Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 5 in 'Dawn' hexapods in Cenozoic ambers (Diplura: Campodeoidea)

Figure 5. Photomicrographs of Lepidocampa glaesi, M-982, in Miocene Dominican amber. A, detail of head and thorax in dorsal view. B, detail of abdomen.

Figure 3 in 'Dawn' hexapods in Cenozoic ambers (Diplura: Campodeoidea)

Figure 3. Photomicrographs of holotype of Lepidocampa glaesi, AMNH DR-KLCa001, in Miocene Dominican amber. A, detail of pretarsus of left leg III, showing the laminar lateral process. B, same pretarsus as in A, showing the claw. C, detail of pretarsus of left leg II. D, detail of scales. E, detail of femora of left leg III, showing the two ventral macrosetae. F, detail of cupuliform organ. G, detail of an abdominal stylus and post macrosetae of abdominal segment VIII.

Figure 2 in 'Dawn' hexapods in Cenozoic ambers (Diplura: Campodeoidea)

Figure 2. Camera lucida drawings of holotype of Lepidocampa glaesi, AMNH DR-KLCa001, in Miocene Dominican amber. A, detail of pretarsus of left leg III. B, detail of pretarsus of left leg II. C, detail of stylus. D, ventral habitus. E, detail of cupuliform organ of left antenna.

Figure 11 in 'Dawn' hexapods in Cenozoic ambers (Diplura: Campodeoidea)

Figure 11. Dorsal photomicrograph of holotype of Rostricampa engeli, AMNH DR-KLCa002, in Miocene Dominican amber. A, dorsolateral habitus. B, detail of head in lateral view. C, detail of anterior part of the head.

Figure 1 in 'Dawn' hexapods in Cenozoic ambers (Diplura: Campodeoidea)

Figure 1. Ventral photomicrograph of holotype of Lepidocampa glaesi, AMNH DR-KLCa001, in Miocene Dominican amber.

Figure 8 in 'Dawn' hexapods in Cenozoic ambers (Diplura: Campodeoidea)

Figure 8. Camera lucida drawings of holotype of Litocampa eobaltica, AMNH Ba-JVe66, in Eocene Baltic amber. A, detail of thorax, showing the distribution of macrosetae. B, detail of basal antennomeres. C, dorsal habitus. D, detail of stylus. E, detail of pretarsus and tibia of leg II; asterisk indicates the ventral macroseta on the tibia. F, detail of pretarsus and tibia of leg III; asterisk indicates the ventral macroseta on the tibia. Abbreviation: c, calcar.

Figure 6 in 'Dawn' hexapods in Cenozoic ambers (Diplura: Campodeoidea)

Figure 6. Computed tomography scan images of Lepidocampa glaesi, M-982, in Miocene Dominican amber. A, ventral habitus. B, dorsal habitus. Both to the same scale.

opennotspecifiedJul 2016View details →

Figs 14–25 in Redescription and synonymies of Diplura macrura (C. L. Koch, 1841) and D. lineata (Lucas, 1857), with notes on the genus (Araneae, Dipluridae)

Figs 14–25. Diplura lineata (Lucas, 1857). 14. ♀, habitus, dorsal. — 15–21. ♂, left leg I. 15. Tibial spur, retrolateral. 16. Tibial spur and metatarsal clasper, ventral. 17. Left palp, retrolateral. 18–21. Bulb detail. 18. Retrolateral. 19. Prolateral. 20. Ventral. 21. Dorsal. — 22–25. ♀. 22. Maxilla with lyra. 23. Lyra detail, SEM. 24. Maxilla with lyra, SEM. 25. Vulva, dorsal. Scale = 1 mm, unless otherwise noted.

opennotspecifiedJul 2016View details →

Figs 2–13 in Redescription and synonymies of Diplura macrura (C. L. Koch, 1841) and D. lineata (Lucas, 1857), with notes on the genus (Araneae, Dipluridae)

Figs 2–13. Diplura macrura (C.L. Koch, 1841). 2. ♀, habitus dorsal. — 3–9. ♂, left leg I. 3. Tibial spur, retrolateral. 4. Tibial spur and metatarsal clasper, ventral. 5. Left palp, retrolateral. 6–9. Left bulb. 6. Retrolateral. 7. Prolateral. 8. Ventral. 9. Dorsal. — 10–13. ♀. 10. Maxilla with lyra. 11. Lyra detail, SEM. 12. Maxilla with lyra, SEM. 13. Vulva, dorsal. Scale = 1 mm, unless otherwise noted.

