Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,418
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
1,418 results for “grass”
Fig. 11.– A in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 11.– A. Brachiaria umbellata (Trin.) Clayton; B, C. Echinochloa hubbardii (A. Camus) Voronts.; D–F. Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D. Webster. [A: Tzimbazaza 24.II.2022; B: Vorontsova et al. 2115; C: Vorontsova et al. 2124; D: Vorontsova et al. 2396; E: Vorontsova et al. 2398; F: Randriatsara et al. 3] [Photos: Maria S. Vorontsova]
Fig. 10. – Brachiaria tsiafajavonensis A. Camus. A in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 10. – Brachiaria tsiafajavonensis A. Camus. A. Habit; B. Ligule; C. Panicle branch; D. Spikelet; E. Lower glume, ventral view; F. Lower glume, dorsal view; G. Upper glume, ventral view; H. Upper glume, dorsal view; I. Lower lemma, ventral view; J. Lower lemma, dorsal view; K. Lower palea; L. Upper floret, ventral view; M. Upper lemma, ventral view; N. Upper lemma, dorsal view; O. Upper palea, ventral view; P. Upper palea, dorsal view; Q. Upper floret lodicules. Scale bar: A = 2.5 cm; B = 3.3 mm; C = 2 mm; D–Q = 1.5 mm. [Bosser 15116, K] [Drawing: Lucy T. Smith]
Fig. 14. – A, B in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 14. – A, B. Urochloa deflexa (Schumach.) H. Scholz; C, D. Urochloa distachyos (L.) T.Q. Nguyen; E, F. Urochloa reptans (L.) Stapf. [A, B: Ankarafantsika NP 17.II.2018; C: Vorontsova et al. 1774; D: Vorontsova et al. 2117; E, F: Vorontsova et al. 2120] [Photos: Maria S. Vorontsova]
Fig. 17 in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 17.– Distribution maps. Urochloa ramosa (L.) T.Q. Nguyen (stars), U. reptans (L.) Stapf (triangles), and U. trichopus (Hochst.) Stapf (circles).
Fig. 7. – Brachiaria subrostrata A. Camus. A in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 7. – Brachiaria subrostrata A. Camus. A. Habit; B. Ligule; C. Leaf; D. Spikelet; E. Lower glume, dorsal view; F. Upper glume, dorsal view; G. Lower lemma, dorsal view; H. Upper floret, dorsal view; I. Upper lemma, dorsal view; J. Caryopsis. [Drawing: Roger Lala Andriamiarisoa]
Fig. 6. – Brachiaria fragrans A. Camus. A in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 6. – Brachiaria fragrans A. Camus. A. Habit; B. Ligule; C. Panicle branch; D. Spikelet; E. Lower glume, ventral view; F. Lower glume, dorsal view; G. Upper glume, ventral view; H. Upper glume, dorsal view; I. Spikelet, glumes removed; J. Lower lemma, ventral view; K. Lower lemma, dorsal view; L. Lower floret lodicule; M. Lower palea, ventral view; N. Lower palea, dorsal view; O. Lower floret stamen; P. Upper floret, ventral view; Q. Upper floret, lateral view; R. Upper lemma, ventral view; S. Upper lemma, dorsal view; T. Upper palea, ventral view; U. Upper palea, dorsal view; V. Upper floret stamen; W. Upper floret gynoecium. Scale bar: A = 3 cm; B = 3.3 mm; C = 4 mm; D–W = 1.6 mm. [Humbert 14315, K] [Drawing: Lucy T. Smith]
Fig. 3 in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 3. – Brachiaria comorensis (Mez) A. Camus. A. Habit; B. Ligule; C. Panicle; D. Panicle branch; E. Spikelet; F. Lower glume, ventral view; G. Upper glume, ventral view; H. Lower lemma, ventral view; I. Upper floret, ventral view; J. Upper floret, lateral view; K. Upper lemma, ventral view; L. Upper lemma, dorsal view; M. Upper palea, ventral view; N. Upper palea, dorsal view. Scale bars: A, C = 3 cm; B = 3.3 mm; D = 2.5 mm; E–N = 0.8 mm. [A–C, E–N: Wohlhauser 60254, K; D: Nanjarisoa et al. 193, K] [Drawing: Lucy T. Smith]
Fig. 13 in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 13. – Distribution maps. Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D. Webster (stars), U. deflexa (Schumach.) H. Scholz (triangles), U. distachyos (L.) T.Q. Nguyen (circles), and U. eminii (Mez) Davidse (squares).
Fig. 2. – A–C. Brachiaria bemarivensis A in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 2. – A–C. Brachiaria bemarivensis A. Camus; D. Brachiaria comorensis (Mez) A. Camus; E, F. Brachiaria dimorpha A. Camus. [A: Vorontsova et al. 1012; B, C: Vorontsova et al. 1770; D: Morris et al. 3; E, F: Nanjarisoa et al. 73] [Photos: Maria S. Vorontsova]
Fig. 9. – Distribution maps. Brachiaria subrostrata A in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 9. – Distribution maps. Brachiaria subrostrata A. Camus (stars), B. tsiafajavonensis A. Camus (triangles), B. umbellata (Trin.) Clayton (circles), and Echinochloa hubbardii (A. Camus) Voronts. (squares).
