Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Figure 1 in Further geometric morphometric analysis on the genus Eysarcoris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) from China

Figure 1. Curves selection of three characters, resampled into 30, 100 and 50 semi-landmarks respectively. A. Head, outline curved of the tylus and jugum. B. Pronotum, outline curved. C. Scutellum, outline curved.

Figure 15 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 15. Geographical distribution of Pseudonaja nuchalis specimens examined in this study (closed circles) and/or included in Skinner et al.'s (2005) phylogenetic analysis (open circles represent specimens not included in the morphometric analyses). Codes for geographical groups correspond with those in Table 2.

Figure 14 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 14. Geographical distribution of Pseudonaja mengdeni specimens examined in this study (closed circles) and/or included in Skinner et al.'s (2005) phylogenetic analysis (open circles represent specimens not included in the morphometric analyses). Codes for geographical groups correspond with those in Table 2.

Figure 7 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 7. Plot of scores for first and second canonical roots extracted in a discriminant function analysis including all male specimens.

Figure 11 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 11. Geographical distribution of Pseudonaja aspidorhyncha specimens examined in this study (closed circles) and/or included in Skinner et al.'s (2005) phylogenetic analysis (open circles represent specimens not included in the morphometric analyses). Codes for geographical groups correspond with those in Table 2.

Figure 6 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 6. Plots of scores for first and second, and first and third canonical roots extracted in a discriminant function analysis including female P. affinis, P. nuchalis 'Darwin', P. nuchalis 'Orange with black head'-'Pale head, grey nape' and P. nuchalis 'Southern' clade group specimens.

Figure 2 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 2. Pseudonaja mengdeni (SAMA R20981), lateral perspective of head; see Table 1 for abbreviations.

Figure 5 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 5. Plot of scores for first and second canonical roots extracted in a discriminant function analysis including all female specimens.

Figure 9 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 9. Plot of scores for first and second canonical roots extracted in a discriminant function analysis including male P. affinis, P. inframacula and P. textilis clade group specimens.

Figure 13 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 13. Geographical distribution of Pseudonaja inframacula specimens examined in this study (closed circles) and/or included in Skinner et al.'s (2005) phylogenetic analysis (open circles represent specimens not included in the morphometric analyses). Codes for geographical groups correspond with those in Table 2.

Figure 12 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 12. Pseudonaja inframacula (SAMA R38606), ventrolateral perspective of midbody illustrating contrasting sectorial markings on ventrals laterally.

Figure 16 in A multivariate morphometric analysis and systematic review of Pseudonaja (Serpentes, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae)

Figure 16. Geographical distribution of Pseudonaja textilis specimens examined in this study (closed circles) and/or included in Skinner et al.'s (2005) phylogenetic analysis (open circles represent specimens not included in the morphometric analyses). Skinner et al.'s (2005) analysis also included two specimens from Merauke, West Papua (not shown). Codes for geographical groups correspond with those in Table 2.

Figure 6 in Evolution of the zygomasseteric construction in Rodentia, as revealed by a geometric morphometric analysis of the mandible of Graphiurus (Rodentia, Gliridae)

Figure 6. Zygomasseteric construction in extinct and extant Gliridae with the origin and insertion of the lateral (thin arrows) and medial (thick arrows) portions of the masseteric muscle. A, QP 625, Gliravus majori (Quercy, France, Oligocene), protrogomorphy; B, ITD 140 Bransatoglis micio [Itardies, Quercy, Oligocene (MP23)], derived protrogomorphy (or primitive myomorphy); C, Glis glis, myomorphy; D, Graphiurus hueti, hystricomorphy. The dotted lines are reconstructions. Abbreviations: iof, infraorbital foramen; zp, zygomatic plate. Scale bar, 5 mm.

