Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Figures 1 and 2 in New data on distribution, ecology, and taxonomy of Turkish Nitidulidae (Coleoptera)

Figures 1 and 2. Ovipositors of Xerogethes kraatzii (Reitter, 1871) (Figure 1) and of X. osellai Audisio & Jelínek, 2000 (Figure 2); female specimens of both species collected ca. 2 km S of Bozca (Turkey, Nevşehir Province).

Figure 5 in Biodiversity, DNA barcoding data and ecological traits of caddisflies (Insecta, Trichoptera) in the catchment area of the Mediterranean karst River Cetina (Croatia)

Figure 5. Maximum likelihood phylogram based on a fragment of COI (DNA barcode region) showing the related relationships of the genus Glossosoma. The bootstrap values (BS) are marked on the branches in the order NJ/ML. BS values less than 80 are not shown. The groups delineated by ABGD approach are shown on the right side of the tree. Specimens which genomic DNA was extracted in this study are written in bold letter.

Figure 1 in Biodiversity, DNA barcoding data and ecological traits of caddisflies (Insecta, Trichoptera) in the catchment area of the Mediterranean karst River Cetina (Croatia)

Figure 1. Map of the study area with sampling stations. Names and corresponding abbreviations of the stations are listed in Table 1.

Figure 3 in Biodiversity, DNA barcoding data and ecological traits of caddisflies (Insecta, Trichoptera) in the catchment area of the Mediterranean karst River Cetina (Croatia)

Figure 3. MDS analysis of caddisfly fauna similarity at stations on the Cetina, the Ruda, the Grab and the Rumin rivers.

Figure 2 in Biodiversity, DNA barcoding data and ecological traits of caddisflies (Insecta, Trichoptera) in the catchment area of the Mediterranean karst River Cetina (Croatia)

Figure 2. Cluster analysis of caddisfly fauna similarity at stations on the rivers Cetina, Ruda, Grab and Rumin.

