Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURES 48–57. Callientomon chinensis Yin, 1980, specimen from the Russian Far East. 48 in Identification and character analysis of the Acerentomidae (Protura) of the northeastern Palearctic (Protura: Acerentomidae)

FIGURES 48–57. Callientomon chinensis Yin, 1980, specimen from the Russian Far East. 48) Tergite I, right side. 49) Tergite XI, left side. 50) Prosternum, left side. 51) Mesosternum, left side. 52) Metasternum, left side. 53) Accessory seta on sternite VI. 54) Seta β1 on foretarsus. 55) Seta δ4 on foretarsus. 56) Sternite I. 57) Sternite VII. Arrows show pores. Scale bar: 20 µm.

FIGURES 44–47 in Identification and character analysis of the Acerentomidae (Protura) of the northeastern Palearctic (Protura: Acerentomidae)

FIGURES 44–47. Yamatentomon yamato (Imadaté &Yosii, 1956), specimen from the Russian Far East. 44) Seta β1 on foretarsus; 45) Seta δ4 and sensillum c' on foretarsus; 46) Male squama genitalis, left side; 47) Sternites VI–VII. Arrows show pores. Scale bar: 20 µm.

FIGURES 37–43. Nipponentomon khabarovskense Nakamura, 2004, holotype. 37 in Identification and character analysis of the Acerentomidae (Protura) of the northeastern Palearctic (Protura: Acerentomidae)

FIGURES 37–43. Nipponentomon khabarovskense Nakamura, 2004, holotype. 37) Pseudoculus with setae l3 and sd4. 38) Cephalic seta sd5. 39) Tergite I, frontal part. 40) Tergite I, lateral part. 41) Sternites II and III. Arrows show pores. Nipponentomon bidentatum Nakamura, 2004, holotype. 42) Pseudoculus with setae l3 and sd4. 43) Cephalic seta sd5. Scale bar: 20 µm.

FIGURES 11–17 in Identification and character analysis of the Acerentomidae (Protura) of the northeastern Palearctic (Protura: Acerentomidae)

FIGURES 11–17. Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977). 11) Head. 12) Pseudoculus. 13) Maxillary palpus. 14) Labial palpus. 15) Canal of maxillary gland. 16) Foretarsus, exterior view. 17) Foretarsus, interior view. Arrows show pores. Figs. 12– 14, paratype a; others, holotype. Scale bar: 20 µm.

FIGURES 18–36 in Identification and character analysis of the Acerentomidae (Protura) of the northeastern Palearctic (Protura: Acerentomidae)

FIGURES 18–36. Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977). 18) Thoracic nota. 19) Tergite I. 20) Tergite VI. 21) Tergite VII. 22) Tergites VIII–XII. 23) Prosternum. 24) Mesosternum. 25) Metasternum. 26) Seta A2 on prosternum. 27) Sternite I. 28) Sternite II. 29) Sternite VI. 30) Sternite VII. 31) Seta P1a on tergite VII. 32) Seta P1a on sternite VI. 33) Anterolateral part of tergite VII. 34) Comb of tergite VIII. 35) Female squama genitalis. 36) Sternites VIII–XII. Arrows show pores. Figs. 34, 35, paratype b; Figs. 23–25, paratype a; others, holotype. Scale bar: 20 µm.

FIGURES 5–7 in Identification and character analysis of the Acerentomidae (Protura) of the northeastern Palearctic (Protura: Acerentomidae)

FIGURES 5–7. Known distribution of proturan genera. 5) Filientomon Rusek, 1974. 6) Yamatentomon Imadaté, 1964. 7) Verrucoentomon Rusek, 1974.

FIGURES 2–4 in Identification and character analysis of the Acerentomidae (Protura) of the northeastern Palearctic (Protura: Acerentomidae)

FIGURES 2–4. Known distribution of proturan genera. 2) Baculentulus Tuxen, 1977. 3) Tuxenentulus Imadaté, 1973. 4) Sugaentulus Imadaté, 1978.

FIGURE 1 in Identification and character analysis of the Acerentomidae (Protura) of the northeastern Palearctic (Protura: Acerentomidae)

FIGURE 1. Locations of Protura investigated from Siberia and the Russian Far East. 1, Turukhanski area; 2, middle flow of Ob River; 3, middle flow of Enisey River; 4, near Lake Baikal; 5, Altaj mountains; 6, West Sayan mountains; 7, near Yuzno- Sakchalinsk on Sakhalin Island; 8, near Magadan City; 9, near Khabarovsk City; 10, near Spassk City; 11, near Vladivostok City; 12, near Nachodka City.

FIGURE 8-10 in Identification and character analysis of the Acerentomidae (Protura) of the northeastern Palearctic (Protura: Acerentomidae)

FIGURE 8-10. Known distribution of proturan genera. 8) Yavanna Szeptycki, 1988. 9) Nipponentomon Imadaté & Yosii, 1959. 10) Imadateiella Rusek, 1974.

FIGURE 11a–b in A phylogenetic analysis of the aquatic weevil tribe Bagoini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) based on morphological characters of adults

FIGURE 11a–b. Morphological analysis. Synapomorphies and autapomorphies plotted on the Bayesian consensus tree. Numbers above branches refer to the character, numbers below branches refer to the state of the character. Red dots: synapomorphies unique for the clade. Blue dots: autapomorphies unique for the species. Black dots: synapomorphies and autapomorphies not unique for the clade or species. White dots: reversals. Outgroup taxa not reported to increase readability of the Bagoini clade.