Fig. 4 in The homology of cephalic muscles and endoskeletal elements between Diplura and Ectognatha (Insecta)

Fig. 4 Transversal SR-μCT section through the head of Atlasjapyx. a The connection of hypopharyngeal fulturae with a part of the galea (ga) and the location of the anterior hypopharyngeal sclerite (ahys); b Transversal slice slightly further posterior to show the course of the ahys and hypopharyngeal fulturae around the mandible; c The contact

Fig. 7 3D in The homology of cephalic muscles and endoskeletal elements between Diplura and Ectognatha (Insecta)

Fig. 7 3D reconstruction of SR-μCT data of the mandibles (md) and associated musculature of Atlasjapyx in dorsal view. Muscle designations are explained in the main text. For clarity, each muscle is shown only on one side

Fig. 6 3D in The homology of cephalic muscles and endoskeletal elements between Diplura and Ectognatha (Insecta)

Fig. 6 3D reconstruction of SR-μCT data of the antennae and labrum and associated musculature of Atlasjapyx. a Dorsal view of right antenna; b Ventral view of right antenna; c Frontal view of labrum. Abbreviations: fl flagellum, lbr labrum, pe pedicellus, sc scapus. Muscle designations are explained in the main text

Fig. 3 3D in The homology of cephalic muscles and endoskeletal elements between Diplura and Ectognatha (Insecta)

Fig. 3 3D reconstruction of SR-μCT data of the mandible, maxilla, hypopharyngeal fulturae, gnathal pouch and associated muscles of Atlasjapyx. a Dorsal view; b Lateral view showing the relative position of the maxilla and the general structure of the hypopharyngeal fulturae. Abbreviations: ahf anterior part of hypopharnygeal fulturae, ahys anterior hypopharyngeal sclerite, cca connection to cardo, chf central part of hypopharnygeal fulturae, phf posterior part of hypopharnygeal fulturae, phx pharynx, pomd sclerotized part of the pouch near the mandible, pomx sclerotized part of the pouch near the maxilla, tb tendon body, tpo thin part of gnathal pouch, tw tendon wing. Muscle designations are explained in the main text

Fig. 2 in The homology of cephalic muscles and endoskeletal elements between Diplura and Ectognatha (Insecta)

Fig. 2 SEM micrographs of the head of Atlasjapyx. a Lateral view; b Frontal view; c Detail of the antennal and labral base in frontal view; d Detail of the admentum and labrum in frontal view. Abbreviations: adm admentum, ads admental suture, anf antennifer, car circumantennal ridge, cly clypeus, clys clypeolabral suture, ga galea, iar interantennal ridge, lbr

Fig. 10 in The homology of cephalic muscles and endoskeletal elements between Diplura and Ectognatha (Insecta)

Fig. 10 Evolution of endoskeletal elements mapped on a transcriptome based phylogenetic tree of Hexapoda (Misof et al. 2014). Shapes of mouthparts, muscles and endoskeletal elements are shown as simplified models, same forms and colours indicate putative homologous structures. Note that the mouthparts of Protura and Diplura have a prognathous

Figures 8 in REVIEW Diplura in caves: diversity, ecology, evolution and biogeography

Figures 8. Distribution of cave-adapted diplurans: A, worldwide; B, Euro-Mediterranean region. In yellow: karst areas (source: Chen et al., 2017). In orange: deserts (source: Olson & Dinerstein, 2002). In blue: ice cover during the Last Glacial Maximum (source: Ehlers et al., 2011). In black: hypogenic karst areas (source: Klimchouk, 2007).

Figure 1 in REVIEW Diplura in caves: diversity, ecology, evolution and biogeography

Figure 1. Maximum likelihood (ML) trees of Diplura. A, ML tree obtained from 18S rDNA data available in Genbank. B, ML tree obtained from COI data. Only bootstrap support values above 70 are shown.

Figure 7 in REVIEW Diplura in caves: diversity, ecology, evolution and biogeography

Figure 7. Pretarsal adaptations in cave-adapted campodeid species: A, Lepidocampa beltrani from Caverna Batu, La Reúnion Island, France; B, Turkmenocampa mirabilis from Kaptarhana cave, Koytendog District, Lebap, Turkmenistan; C, Anisuracampa sp. from Win Twin Cave, Ywangan, Shan State, Myanmar; D, Patrizicampa sardoa from Grotta di Mesu'e Monte, Baunei, Sardinia, Italy.

Figure 3. Cave-adapted dipluran species described from 1871 in REVIEW Diplura in caves: diversity, ecology, evolution and biogeography

Figure 3. Cave-adapted dipluran species described from 1871 to 2020; photographs of the authors arranged from right to left and from top to bottom: Alpheus Spring Packard, Armand Viré, Filippo Silvestri, Jean Robert Denis, Petr Wygodzinsky, Boris Pimenovitch Chevrizov, Bruno Condé, Jean Pagés and Mark Alan Muegge. Courtesy of Bernd Hauser, Sergei Golovatch and Ernest C. Bernard.

Figures 4 in REVIEW Diplura in caves: diversity, ecology, evolution and biogeography

Figures 4. Two cave-adapted Diplura: A, Plusiocampa hoffmanni Sendra & Paragamian, 2020 from Spilaio Sfento Trypa Cave, Crete, Greece (author: Kaloust Paragamian); B, Gollumjapyx smeagol from Avenc d'En Serenge, Cabanes, Castellón, Spain. Courtesy of José María Azkárraga.