Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 11. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 in Hidden diversity within the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae) Part I: Morphological evidence

Fig. 11. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex, ♀♀; Rec sem (lateral view, right portion, except F left figure, which is in dorsal view). A. The frame encloses the ovipositor portion with Rec sem. Note: Female N. pluridentatum (Hadži, 1973) stat. nov. is unknown.

Fig. 10. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 in Hidden diversity within the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae) Part I: Morphological evidence

Fig. 10. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex, ♂♂. Variation of the Pa-Fe (A–B first image, C, D–E first image, F–G first image; H–J, L–M right, N–O: lateral view; the others in dorso-medial view to show the armament).

Fig. 6. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 in Hidden diversity within the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae) Part I: Morphological evidence

Fig. 6. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex, ♂♂. Synchroscopic images of the male Ch basal article and Pa-Fe (medial views, except G, right figure, which is in dorso-medial view).

Fig. 9. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 in Hidden diversity within the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae) Part I: Morphological evidence

Fig. 9. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex, ♂♂. Variation of the Ch basal article (medial view) in species, subspecies and hybrids.

Fig. 2 in Hidden diversity within the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae) Part I: Morphological evidence

Fig. 2. The complete distributional area of the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex, according to Gruber & Martens (1968), Martens (2006), Schönhofer & Holle (2007) and own data, with marked positions of the type localities of the taxa.

Fig. 13. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 in Hidden diversity within the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae) Part I: Morphological evidence

Fig. 13. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex, ♀♀. From left to right: Silhouettes of the Ch basal article, Pa (both medial view) and Rec sem. Arrows indicate the most identifying characters. Note: female N. pluridentatum (Hadži, 1973) stat. nov. is unknown.

Fig. 12. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 in Hidden diversity within the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae) Part I: Morphological evidence

Fig. 12. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex, ♂♂. From left to right: Ch basal article (medial, lateral views), Pa (medial view) and Pe tip (dorsal, lateral views). Arrows indicate the most identifying characters. Note: Pe of N. pluridentatum (Hadži, 1973) stat. nov. is unknown.

Fig. 8. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 in Hidden diversity within the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae) Part I: Morphological evidence

Fig. 8. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex. Glans (dorsal and lateral views). Note: The penis of N. pluridentatum (Hadži, 1973) stat. nov. is unknown.

Fig. 7. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 in Hidden diversity within the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae) Part I: Morphological evidence

Fig. 7. Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex. Penes (lateral view). Note: The penis of N. pluridentatum (Hadži, 1973) stat. nov. is unknown.

Fig. 8 in Revision of the troglomorphic genus Troglostygnopsis Šilhavý, 1974 (Opiliones, Laniatores, Stygnopsidae)

Fig. 8. Distribution of selected troglobitic genera of Stygnopsidae Sørensen, 1932. Squares are distribution of Troglostygnopsis Šilhavý, 1974: black = T. anophthalma Šilhavý, 1974; red = T. kalebi sp. nov. Circles show distribution of Brujita Cruz-López, in press, Toojah Cruz-López, in press and the dubious record for Mictlana inops (Goodnight & Goodnight, 1971) reported by Goodnight & Goodnight (1973): black = B. chapulapa Cruz-López, in press; red = T. cimutaa Cruz-López, in press; blue = M. inops? Pentagons are the distribution of Mictlana Cruz-López & Francke, 2015: black = M. plana (Goodnight & Goodnight, 1973); red = M. inops.

Fig. 6 in Revision of the troglomorphic genus Troglostygnopsis Šilhavý, 1974 (Opiliones, Laniatores, Stygnopsidae)

Fig. 6. Troglostygnopsis kalebi sp. nov., ♂, holotype (CNAN-T0850). A. Apical femur, patella and basal tibia IV. B. Patella IV.

