Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedNov 2015View details →

Fig. 1 in Phylogeography of three closely related myrmecophytic pioneer tree species in SE Asia: implications for species delimitation

Fig. 1 Study sites and geographic distribution of cpDNA haplotypes found in M. constricta, M. griffithiana, and M. motleyana. Circle sizes are proportional to population sample sizes. Individual haplotypes are defined by different colors (for haplotype numbers see Table 1, Fig. 2)

Fig. 5 in Systematics and phylogenetic species delimitation within Polinices s.l. (Caenogastropoda: Naticidae) based on molecular data and shell morphology

Fig. 5 Pictures of type specimens and protoconchs of a Nerita mammilla Linnaeus, 1758 [ZMUU#386] b Mamma albula Chemnitz, 1758 [nonbinomial, ZMUC] and c Natica pyriformis Recluz, 1844 [BMNH#1991089.1]. For further information see Table 1. Bars 0.5 cm

Fig. 3 in Systematics and phylogenetic species delimitation within Polinices s.l. (Caenogastropoda: Naticidae) based on molecular data and shell morphology

Fig. 3 Phylogram obtained through Bayesian inference based on the COI gene fragment. Posterior probabilities are indicated at the nodes. Branches supported by values>0.95 are indicated in bold. Polytomies are due to the cut-off value specified for the consensus tree (50 % used as the default value in MrBayes)

Fig. 2 in Systematics and phylogenetic species delimitation within Polinices s.l. (Caenogastropoda: Naticidae) based on molecular data and shell morphology

Fig. 2 Phylogram obtained through Bayesian inference based on the concatenated data set (COI, 16S, 18S, 28S, H3) for a reduced number of taxa. Posterior probabilities are indicated at the nodes. Branches supported by values>0.95 are indicated in bold. Polytomies are due to the cut-off value specified for the consensus tree (50 % used as the default value in MrBayes)

Fig. 6 in Systematics and phylogenetic species delimitation within Polinices s.l. (Caenogastropoda: Naticidae) based on molecular data and shell morphology

Fig. 6 Analysed type specimens or figured type specimens of taxa that could potentially represent Polinices sp. 2, Polinices sp. 3 or Polinices sp. 4. a Natica controversa Pritchard & Gatliff, 1913 [MV#F7695]. b Natica dubia Récluz, 1844 [BMNH#1991085] (0 P. constanti Huelsken and Hollmann, herein; replacement name). c Natica deiodosa Reeve, 1855 [BMNH#1991069]. d Uber mellosum Hedley, 1924 [AMS#C20058]. e Natica phytelephas Reeve 1855 [BMNH#1991096]. f Polinices putealis Garrard, 1961 [AMS#C63344]. g Natica jukesii Reeve, 1855 [BMNH#1991067]. (h) Polinices tawhitirahia Powell, 1965 [Auckland Museum #71242]. i Natica vavaosi Reeve, 1855 [figured type]. j Natica galactites Philippi, 1851 [figured type]. k Natica cygnea Philippi, 1850 [figured type]. l Natica virginea Philippi, 1850 [figured type]. For further information see Table 1. Bars 0.5 cm

opennotspecifiedDec 2011View details →

Fig. 5 a 95 in Using haplotype networks, estimation of gene flow and phenotypic characters to understand species delimitation in fungi of a predominantly Antarctic Usnea group (Ascomycota, Parmeliaceae)

Fig. 5 a 95% probability haplotype network for the U. sphacelata group based on a combined dataset of ribosomal IGS and ITS and protein-coding RPB1 sequences. The 3-step nesting level is shown. Haplotypes are represented by colored circles according to the sample localities. The circle size is proportional to the number of sequences sharing a haplotype, except for haplotype H5 comprising too many

opennotspecifiedOct 2011View details →

Fig. 3 in Phenotypical plasticity and homoplasy complicate species delimitation in the Cladonia gracilis group (Cladoniaceae, Ascomycota)

Fig. 3 Results of PTLPT analysis, actual tree length compared to the tree lengths for 1,000 artificially recombined

opennotspecifiedOct 2011View details →

Fig. 1 in Phenotypical plasticity and homoplasy complicate species delimitation in the Cladonia gracilis group (Cladoniaceae, Ascomycota)

Fig. 1 Phylogeny of the C. gracilis group. 50% Majority Rule Bayesian tree based on a combined data set including ITS rDNA, IGS and RPB2. Branches supported with posterior probability ≥0.95 and

Fig. 7 in Species delimitation in Ceratozamia (Zamiaceae) from Southwestern Mexico, in light of reproductive and climatic diversification