Figure 4 in Evolution of the zygomasseteric construction in Rodentia, as revealed by a geometric morphometric analysis of the mandible of Graphiurus (Rodentia, Gliridae)

Figure 4. Plot of the discriminant analysis of the Fourier coefficients versus morphological type. Solid symbols indicate families with hystricomorphous skull: squares, Anomaluridae; rhombi, Ctenodactylidae; circles, Pedetidae; triangles, Dipodidae; stars, Graphiurinae. Open symbols indicate myomorph families: stars, Gliridae (Glirinae/Leithiinae); rhombi, Nesomyidae; circles, Muridae; triangles, Cricetidae.

Figure 2 in Evolution of the zygomasseteric construction in Rodentia, as revealed by a geometric morphometric analysis of the mandible of Graphiurus (Rodentia, Gliridae)

Figure 2. Phylogenetic hypotheses for Graphiurus (A) based on cranial and dental characters of fossils and living species (Vianey-Liaud & Jaeger, 1996), (B) based on cranial and dental characters of living species (Wahlert et al., 1993), (C) based on dental morphological characters of fossils and extant species (Daams & De Brujn, 1995), (D) based on incisor enamel microstructure (Koenigswald, 1995), (E) based on partial mitochondrial gene sequences (Bentz & Montgelard, 1999), and (F) based on partial mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences (Montgelard et al., 2003).

Figure 1 in Evolution of the zygomasseteric construction in Rodentia, as revealed by a geometric morphometric analysis of the mandible of Graphiurus (Rodentia, Gliridae)

Figure 1. The four basic types of rodent skulls. A, protrogomorphy; B, sciuromorphy; C, hystricomorphy; D, myomorphy. Thin and thick arrows show the origin and the insertion of the lateral and medial portions of the masseter respectively.

FIG. 15 in Analysis of lichen secondary metabolites and morphometrics in the Cladonia chlorophaea species group (Cladoniaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in Hungary

FIG. 15. — Cladonia novochlorophaea (Sipman) Brodo & Ahti: A, habit (BP[BP 9314]); B, spots of lichen secondary metabolites on chromatographic plates; C, distribution in Hungary. Abbreviations: H, homosekiaic acid; F, fumarprotocetraric acid; Z, zeorin; N, norstictic acid. Scale bar: A, 2 mm.

FIG. 8 in Analysis of lichen secondary metabolites and morphometrics in the Cladonia chlorophaea species group (Cladoniaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in Hungary

FIG. 8. — The mean diameter of soredia (µm) measured on podetia (n = 10). Abbreviations: asa, C. asahinae (n = 22); chlo, C. chlorophaea (n = 55); cry, C. cryptochlorophaea (n = 53); gra, C. grayi (n = 17); mero, C. merochlorophaea (n = 70); novo, C. novochlorophaea (n = 10). The lines represent the minimum and maximum values, the box represents the 25% and 75% of the data, the thick line represents the median. Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 95% confidence.

FIG. 5 in Analysis of lichen secondary metabolites and morphometrics in the Cladonia chlorophaea species group (Cladoniaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in Hungary

FIG. 5. — Height of cup (mm) in different species. Abbreviations: asa, C. asahinae (n = 22); chlo, C. chlorophaea (n = 55); cry, C. cryptochlorophaea (n = 53); gra, C. grayi (n = 17); mero, C. merochlorophaea (n = 70); novo, C. novochlorophaea (n = 10). The lines represent the minimum and maximum values, the box represents the 25% and 75% of the data, the thick line represents the median. Means with the same letter are not significantly different at 95% confidence.

FIG. 9 in Analysis of lichen secondary metabolites and morphometrics in the Cladonia chlorophaea species group (Cladoniaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in Hungary

FIG. 9. — Conditional inference tree presenting the five most important morphological variables separating species: CH, height of cup; CW, width of cup; PH, height of podetium; SW, width of podetium stalk. The order of the species at the end of the nodes is as follows: a, C. asahinae; c, C. chlorophaea; cr, C. cryptochlorophaea; g, C. grayi; m, C. merochlorophaea; n, C. novochlorophaea. Boxes represent the highest probability of a species occurrence on the tree node. A level of p <0.05 was considered for a significant difference.