Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
242
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
242 results for “mixed methods”
Data from: Socio-cultural factors influencing knowledge, attitudes and menstrual hygiene practices among Junior High School adolescent girls in the Kpando District of Ghana: A mixed method study
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Redesigning the ‘choice architecture’ of hospital prescription charts: a mixed methods study incorporating in-situ simulation
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: How do organisational characteristics influence teamwork and service delivery in lung cancer diagnostic assessment programmes? A mixed-methods study
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Evaluating the Impact of a Mandatory Pre-Abortion Ultrasound Viewing Law: A Mixed Methods Study
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Coping with impostor feelings: evidence-based recommendations from a mixed methods study
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Experiences of women who travel for abortion: a mixed methods systematic review
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Patients' experiences with a behaviour change intervention to enhance physical activity in primary care: a mixed methods study
Objective: To explore the experiences of patients at risk for cardiovascular disease in primary care with the Activate intervention in relation to their success in increasing their physical activity. Methods: A convergent mixed-methods design, parallel to a cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care, using a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews was conducted. Questionnaires from 67 patients were analysed, and semi-structured interviews of 22 patients were thematically analysed. Experiences of patients who had objectively increased their physical activity (responders) were compared to those who had not (non-responders). Objective success was analysed in relation to self-perceived success. Results: The questionnaire and interview data corresponded, and no substantial differences among responders and non-responders emerged. Participating in the intervention increased their awareness of their physical activity and their physical activity level. Key components of the intervention were nurses' subsequent consultations and trustful support and the use of self-monitoring tools. Patients highly valued jointly setting goals, planning actions, receiving feedback and review on their goal attainment and jointly solving problems. Nurses' support, using self-monitoring tools, and involving others incentivised patients. Internal circumstances and external circumstances challenged patients' engagement in increasing and maintaining their physical activity. Conclusion: Patients experienced the Activate intervention as valuable to increase and maintain their physical activity, irrespective of their objective change in physical activity. The findings enable the understanding of the effectiveness of the intervention and implementation in primary care. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02725203
Supervisors' Perspectives on Online Interprofessional Supervision: Results from a Mixed Methods Longitudinal Cross-sectional Study
<p>Supervisors’ Perspectives on Online Interprofessional Supervision: Results from a Mixed Methods Longitudinal Cross-sectional Study </p>
Interview Guide for the article: Examining Online International Health Professions Education: A Mixed Methods Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Early Outcomes
<p>This interview guide was used to conduct the 17 interviews upon which the qualitative portion of the research was built.</p>
The Use of the Diary in Neonatal Pathology: a Mixed-method Study for Collecting and Analyzing the Experience of Parents and Health Care Personnel.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06316193. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Mixed Method Study Protocol_Cognitive Non-technical Skills Learning Module for a Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05288257. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
A Feasibility Mixed Methods Study of the Intervention Take Your Sexuality Back for Sexually Traumatized Women.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07147855. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Investigation of the Effect of Information on the Empowerment of Cancer Patients Using Question Prompt List: A Mixed Method Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06903390. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Transcultural Mindfulness Assessment: A Mixed Methods Analysis
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01299064. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to the Participation of Women Living With HIV in Clinical Trials : a Mixed-method Study (EVA)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04655560. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
The Efficacy of a Technology-Assisted Block Training Program on Cognitive Function, Hand Dexterity, and Grip Strength in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Research
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07315724. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Patient Descriptors Of Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study Of Cancer Survivors
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06634381. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Chronic Conditions in Childhood Obesity Subject: An Mixed Methods Research Approach
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01987713. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Supporting Sexual Health in Bladder Cancer Patients: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Intervention Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07339761. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Mixed Methods Study to Assess Family Members Unmet Needs in an Oncology Setting
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06142071. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.