Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 5 in The nomenclatural status of "Anoplophallus maculatus" Cope, 1895, its consequences on the systematics of Lycodon subcinctus auctorum, and the description of a new species (Squamata: Colubridae)

FIGURE 5. Lycodon neomaculatus sp. nov. in preservative—MCZ R-175968 (holotype, adult male) A—General dorsal view; B—General ventral view; C—Lateral view of the head, right side; D—Lateral view of the head, left side; E—Dorsal view of the head; F—Ventral view of the tail with the everted hemipenes. Images not to scale. Photos by M. Gage and J. Martinez.

FIGURE 4. A in The nomenclatural status of "Anoplophallus maculatus" Cope, 1895, its consequences on the systematics of Lycodon subcinctus auctorum, and the description of a new species (Squamata: Colubridae)

FIGURE 4. A statistical summary of the L. subcinctus species complex. (A) principal components analysis (PCA) showing three discrete clusters corresponding to Lycodon neomaculatus sp. nov., L. sealei, and L. subcinctus, respectively. (B–E) Box and whisker plots showing statistically significant differences in the number of ventrals (B), subcaudals (C), total body scales (D) and subcaudal ratio values (E) between the three species.

FIGURE 1 in The nomenclatural status of "Anoplophallus maculatus" Cope, 1895, its consequences on the systematics of Lycodon subcinctus auctorum, and the description of a new species (Squamata: Colubridae)

FIGURE 1. Colubrid snake species involved in the case of Anoplophallus maculatus Cope, 1895.—USNM 7339, previously considered the holotype of "Lycodon maculatus" reported by Liu et al. (2023): A—General dorsal view; B—General ventral view; C—Dorsal view of the head; D—Lateral view of the head, left side; E—Live specimen of Leptodeira maculata (= Megalops maculatus) from Minatitlán, Colima, Mexico; F—Live specimen of Lycodon subannulatus from Penang Island, Malaysia, of which Nymphophidium maculatum is a junior synonym. Images not to scale. Photos by T. Hsu (A–D), C. Grünwald (E), J. L. Lee (F).

FIGURE 8 in The nomenclatural status of "Anoplophallus maculatus" Cope, 1895, its consequences on the systematics of Lycodon subcinctus auctorum, and the description of a new species (Squamata: Colubridae)

FIGURE 8. Lycodon neomaculatus sp. nov. in life (not collected, sex not determined): A, B—Hong Kong, China (adult, subadult; respectively); C—Qiongzhong, Hainan, China (adult); D—Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China; E—Pu Mat NP, Nghe An, Vietnam; F—Ma Da NR, Dong Nai, Vietnam (adult); G—Cat Tien NP, Dong Nai, Vietnam (subadult); H—Loc Bac, Lam Dong, Vietnam (adult); I—Phuoc Binh NP, Ninh Thuan, Vietnam (adult); J—Hinhurp, Vientiane, Laos (subadult); K—Kompong Seila, Seihanuk, Cambodia (adult); L—Chai Prakarn, Chiang Mai, Thailand (subadult); M—Mae Yom NP, Phrae, Thailand (adult); N—Wang Nam Khiao, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand (adult); O—Kaeng Krachan NP, Phetchaburi, Thailand (subadult). Photos by: A. Tomaszek (A, B); C.X. Liao (C); Z.H. Ma (D); P.S. Hamilton (E); H.X.N. Nguyen (F); A.M. Bragin (G, I); N.A. Poyarkov (H); T. Calame (J); T. Samnang (K); A. Kaosung (L); R. Grassby-Lewis (M, N); A. Pierce (O).

FIGURE 12 in The nomenclatural status of "Anoplophallus maculatus" Cope, 1895, its consequences on the systematics of Lycodon subcinctus auctorum, and the description of a new species (Squamata: Colubridae)

FIGURE 12. Distribution ranges of Lycodon neomaculatus sp. nov. Numbers indicate various localities where the species have been recorded (see Appendix Table S6 for the details of localities).

