Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in Pattern Of Genetic And Morphometric Differentiation In Maculinea Nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) In The Carpathian Basin

Fig. 2. Measured traits on the wings of Maculinea nausithous. Forewing: anal length (a), length of the outer margin (b), apical angle (β). Hindwing: anal length (c), costal length (d), basal angle (γ), widths

Fig. 3 in Pattern Of Genetic And Morphometric Differentiation In Maculinea Nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) In The Carpathian Basin

Fig. 3. UPGMA dendrogram constructed using CAVALLI-SFORSA & EDWARDS chord distances (A) and UPGMA phenogram built on the basis of the Euclidean distances among the average canonical

Fig. 1 in Pattern Of Genetic And Morphometric Differentiation In Maculinea Nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) In The Carpathian Basin

Fig. 1. Sample sites. Őrség region (West Hungary): Kétvölgy (Kv) and Magyarszombatfa (Mfa). Transylvania (Romania): Răscruci (Ras) and Fânatele Clujului (Fan)

Fig. 7 in Pattern Of Genetic And Morphometric Differentiation In Maculinea Nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) In The Carpathian Basin

Fig. 7. Results of the classification of individuals. A: Bar plot of the individuals as a result of the Bayesian clustering analysis. B: Distribution of the two genetic clusters in the two regions. 1: genetic cluster 1; 2: genetic cluster 2. C: Allocation of the individuals at the regional level on the basis of their

opencc-by-4.0May 2021View details →

Fig. 9 Morphometric relationship between a in Eurythenes atacamensis sp. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda) exhibits ontogenetic vertical stratification across abyssal and hadal depths in the Atacama Trench, eastern South Pacific Ocean

Fig. 9 Morphometric relationship between a total body length and weight and b coxa 4 diagonal length and total body length. Bathymetric relationship of total body length for c juvenile and d female Eurythenes atacamensis sp. nov. Grey areas in b and c represent 95% confidence intervals of the model mean

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →

Pollen morphometric data and phytolith counts and frequencies of native grasses of the Falkland Islands

Groff et al. phytolith count freq.csv is a dataset of the raw counts and cumulative frequencies of phytolith shape/texture classifications for nine native grass species from the Falkland Islands. Grass species include xyz. and 42 phytoliths were classified by counting at least 300 phytoliths.  Groff et al. pollen morphometrics.csv is a dataset of the raw measurements of pollen grains from eight native grass species from the Falkland Islands. Measurements (in µm) include the polar axis, equatorial axis, annulus diameter, pore diameter (col B), annulus diameter (col C), polar axis (col D), equatorial axis (col E), and the respective transformed data (cols F-I) and the six possible ratios of measurements (cols J-O).

Fig. 6 in Morphometric Variation Of Hybridizing Species And Gynogenetic Biotypes Of Spined Loaches (Cobitidae, Cobitis) In River Systems Of Ukraine

Fig. 6. UPGMA clustering of biotypes by Mahalanobis distances calculated for body measurements and indices separately. Rectangles bounds the clusters with more than 90 % AU-support.

Fig 5. 95 in Morphometric Variation Of Hybridizing Species And Gynogenetic Biotypes Of Spined Loaches (Cobitidae, Cobitis) In River Systems Of Ukraine

Fig 5. 95 % confidence ellipses of the biotypes in the morphospace of four between-group principal components calculated for indices. Mean groups of each biotype is marked with black point and designation.

Fig. 3. 95 in Morphometric Variation Of Hybridizing Species And Gynogenetic Biotypes Of Spined Loaches (Cobitidae, Cobitis) In River Systems Of Ukraine

Fig. 3. 95 % confidence interval ellipses of the biotypes in the morphospace of bgPC1 and bgPC2 calculated for log10-transformed absolute traits. Each biotype means are marked with black points and names. The biotypes are explained in table 1.

Fig. 4. 95 in Morphometric Variation Of Hybridizing Species And Gynogenetic Biotypes Of Spined Loaches (Cobitidae, Cobitis) In River Systems Of Ukraine

Fig. 4. 95% confidence interval ellipses of the biotypes in the morphospace of bg PC3 and bgPC4 A calculated for log10 transformed absolute traits. Designations the same as on fig. 3.