Fig. 16 in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 16. – Distribution maps. Urochloa nana (Stapf) Voronts. (stars), U. panicoides P. Beauv. (triangles), U. plantaginea (Link) R.D. Webster (circles), and U. pseudodichotoma (Bosser) Voronts. (squares).
Fig. 5 in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 5. – Distribution maps. Brachiaria epacridifolia (Stapf) A. Camus (stars), B. fragrans A. Camus (triangles), B. fruticulosa A. Camus (circles), and B. perrieri A. Camus (squares).
Fig. 12 in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 12. – Distribution maps. Echinochloa leandriana (Bosser) Voronts. (stars), E. serpens (Kunth) Voronts. (triangles), Moorochloa eruciformis (Sm.) Veldkamp (circles), and Urochloa arrecta (Hack. ex T. Durand & Schinz) Morrone & Zuloaga (squares).
Fig. 15 in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 15. – Distribution maps. Urochloa glumaris (Trin.) Veldkamp (stars), U. humbertiana (A. Camus) Voronts. (triangles), U. jubata (Fig. & De Not.) Sosef (circles), and U. mutica (Forssk.) T.Q. Nguyen (squares).
Fig. 1. – Distribution maps. Brachiaria antsirabensis A in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 1. – Distribution maps. Brachiaria antsirabensis A. Camus (stars), B. bemarivensis A. Camus (triangles), B. comorensis (Mez) A. Camus (circles), and B. dimorpha A. Camus (squares). [Map: Sarah Z. Ficinski]
Fig. 8. – A, B. Brachiaria subrostrata A in Revision of some Malagasy forage grasses and their relatives within Brachiaria, Echinochloa, Moorochloa, and Urochloa
Fig. 8. – A, B. Brachiaria subrostrata A. Camus; C. Brachiaria tsiafajavonensis A. Camus; D–F. Brachiaria umbellata (Trin.) Clayton.
Dataset and code supporting Cornelis et al. 2023. Stuck in the weeds: Invasive grasses reduce tiger snake movement
<p>Data and code used in the publication:</p> <p>Cornelis, J., Cooper, C. E., Lettoof, D. C., Mayer, M., Marshall, B. M. 2023 Stuck in the weeds: Invasive grasses reduce tiger snake movement. bioRxiv 2023.03.06.531246; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.06.531246</p> <p>Includes telemetry data, aKDE, dBBMM, and Bayesian model specification and results, code to reproduce analysis and generate figures </p> <p> </p> <div> </div>
Global intraspecific trait-climate relationships for grasses are linked to a species' typical form and function
<p>Plant traits are useful for predicting how species may respond to environmental change and/or influence ecosystem properties. Understanding the extent to which traits vary within species and across climatic gradients is particularly important for understanding how species may respond to climate change. We explored whether climate drives spatial patterns of intraspecific trait variation for three traits (specific leaf area (SLA), plant height, and leaf nitrogen content (Nmass)) across 122 grass species (family: Poaceae) with a combined distribution across six continents. We tested the hypothesis that the sensitivity (i.e., slope) of intraspecific trait responses to climate across space would be related to the species' typical form and function (e.g., leaf economics, stature, and lifespan). We observed both positive and negative intraspecific trait responses to climate with the distribution of slope coefficients across species straddling zero for precipitation, temperature, and climate seasonality. As hypothesized, variation in slope coefficients across species was partially explained by leaf economics and lifespan. For example, acquisitive species with nitrogen-rich leaves grew taller and produced leaves with higher SLA in warmer regions compared to species with low N<sub>mass</sub>. Compared to perennials, annual grasses invested in leaves with higher SLA yet decreased height and N<sub>mass</sub> in regions with high precipitation seasonality. Thus, while the influence of climate on trait expression may at first appear idiosyncratic, variation in trait-climate slope coefficients is at least partially explained by the species' typical form and function. Overall, our results suggest that a species' mean location along one axis of trait variation (e.g., leaf economics) could influence how traits along a separate axis of variation (e.g., plant size) respond to spatial variation in climate.</p>
Figs 38–39 in Revision of the grass huntsman spider genus Pseudomicrommata Järvi, 1914 (Araneae: Sparassidae) in the Afrotropical Region
Figs 38–39. Pseudomicrommata schoemanae sp. n., female paratype, Bossoum, Cameroon (SMF): (38) epigyne, ventral view; (39) vulva, dorsal view.
Figs 28–30 in Revision of the grass huntsman spider genus Pseudomicrommata Järvi, 1914 (Araneae: Sparassidae) in the Afrotropical Region
Figs 28–30. Pseudomicrommata mary sp. n., female paratype, Mt Nimba, Guinea (MRAC): (28) epigyne, ventral view; (29) vulva, dorsal view; (30) left vulva, anterio-dorso-lateral view.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.