FIGURE 7 in The nomenclatural status of "Anoplophallus maculatus" Cope, 1895, its consequences on the systematics of Lycodon subcinctus auctorum, and the description of a new species (Squamata: Colubridae)

FIGURE 7. Differences in dorsal body band coloration in preservative between Lycodon neomaculatus sp. nov. (A, B) and L. subcinctus (C, D). A—FMNH 180149 from Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand; B—CAS 229729 from Tanintharyi, Myanmar; C—FMNH 229855 from Selangor, Malaysia; D—FMNH 183772 from Selangor, Malaysia. Images not to scale. Photos by J.L. Lee.

FIGURE 11 in The nomenclatural status of "Anoplophallus maculatus" Cope, 1895, its consequences on the systematics of Lycodon subcinctus auctorum, and the description of a new species (Squamata: Colubridae)

FIGURE 11. Distribution ranges of Lycodon sealei, L. subcinctus, and L. cf. subcinctus (Nicobar Island). Notes: numbers indicate different localities where the species have been recorded (see Appendix Table S5 for the details of localities).

opennotspecifiedJan 2024View details →

TABLE 2 in A review and analysis of the early nomenclature and taxonomy associated with the genus name Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae subfam. Kalanchooideae), published by Michel Adanson (1727 - 1806) in 1763, with notes on the late- 18 century taxonomy of the genus

TABLE 2. Information about, and identity of, material mentioned,typically by means of phrase names, in the pre-Linnaean (i.e., pre-1753) literature references cited by Adanson (1763), Rumphius (1747), and Linnaeus (1738). “ K.” = “ Kalanchoe ”.<table><tbody><tr><th>#</th><th>Reference [Reference as cited in this paper]</th><th>Phrase name</th><th>Identity of material</th><th>Geographical origin</th></tr><tr><th>A. References included in Adanson (1763)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>1.</th><td>Rumph. 5. t. 95. [Rumphius (1747: 276 and “ Tab. XCV ” on the facing p.)]</td><td>i. Cotyledon foliis laciniatis Hort. Cliffort. p. 175</td><td>K. laciniata</td><td>Not stated; Africa according to Linnaeus (1738: 175)</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>ii. Cotyledon Afra, folio crasso, lato, laciniato, flosculo aureo. Boerh. Ind. H. L. B. part. I. p. 288</td><td>K. laciniata</td><td>Africa</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>iii. Telephium Africanum, angustiore folio, flore aurantiaco. Plukn. Almag. p. 362. Tab. 228. Fig. 3.</td><td>Possibly K. crenata given that Plukenet (1696: 362) gave the flower colour as orange</td><td>Africa (Plukenet obtained material from The Netherlands)</td></tr><tr><th>2.</th><td>Boerh. I. B. t. 288. [Boerhaave (1720: 288)]</td><td>Cotyledon; Afra; folio crasso, lato, laciniato, flosculo aureo. Telephium, maximum, Africanum, flore aurantio. Ex Cod. Bent. Plukn. Phyt. 228 3? H. R. D.</td><td>Probably K. laciniata</td><td>Africa</td></tr><tr><th>3.</th><td>Camell. [Camello (1704: 6, no. 18)]</td><td>Telephium Sempervivum, seu Sinarum Kalanchauhuy</td><td>K. laciniata</td><td>Not stated</td></tr><tr><th>B. References included in Rumphius (1747) [see rows A.1.i–A.1.iii, above]</th></tr><tr><th>4.</th><td>Hort. Cliffort. p. 175. [Linnaeus (1738: 175)]</td><td>See rows C.6 and C.7, below</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>5.</th><td>Plukn. Almag. p. 362. Tab. 228. Fig. 3. [Plukenet (1692: t. 228, 1696: 362)]</td><td>See row A.1.iii, above, and C.7, below</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>C.</th><td>References included in Linnaeus (1738: 175) [both C.6 and C.7 were cited under COTYLEDON foliis laciniatis]</td></tr><tr><th>6.</th><td>Boerh. lugdb. 1. p. 288 t. 288. [Boerhaave (1720: 288)]</td><td>Cotyledon afra, folio crasso lato laciniato, flosculo aureo</td><td>Probably K. laciniata</td><td>Africa</td></tr><tr><th>7.</th><td>Pluk. alm. 362. t. 228. f. 3. [Plukenet (1692: t. 228, Figure 3, 1696: 362])</td><td>Telephium africanum, angustiori folio, flore aurantiaco1</td><td>Possibly K. crenata, given that Plukenet (1696: 362) gave the flower colour as orange</td><td>Africa (Plukenet obtained material from The Netherlands)</td></tr></tbody></table>1 As discussed in the main text, in this instance the wrong phrase name was cited by Linnaeus (1738: 175), and by Rumphius (1747: 276), for that matter. It should have been “ Telephium maximum Africanum flore aurantiaco, ex Cod. Benting Phytogr. Tab. 228 fig. 3. Itèm ex Hollandiâ habuimus”.