opencc-zeroAug 2024View details →

Arthropod Trophic Ecology Data

Data on arthropod trophic guilds & feeding structures compiled from the following sources:  Aanen, D.K. and Eggleton, P., 2005. Fungus-growing termites originated in African rain forest. Current biology, 15(9), pp.851-855. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.043">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.043</a> Aanen, D.K., Eggleton, P., Rouland-Lefevre, C., Guldberg-Frøslev, T., Rosendahl, S. and Boomsma, J.J., 2002. The evolution of fungus-growing termites and their mutualistic fungal symbionts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(23), pp.14887-14892. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.222313099">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.222313099</a> Adams, E.C.G., Salmon, J.T., 1972. The mouth-parts and feeding methods of Brachystomella parvula (Schaeffer) (Collembola: Brachystomellidae). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 124, 269–286. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1972.tb00366.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1972.tb00366.x</a> Bartlett, C.R., Deitz, L.L., Dmitriev, D.A., Sanborn, A.F., Soulier‐Perkins, A. and Wallace, M.S., (2018). The Diversity of the True Hoppers (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Volume 2. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.501-590. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch19">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch19</a> Bicha, W.J., (2018). Biodiversity of Mecoptera. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Volume 2. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.705-720. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch23">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch23</a> Blanke, A. (2019). The Early Evolution of Biting–Chewing Performance in Hexapoda. In: Krenn, H. (eds) Insect Mouthparts. Zoological Monographs, vol 5. Springer, Cham. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_6">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_6</a> Borkent, A. 2008. The frog-biting midges of the world (Corethrellidae: Diptera). Zootaxa 1804: 1–456. <a href="https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1804.1.1">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1804.1.1</a> Borkent, A. 2009. Chaoboridae (Phantom Midges). Pages 365-367 in Brown, B. V.; A. Borkent; J. M. Cumming; D. M. Wood; N. E. Woodley & M. A. Zumbado, eds., Manual of Central America Diptera. Volume 1. NRC Research Press, Ottawa.  Bouchard, P., Smith, A.B., Douglas, H., Gimmel, M.L., Brunke, A.J. and Kanda, K., (2017). Biodiversity of Coleoptera. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.337-417. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch11">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch11</a> Bradler, S., T. R. Buckley. (2018). Biodiversity of Phasmatodea. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Volume 2. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.281-313. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch11">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch11</a> Brandão, C.R.F., Feitosa, R.M. and Diniz, J.L., 2015. Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical Myrmicinae ant genus Blepharidatta Wheeler. Zootaxa, 4012(1), pp.33-56. <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4012.1.2">https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4012.1.2</a> Branstetter, M.G., Je&scaron;ovnik, A., Sosa-Calvo, J., Lloyd, M.W., Faircloth, B.C., Brady, S.G. and Schultz, T.R., 2017. Dry habitats were crucibles of domestication in the evolution of agriculture in ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1852), p.20170095. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0095">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0095</a> Carmean, D. (1991) Biology of the Trigonalyidae (Hymenoptera), with notes on the vespine parasitoid Bareogonalos canadensis. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 18, 209–214. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1991.10757968">https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1991.10757968</a> Cavalleri, A. and Kaminski, L.A., 2014. Two new ectoparasitic species of Aulacothrips Hood, 1952 (Thysanoptera: Heterothripidae) associated with ant-tended treehoppers (Hemiptera). Systematic Parasitology, 89, pp.271-278. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-014-9526-z">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-014-9526-z</a> Cavalleri, A., Kaminski, L.A. and Mendonça Jr, M.D.S., 2010. Ectoparasitism in Aulacothrips (Thysanoptera: Heterothripidae) revisited: host diversity on honeydew-producing Hemiptera and description of a new species. Zoologischer Anzeiger-A Journal of Comparative Zoology, 249(3-4), pp.209-221. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2010.09.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2010.09.002</a> Cavalleri, A., Kaminski, L.A. and Mendonca Jr, M.S., 2012. A new ectoparasitic Aulacothrips (Thysanoptera: Heterothripidae) from Amazon rainforest and the significance of variation in antennal sensoria. Zootaxa, 3438(1), pp.62-68. <a href="https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3438.1.4">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3438.1.4</a> Chapin, K.J. and Hebets, E.A., 2016. The behavioral ecology of amblypygids. Journal of Arachnology, pp.1-14. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1636/V15-62.1">https://doi.org/10.1636/V15-62.1</a> Chen, H., Lahey, Z., Talamas, E.J., Valerio, A.A., Popovici, O.A., Musetti, L., Klompen, H., Polaszek, A., Masner, L., Austin, A.D. and Johnson, N.F., 2021. An integrated phylogenetic reassessment of the parasitoid superfamily Platygastroidea (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupomorpha) results in a revised familial classification. Systematic Entomology, 46(4), pp.1088-1113. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12511">https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12511</a> Chouvenc, T., &Scaron;obotník, J., Engel, M.S., Bourguignon, T., 2021. Termite evolution: mutualistic associations, key innovations, and the rise of Termitidae. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 2749–2769. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03728-z">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03728-z</a> Coddington, J. A., Colwell, R.K. 2001. Arachnids Pages 199-218 in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Volume 1. Academic Press. San Diego, CA. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00016-X">https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00016-X</a> Colombo, W.D., Tribull, C.M., Waichert, C. and Azevedo, C.O., 2022. Integrative taxonomy solves taxonomic impasses: a case study from Epyrinae (Hymenoptera, Bethylidae). Systematic Entomology, 47(3), pp.504-529. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12544">https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12544</a> Courtney, G.W., Pape, T., Skevington, J.H. and Sinclair, B.J. (2017). Biodiversity of Diptera. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 229-278. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch9">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch9</a> David J. Lohman & Venancio U. Samarita (2009) The biology of carnivorous butterfly larvae (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Miletinae: Miletini) and their ant‐tended hemipteran prey in Thailand and the Philippines, Journal of Natural History, 43:9-10, 569-581. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930802610485">https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930802610485</a> De Clercq, P. (2008). Predatory Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae, Asopinae). Pages 3042-3045 in: Capinera, J.L. (eds) Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer, Dordrecht. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_3115">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_3115</a> Devetak, D., Kloko, V., 2016. The feeding biology of adult lacewings (Neuroptera): a review. Trends in Entomology 12, 29–42. Donald, C.L., Siriyasatien, P. and Kohl, A., 2020. Toxorhynchites species: a review of current knowledge. Insects, 11(11), p.747. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11110747">https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11110747</a> Donovan, S.E., Eggleton, P., Bignell, D.E., 2001. Gut content analysis and a new feeding group classification of termites. Ecological Entomology 26, 356–366. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2001.00342.x">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2001.00342.x</a> Eberhard, M.J., Schoville, S.D. and Klass, K.D. (2018). Biodiversity of Grylloblattodea and Mantophasmatodea. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Volume 2. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.335-357. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch13">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch13</a> Ferrar P. 1987. A guide to the breeding habits and immature stages of Diptera Cyclorrhapha. Entomonograph. 8:1–907. Fialho, V.S., Chamorro-Rengifo, J., Lopes-Andrade, C. and Yotoko, K.S.C., 2014. Systematics of spiny predatory katydids (Tettigoniidae: Listroscelidinae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest based on morphology and molecular data. PloS one, 9(8), p.e103758. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103758">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103758</a> Foelix, R., 2011. Biology of Spiders. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press, New York. Foote, B.A., 1995. Biology of Shore Flies. Annual Review of Entomology 40, 417–442. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.002221">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.002221</a> Fowles, T.M., Coscarón, M.d.C., Panizzi, A.R., Carroll, S.P. (2015). Scentless Plant Bugs (Rhopalidae). In: Panizzi, A., Grazia, J. (eds) True Bugs (Heteroptera) of the Neotropics. Entomology in Focus, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9861-7_20">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9861-7_20</a> Galli, L., Capurro, M., Colasanto, E., Molyneux, T., Murray, A., Torti, C., Zinni, M., 2020. A synopsis of the ecology of Protura (Arthropoda: Hexapoda). Revue suisse de Zoologie 126, 155–164. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.346344">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.346344</a> Garnier-Sillam, E., Toutain, F., Villemin, G. and Renoux, J., 1989. Preliminary studies of the particular combs of the xylophageous termite Sphaerotermes sphaerothorax (Sjöstedt). Insectes Sociaux, 36, pp.293-312. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224882">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224882</a> Gimmel, M.L., Ferro, M.L. (2018). General Overview of Saproxylic Coleoptera. In: Ulyshen, M. (eds) Saproxylic Insects. Zoological Monographs, vol 1. Springer, Cham. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75937-1_2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75937-1_2</a> Grimaldi, D. & Engel, M.S. 2005. Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press. <a href="https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q118956339">https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q118956339 </a> GRONENBERG, W., BRANDÃO, C.R.F., DIETZ, B.H. and JUST, S., 1998. Trap‐jaws revisited: the mandible mechanism of the ant Acanthognathus. Physiological Entomology, 23(3), pp.227-240. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3032.1998.233081.x">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3032.1998.233081.x</a> Hancock, R.G., Boyd, T., MacFadden, S., Sowders, A., Foster, W.A., Lounibos, L.P., 2022. Mosquitoes Eating Mosquitoes: How Toxorhynchites amboinensis, Psorophora ciliata, and Sabethes cyaneus (Diptera: Culicidae) Capture Prey. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 115, 461–471. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saac017">https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saac017</a> Harrington, B.J., 1988. Comments on the blood-feeding tribe Cleradini (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae: Rhyparochrominae) and description of a new genus and new species with the legs modified for grasping. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 81(4), pp.577-580. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/81.4.577">https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/81.4.577</a> Harvey, M.S., 2002. The neglected cousins: what do we know about the smaller arachnid orders? The Journal of arachnology, 30(2), pp.357-372. <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/3706280">https://www.jstor.org/stable/3706280 </a> Henry, T.J. (2017). Biodiversity of Heteroptera. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 279–335. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch10">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch10</a> Hogan, J., Bass, A.I., Zhang, Y.M. and Sharanowski, B.J., 2019. Integrating multiple sources of biodiversity information greatly expands the range of a rare species of Hymenoptera (Vanhorniidae). Biodiversity Data Journal, 7. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e37569">https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e37569</a> Holzenthal, R.W., Blahnik, R.J., Prather, A.L., Kjer, K.M., 2007. Order Trichoptera Kirby, 1813 (Insecta), Caddisflies*. Zootaxa 1668, 639–698. <a href="https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1668.1.29">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1668.1.29</a> Huber, J.T., (2017). Biodiversity of Hymenoptera. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.419-461. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch12">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch12</a> Izzo, T.J., Pinent, S.M. and Mound, L.A., 2002. Aulacothrips dictyotus (Heterothripidae), the first ectoparasitic thrips (Thysanoptera). Florida Entomologist, 85(1), pp.281-283. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2002)085[0281:ADHTFE]2.0.CO;2">https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2002)085[0281:ADHTFE]2.0.CO;2</a> Javahery, M., Schaefer, C.W. and Lattin, J.D., 2000. Shield bugs (Scutelleridae). Heteroptera of Economic Importance. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp.475-503. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041859-15">https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041859-15</a> Jennings, J. and Austin, A., 2004. Biology and host relationships of aulacid and gasteruptiid wasps (Hymenoptera: Evanioidea): a review. Pages 187-215 in: Perspectives on Biosystematics and Biodiversity. K Rajmohana, K Sudheer, P Girish Kumar, S Santhosh, eds. University of Calicut, Kerala, India.  Kaltenbach, A., 2021. Saginae. Saltatoria-Tettigoniidae. Pages 1-95 in Das Tierreich. Teilband 103. De Gruyter, Berlin. Kathirithamby, J., (2018). Biodiversity of the Strepsiptera. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Volume 2. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.673-703. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch22">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch22</a> Keiper, J.B., Walton, W.E. and Foote, B.A., 2002. Biology and ecology of higher Diptera from freshwater wetlands. Annual Review of Entomology, 47(1), pp.207-232. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145159">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145159</a> Klass, K.D., Nalepa, C. and Lo, N., 2008. Wood-feeding cockroaches as models for termite evolution (Insecta: Dictyoptera): Cryptocercus vs. Parasphaeria boleiriana. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 46(3), pp. 809-817. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.028">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.028</a> Knight, K. L. 1947. The Aedes (Mucidus) mosquitoes of the Pacific (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 37: 315–325. <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/24531923">https://www.jstor.org/stable/24531923 </a> Koenig, D. P. & Young, C. W. (2007): First observation of parasitic relations between big-headed flies, Nephrocerus Zetterstedt (Diptera: Pipunculidae) and crane flies, Tipula Linnaeus (Diptera: Tipulidae: Tipulinae), with larval and puparial descriptions for the genus Nephrocerus. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 109: 52–65. <a href="https://biostor.org/reference/55328">https://biostor.org/reference/55328</a>  Krenn H.W. (2019) Fluid-Feeding Mouthparts. In: Krenn H. (eds) Insect Mouthparts. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_3">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_3</a> Krenn H.W. (2019) Form and Function of Insect Mouthparts. In: Krenn H. (eds) Insect Mouthparts. Zoological Monographs, vol 5. Springer, Cham. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_2</a> Krenn, H.W., 2010. Feeding Mechanisms of Adult Lepidoptera: Structure, Function, and Evolution of the Mouthparts. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 307–327. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085338">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085338</a> Lehane, M.J. (1991). The blood-sucking insect groups. In: Biology of Blood-Sucking Insects. Springer, Dordrecht. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7953-9_9">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7953-9_9</a> Lent, H. and Wygodzinsky, P., 1979. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), and their significance as vectors of Chagas__ disease. Bulletin of the American museum of Natural History, 163(3), pp.123-520. <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/2246/1282">http://hdl.handle.net/2246/1282</a> Lo, N., Eggleton, P., 2010. Termite Phylogenetics and Co-cladogenesis with Symbionts, in: Bignell, D.E., Roisin, Y., Lo, N. (Eds.), Biology of Termites: A Modern Synthesis. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 27–50. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3977-4_2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3977-4_2</a> McCafferty, W.P., Provonsha, A.V., 1986. Comparative mouthpart morphology and evolution of the carnivorous heptageniidae (Ephemeroptera). Aquatic Insects 8, 83–89. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01650428609361236">https://doi.org/10.1080/01650428609361236</a> Meehan, C.J., Olson, E.J., Reudink, M.W., Kyser, T.K. and Curry, R.L., 2009. Herbivory in a spider through exploitation of an ant–plant mutualism. Current biology, 19(19), pp.R892-R893. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.049">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.049</a> Mendes, D.M., Chamorro-Rengifo, J. and Rafael, J.A., 2016. A new genus of predatory katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Listroscelidinae) from the Amazonian Rainforest. Zootaxa, 4162(3), pp.594-600. <a href="https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4162.3.12">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4162.3.12</a> Moore, W., Brusca, R. C., Shuster, S. M. (2016). Invertebrates. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Mound LA Palmer JM . 1983. The generic and tribal classification of spore-feeding Thysanoptera (Phlaeothripidae: Idolothripinae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Entomology)46: 1-174. <a href="https://biostor.org/reference/165">https://biostor.org/reference/165</a> Naskrecki, P., 2001. Grasshoppers and their relatives. Pages 247-264 in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Volume 3. Academic Press. San Diego, CA. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00140-1">https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00140-1</a> Oswald, J. D., R. J. P. Machado, (2018). Biodiversity of the Neuropterida (Insecta: Neuroptera, Megaloptera, and Raphidioptera). In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Volume 2. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.627-672. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch21">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch21</a> Panizzi AR, Schaefer CW, Natuhara Y (2000) Broad-headed bugs (Alydidae). In: Schaefer CW, Panizzi AR (eds) Heteroptera of economic importance. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 321–336 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041859-11">https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041859-11</a> Peck, S. B. 2006. Distribution and biology of the ectoparasitic beaver beetle Platypsyllus castoris Ritsema in North America (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Platypsyllinae). Insecta Mundi 20: 85– 94. <a href="https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/108">https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/108</a> Pierce, N.E. and Dankowicz, E., 2022. The natural history of caterpillar-ant associations. In Caterpillars in the Middle: Tritrophic Interactions in a Changing World (pp. 319-391). Cham: Springer International Publishing. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86688-4_11">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86688-4_11</a> Pierce, N.E., 1995. Predatory and parasitic Lepidoptera: carnivores living on plants. Journal of the Lepidopterists__ Society, 49(4), pp.412-453. Polaszek, A. (1991). Egg parasitism in Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) with special reference to Centrodora and Encarsia species. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 81(1), 97-106. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300053293">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300053293</a> Polaszek, A. and Vilhemsen, L., 2023. Biodiversity of hymenopteran parasitoids. Current Opinion in Insect Science, p.101026. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2023.101026">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2023.101026</a> Pollet, M.A.A., Brooks, S.E. (2008). Long-Legged Flies (Diptera: Dolichopodidae). Pages 223-22241 in: Capinera, J.L. (eds) Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer, Dordrecht. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_2087">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_2087</a> Reinhardt, K. and Siva-Jothy, M.T., 2007. Biology of the bed bugs (Cimicidae). Annu. Rev. Entomol., 52, pp.351-374. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.52.040306.133913">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.52.040306.133913</a> Richards, W.R., 1979. Collembola. The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 111(S108), pp.300-303. Richman, D.B. (2008). Scorpions (Class Arachnida, Order Scorpiones). In: Capinera, J.L. (eds) Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer, Dordrecht. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_4078">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_4078</a> Ronquist, F., 1999. Phylogeny, classification and evolution of the Cynipoidea. Zoologica scripta, 28(1‐2), pp.139-164. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6409.1999.00022.x">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6409.1999.00022.x</a> Schaefer, C.W. and Ahmad, I., 2000. Cotton stainers and their relatives (Pyrrhocoroidea: Pyrrhocoridae and Largidae). Heteroptera of Economic Importance. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 271-307. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041859-8">https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041859-8</a> Schuh, R.T., Weirauch, C., Henry, T.J. and Halbert, S.E., 2008. Curaliidae, a new family of Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera) from the eastern United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101(1), pp.20-29. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2008)101[20:CANFOH]2.0.CO;2">https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2008)101[20:CANFOH]2.0.CO;2</a> Schwertner, C.F., Grazia, J. (2015). Less Diverse Pentatomoid Families (Acanthosomatidae, Canopidae, Dinidoridae, Megarididae, Phloeidae, and Tessaratomidae). In: Panizzi, A., Grazia, J. (eds) True Bugs (Heteroptera) of the Neotropics. Entomology in Focus, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9861-7_25">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9861-7_25</a> Schwertner, C.F., Nardi, C. (2015). Burrower Bugs (Cydnidae). In: Panizzi, A., Grazia, J. (eds) True Bugs (Heteroptera) of the Neotropics. Entomology in Focus, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9861-7_21">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9861-7_21</a> Short, A.E.Z. and FIKÁČEK, M., 2013. Molecular phylogeny, evolution and classification of the Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera). Systematic entomology, 38(4), pp.723-752. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12024">https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12024</a> Song, H., (2018). Biodiversity of Orthoptera. In: R.G. Foottit &. Adler, P.H (eds.) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Volume 2. Hoboken: Wiley. pp.245-279. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch10">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch10</a> Sutherland, A.M. and Parrella, M.P., 2009. Mycophagy in Coccinellidae: review and synthesis. Biological Control, 51(2), pp.284-293. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.012</a> Szentiványi, T., Hornok, S., Kovács, Á.B., Takács, N., Gyuranecz, M., Markotter, W., Christe, P. and Glaizot, O., 2022. Polyctenidae (Hemiptera: Cimicoidea) species in the Afrotropical region: Distribution, host specificity, and first insights to their molecular phylogeny. Ecology and Evolution, 12(10), p.e9357. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9357">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9357</a> Vieira, N. K., Poff, N. L., Carlisle, D. M., Moulton, S. R., Koski, M. L., & Kondratieff, B. C. (2006). A database of lotic invertebrate traits for North America. US Geological Survey Data Series, 187, 1-15. <a href="https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/ds187/">https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/ds187/</a> Villanueva, R. T., Rodrigues, J. C., & Childers, C. C. (2005). Larval Cryptothelea gloverii (Lepidoptera: Psycidae), an arthropod predator and herbivore on Florida citrus. Experimental & applied acarology, 36(1-2), 83-92. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-005-1673-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-005-1673-0</a> Voigtländer, K., 2011. 15 Chilopoda–Ecology. In Treatise on Zoology-Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Myriapoda, Volume 1 (pp. 309-325). Brill. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004188266_016">https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004188266_016</a> Wagner, D. L. 2001. Moths. Pages 249-270 in the Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Volume 4. Academic Press. San Diego, CA. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00201-7">https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00201-7</a> Wang, Z.H., Huang, J. and Polaszek, A., 2016. The species of genus Ablerus Howard (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Azotidae) from China, with description of a new species. Florida Entomologist, 99(3), pp.395-405. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0310">https://doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0310</a> Weihmann, T., Wipfler, B. (2019). The Generalized Feeding Apparatus of Cockroaches: A Model for Biting and Chewing Insects. In: Krenn, H. (eds) Insect Mouthparts. Zoological Monographs, vol 5. Springer, Cham. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_7">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_7</a> Weirauch, C., Schuh, R.T., Cassis, G. and Wheeler, W.C., 2019. Revisiting habitat and lifestyle transitions in Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera): insights from a combined morphological and molecular phylogeny. Cladistics, 35(1), pp.67-105. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12233">https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12233</a> Wetterer, J.K., 1994.10. Nourishment and evolution in fungus-growing ants and their fungi. Pages 309-328 in Nourishment and Evolution in Insects Societies. J.H. Hunt & C.A. Nalepa, eds. Westview Press, Bolder, CO, USA.  Yavorskaya, M.I., Leschen, R.A., Polilov, A.A. and Beutel, R.G., 2014. Unique rostrate larvae and basidiomycophagy in the beetle family Corylophidae. Arthropod Structure & Development, 43(2), pp.153-162. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2013.11.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2013.11.001</a> Yee, D.A., Kaufman, M.G. (2019). Suspension and Filter Feeding in Aquatic Insects. In: Krenn, H. (eds) Insect Mouthparts. Zoological Monographs, vol 5. Springer, Cham. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_4">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_4</a> Zaspel, J.M. (2008). Skin-Piercing and Blood-Feeding Moths, Calyptra spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Calpinae). In: Capinera, J.L. (eds) Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer, Dordrecht. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_4221">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_4221</a> Zimmermann D., Randolf S., Aspöck U. (2019) From Chewing to Sucking via Phylogeny—From Sucking to Chewing via Ontogeny: Mouthparts of Neuroptera. In: Krenn H. (eds) Insect Mouthparts. Zoological Monographs, vol 5. Springer, Cham. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_11">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29654-4_11</a>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →

Data for: Terrestrial land use signals on groundwater fauna beyond current protection buffers (Ecological Applications, 2024)

Original research article: Knüsel M., Alther R. & Altermatt F. (2024). Terrestrial land use signals on groundwater fauna beyond current protection buffers. Ecological Applications.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →

Social-ecological dynamics of quarry restoration: a Flickr data analysis

<div> <div> <div> With increasing urbanization and demand for construction materials, quarries have become central to the recovery of degraded landscapes into spaces that offer ecological, but also social benefits. While ecological restoration has long been investigated, integrated social-ecological restoration of post-mining landscapes remains underexplored. The overall aim of this study is to assess the perceptions of cultural ecosystem services and landscape features expressed in social media posts about quarries in Germany, Denmark, and the Czech Republic. We focus on concepts of cultural ecosystem services and landscape features to investigate the interactions between humans and restored ecosystems. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyzed 1,660 geotagged photographs from 50 quarries across three regions: Berlin, Roskilde, and the Czech Karst. Flickr social media images were analyzed to elicit the richness of cultural ecosystem services (CES) and landscape features (LF), highlighting popular quarries and their social-ecological significance. Our results indicate that rehabilitated quarries exhibit higher CES richness than abandoned or operational ones, and that accessibility significantly influences public engagement. Our study demonstrates that once primarily industrial sites, quarries can evolve into vibrant social-ecological systems that provide diverse landscape features and cultural ecosystem services. It also points to the potential of social media data for designing restoration efforts from a social-ecological perspective. Such an approach provides insights into public perceptions of restored landscapes and may inform future restoration strategies.   This dataset includes: (1) the review protocol, (2) a list of place names used for data collection on Flickr when posts were not geolocated, (3) data on landscape features and cultural ecosystem services identified in Flickr posts from 50 study quarries, (4) characteristics of the quarries, and (5) a shapefile of the quarry polygons.     </div> </div> </div>

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →

Linked collectors and determiners for: A taxonomic revision of the ecologically important Ochna holstii (Ochnaceae) complex using molecular and morphological data.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "A taxonomic revision of the ecologically important Ochna holstii (Ochnaceae) complex using molecular and morphological data". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/954f96c0-684a-41ff-a23a-8287ce9f7e81">https://bionomia.net/dataset/954f96c0-684a-41ff-a23a-8287ce9f7e81</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/954f96c0-684a-41ff-a23a-8287ce9f7e81">https://gbif.org/dataset/954f96c0-684a-41ff-a23a-8287ce9f7e81</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2024View details →

The ECOLOPES Voxel Model: Multi-domain data integration for ontology-aided generative computational design of ecological building envelopes

The research portrayed in this article is part of the research project ‘ECOlogical building enveLOPES: a game-changing design approach for regenerative ecosystems’ funded by Horizon 2020 Future and Emerging Technologies. The overall research project focuses on developing a multi-domain data-driven computational design framework for the design of ecological building enclosures that addresses humans, plants, animals and microbiota. This article focuses on the development of a key component of the computational workflow in which initial designs are computationally initiated generated and analyzed, namely the ECOLOPES Voxel Model that contains and correlates multi-domain spatialised data for the design process, and its interactions with other components of the ontology-aided generative computational design process for ecological building envelopes. This repository contains all relevant data produced in this paper. Extended technical description is available in the Appendix A to the published paper, containing listing and description of individual voxel data layers. Data were exported from the RDB server (PostgreSQL) in text-based, future-proof format (csv).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2021View details →

Data from: Andriollo T., Michaux J.R., Ruedi M. (2021). Food for everyone: differential feeding habits of cryptic bat species inferred from DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology

Supporting data for: Andriollo T., Michaux J.R., Ruedi M. (2021). Food for everyone: differential feeding habits of cryptic bat species inferred from DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/mec.16073 Raw DNA sequences of prey of Plecotus auritus, P. austriacus and P. macrobullaris with complete sampling information and taxonomic assignations. Data separated by semicolums as follows: Sample name; Dataset; Colony; Bat species; Date; Season; Read numbers (Size); DNA sequence; Lowest taxonomic identification (ID_MOTU); Family; Order; Class; Is the sequence attributable to the diet or not (Diet)

dryad40/100

Data from: Dispersal in a house sparrow metapopulation: an integrative case study of genetic assignment calibrated with ecological data and pedigree information

Dispersal has a crucial role determining eco-evolutionary dynamics through both gene flow and population size regulation. However, to study dispersal and its consequences, one must distinguish immigrants from residents. Dispersers can be identified using telemetry, capture-mark-recapture (CMR) methods, or genetic assignment methods. All of these methods have disadvantages, such as, high costs and substantial field efforts needed for telemetry and CMR surveys, and adequate genetic distance required in genetic assignment. In this study, we used genome-wide 200K Single Nucleotide Polymorphism data and two different genetic assignment approaches (GSI_SIM, Bayesian framework; BONE, network-based estimation) to identify the dispersers in a house sparrow (Passer domesticus) metapopulation sampled over 16 years. Our results showed higher assignment accuracy with BONE. Hence, we proceeded to diagnose potential sources of errors in the assignment results from the BONE method due to variation in levels of inter-population genetic differentiation, intra-population genetic variation and sample size. We show that assignment accuracy is high even at low levels of genetic differentiation and that it increases with the proportion of a population that has been sampled. Finally, we highlight that dispersal studies integrating both ecological and genetic data provide robust assessments of the dispersal patterns in natural populations.