Fig. 2 in Morphometric Variation Of Hybridizing Species And Gynogenetic Biotypes Of Spined Loaches (Cobitidae, Cobitis) In River Systems Of Ukraine

Fig. 2. Body measurements for Cobitis. Th e original fish image is from Wilhelm von Wright out of Fries, 1895.

Fig. 1 in Morphometric Variation Of Hybridizing Species And Gynogenetic Biotypes Of Spined Loaches (Cobitidae, Cobitis) In River Systems Of Ukraine

Fig. 1. Collection points of spined loaches in the river systems of Ukraine. Th e decoding of the numbering of samples is given in Material and methods.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2019View details →

Fig. 3 in Size-At-Age Variability And Sexual Dimorphism Of Morphometric Characteristics In The Late Ontogenesis Of The Marsh Frog, Pelophylax Ridibundus (Anura, Ranidae), From Terrytory Of Crimea

Fig. 3. The differentiation of males (А) and females (B) of the marsh frog according to the absolute values of the body measurements.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2019View details →

Fig. 2 in Size-At-Age Variability And Sexual Dimorphism Of Morphometric Characteristics In The Late Ontogenesis Of The Marsh Frog, Pelophylax Ridibundus (Anura, Ranidae), From Terrytory Of Crimea

Fig. 2. Micrographs of cross- sections through the middle part of the diaphysis of the fifth phalange of the fourth toe of frogs: a, b, c, d, e — the arrow indicates the lines that correspond wintering 1–5.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2022View details →

Meristic and morphometric data of Albula species from Japan and adjacent waters

Meristic counts and morphometric measurements of Albula argentea (Forster, 1801); Albula glossodonta (Forsskål, 1775); Albula koreana Kwun and Kim, 2011; and Albula oligolepis Hidaka, Iwatsuki and Randall, 2008 from Japan and adjacent waters in the northwestern Pacific Ocean, based on Matsunuma et al. (2022) for examined specimens.

Fig. 11 in A morphometric approach and recircumscription of the Stachytarpheta longispicata complex (Verbenaceae)

Fig. 11. Stachytarpheta longispicata (Pohl) S.Atkins. A. Habitat. B. Habit. C–D. Individuals showing details of the leaves and inflorescences, highlighting the short pedicels, bracts, calyxes, and corollas. Photos by Marcelo Trovó.

Fig. 12 in A morphometric approach and recircumscription of the Stachytarpheta longispicata complex (Verbenaceae)

Fig. 12. Stachytarpheta minasensis (S.Atkins) P.H.Cardoso comb. and stat. nov. A. Habitat. B. Habit. C–D. Individuals showing details of the leaves and inflorescences, highlighting the short pedicels, bracts, calyxes, and corollas. Photos by Pedro Henrique Nobre.

Fig. 13 in A morphometric approach and recircumscription of the Stachytarpheta longispicata complex (Verbenaceae)

Fig. 13. Stachytarpheta ratteri (S.Atkins) P.H.Cardoso comb. and stat. nov. A. Habitat. B. Habit. C–D. Individuals showing details of the leaves and inflorescences, highlighting the short pedicels, bracts, calyxes, and corollas. Photos by Pedro Henrique Cardoso (A–B, D) and Maurício Mercadante (C).

Fig. 10 in A morphometric approach and recircumscription of the Stachytarpheta longispicata complex (Verbenaceae)

Fig. 10. Stachytarpheta longipedicellata (Moldenke) P.H.Cardoso comb. and stat. nov. A. Habitat. B. Habit. C–D. Individuals showing details of the inflorescences, highlighting the pubescence of the inflorescence, long pedicels, bracts, calyxes, and corollas. Photos by Pedro Henrique Cardoso.

Fig. 9 in A morphometric approach and recircumscription of the Stachytarpheta longispicata complex (Verbenaceae)

Fig. 9. Stachytarpheta brevibracteata (Moldenke) P.H.Cardoso comb. and stat. nov. A. Habitat. B. Habit. C–D. Individuals showing details of the leaves and inflorescences, highlighting the short pedicels, bracts, calyxes and corollas. Photos by Pedro Henrique Cardoso (A–B) and Pedro Henrique Nobre (C).