Fig. 7 Disintegration phenophase of Ceratozamia in Soconusco. A Beginning of disintegration phenophase of C. matudae. B Seed release of C. matudae. C Timing of disintegration of Ceratozamia

Fig. 2 in Species delimitation in Ceratozamia (Zamiaceae) from Southwestern Mexico, in light of reproductive and climatic diversification

Fig. 2 Vegetative characteristics of Ceratozamia species in habitat. A C. alvarezii (population 1 from Cintalapa), B C. mirandae (population 4 from Villaflores), C C. norstogii (population 1 from Cintalapa), D C. matudae (population 1 from Acacoyagua), E C. vovidesii (population 1 from La Concordia)

Fig. 1 in Species delimitation in Ceratozamia (Zamiaceae) from Southwestern Mexico, in light of reproductive and climatic diversification

Fig. 1 Distribution of Ceratozamia in the Soconusco region. The small symbols indicate species records from herbaria, whereas the large symbols indicate sampled populations

Fig. 4 in Species delimitation in Ceratozamia (Zamiaceae) from Southwestern Mexico, in light of reproductive and climatic diversification

Fig. 4 Phenotypic variation of ovulate strobili. A Ceratozamia mirandae from Villaflores (1), (2) population 4; (3) population 1; (4) population 3. B C. alvarezii from Cintalapa (1), (2) populations 1 and 2. Scale bar = 5 cm

Fig. 8 The haplotype network for Ceratozamia species. A CyAG. B matK. C in Species delimitation in Ceratozamia (Zamiaceae) from Southwestern Mexico, in light of reproductive and climatic diversification

Fig. 8 The haplotype network for Ceratozamia species. A CyAG. B matK. C ITS region. The area of the circles is proportional to haplotype frequency

opennotspecifiedFeb 2016View details →

Figure 9. Phylogenetic relationships within the Xiphinema americanum-group complex. Bayesian 50 in Cryptic diversity and species delimitation in the Xiphinema americanum-group complex (Nematoda: Longidoridae) as inferred from morphometrics and molecular markers

Figure 9. Phylogenetic relationships within the Xiphinema americanum-group complex. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from D2-D3 expansion segments of 28S rRNA sequence alignment under the general time reversible model with invariable sites and gamma-shaped distribution. Posterior probabilities more than 65% are given for appropriate clades; bootstrap values greater than 50% are given on appropriate clades in the maximum likelihood analysis. Sequences newly obtained in this study are in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site.

Figure 19 in Intraspecific or interspecific variation: delimitation of species boundaries within the genus Gammarus (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridae), with description of four new species

Figure 19. Gammarus parvioculus sp. nov., male. A, head; B, antenna 1; C, antenna 2; D, upper lip; E, right incisor and lacinia mobilis; F, left mandible; G, lower lip; H, left maxilla 1; I, outer plate of left maxilla 1; J, maxilla 2; K, maxilliped; L, inner plate of maxilliped; M, palp of right maxilla 1.

Figure 12 in Intraspecific or interspecific variation: delimitation of species boundaries within the genus Gammarus (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridae), with description of four new species

Figure 12. Gammarus clarus sp. nov., male, A–F; female, G–J. A, pleopod 1; B, pleopod 2; C, pleopod 3; D, uropod 1; E, uropod 2; F, uropod 3; G, oostegite of gnathopod 2; H, oostegite of pereopod 3; I, oostegite of pereopod 4; J, oostegite of pereopod 5.

Figure 11 in Intraspecific or interspecific variation: delimitation of species boundaries within the genus Gammarus (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridae), with description of four new species

Figure 11. Gammarus clarus sp. nov., male. A, pereopod 3; B, pereopod 4; C, pereopod 5; D, pereopod 6; E, pereopod 7; F, dactyle of pereopod 7; G, dactyle of pereopod 4.

Figure 14 in Intraspecific or interspecific variation: delimitation of species boundaries within the genus Gammarus (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridae), with description of four new species

Figure 14. Gammarus hypolithicus sp. nov., male. A, head; B, antenna 1; C, antenna 2; D, upper lip; E, left mandible; F, incisor of right mandible; G, lower lip; H, left maxilla 1; I, palp of right maxilla 1; J, maxilla 2; K, maxilliped; L, dactylus of palp of maxilliped.

Figure 18 in Intraspecific or interspecific variation: delimitation of species boundaries within the genus Gammarus (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridae), with description of four new species

Figure 18. Gammarus hypolithicus sp. nov., female. A, gnathopod 1; B, gnathopod 2; C, propodus of gnathopod 1; D, propodus of gnathopod 2; E, oostegite of gnathopod 2; F, oostegite of pereopod 3; G, oostegite of pereopod 4; H, oostegite of pereopod 5.