Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in Temporal dynamics of species associations in the parasite community of European eels, Anguilla anguilla, from a coastal lagoon

Fig. 2. Intensity of infection (mean ± SE number of parasites per host, including infected hosts only) of the six most common helminth parasites of eels, Anguilla anguilla, in Comacchio Lagoons, during three sampling periods. Graphs on the right-hand side do not include the 2015–2017 period, as these species were not found during that period. See Table 1 for full species names.

Fig. 4 in Temporal dynamics of species associations in the parasite community of European eels, Anguilla anguilla, from a coastal lagoon

Fig. 4. Pairwise relationships between numbers of parasites per host for the three most common digenean parasites of eels, Anguilla anguilla, in Comacchio Lagoons, across all three sampling periods combined. The line represents the relationship (with 95% confidence intervals) predicted by the generalized linear model; see text. Tick marks indicate partial residuals with either positive (top) or negative values (bottom). See Table 1 for full species names.

Fig. 3 in Temporal dynamics of species associations in the parasite community of European eels, Anguilla anguilla, from a coastal lagoon

Fig. 3. Scatterplots of pairwise relationships between numbers of parasites per host for the three most common digenean parasites of eels, Anguilla anguilla, in Comacchio Lagoons, across all three sampling periods combined. See Table 1 for full species names.

Fig. 1 in Temporal dynamics of species associations in the parasite community of European eels, Anguilla anguilla, from a coastal lagoon

Fig. 1. Abundance (mean number of parasites per host, including non-infected hosts) of the six most common helminth parasites of eels, Anguilla anguilla, in Comacchio Lagoons, during three sampling periods: 2005–2006 (N = 140 eels), 2010–2013 (N = 131), and 2015–2017 (N = 30). Note that some values for the time period 2015–2017 are based on very few fish; see Table 1 for actual numbers and for full species names.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →

Fig. 3 in Effect of vegetation and abiotic factors on the abundance and population structure of Crocodylus acutus (Cuvier, 1806) in coastal lagoons of Colima, Mexico

Fig. 3. Dendrogram considering the crocodiles observed, water salinity, temperature, depth, and the four vegetation types present. Acronym definitions and characteristics of the sites are given in Table 1.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Effect of vegetation and abiotic factors on the abundance and population structure of Crocodylus acutus (Cuvier, 1806) in coastal lagoons of Colima, Mexico

Fig. 1. Selected sites in the study area. Acronym definitions and characteristics of the sites are given in Table 1.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →

Fig. 2 in Effect of vegetation and abiotic factors on the abundance and population structure of Crocodylus acutus (Cuvier, 1806) in coastal lagoons of Colima, Mexico

Fig. 2. Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) analysis showing the formation of two groups, by taking into account the crocodiles observed, water salinity, temperature, depth, and the four vegetation types present. Acronym definitions and characteristics of the sites are given in Table 1.

Fig. 7. A and B in Reproduction of Brevoortia aurea (Spix & Agassiz, 1829) (Actinopterygii: Clupeidae) in the Mar Chiquita Coastal Lagoon, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Fig. 7. A and B: Batch fecundity as a function of total weight (without ovary) and total length, respectively. C and D: Relative fecundity as a function of total weight (without ovary) and total length respectively.

Fig. 4 in Reproduction of Brevoortia aurea (Spix & Agassiz, 1829) (Actinopterygii: Clupeidae) in the Mar Chiquita Coastal Lagoon, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Fig. 4. Monthly relative frequency of the different gonadal development stages observed in females of Brevoortia aurea on the annual cycle, and the added samples of October and November for the Mar Chiquita coastal lagoon.

Fig. 8 in Reproduction of Brevoortia aurea (Spix & Agassiz, 1829) (Actinopterygii: Clupeidae) in the Mar Chiquita Coastal Lagoon, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Fig. 8. Proportion of mature individuals observed for each length classes of Brevoortia aurea. Females (black circles, dotted line) L 50 = 27.77 cm, N = 588. Males (white circles, solid line) L 50 = 26.59 cm, N = 293.

Fig. 2 in Reproduction of Brevoortia aurea (Spix & Agassiz, 1829) (Actinopterygii: Clupeidae) in the Mar Chiquita Coastal Lagoon, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Fig. 2. Captures per unite effort (CPUE kg/h), temperature (°C) and salinity (psu) obtained for Brevoortia aurea during sampled period in Mar Chiquita Coastal Lagoon.

Fig. 5. A in Reproduction of Brevoortia aurea (Spix & Agassiz, 1829) (Actinopterygii: Clupeidae) in the Mar Chiquita Coastal Lagoon, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Fig. 5. A: oogonias (arrow) and primary growth (p) oocytes; B: cortical alveoli stage oocyte (arrow); C: yolked oocytes; D: hydrated oocytes (arrow); E: details of a yolked oocyte (r: radiata zone; g: granulosa cells; t: teca cells); F: atresic follicle (arrow); G: post-ovulatory follicle "0" (arrow); H: post-ovulatory follicle "1" (arrow). Scale bars: A, E 25 μm; B, C, F, G, H, 100 μm; D, 250 μm.

Fig. 3 in Reproduction of Brevoortia aurea (Spix & Agassiz, 1829) (Actinopterygii: Clupeidae) in the Mar Chiquita Coastal Lagoon, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Fig. 3. Monthly variation of the gonadosomatic index (GSI) (females only), based on an annual cycle.

Fig. 6 in Reproduction of Brevoortia aurea (Spix & Agassiz, 1829) (Actinopterygii: Clupeidae) in the Mar Chiquita Coastal Lagoon, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Fig. 6. Frequency distribution of oocyte diameters (N = 6000 oocytes measured). From black bars to white bars: Primary growth oocyte, cortical alveoli, yolked oocytes and hydrated oocytes.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Figure 3 in Colonization, hatching dates, and growth rates of juvenile Hyporhamphus picarti (Hemiramphidae), in the Nador lagoon (NE Morocco)

Figure 3. - Mean monthly air temperature (°C) at Nador during 2012 and 2013. (X) indicate water temperature at each sampling date in 2012 and 2013.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Figure 1 in Colonization, hatching dates, and growth rates of juvenile Hyporhamphus picarti (Hemiramphidae), in the Nador lagoon (NE Morocco)

Figure 1. - The Nador lagoon and location of the six sampling stations. Black arrows indicate the hourly sense of the water flow in the lagoon. White arrows indicate the main freshwater inputs. Some geographical features cited in the text are indicated.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2013View details →

Figure 1 in Morphological characterization of striped seabream (Lithognathus mormyrus, Sparidae) in some Mediterranean lagoons

Figure 1. - Sampling localities of Lithognathus mormyrus: (1) Mellah lagoon (Algeria); (2) Bizerta lagoon (Tunisia); (3) Ghar El Melh lagoon (Tunisia); (4) El Biban lagoon (Tunisia); (5) Farwa lagoon (Libya); (6) Venice lagoon (Italy).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2013View details →

Figure 3 in Morphological characterization of striped seabream (Lithognathus mormyrus, Sparidae) in some Mediterranean lagoons

Figure 3. - FDA scores on the three first discriminant functions for the Mediterranean lagoon samples projected on FD1×FD2 plane (A) and on FD1×FD3 plane (B).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2013View details →

Figure 2 in Morphological characterization of striped seabream (Lithognathus mormyrus, Sparidae) in some Mediterranean lagoons

Figure 2. - Conventional linear variables and truss elements. Locations of the 11 landmarks (1-11) used to define the truss network on L. mormyrus. Landmarks are illustrated as black dots and truss measurements between the dots as discontinued lines. Abbreviations in Annex II.