Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in Trypanosome co-infections increase in a declining marsupial population

Fig. 2. The proportion of woylie captures detected with (a) T. copemani and (b) T. vegrandis in individual sampling trips across the study period (n = 32, 8, 20, 6, 14, 29, 37, 54, 31, 31, 21, 25, 25, 32, 15, 13, 2, 8, 13, 11, 9, 8), with the x-axis representing continuous time. Error bars represent 95% Jeffrey's confidence intervals of prevalence estimates. Overlaid on prevalence estimates are the capture rates (the number of independent captures as a proportion of the total number of traps set, derived from Wayne et al., 2015) for each of the sampling periods to indicate the woylie population trends over the same period.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2018View details →

Fig. 3 in Trypanosome co-infections increase in a declining marsupial population

Fig. 3. The proportion of woylie captures detected with (a) T. copemani and (b) T. vegrandis across years (categorized into groups for plotting purposes: 2006–2007, 2008, 2009–2010, 2011–2012) for woylies that were either co-infected by the other trypanosome species (blue) or individuals not co-infected by the other trypanosome species (red). Error bars represent 95% Jeffrey's confidence intervals of prevalence estimates. Numbers above the x-axis represent the sample sizes for each group. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2018View details →

Fig. 1. A in Trypanosome co-infections increase in a declining marsupial population

Fig. 1. A map of Australia indicating the location of Keninup (our sampling site), with the location of Perth provided for reference.

Fig. 7 in Altered parasite community structure in an endangered marsupial following translocation

Fig. 7. Mean trypanosome prevalence over time (with 95% CI) in translocated and resident woylies within Dryandra. TRAN: time of translocation.

Fig. 6 in Altered parasite community structure in an endangered marsupial following translocation

Fig. 6. Non-metric multidimensional scaling plots showing convergence of parasite community composition in translocated (TYPE T) and resident (TYPE R) woylie groups following translocation. Boxes on the left depict both groups at all time points prior to and including the point of translocation; boxes on the right depict both groups six months after translocation.

Fig. 5 in Altered parasite community structure in an endangered marsupial following translocation

Fig. 5. Overall parasite infracommunity richness in (A) translocated and (B) resident woylies over time. TRAN: time of translocation; Error bars represent one standard error.

Fig. 2 in Altered parasite community structure in an endangered marsupial following translocation

Fig. 2. The overall effect of site on mean faecal egg counts (above solid line) and parasite prevalence (below solid horizontal line) for each parasite taxon in (A) translocated and (B) resident woylies. Error bars represent 95% CI.

Fig. 3 in Altered parasite community structure in an endangered marsupial following translocation

Fig. 3. The effect of time since translocation (model coefficients for all sites combined) on mean faecal egg counts (above solid horizontal line) and parasite prevalence (below solid horizontal line) for each parasite taxon in translocated and resident woylies. Left of the dashed vertical line indicates a negative effect, right of the line indicates a positive effect; Error bars represent 95% CI.

Fig. 4 in Altered parasite community structure in an endangered marsupial following translocation

Fig. 4. Significant changes to mean strongyle egg counts (A) and flea prevalence (B) over time. TRAN: time of translocation; Boxplots (A) are delimited by the first (lower) and third (upper) quartile with the median represented by the thick horizontal line; whiskers represent the 1.5 interquartile range; solid black dots represent outliers; Error bars (B) represent 95% CI.

Fig. 1 in Altered parasite community structure in an endangered marsupial following translocation

Fig. 1. Map (from Northover et al., 2019) illustrating the study sites within south-western Australia, including Walcott and Warrup East in relation to Perup Sanctuary (box, right), and Dryandra, situated roughly 250 km north-east of the Upper Warren region.

Fig. 33 in Phylogenetic Analyses Of Postcranial Skeletal Morphology In Didelphid Marsupials

Fig. 33. Strict consensus of three equally most parsimonious trees resulting from cladistic parsimony analysis of 114 postcranial characters for 38 taxa described in this report, where polymorphic data were treated as composite entries (CO) (see tables 2–4 for summary data set characteristics and tree statistics). Numbers above branches refer to absolute Bremer support values ($1). Numbers below branches refer to

Fig. 31 in Phylogenetic Analyses Of Postcranial Skeletal Morphology In Didelphid Marsupials

Fig. 31. Chironectes minimus (AMNH 148720), plantar and dorsal views of left astragalus. The ridge between the medial (atim) and lateral (atil) astragalotibial facets is present (ch. 108[1]), as well as being between the lateral atragalotibial and astragalofibular (afi) facets (ch. 109[1]). There is no contact between the astragalonavicular (an) and sustentacular (su) facets (ch. 110[0]), and the sustentacular facet is separated from the calcaneoastragalar (caa) facet by the well-developed sulcus astragali (sa) (ch. 111[0]). Other abbreviation: ampt, astragalar medial plantar tuberosity. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Fig. 30 in Phylogenetic Analyses Of Postcranial Skeletal Morphology In Didelphid Marsupials