opennotspecifiedJan 2024View details →

TABLE 1 in A review and analysis of the early nomenclature and taxonomy associated with the genus name Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae subfam. Kalanchooideae), published by Michel Adanson (1727 - 1806) in 1763, with notes on the late- 18 century taxonomy of the genus

TABLE 1. Additional information included by Adanson (1763: 248, 530, 614) when he published the genus name Kalanchoe and provided a description for the genus (on p. 248). The information tabulated here is discussed in detail in the main text.<table><tbody><tr><th>#</th><th>Information provided by Adanson (1763) for the genus name Kalanchoe</th><th>Explanation</th></tr><tr><th>A. p. 248</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>1.</th><td>Kalanchoè</td><td>Genus name [with a grave accent on the ‘ è ’]</td></tr><tr><th>2.</th><td>Chin.</td><td>Linguistic or geographical origin of the name</td></tr><tr><th>3.</th><td>Tjsacarbebe. Rumph. 5. t. 95.</td><td>Vernacular name and reference to Rumphius (1747)</td></tr><tr><th>4.</th><td>Cotyledon. Boerh. I. B. t. 288.</td><td>Reference to a pre-Linnaean phrase name in Boerhaave (1720)</td></tr><tr><th>B. p. 530 (under the letter ‘C’)</th></tr><tr><th>5.</th><td>KALANCHOE.[;] Sin.[;] Camell. 248</td><td>Genus name [without a grave accent on the ‘E’][;] linguistic or geographical origin of the name[;] reference to Camello (1704) and p. 248 of Adanson</td></tr><tr><th>6.</th><td>Tsjakarbebe.[;] Rumph.</td><td>Vernacular name; and reference to Rumphius (1747)</td></tr><tr><th>7.</th><td>Cotyledon. Boerh.</td><td>Reference to a pre-Linnaean phrase name in Boerhaave (1720)</td></tr><tr><th>C. p. 614</th></tr><tr><th>8.</th><td>Tsjakarbebe. Rumph.[;] V. Kalanchoè</td><td>Vernacular name and reference to Rumphius (1747) [;] vide the genus name [on p. 248], again with a grave accent on the ‘ è ’</td></tr></tbody></table>

FIGURE 9 in Resolving phylogenetic and classical nomenclature: A revision of Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 (Gastropoda: Neostromboidae)

FIGURE 9. Terebellum Röding, 1798. A. Terebellum delicatum Kuroda & Kawamoto in Kawamoto & Tanabe, 1956, Khánh Hòa, Nha Trang, Vietnam, length 27 mm (NMR 54693). B. Terebellum hubrechti Poppe & Tagaro, 2016, Caubian Deep, Bohol, Philippine, length 33.2 mm (image Conchology Inc.). C. Terebellum simoni Dekkers et al., 2019, Bohol Island, Philippines, length 50.6 mm (Paratype 1, AMD STR2269). D. Terebellum terebellum. D1. Vanuatu, length 63.4 mm (Coll. Guido and Philippe Poppe, 464722). D2. Solomon Islands, size unknown (NMR 44172). D3. Solomon Islands, size unknown (NMR 54964). D4. Leyte, Philippines, length 41.3 mm (Coll. Guido and Philippe Poppe, 378696).

