Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedMay 2022View details →

FIGURE 15. The secondary structures for 22 in Study of the Subfamily Anabropsinae (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae) in China V Two new species of Anabropsis (Apteranabropsis) from Guangxi and phylogenetic analysis of the genus Anabropsis

FIGURE 15. The secondary structures for 22 tRNA genes of A. (Apteranabropsis) guangxiensis (XZ263).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2024View details →

Raw data for "Unsteady secondary flow structure at a large river confluence"

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 6 in Constraints on Phylogenetic Interrelationships among Four Free-living Litostomatean Lineages Inferred from 18S rRNA gene-ITS Region sequences and Secondary Structure of the ITS2 molecule

Fig. 6. Consensus secondary structure of the ITS2 molecule of free-living litostomateans. The ITS2 molecule shows an internal loop, radiating two helices. There is an A-G bulge in the stem of helix III.

opennotspecifiedSep 2024View details →

Table 1 in Complete mitochondrial genome of the terrestrial isopod Cubaris murina Brandt, 1833: new family gene order and novel tRNA secondary structures

<p><b>Table 1.</b> Arrangement and annotation of the mitochondrial genome of Cubaris murina.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th>Length</th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Name</th><td>Type</td><td>Start</td><td>Stop</td><td>Strand</td><td>(bp)</td><td>Start</td><td>Stop</td><td>Inter-genic space</td><td>Overlap</td></tr><tr><th>Cox1</th><td>Coding</td><td>1</td><td>1536</td><td>+</td><td>1536</td><td>ATG</td><td>TAA</td><td>1</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>trnL2(tta)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>1538</td><td>1598</td><td>+</td><td>61</td><td></td><td></td><td>48</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Cox2</th><td>Coding</td><td>1647</td><td>2282</td><td>+</td><td>636</td><td>ATA</td><td>TAG</td><td></td><td>2</td></tr><tr><th>trnK(aaa)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>2281</td><td>2336</td><td>+</td><td>56</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>8</td></tr><tr><th>trnD(gac)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>2329</td><td>2403</td><td>+</td><td>75</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>17</td></tr><tr><th>atp8</th><td>Coding</td><td>2387</td><td>2533</td><td>+</td><td>147</td><td>ATA</td><td>TAA</td><td></td><td>4</td></tr><tr><th>atp6</th><td>Coding</td><td>2530</td><td>3192</td><td>+</td><td>663</td><td>ATA</td><td>TAA</td><td>2</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Cox3</th><td>Coding</td><td>3195</td><td>3989</td><td>+</td><td>795</td><td>ATG</td><td>TAG</td><td></td><td>2</td></tr><tr><th>trnR(cga)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>3988</td><td>4055</td><td>+</td><td>68</td><td></td><td></td><td>55</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>nad3</th><td>Coding</td><td>4111</td><td>4407</td><td>+</td><td>297</td><td>ATA</td><td>TAA</td><td></td><td>9</td></tr><tr><th>trnA(gca)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>4399</td><td>4446</td><td>+</td><td>48</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>8</td></tr><tr><th>nad1 CR putative</th><td>Coding</td><td>4439 5219</td><td>5218 5360</td><td>−</td><td>780 