Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2005View details →

Fig. 2 in A Collection Of Amphibians From West Sumatra, With Description Of A New Species Of Megophrys (Amphibia: Anura)

Fig. 2. Lateral view of head of Megophrys parallela, new species (Paratype FMNH 264512). Scale bar = 5 mm.

Fig. 3 in Rana Siberu Dring, & Whitten, 1990 - A First Record For Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae)

Fig. 3. Ventral aspect of preserved Rana siberu (ZRC.1.10536). Note darkly pigmented throat, scattered light spots, enlarged humeral glands (length 4.2 mm), and lack of nuptial pads.

Fig. 1 in Rana Siberu Dring, & Whitten, 1990 - A First Record For Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae)

Fig. 1. Live adult male Rana siberu Dring, McCarthy & Whitten, 1990 (ZRC.1.10536; SVL 39.5 mm) from Lakum forest reserve, Pahang, Peninsular Malaysia. Note (i) uninterrupted dorsolateral stripe (bright orange in live) from snout tip to vent; (ii) lack of spots/ blotches on dorsum and immediately below dorsolateral stripes; (iii) spots, instead of barrings, on hindlimbs. Photographed by C. C. Lim.

Fig. 6 in Larval Descriptions Of Some Poorly Known Tadpoles From Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Anura)

Fig. 6. Dorsal aspect of recent emergent of Rhacophorus appendiculatus (Stage 46). Note symmetrical pale areas on axilla, upper arm to elbow, knee, heel and around vent.

Fig. 10 in Larval Descriptions Of Some Poorly Known Tadpoles From Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Anura)

Fig. 10. Lateral (A) and dorsal (B) aspects of Rhacophorus tunkui larva (Stage 37). Note presence of three distinct dark spots on midline of tail muscle, immediately posterior to body-tail junction.

Fig. 9 in Larval Descriptions Of Some Poorly Known Tadpoles From Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Anura)

Fig. 9. Freshly hatched embryos of Rhacophorus tunkui dropping into receptacle of water provided for them below.

Fig. 5 in Larval Descriptions Of Some Poorly Known Tadpoles From Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Anura)

Fig. 5. Lateral (A) and dorsal (B) aspects of Rhacophorus appendiculatus larva (Stage 40). Note presence of pale spots/ blotches along tail muscle.

Fig. 8 in Larval Descriptions Of Some Poorly Known Tadpoles From Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Anura)

Fig. 8. In-situ ovophagy by a juvenile Xenochrophis trianguligerus (ZRC.2.5623, total length 28.2cm) on the freshly deposited ova (unpigmented) of Rhacophorus tunkui. Photographed by Andrew Tay (04 Jan.2003).

Fig. 7 in Larval Descriptions Of Some Poorly Known Tadpoles From Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Anura)

Fig. 7. Lateral (A) and dorsal (B) aspects of Rhacophorus cyanopunctatus larva (Stage 31). Note uniformly black head-body and tail muscle, fins largely unpigmented.

Fig. 1 in Larval Descriptions Of Some Poorly Known Tadpoles From Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Anura)

Fig. 1. Dorsal aspect of larval Microhyla annectens; depicting (from left to right) early (Stage 31), advanced (Stage 42) and emergent (Stage 46). Note anteriorly directed mouth (lower labium not expanded) and lack of thread-like terminal tail filament.

Fig. 3 in Larval Descriptions Of Some Poorly Known Tadpoles From Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Anura)

Fig. 3. Lateral (A) and dorsal (B) aspects of Limnonectes laticeps larva (Stage 37). Note persistence of pronounced yolk sac, despite well developed hind limb buds.

Fig. 2 in Larval Descriptions Of Some Poorly Known Tadpoles From Peninsular Malaysia (Amphibia: Anura)

Fig. 2. Lateral (A) and dorsal (B) aspects of Microhyla berdmorei larva (Stage 39). Note anteriorly directed mouth (lower labium not expanded) and absence of terminal tail filament.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in Thorius narismagnus (Amphibia: Plethodontidae): rediscovery at the type locality and detection of a new population

Fig. 1. Locations of historical collection localities and the new localities of Thorius narismagnus in Los Tuxtlas region, Mexico.

Fig. 76 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)

Fig. 76. Strict consensus of 25,872 most parsimonious trees of 46,520 steps: relationships among dendrobatids. Numbers above branches are Bremer support values. Numbers following terminal names are unique sample identifiers. Terminals without numbers or with alphanumeric identifiers (GenBank numbers) were not sequenced for the present study or Frost et al. (2006) and were taken from GenBank. Unidentified species taken from GenBank are labeled as originally published. Upper right inset shows entire cladogram and corresponding figure numbers, with present view in black.

Fig. 68 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)

Fig. 68. Length variation in character 142, retroarticular process of the mandible. A: nocturnus, AMNH 130041. B: riveroi, AMNH 134142. C: vittatus, AMNH 118386. D: lehmanni Myers and Daly, AMNH118442. E: pratti, AMNH118364. F: ''Neblina species'', AMNH 118667.

Fig. 72 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)

Fig. 72. Strict consensus of 25,872 most parsimonious trees of 46,520 steps: relationships among dendrobatids. Numbers above branches are Bremer support values. Numbers following terminal names are unique sample identifiers. Terminals without numbers or with alphanumeric identifiers (GenBank numbers) were not sequenced for the present study or Frost et al. (2006) and were taken from GenBank. Unidentified species taken from GenBank are labeled as originally published. Upper right inset shows entire cladogram and corresponding figure numbers, with present view in black.

Fig. 74 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)

Fig. 74. Strict consensus of 25,872 most parsimonious trees of 46,520 steps: relationships among dendrobatids. Numbers above branches are Bremer support values. Numbers following terminal names are unique sample identifiers. Terminals without numbers or with alphanumeric identifiers (GenBank numbers) were not sequenced for the present study or Frost et al. (2006) and were taken from GenBank. Unidentified species taken from GenBank are labeled as originally published. Upper right inset shows entire cladogram and corresponding figure numbers, with present view in black.

Fig. 62. Character 105, reproductive amplexus. State 2 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)

Fig. 62. Character 105, reproductive amplexus. State 2, cephalic amplexus (anthonyi, AMNH live exhibit) shown in anterior (A) and lateral (B) aspects.

Fig. 63. Character 109, dorsal larval transport. State 1 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)

Fig. 63. Character 109, dorsal larval transport. State 1, present (fraterdanieli, specimens at UVC). This male nurse frog was transporting 12 tadpoles.

Fig. 57 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)

Fig. 57. Anterior view of the open mouth of the dendrobatid praderioi (CPI 10203) showing the short, tapered median lingual process (MLP).