FIGURE 6. Dimeza Deshayes, 1865, Miniseraphs Jung 1974 in Resolving phylogenetic and classical nomenclature: A revision of Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 (Gastropoda: Neostromboidae)

FIGURE 6. Dimeza Deshayes, 1865, Miniseraphs Jung 1974 and Mauryna de Gregorio 1880. A. Diameza fragilis (Defrance, 1825), MNHN A28784, Collection de Paleontologie, Paris, length 6.9 mm (Caze et al. 2010, figs. 20A, C & E). B. Miniseraphs eratoides (Cossmann, 1889), MNHN A28785, Collection de Paleontologie, Paris, length 8.3 mm (Caze et al. 2010, figs. 20F–H). C. Miniseraphs isabella (Deshayes, 1865), MNHN A28783, Collection de Paleontologie, Paris, length 7.5 mm (Caze et al. 2010, figs. 20M–O). D. Mauryna plicata (d'Archiac & Haime, 1853), NMB H15324, length 51 mm.

FIGURE 5. Seraphs Montfort, 1810. A in Resolving phylogenetic and classical nomenclature: A revision of Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 (Gastropoda: Neostromboidae)

FIGURE 5. Seraphs Montfort, 1810. A. Seraphs minus (Vincent, 1913), length 7.1 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 6, figs. 9, 10). B. Seraphs naricus (Vredenberg, 1925), holotype, GSI 12614, length 38.6 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 6, figs. 20–22). C. Seraphs olivaceus (Cossmann, 1889), MNHN A28577, Collection de Paleontologie, Paris, length 32 mm (Caze et al. 2010, figs. 6H, I). D. Seraphs peterjungi Caze et al., 2010, holotype, MNHN A28578, Collection de Paleontologie, length 16 mm (Caze et al. 2010, figs. 15J, K, N). E. Seraphs placiferus (Bayan, 1870), lectotype, MNHN G2100, length 33.7 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 7, figs. 5–7). F. Seraphs sopita (Brander, 1766), lectotype, NHMUK GG21010, length 26.4 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 1, figs. 1–3). G. Seraphs squamosus (Martin, 1914), Lectotype, RGM, Leiden St10344, length 37.1 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 6, figs. 17–19). H. Seraphs striatus (von Koenen, 1889), holotype, length 38.5 mm (von Koenen 1889, pl. I, figs. 7A–C). I. Seraphs subconvolutus (d'Orbigny, 1852), lectotype, MNHN UBT65-2-120, length 28 mm (Caze et al. 2010, figs. 14A, B). J. Seraphs volutatus (Brander, 1766), MNHN A28776, Collection de Paleontologie, Paris, length 17 mm (Caze et al. 2010, figs. 6A–C).

FIGURE 1. The single tnt generated maximum likelihood cladogram showing internal cladistic relationships within Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 in Resolving phylogenetic and classical nomenclature: A revision of Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 (Gastropoda: Neostromboidae)

FIGURE 1. The single tnt generated maximum likelihood cladogram showing internal cladistic relationships within Seraphsidae Jung, 1974.

FIGURE 2 in Resolving phylogenetic and classical nomenclature: A revision of Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 (Gastropoda: Neostromboidae)

FIGURE 2. Temporal distribution of Seraphsidae Jung, 1974: solid lines indicate presence; dotted lines indicate a geological discontinuities and hypothetical internal relationship.

FIGURE 8 in Resolving phylogenetic and classical nomenclature: A revision of Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 (Gastropoda: Neostromboidae)

FIGURE 8. Pseudoterebellum new genus and Terebellum Röding, 1798. A. Pseudoterebellum diversiornatum (Eames, 1952), holotype, NHMUK GG68239, length 10.1 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 14, figs. 12–14). B. Pseudoterebellum oympiae (Rolando, 2001), holotype, MGPD 28168, length 20.9 mm (Rolando 2001, fig. 2). C. Pseudoterebellum saudiensis (Abbass, 1972), holotype, ASU S53, length 25 mm (Abbass 1972, pl. V, figs. 1, 2). D. Terebellum cinctum Martin, 1916, holotype, RGM St10337, length 34.7 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 13, figs. 4, 6). E. Terebellum obtusum Sowerby, 1840, holotype, NHMUK GG21000, length 42.2 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 13, figs. 17, 18). F. Terebellum papilliferum Martin, 1916, lectotype, RGM St10339, length 28 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 13, figs. 9, 11).