opencc-zeroJul 2021View details →

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2018View details →

Fig. 3 a-h in Ecological characterization of habitats colonized by the freshwater gastropod Viviparus contectus (MILLET, 1813) (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia) - Theoretical and experimental data

Fig. 3 a-h: Logistic regression models of the single environmental variables for the presentation of eventual habitat preferences of V. contectus. For a validation of the models experimental data from diverse field studies were used (e.g., PATZNER & ISARCH 1999, STURM 2000a).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Ecological characterization of habitats colonized by the freshwater gastropod Viviparus contectus (MILLET, 1813) (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia) - Theoretical and experimental data

Fig. 1: Stereoscopic photographs showing the front and back of the shell of V. contectus with its typical shape and mouth geometry. The height of the shells measures about 4.5 cm.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2018View details →

Fig. 2 a-h in Ecological characterization of habitats colonized by the freshwater gastropod Viviparus contectus (MILLET, 1813) (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia) - Theoretical and experimental data

Fig. 2 a-h: Box-plots for the statistical evaluation of single environmental variables under incorporation of all malacological data available in the scientific literature and those data with occurrence of V. contectus, respectively. The black boxes range from the first to the third quartile, whereas the ends of the lines mark the minimum and the maximum of the data. The white line indicates the position of the median.

Fig. 31 in Andrena (Suandrena) portosanctana COCKERELL, 1922 and A. (Suandrena) maderensis COCKERELL, 1922 - new taxonomical and ecological data for two closely related endemic bee species of the Madeira Archipelago, Portugal

Fig. 31 ff.: Morphological differences between males of A. portosanctana (N = 4) and A. maderensis (N = 13): (e) labrum process width; (f) stigma length; (g) propodeum length.

Fig. 30 in Andrena (Suandrena) portosanctana COCKERELL, 1922 and A. (Suandrena) maderensis COCKERELL, 1922 - new taxonomical and ecological data for two closely related endemic bee species of the Madeira Archipelago, Portugal

Fig. 30 ff.: Morphological differences between females of A. portosanctana (N = 19) and A. maderensis (N = 30): (g) stigma length; (h) propodeum length.

Figs. 25-29 in Andrena (Suandrena) portosanctana COCKERELL, 1922 and A. (Suandrena) maderensis COCKERELL, 1922 - new taxonomical and ecological data for two closely related endemic bee species of the Madeira Archipelago, Portugal

Figs. 25-29: Male of Andrena maderensis, collected by A. Kratochwil (MA05/38: Madeira, Ponta de São Lourenço, coastal rock, partly ruderalized, 100 m, 32°44'44.01''N, -16°43'20.74''E, Leontodon taraxacoides subsp. longirostris, 26.03.2005); (25) lateral view; (26) dorsal view; (27) head frontal view; genital (28) front view, (29) sideview; photos: L. Haitzinger.

Figs. 1-4 in Andrena (Suandrena) portosanctana COCKERELL, 1922 and A. (Suandrena) maderensis COCKERELL, 1922 - new taxonomical and ecological data for two closely related endemic bee species of the Madeira Archipelago, Portugal

Figs. 1-4: Syntype of Andrena portosanctana (female) deposited in the California Academy of Science, California, San Francisco, USA (CAS TYPE 15373); (1) lateral view; (2) dorsal view; (3) head frontal view; (4) labels; photos: V. Smith.

Fig. 30 in Andrena (Suandrena) portosanctana COCKERELL, 1922 and A. (Suandrena) maderensis COCKERELL, 1922 - new taxonomical and ecological data for two closely related endemic bee species of the Madeira Archipelago, Portugal

Fig. 30: Morphological differences between females of A. portosanctana (N = 19) and A. maderensis (N = 30): (a) body length; (b) wing length; (c) head length/width index; (d) facial fovea index; (e) clypeal length; (f) labrum process width.