdal H, Klopfstein S (2022) Open access in a taxonomic sense: a morphological and molecular guide to Western Palaearctic Dusona (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 91: 83-183. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.91.83318
PCR conditions
Supplementary material 1 from: Meier N, Urfer K, Haraldseide H, Vårdal H, Klopfstein S (2022) Open access in a taxonomic sense: a morphological and molecular guide to Western Palaearctic Dusona (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 91: 83-183. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.91.83318
Taxon list SMTP
Supplementary material 3 from: Meier N, Urfer K, Haraldseide H, Vårdal H, Klopfstein S (2022) Open access in a taxonomic sense: a morphological and molecular guide to Western Palaearctic Dusona (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 91: 83-183. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.91.83318
Specimens with molecular data
Supplementary material 5 from: Meier N, Urfer K, Haraldseide H, Vårdal H, Klopfstein S (2022) Open access in a taxonomic sense: a morphological and molecular guide to Western Palaearctic Dusona (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 91: 83-183. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.91.83318
MrBayes Input file
Supplementary material 6 from: Meier N, Urfer K, Haraldseide H, Vårdal H, Klopfstein S (2022) Open access in a taxonomic sense: a morphological and molecular guide to Western Palaearctic Dusona (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 91: 83-183. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.91.83318
P-distances
Supplementary material 2 from: Meier N, Urfer K, Haraldseide H, Vårdal H, Klopfstein S (2022) Open access in a taxonomic sense: a morphological and molecular guide to Western Palaearctic Dusona (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 91: 83-183. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.91.83318
Taxon list CH
Supplementary material 1 from: Cardoso A, Tsiamis K, Gervasini E, Schade S, Taucer F, Adriaens T, Copas K, Flevaris S, Galiay P, Jennings E, Josefsson M, López B, Magan J, Marchante E, Montani E, Roy H, von Schomberg R, See L, Quintas M (2017) Citizen Science and Open Data: a model for Invasive Alien Species in Europe. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e14811. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14811
Appendix 2.
Supplementary material 1 from: Woolfrey L (2017) Data Management Plan: Opening access to economic data to prevent tobacco related diseases in Africa. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e14837. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14837
Data quality issues: Accuracy - issues around data collection.
Supplementary material 1 from: Smith C, Todd M, Patiny L, Swain C, Southan C, Williamson A, Clark A (2016) SCINDR - The SCience INtroDuction Robot that will Connect Open Scientists. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9995. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9995
SCINDR Open Science Prize Proposal
Supplementary material 2 from: Heuer K, Ghosh S, Robinson Sterling A, Toro R (2016) Open Neuroimaging Laboratory. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9113. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9113
Cartoon showing the idea of distributed collaboration on Magnetic Resonance Imaging data.
Supplementary material 1 from: Wojnarski M, Hanken Kurtz D (2016) Paperity Central: An Open Catalog of All Scholarly Literature. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e8462. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8462
An introductory video presenting our Open Science Prize project.
Figure 1 from: Cardoso A, Tsiamis K, Gervasini E, Schade S, Taucer F, Adriaens T, Copas K, Flevaris S, Galiay P, Jennings E, Josefsson M, López B, Magan J, Marchante E, Montani E, Roy H, von Schomberg R, See L, Quintas M (2017) Citizen Science and Open Data: a model for Invasive Alien Species in Europe. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e14811. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14811
Figure 1 - Participants of the workshop on "Citizen Science and Open Data: a model for Invasive Alien Species in Europe". Image: COST Association.
Figure 4 from: Cardoso A, Tsiamis K, Gervasini E, Schade S, Taucer F, Adriaens T, Copas K, Flevaris S, Galiay P, Jennings E, Josefsson M, López B, Magan J, Marchante E, Montani E, Roy H, von Schomberg R, See L, Quintas M (2017) Citizen Science and Open Data: a model for Invasive Alien Species in Europe. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e14811. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14811
Figure 4 - Flipchart with participants notes addressing the topic "Main characteristics of a model for a citizen participation replicable across different policies" during Session 1. Image: COST Association.
Figure 3 from: Cardoso A, Tsiamis K, Gervasini E, Schade S, Taucer F, Adriaens T, Copas K, Flevaris S, Galiay P, Jennings E, Josefsson M, López B, Magan J, Marchante E, Montani E, Roy H, von Schomberg R, See L, Quintas M (2017) Citizen Science and Open Data: a model for Invasive Alien Species in Europe. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e14811. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14811
Figure 3 - Discussion of a round table through the "world café" method, addressing the topic "List of methods for mainstreaming inputs from CS in policy making including quality assurance and validations and other parameters" during Session 1. Image: COST Association.
Figure 2 from: Cardoso A, Tsiamis K, Gervasini E, Schade S, Taucer F, Adriaens T, Copas K, Flevaris S, Galiay P, Jennings E, Josefsson M, López B, Magan J, Marchante E, Montani E, Roy H, von Schomberg R, See L, Quintas M (2017) Citizen Science and Open Data: a model for Invasive Alien Species in Europe. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e14811. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14811
Figure 2 - Discussion of a round table through the "world café" method, addressing the topic "List of successful case-studies and examples of good practices in environment and IAS" during Session 1. Image: COST Association.
Figure 1 from: Woolfrey L (2017) Data Management Plan: Opening access to economic data to prevent tobacco related diseases in Africa. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e14837. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14837
Figure 1 - Tobacco Data in Africa Project Data Inventory 2016. Original data available as Suppl. material 1.
Figure 1 from: Smith C, Todd M, Patiny L, Swain C, Southan C, Williamson A, Clark A (2016) SCINDR - The SCience INtroDuction Robot that will Connect Open Scientists. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9995. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9995
Figure 1 - SCINDR, the Science Introduction Robot, watches health research being carried out and, like a good host, introduces people with shared interests, so they can do better work together.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.