142</td><td>ATG</td><td>TAG</td><td></td><td>14</td></tr><tr><th>NCR1</th><td>tRNA</td><td>5361</td><td>5429</td><td>+</td><td>69</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>17</td></tr><tr><th>rrnS</th><td>rRNA</td><td>5413</td><td>6139</td><td>+</td><td>727</td><td></td><td></td><td>48</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>trnW(tga)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>6188</td><td>6244</td><td>+</td><td>57</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>7</td></tr><tr><th>trnS1(aga)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>6238</td><td>6296</td><td>−</td><td>59</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>NCR2</th><td></td><td>6297</td><td>6666</td><td></td><td>370</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>trnL1(cta)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>6667</td><td>6731</td><td>−</td><td>65</td><td></td><td></td><td>29</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>cob</th><td>Coding</td><td>6759</td><td>7907</td><td>−</td><td>1,149</td><td>ATA</td><td>TAG</td><td>38</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>trnT(aca)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>7946</td><td>8017</td><td>−</td><td>72</td><td></td><td></td><td>29</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>nad5</th><td>Coding</td><td>8047</td><td>9648</td><td>+</td><td>1,602</td><td>ATG</td><td>TAG</td><td></td><td>3</td></tr><tr><th>trnF(ttc)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>9646</td><td>9707</td><td>+</td><td>62</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>15</td></tr><tr><th>trnH(cac)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>9693</td><td>9758</td><td>−</td><td>66</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>23</td></tr><tr><th>nad4</th><td>Coding</td><td>9736</td><td>11,082</td><td>−</td><td>1,312</td><td>ATA</td><td>TAA</td><td>13</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>nad4L</th><td>Coding</td><td>11,096</td><td>11,374</td><td>−</td><td>279</td><td>ATA</td><td>TAA</td><td></td><td>13</td></tr><tr><th>trnP(cca)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>11,362</td><td>11,422</td><td>−</td><td>61</td><td></td><td></td><td>25</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>nad6</th><td>Coding</td><td>11,448</td><td>11,903</td><td>+</td><td>456</td><td>ATA</td><td>TAG</td><td></td><td>2</td></tr><tr><th>trnS2(tca)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>11,902</td><td>11,962</td><td>+</td><td>61</td><td></td><td></td><td>17</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>rrnL</th><td>rRNA</td><td>11,980</td><td>12,549</td><td>−</td><td>570</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>NCR3</th><td></td><td>12,550</td><td>12,753</td><td></td><td>204</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>trnE(gaa)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>12,754</td><td>12,812</td><td>−</td><td>59</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>NCR4</th><td></td><td>12,813</td><td>12,950</td><td></td><td>138</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>trnV(gta)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>12,951</td><td>13,019</td><td>−</td><td>69</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>5</td></tr><tr><th>trnQ(caa)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>13,015</td><td>13,077</td><td>−</td><td>63</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>6</td></tr><tr><th>trnM(atg)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>13,072</td><td>13,141</td><td>+</td><td>70</td><td></td><td></td><td>25</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>nad2</th><td>Coding</td><td>13,167</td><td>14,123</td><td>+</td><td>978</td><td>ATA</td><td>TAG</td><td></td><td>15</td></tr><tr><th>trnC(tgc)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>14,109</td><td>14,158</td><td>−</td><td>50</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>trnY(tac)</th><td>tRNA</td><td>14,159</td><td>14,205</td><td>−</td><td>47</td><td></td><td></td><td>7</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