FIGURE 4. Seraphs Montfort, 1810. A in Resolving phylogenetic and classical nomenclature: A revision of Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 (Gastropoda: Neostromboidae)

FIGURE 4. Seraphs Montfort, 1810. A. Seraphs andersoni (Dickerson, 1917), holotype, CAS Department of Geology 434, length 38 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 9, fig. 5). B. Seraphs belemnitus (Palmer, 1953), PRI 29236, length 48.2 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 6, figs. 12–14). C. Seraphs caracassense (Leymerie, 1846), BMNH G50180, length 51.3mm (Jung 1974, pl. 4, figs. 10, 11). D. Seraphs chilophorus (Cossmann, 1889), MNHN A28779, Collection de Paleontologie, Paris, length 29 mm (Caze et al. 2010, figs. 15A, B, D). E. Seraphs hernandoensis (Mansfield, 1937), holotype, USNM 495948, length 31.4 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 9, figs. 7–9). F. Seraphs kaindraperi new sp., holotype, USNM 135098, length 50.6 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 5, figs. 3, 4). G. Seraphs leukoleptus Jung, 1974, neotype, MNHN A28781, Collection de Paleontologie, Paris, length 27.6 mm (Caze et al. 2010, figs. 11F, H, I). H. Seraphs mayeri Jung, 1974, holotype, NMB H16579, length 21.4 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 8, figs. 16–18).

FIGURE 3. The clade Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 in Resolving phylogenetic and classical nomenclature: A revision of Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 (Gastropoda: Neostromboidae)

FIGURE 3. The clade Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 derived from character analysis and contextualised with the fossil record showing the ancestral Seraphsinae and crown clade Pseudoterebellinae both new subfamilies.

FIGURE 7. Paraseraphs Jung, 1974. A in Resolving phylogenetic and classical nomenclature: A revision of Seraphsidae Jung, 1974 (Gastropoda: Neostromboidae)

FIGURE 7. Paraseraphs Jung, 1974. A. Paraseraphs ameri (Abbass, 1967), Holotype, EMC, Gastropod Section, G363, incomplete (Abbass 1967, p. 61, pl. VIII, fig. 6). B. Paraseraphs armoricensis (Cossmann, 1897), Dumas Collection, length 22.7 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 10, figs. 16–18). C. Paraseraphs cantamessae Maxwell et al., 2018a, holotype, USNM 135097A, length 56.9 mm (Maxwell et al. 2018a, fig. 1). D. Paraseraphs erraticus (Cooper, 1894)), UCMP 15820, length 26.8 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 12, figs. 8–10). E. Paraseraphs placitus Jung, 1974, holotype, NMB H14491, length 22.7 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 10, figs. 16–18). F. Paraseraphs praecedens Caze et al., 2010, holotype, MNHN A05707, Collection de Paleontologie, Paris, length 19 mm (Caze et al. 2010, figs. 29E, F). G. Paraseraphs procerus (Merian, 1844), holotype, NMB H14374, length 71.8 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 12, figs. 1, 2). H. Paraseraphs propedistortus (de Gregorio, 1880), NMB H14509, length 53.2 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 11, figs. 12–13). I. Paraseraphs tetanus Jung, 1974, holotype, NMB H15409, length 28.7 mm (Jung 1974, pl. 10, figs. 5–7). J) Paraseraphs texanopsis Garvie, 2013, Texas Natural Science Centre, UT(Austin), NPL46617, length 53.3 mm (Garvie 2013, pl. 1, figs. 10, 11).

opennotspecifiedApr 2012View details →

FIGURE 1. A–C. Polystachya masayensis, A. Habit. B. Inflorescence detail. C in Things are seldom what they seem: the nomenclature of Polystachya masayensis (Orchidaceae)

FIGURE 1. A–C. Polystachya masayensis, A. Habit. B. Inflorescence detail. C. Labellum outline, based on C.H. Lankester 1081 (AMES). D. Polystachya elatior, labellum outline, based on L.O. Williams et al. 23880 (EAP-5624). A–B, Modified from Romero & Carnevali (2000) with permission of the authors. C–D. Drawn by L. Peraza.