Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 8 in Palaeoecology of the Spathian Virgin Formation (Utah, USA) and its implications for the Early Triassic recovery

Fig. 8. Sedimentary facies of the Spathian, Lower Triassic in the Hurricane Cliffs area, Utah, USA. A. Middle part (~ 6–12 m) of the Virgin Formation at section HC−A showing the transition between lagoonal and intertidal siltstone to the overlying open marine siltstone. The black arrow heads point to the transgressive surface. Height of exposure is 6 m. B. Alternating marls and limestone in the middle part of the section HC−C interpreted as channel fill of the tidal inlet complex. C. Trough cross−bedded, highly sandy limestone of the upper shoreface capping the section HC−A. D. Hummocky cross−bedded sandstone with Skolithos isp. forming the top of section HC−B. E. Sandy limestone of the shoreface in the middle part (11 m) of section HC−A. F. Parallel stratified grainstone beds forming the topmost beds of HC−C. G. Lagoonal siltstone of the lower part of section HC−D. Height of exposure is 3 m. The hammer is 35 cm long.

Fig. 1 in Palaeoecology of the Spathian Virgin Formation (Utah, USA) and its implications for the Early Triassic recovery

Fig. 1. Localities of the sections mentioned in the text. A. Beaver Dam Area (samples BD and VR). B. Hurricane Cliff Area (samples HC). C. Overview map depicting the position of the study areas (A and B) around St. George, south−western Utah.

Fig. 4 in Palaeoecology of the Spathian Virgin Formation (Utah, USA) and its implications for the Early Triassic recovery

Fig. 4. Stratigraphic sections shown as weathering profile of the Spathian, Lower Triassic in the Beaver Dam Mountains area, Utah, USA. Bathymetric interpretation on the left. Locality map see Fig. 1B. A. Section BD−A. B. Section BD−B. C. Section VR.

Fig. 7 in Palaeoecology of the Spathian Virgin Formation (Utah, USA) and its implications for the Early Triassic recovery

Fig. 7. Stratigraphic sections shown as weathering profile of the Spathian, Lower Triassic in the Hurricane Cliffs area, Utah, USA. See Fig. 1B for locality map. A. Section HC−A. B. Section HC−B. C. Section H−C. D. Section HC−D.

Fig. 3 in Palaeoecology of the Spathian Virgin Formation (Utah, USA) and its implications for the Early Triassic recovery

Fig. 3. Palaeogeographic restorations after Blakey (2011). A. Global palaeogeography of the Early Triassic. B. Early Triassic palaeogeography of the western USA.

Fig. 2 in Palaeoecology of the Spathian Virgin Formation (Utah, USA) and its implications for the Early Triassic recovery

Fig. 2. Lithostratigraphic column of the Moenkopi Group in the investigated area. Thickness of lithostratigraphic units and the position of ammonite markers are schematic and not to scale. Presence of Anasibirites after Lucas et al. (2007), Tirolites after Poborski (1954), and Columbites after Bucher in Hautmann et al. (2012).

Fig. 4 in A new Early Triassic gastropod genus and the recovery of gastropods from the Permian/Triassic extinction

Fig. 4. Werfenella rectecostata redrawn from Neri and Posenato (1985: pl. 3: 7, 8). This relatively large and undeformed steinkern (composite mould from Val Sorda, western Dolomites, Italy) shows the purpurinid shape of Werfenella and its obliquely elongated, subrectangular aperture. The axial ornament is visible while the nodular ornament at the carinations is obscured.

Fig. 2 in A new Early Triassic gastropod genus and the recovery of gastropods from the Permian/Triassic extinction

Fig. 2. Limestone slab with several specimens of Werfenella rectecostata; Werfen Formation, Cencenighe Member, Bad Radein/Redgano, Italian Dolomites, Weisshorn (MHI 1819). The specimens show unusually wellpreserved shells with a pronounced nodular ornament at the carinations which cannot be seen in the steinkern−preservation which is usual for gastropods from the Werfen Formation.

Fig. 1. A–F in A new Early Triassic gastropod genus and the recovery of gastropods from the Permian/Triassic extinction

Fig. 1. A–F. Werfenella rectecostata from the Early Triassic (Olenekian) Werfen Formation. A. Reproduction of Frech's (1912: pl. 7: 7a–c) illustrations of exceptionally well−preserved specimens of Werfenella rectecostata from the Tirolites−Marls near Csopak (Iszkahegy, Hungary). B. Reproduction of Hauer's (1851: pl. 20: 10) original illustrations of "Turbo" rectecostatus. C–F. Werfenella rectecostata in typical preservation as more or less deformed steinkerns. Despite poor preservation species identity is strongly suggested by the characteristic shape and traces of the axial ornament. C. NHMW 1865 IX 22, Heilig Kreuz near St. Cassian, Südtirol. D. NHMW 1858 IX 3A, Heilig Kreuz near St. Cassian, Südtirol. E. NHMW 1884 D 475, Pitzberg, Südtirol. F. BMNH G 9059314A, Fachiade Monzoni. G. Chartronella? pagina Batten and Stokes, 1986, from Batten and Stokes (1986: fig. 10); this species from the Olenekian of Utah resembles Werfenella rectecostata. H. Chartronella unicostata Batten and Stokes, 1986, from Batten and Stokes (1986: fig. 8). I. Chartronella diagonata Cossmann, 1902, topotype material of the type species of Chartronella from the lowermost Jurassic (Hettangian) of France (from Gründel 1997: pl. 2: 1, 2).