FIGURE 6 in A phylogenetic analysis of the aquatic weevil tribe Bagoini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) based on morphological characters of adults

FIGURE 6. Penis in dorsal and lateral view of (A) Bagous (Hydrillaebagous) hydrillae; (B) Bagous (Macropelmus) tempestivus; (C and D) Bagous (Macropelmus) affaber; (E) Bagous (Macropelmus) lutosus; (F) Bagous (Macropelmus) exilis; (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) cylindricus; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) dieckmanni; (I) Bagous (Macropelmus) peregrinus. Not at the same scale.

FIGURE 10 in A phylogenetic analysis of the aquatic weevil tribe Bagoini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) based on morphological characters of adults

FIGURE 10. Morphological analysis—type species only. Bayesian consensus tree (50% majority rule). Taxa in bold font: valid taxa recognized in the present work; larger font: genera, smaller font: subgenera. Taxa in regular font: synonyms in the present work. Numbers above branches: support values, in percentage, in the following order: posterior probability (BI) / bootstrap value (ML) / symmetric resampling (MP); 'ns' means that the group was present, but its support was <50%; 'np' means that the group was not present. Number below branches: Bremer support in the MP analysis. Scale bar unit: expected changes of state per character. MP analysis: length 146, consistency index = 0.70, retention index = 0.78.

FIGURE 3 in A phylogenetic analysis of the aquatic weevil tribe Bagoini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) based on morphological characters of adults

FIGURE 3. Prosternum of (A) Hydronomus alismatis; (B) Memptorrhynchus crispus: (C) Bagous (Hydronoplus) longulus; (D) Bagous (Macropelmus) geniculatus. Elytra of (E) Bagous (Macropelmus) tubulus; (F) Bagous (Macropelmus) elegans; (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) trapae. Anterior leg of (H) Memptorrhynchus crispus; (I) Bagous (Macropelmus) fragosus; (J) Bagous (Macropelmus) trapae. Not at the same scale.

FIGURE 1 in A phylogenetic analysis of the aquatic weevil tribe Bagoini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) based on morphological characters of adults

FIGURE 1. Rostrum in lateral view of (A) Hydronomus alismatis; (B) Memptorrhynchus crispus; (C) Bagous (Parabagous) guttatus; (D) Bagous (Hydronoplus) longulus. Rostrum in dorsal view of (E) Hydronomus alismatis; (F) Memptorrhynchus crispus; (G) Bagous (Hydronoplus) longulus; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) tubulus. Not at the same scale. Scale references are not reported in this and following figures since the illustrations are only meant to show the characters used for the phylogenetic inference.

FIGURE 4 in A phylogenetic analysis of the aquatic weevil tribe Bagoini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) based on morphological characters of adults

FIGURE 4. Habitus of Azollaebagous clarencensis, in (A) dorsal and (B) lateral view; Bagous (Hydrillaebagous) hydrillae, in (C) dorsal and (D) lateral view. Venter of (E) Bagous (Bagous) binodulus; (F) Memptorrhynchus crispus. Detail of ventrite 1 after removal of scales of (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) affaber; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) collignensis. Not at the same scale.

FIGURE 5 in A phylogenetic analysis of the aquatic weevil tribe Bagoini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) based on morphological characters of adults

FIGURE 5. Penis in dorsal view of (A) Hydronomus alismatis; (B) Memptorrhynchus brevipennis; (C) Bagous (Parabagous) costulatus; (D) Bagous (Parabagous) longirostris; (E) Bagous (Bagous) binodulus; (F) Bagous (Bagous) robustus; (G) Azollaebagous clarencensis; (H) Bagous (Bagous) josephi. Not at the same scale.

FIGURE 2 in A phylogenetic analysis of the aquatic weevil tribe Bagoini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) based on morphological characters of adults

FIGURE 2. Pronotum of (A) Bagous (Macropelmus) setosus; (B) Bagous (Macropelmus) argillaceus; (C) Bagous (Bagous) binodulus. Antenna of (D) Bagous (Parabagous) guttatus; (E) Bagous (Macropelmus) geniculatus. Fore tarsus of (F) Bagous (Parabagous) guttatus; (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) trapae. Detail of elytra of (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) limosus. Not at the same scale.

FIGURE 12. Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I in A phylogenetic analysis of the aquatic weevil tribe Bagoini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) based on morphological characters of adults

FIGURE 12. Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I analysis. Bayesian consensus tree (50% majority rule). Codes after the species name are GenBank Accession Numbers. Scale bar unit: expected substitutions per site.

FIGURE 7 in A phylogenetic analysis of the aquatic weevil tribe Bagoini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) based on morphological characters of adults

FIGURE 7. Penis in dorsal and lateral view of (A) Bagous (Macropelmus) geniculatus; (B) Bagous (Macropelmus) humeridens; (C) Bagous (Macropelmus) tuberculatus; (D) Bagous (Macropelmus) nodulosus; (E) Bagous (Macropelmus) collignensis; (F and G) Bagous (Macropelmus) limosus; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) humeralis; (I) Bagous (Macropelmus) adelaidae. Not at the same scale.

FIGURE 9 in A phylogenetic analysis of the aquatic weevil tribe Bagoini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) based on morphological characters of adults

FIGURE 9. Morphological analysis—all species. Bayesian consensus tree (50% majority rule). Numbers above branches: support values, in percentage, in the following order: posterior probability (BI) / bootstrap value (ML) / symmetric resampling (MP); 'ns' means that the group was present, but its support was <50%; 'np' means that the group was not present. Number below branches: Bremer support in the MP analysis. Scale bar unit: expected changes of state per character. MP analysis: length 261, consistency index = 0.61, retention index = 0.83. Outgroup taxa not reported to increase readability of the Bagoini clade.