opennotspecifiedSep 2024View details →

Table 2 in Complete mitochondrial genome of the terrestrial isopod Cubaris murina Brandt, 1833: new family gene order and novel tRNA secondary structures

<p><b>Table 2.</b> Base composition (%) of nucleotide, AT content, and AT- and GC-skew of the mitochondrial genome of <i>Cubaris murina.</i> Values in bold indicate positive AT-skew.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th>Base composition (%)</th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Total</th><td></td><td>A</td><td>C</td><td>G</td><td>T</td><td>%AT</td><td>AT skew</td><td>GC skew</td></tr><tr><th>14,212 bp</th><td>28.90%</td><td>15.80%</td><td>23.40%</td><td>31.90%</td><td>60.80%</td><td>−0.049</td><td>0.194</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>Base composition (%)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Gene Strand</th><td>A</td><td>C</td><td>G</td><td>T</td><td>%AT</td><td>AT skew</td><td>GC skew</td></tr><tr><th><i>cox1</i></th><td>(+)</td><td>22.4%</td><td>18.6%</td><td>24.2%</td><td>34.8%</td><td>57.2%</td><td>−0.217</td><td>0.131</td></tr><tr><th><i>cox2</i></th><td>(+)</td><td>20.6%</td><td>21.7%</td><td>27.7%</td><td>30.0%</td><td>50.6%</td><td>−0.186</td><td>0.121</td></tr><tr><th><i>atp8</i></th><td>(+)</td><td>21.1%</td><td>15.0%</td><td>34.7%</td><td>29.3%</td><td>50.4%</td><td>−0.163</td><td>0.396</td></tr><tr><th><i>atp6</i></th><td>(+)</td><td>20.4%</td><td>19.8%</td><td>29.1%</td><td>30.8%</td><td>51.2%</td><td>−0.203</td><td>0.190</td></tr><tr><th><i>cox3</i></th><td>(+)</td><td>17.2%</td><td>23.6%</td><td>28.6%</td><td>30.6%</td><td>47.8%</td><td>−0.280</td><td>0.096</td></tr><tr><th><i>nad3</i></th><td>(+)</td><td>20.2%</td><td>16.2%</td><td>32.3%</td><td>31.3%</td><td>51.5%</td><td>−0.216</td><td>0.332</td></tr><tr><th><i>nad1</i></th><td>(−)</td><td>31.7%</td><td>22.2%</td><td>27.6%</td><td>18.6%</td><td>50.3%</td><td><b>0.260</b></td><td>0.108</td></tr><tr><th><i>NCR1</i></th><td></td><td>28.9%</td><td>27.5%</td><td>19.7%</td><td>23.9%</td><td>52.8%</td><td>0.095</td><td>−0.165</td></tr><tr><th><i>NCR2</i></th><td></td><td>27.0%</td><td>22.2%</td><td>18.1%</td><td>32.7%</td><td>59.7%</td><td>−0.095</td><td>−0.102</td></tr><tr><th><i>cob</i></th><td>(−)</td><td>36.0%</td><td>12.0%</td><td>23.5%</td><td>28.5%</td><td>64.5%</td><td><b>0.116</b></td><td>0.324</td></tr><tr><th><i>nad5</i></th><td>(+)</td><td>28.5%</td><td>10.5%</td><td>21.7%</td><td>39.3%</td><td>67.8%</td><td>−0.159</td><td>0.348</td></tr><tr><th><i>nad4</i></th><td>(−)</td><td>38.4%</td><td>11.9%</td><td>22.8%</td><td>26.9%</td><td>65.3%</td><td><b>0.176</b></td><td>0.314</td></tr><tr><th><i>nad4L</i></th><td>(−)</td><td>41.9%</td><td>12.2%</td><td>17.6%</td><td>28.3%</td><td>70.2%</td><td><b>0.194</b></td><td>0.181</td></tr><tr><th><i>nad6</i></th><td>(+)</td><td>25.7%</td><td>10.5%</td><td>17.8%</td><td>46.1%</td><td>71.8%</td><td>−0.284</td><td>0.258</td></tr><tr><th><i>NCR3</i></th><td></td><td>36.8%</td><td>9.8%</td><td>19.1%</td><td>34.3%</td><td>71.1%</td><td>0.035</td><td>0.322</td></tr><tr><th><i>NCR4</i></th><td></td><td>35.5%</td><td>13.0%</td><td>15.2%</td><td>36.2%</td><td>71.7%</td><td>−0.010</td><td>0.078</td></tr><tr><th><i>nad2</i></th><td>(+)</td><td>28.9%</td><td>12.4%</td><td>22.6%</td><td>36.1%</td><td>65.0%</td><td>−0.111</td><td>0.291</td></tr></tbody></table>

opennotspecifiedNov 2016View details →

Figure 1 in Postembryonic development, paedomorphosis, secondary sexual dimorphism and population structure of a new Florarctus species (Tardigrada, Heterotardigrada)

Figure 1. Developmental stages of the new Florarctus species, males and females.

Figure 3 from: Xie Q, Yu S, Wang Y, Rédei D, Bu W (2013) Secondary structure models of 18S and 28S rRNAs of the true bugs based on complete rDNA sequences of Eurydema maracandica Oshanin, 1871 (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae). ZooKeys 319: 363-377. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.319.4178

Figure 3 - The 3'-half part of secondary structure model of 28S rRNA of Eurydema maracandica. The numbers D8 to D11 represent four LVRs.