Fig. 3 in A new Early Triassic gastropod genus and the recovery of gastropods from the Permian/Triassic extinction

Fig. 3. Limestone slab with specimens of Werfenella rectecostata and Natiria costata forming a characteristic gastropod assemblage in the Werfen Formation; Werfen Formation, Cencenighe Member, Bad Radein/Redgano, Italian Dolomite, Weisshorn (MHI 1820).

Figure 6 in Human induced trauma and directed take inhibits sea turtle recovery in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands

Figure 6. Locations of opportunistic sea turtle stranding recoveries on Tinian, CNMI from July 2009 to July 2016.

Figure 4 in Human induced trauma and directed take inhibits sea turtle recovery in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands

Figure 4. Examples of trauma, predation, impact, and entanglement in CNMI: A) butchered green turtle carapace and head; B) spear piercing neck of live juvenile green turtle; C) three-prong spear impact to cranium; D) large stainless steel hook embedded in ventral neck; E) rubber (inner tube) straps binding front flippers; F) nesting female immobilized by flipping onto carapace; G) hatchling retained as pet; H) shark predation; I) marine debris entanglement (note marked disfigurement due to debris); and J) boat strike (photo depicts carapace repair-arrow). Photos taken under USFWS recovery permit no. TE017352-17.

Figure 5 in Human induced trauma and directed take inhibits sea turtle recovery in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands

Figure 5. Locations of sea turtle stranding recoveries on Saipan, CNMI from April 2005 to September 2016.

Figure 3 in Human induced trauma and directed take inhibits sea turtle recovery in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands

Figure 3. Primary causes of injury and mortality of dead and live stranded sea turtles in Saipan and Tinian from 2005-2016 (n = 89). Trauma includes butchery, spear/bullet damage, rubber inner tube binding & improper husbandry. Nutritional refers to emaciation, predation is from sharks, entanglement sources include marine debris, lines and nets. Infectious damage is evidenced by inflammation.

Figure 1 in Human induced trauma and directed take inhibits sea turtle recovery in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands

Figure 1. Map of the Mariana Islands Archipelago showing the study site locations (denoted by stars) of the islands of Saipan and Tinian, CNMI.

Fig. 5 in Blood recovery of wild Mekong snail-eating turtles (Malayemys subtrijuga Schlegel and Müller, 1845) in captivity from leech infestation

Fig. 5. Morphological comparison of Malayemys subtrijuga no. 5 between week 0 (A and B) and week 17 (C and D).

Fig. 4 in Blood recovery of wild Mekong snail-eating turtles (Malayemys subtrijuga Schlegel and Müller, 1845) in captivity from leech infestation

Fig. 4. Symptoms of Placobdelloides siamensis infection on Malayemys subtrijuga: (A) Leech penetration beneath the keratin layer (scute) on plastron from no. 8; (B) Shell holes resulting from leech penetration on plastron from no. 7; (C) Epidermal lesion on the hind foot from no. 6; (D) Keratin mandible jaw with leech consumption from no. 4.

Fig. 3 in Blood recovery of wild Mekong snail-eating turtles (Malayemys subtrijuga Schlegel and Müller, 1845) in captivity from leech infestation

Fig. 3. Trend analysis of red blood cell count (RCC) (left) and white blood cell count (WCC) (right) of Malayemys subtrijuga during captivity recovery from 2 November 2018 (week 0) to 1 March 2019 (week 17). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 1 in Blood recovery of wild Mekong snail-eating turtles (Malayemys subtrijuga Schlegel and Müller, 1845) in captivity from leech infestation

Fig. 1. Analysis of the mean red blood cell count (RCC) (blue line) and white blood cell count (WCC) (green line) of Malayemys subtrijuga during captivity recovery from 2 November 2018 (week 0) to 1 March 2019 (week 17). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 2 in Blood recovery of wild Mekong snail-eating turtles (Malayemys subtrijuga Schlegel and Müller, 1845) in captivity from leech infestation

Fig. 2. Analysis of the mean weight of Malayemys subtrijuga during captivity recovery from 2 November 2018 (week 0) to 1 March 2019 (week 17).