Fig. 4 in Revision of the troglomorphic genus Troglostygnopsis Šilhavý, 1974 (Opiliones, Laniatores, Stygnopsidae)

Fig. 4. Troglostygnopsis kalebi sp. nov., ♂, holotype (CNAN-T0850). A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view.

Fig. 1 in Revision of the troglomorphic genus Troglostygnopsis Šilhavý, 1974 (Opiliones, Laniatores, Stygnopsidae)

Fig. 1. Troglostygnopsis anophthalma Šilhavý, 1974, ♂, topotype (AMNH). A. Chelicera, mesal view. B. Chelicera, frontal view. C. Pedipalpal femur, mesal view. D. Pedipalpal tibia and tarsus, ventral view.

Fig. 3 in Revision of the troglomorphic genus Troglostygnopsis Šilhavý, 1974 (Opiliones, Laniatores, Stygnopsidae)

Fig. 3. Troglostygnopsis anophthalma Šilhavý, 1974, ♂, topotype (AMNH), penis. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. C. Ventral view. Scale bar in C applicable to all figures.

Fig. 2 in Revision of the troglomorphic genus Troglostygnopsis Šilhavý, 1974 (Opiliones, Laniatores, Stygnopsidae)

Fig. 2. Troglostygnopsis anophthalma Šilhavý, 1974, ♂, topotype (AMNH). A. Apical femur, patella and basal tibia IV. B. Patella IV.

Figs 33-44 in A mysterious dwarf: Suthepiidae nov. fam., a new harvestman family from mountains of northern Thailand (Arachnida: Opiliones: Laniatores)

Figs 33-44. Suthepia inermis sp. nov., male holotype (33-38), female paratype (39-44). (33) Penis in dorsal view. (34) Same in ventral view. (35-36) Same in lateral view. (37, 39) Right chelicera, prolateral view. (38, 40) Same in retrolateral view. (41) Whole ovipositor, ventral view. (42) Distal part of ovipositor, ventral view. (43-44). (43) Single claw of leg I of female, retrolateral view. (44) Double claw of leg IV of female, retrolateral view. Scale lines: 0.3 mm (33-36; 37-41), 0.05 mm (42), 0.07 mm (43-44).

Figs 3-8 in A mysterious dwarf: Suthepiidae nov. fam., a new harvestman family from mountains of northern Thailand (Arachnida: Opiliones: Laniatores)

Figs 3-8. Suthepia inermis sp. nov, male holotype (3, 5-6), female paratype. (4, 7-8). (3-4) Habitus, lateral view. (5, 7) Habitus, dorsal view, (6, 8) Habitus, ventral view. Scale line 0.5 mm.

Figs 17-32 in A mysterious dwarf: Suthepiidae nov. fam., a new harvestman family from mountains of northern Thailand (Arachnida: Opiliones: Laniatores)

Figs 17-32. Suthepia inermis sp. nov., male paratype (17-20, 25-28), female paratype (21-24, 29-32). (17-24) Femora I-IV, retrolateral view. (25-32) Tarsi I-IV, retrolateral view. Scale lines 0.3 mm.

Figs 9-16 in A mysterious dwarf: Suthepiidae nov. fam., a new harvestman family from mountains of northern Thailand (Arachnida: Opiliones: Laniatores)

Figs 9-16. Suthepia inermis sp. nov., pedipalps of male holotype (9-12) and of female paratype (13-16). (9, 13) Right pedipalp, retrolateral view. (10, 14) Same, prolateral view. (11, 15) Right pedipalpal tarsus, retrolateral view. (12, 16) Same, prolateral view. Scale lines 0.3 mm.

Figs 1-2 in A mysterious dwarf: Suthepiidae nov. fam., a new harvestman family from mountains of northern Thailand (Arachnida: Opiliones: Laniatores)

Figs 1-2. Suthepia inermis sp. nov., body in dorsal view. (1) Female paratype. (2) Male holotype. Scale line 0.5 mm. Photograph by J. Severin.