Figure 4 from: Xie Q, Yu S, Wang Y, Rédei D, Bu W (2013) Secondary structure models of 18S and 28S rRNAs of the true bugs based on complete rDNA sequences of Eurydema maracandica Oshanin, 1871 (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae). ZooKeys 319: 363-377. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.319.4178

Figure 4 - Secondary structure models of LVR W of Naboidea and Cimicoidea. These sequences are from 15 genera, 19 species of Naboidea and Cimicoidea. The species names and GenBank Accession numbers are as follow: Nabidae (a) Nabis ferus EF487300 (b) Nabis flavomarginatus GQ258424 (c) Himacerus apterus GQ258425; Lyctocoridae (d) Lyctocoris beneficus EF487298; Anthocoridae (e) Anthocoris sp. AY252319 (f) Anthocoris confusus EF487297 (g) Anthocoris montanus EF487307 (h) Tetraphleps aterrimus EF487295 (i) Amphiareus obscuriceps EF487301 (j) Orius agilis EF487296 (k) Physopleurella armata EF487308 (l) Montandoniola moraguesi EF487310 (m) Xylocoris cerealis GQ258395 (n) Bilia sp. GQ258406 (o) Buchananiella crassicornis GQ258407 (p) Lasiochilus japonicus GQ258410 (q) Lasiochilus luceonotatus GQ258411; Cimicidae (r) Cimex lectularius GQ258396; Curaliidae (s) Curalium cronini EU683128.

Figure 1 from: Xie Q, Yu S, Wang Y, Rédei D, Bu W (2013) Secondary structure models of 18S and 28S rRNAs of the true bugs based on complete rDNA sequences of Eurydema maracandica Oshanin, 1871 (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae). ZooKeys 319: 363-377. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.319.4178

Figure 1 - Secondary structure model of 18S rRNA of Eurydema maracandica. The bases marked in black represent length-conservative regions, and the bases labeled as capital letters B to W in red represent 13 LVRs. CP and NC represent monophyletic groups Cimicomorpha+Pentatomomorpha and Naboidea+Cimicoidea, respectively. Base pairing is indicated as follows: standard canonical pairs by lines (G–C, A–U), wobble G:U pairs by dots (G·U), A:G or A:C pairs by open circles (A○G, A○C), and other non-canonical pairs by filled circles (e.g., A●A).

Figure 2 from: Xie Q, Yu S, Wang Y, Rédei D, Bu W (2013) Secondary structure models of 18S and 28S rRNAs of the true bugs based on complete rDNA sequences of Eurydema maracandica Oshanin, 1871 (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae). ZooKeys 319: 363-377. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.319.4178

Figure 2 - The 5'-half part of secondary structure model of 28S rRNA of Eurydema maracandica. The numbers D2 to D7 represent six LVRs. PM, GO and AL represent monophyletic groups Paraphrynoveliidae+Macroveliidae, Gelastocoridae+Ochteridae and Acanthosomatidae+Lestoniidae, respectively.

Figure 27 from: Robbins RK, Heredia AD, Busby RC (2015) Male secondary sexual structures and the systematics of the Thereus oppia species group (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Eumaeini). ZooKeys 520: 109-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.520.10134

Figure 27 - Natural succession forest in Loma Larga, the type locality of Thereus lomalarga, with flowering Miconia minutiflora (Bonpl.) DC.

Figure 25 from: Robbins RK, Heredia AD, Busby RC (2015) Male secondary sexual structures and the systematics of the Thereus oppia species group (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Eumaeini). ZooKeys 520: 109-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.520.10134

Figure 25 - Male (top) and female antennae of Thereus lomalarga in ventral aspect showing nudum extent. The male has 14 nudum segments in contrast to 21 nudum segments in the female. Scale bar: 2 mm.