Fig. 30. Philander frenatus (MVZ 182067), dorsal aspect of distal ulna (ul), radius (ra), carpal, and metacarpal (Mc) bones. Note the lunate (lu) relatively large and in contact with other elements (ch. 103[1]). A distolateral process of the scaphoid (sca) separates the lunate and magnum (mag) (ch. 105[1]). Other abbreviations: un, unciform; cu, cuneiform; tm, trapezium; tr, trapezoid. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Fig. 22 in Phylogenetic Analyses Of Postcranial Skeletal Morphology In Didelphid Marsupials

Fig. 22. Caluromys philander (AMNH 267337) and Chironectes minimus (AMNH 148720), radius in lateral view showing the well-developed bicipital tuberosity (bt) (ch. 81[1]) and the bony plate (bp) on the caudal portion (ch. 82[1]) in Caluromys, whereas in Chironectes the bicipital tuberosity is small (ch. 81[0]) and the bony plate is absent (ch. 82[0]). Scale bar: 10 mm.

Fig. 23 in Phylogenetic Analyses Of Postcranial Skeletal Morphology In Didelphid Marsupials

Fig. 23. Marmosops parvidens (AMNH 267348), os coxae in lateral view showing the posteroventral extension (pex) on the pubis (ch. 86[1]). Scale bar: 5 mm.

Fig. 26 in Phylogenetic Analyses Of Postcranial Skeletal Morphology In Didelphid Marsupials

Fig. 26. Monodelphis brevicaudata (AMNH 257203) and Chironectes minimus (AMNH 212909), pelvis in dorsal view. In Chironectes the posterior part of the ischium (is) body is laterally deflected (ch. 92[1]), whereas in Monodelphis it is almost straight (ch. 92[0]). Other abbreviations: il, illium; syp, symphysis pubis. Scale bars: 10 mm.

Fig. 21 in Phylogenetic Analyses Of Postcranial Skeletal Morphology In Didelphid Marsupials

Fig. 21. Lestodelphys halli (UWZM 22422) and Monodelphis brevicaudata (AMNH 257203), proximal part of right ulna, anterior surface. In Monodelphis, the anconeal process (ap) is poorly developed (ch. 76[0]) and the ulnar coronoid process (ucop) is well developed in the lateral side (ch. 78[1]). In contrast, in Lestodelphys the anconeal process is well developed (ch. 76[1]) and the ulnar coronoid process is not very developed on the lateral side (ch. 78[0]). The greater sigmoid cavity (gsc) is mesially extended in Monodelphis (ch. 75[1]), whereas in Lestodelphys it is not mesially extended (ch. 75[0]). Other abbreviations: ol, olecraneon; tn, trochlear notch. Scale bars: 5 mm.

Fig. 20 in Phylogenetic Analyses Of Postcranial Skeletal Morphology In Didelphid Marsupials

Fig. 20. Tlacualtzin canescens (UMMZ 94604), proximal portion of ulna (ul) and radius (ra) showing the fossa for exterior ligament (fel) extended beyond the trochlear notch (tn) (ch. 74[3]). Scale bar: 5 mm.

Fig. 25 in Phylogenetic Analyses Of Postcranial Skeletal Morphology In Didelphid Marsupials

Fig. 25. Tlacuatzin canescens (UMMZ 94604) and Marmosa mexicana (ROM 99604), pelvis in dorsal view. In Tlacuatzin the symphysis pubis (syp) is shorter than the obturator foramen (of) (ch. 91[0]), whereas the symphysis size is similar to the obturator foramen in Marmosa mexicana (ch. 91[1]). Note the anterior portion of the ilium (il) curved laterally in Tlacuatzin (ch. 90[1]), and in Marmosa it is almost straight (ch. 90[0]). Scale bars: 5 mm.

Fig. 17 in Phylogenetic Analyses Of Postcranial Skeletal Morphology In Didelphid Marsupials

Fig. 17. Caluromys philander (AMNH 267001) and Chironectes minimus (AMNH 212909), distal portion of left humerus in anterior view. The capitulum (cap) in Caluromys is spherical in shape (ch. 60[0]), whereas in Chironectes it is cylindrical (ch. 60[1]). Note the more developed proximal extension of the capitulum in Caluromys relative to the proximal extension of the trochlea (tr) (ch. 63[1]). In both species there is a lateral extension (lex) of the capitulum (ch. (64[1]). In Caluromys, a proximal process (prp) in the supinator ridge (sur) is present (ch. 67[1]), whereas in Chironectes it is absent (ch. 67[0]). Other abbreviations: enf, entepicondylar foramen; en, entepicondyle. Scale bars: 5 mm.