Figures 23-24 from: Robbins RK, Heredia AD, Busby RC (2015) Male secondary sexual structures and the systematics of the Thereus oppia species group (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Eumaeini). ZooKeys 520: 109-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.520.10134

Figures 23-24 - Female papillae anales in ventral aspect showing sclerites that characterize Thereus (arrow). Posterior of insect to the right. 23 Thereus lomalarga 24 Thereus brocki. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Figures 19-22 from: Robbins RK, Heredia AD, Busby RC (2015) Male secondary sexual structures and the systematics of the Thereus oppia species group (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Eumaeini). ZooKeys 520: 109-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.520.10134

Figures 19-22 - Female bursa copulatrix of the Thereus oppia species group. Dorsal (top) and lateral view of the ductus copulatrix. Posterior of insect to the right. 19 Thereus orasus 20 Thereus lomalarga 21 Thereus oppia 22 Thereus brocki. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Figures 15-18 from: Robbins RK, Heredia AD, Busby RC (2015) Male secondary sexual structures and the systematics of the Thereus oppia species group (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Eumaeini). ZooKeys 520: 109-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.520.10134

Figures 15-18 - Male genitalia of the Thereus oppia species group. Lateral view of capsule and penis (top) with penis tip enlarged and ventral view (bottom). Posterior of insect to the right 15 Thereus orasus (arrow points to ventral brush organ) 16 Thereus lomalarga (arrow points to position of small teeth) 17 Thereus oppia 18 Thereus brocki. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Figures 13-14 from: Robbins RK, Heredia AD, Busby RC (2015) Male secondary sexual structures and the systematics of the Thereus oppia species group (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Eumaeini). ZooKeys 520: 109-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.520.10134

Figures 13-14 - Scent patches on the ventral forewing. 13 Thereus lomalarga 14 Thereus oppia, showing the erect androconia attached to the inner margin (also in Thereus brocki), which occurs in no other Eumaeini. Superficially similar androconia are widespread in tribe Deudorigini. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

Figure 28 from: Robbins RK, Heredia AD, Busby RC (2015) Male secondary sexual structures and the systematics of the Thereus oppia species group (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Eumaeini). ZooKeys 520: 109-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.520.10134

Figure 28 - Most parsimonious cladogram for of the Thereus oppia species group with unambiguous character state changes (22 steps, CI = 81, RI = 66). Hollow circles are homoplastic changes. Numbers to right of nodes in brackets are bootstrap values. The dorsal forewing scent pad (Character 12) was unambiguously lost twice. See text for further explanation.

Figures 1-4 from: Robbins RK, Heredia AD, Busby RC (2015) Male secondary sexual structures and the systematics of the Thereus oppia species group (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Eumaeini). ZooKeys 520: 109-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.520.10134

Figures 1-4 - Adults of the Thereus oppia species group. Male (left, dorsal wing surface on left) and female (right). 1 Thereus orasus ♂ Panama, ♀ Mexico (holotype of Thecla echinita Schaus) 2 Thereus lomalarga ♂ Colombia (holotype), ♀ Colombia (paratype) 3 Thereus oppia ♂ Nicaragua, ♀ Nicaragua 4 Thereus brocki ♂ Ecuador (holotype), ♀ Ecuador (paratype). Scale bars: 1.0 cm.

Figures 5-12 from: Robbins RK, Heredia AD, Busby RC (2015) Male secondary sexual structures and the systematics of the Thereus oppia species group (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Eumaeini). ZooKeys 520: 109-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.520.10134

Figures 5-12 - 5–8 Scent pads on the dorsal forewing. 5 Thereus orasus (absent) 6 Thereus lomalarga (arrow) 7 Thereus oppia (absent) 8 Thereus brocki (arrow) 9–12 Scent patches on the dorsal hindwing, also showing the convex forewing inner margin. 9 Thereus orasus 10 Thereus lomalarga 11 Thereus oppia 12 Thereus brocki.