Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

146

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

146 results for “phase imaging”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
ClinicalTrials.gov20/100

Phase II Study for Amyloid Binding Imaging Study of [18F]AV-45 in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease and Healthy Volunteers

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01238458. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
zenodo16/100

Reconstruction software: 4D imaging of two-phase flow in porous media using laboratory-based micro-Computed Tomography

<p>This repository contains the dataset and the computed tomography (CT) reconstruction software used in the journal article "4D imaging of two-phase flow in porous media using laboratory-based micro-Computed Tomography".&nbsp;</p>

restrictedcc-by-4.0Oct 2023View details →
zenodo16/100

DICOM imagings three-phase bone scintigraphy of patients with diabetic foot syndrome

<p>The results of&nbsp;three-phase bone scan in patients with diabetic foot are presented. The dataset contains DICOM files.</p><p>The study was supported by the RSF grant within the research project No.&nbsp;22-75-00081.</p>

restrictedcc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov16/100

A Radiopharmacokinetic and Radiodosimetric Phase I Imaging Study of 18F-FAZA

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00756691. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
zenodo12/100

Carotid Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance before Treatment: 4D-Flow versus Standard 2D Imaging

<p>Secchi F, Monti CB, Capra D, Vitale R, Mazzaccaro D, Conti M, Jin N, Giese D, Nano G, Sardanelli F, Marrocco-Trischitta MM. Carotid Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance before Treatment: 4D-Flow versus Standard 2D Imaging. Tomography. 2021 Sep 28;7(4):513-522. doi: 10.3390/tomography7040044. PMID: 34698250; PMCID: PMC8544659.</p> <p>Abstract</p> <p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of agreement between flow/velocity data obtained from 2D-phase-contrast (PC) and 4D-flow in patients scheduled for treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Image acquisition was performed using a 1.5 T scanner. We compared mean flow rates, vessel areas, and peak velocities obtained during the acquisition with both techniques in 20 consecutive patients, 15 males and 5 females aged 69 &plusmn; 5 years (mean &plusmn; standard deviation). There was a good correlation between both techniques for the CCA flow (<em>r</em>&nbsp;= 0.65,&nbsp;<em>p</em>&nbsp;&lt; 0.001), whereas for the ICA flow and ECA flow the correlation was only moderate (<em>r</em>&nbsp;= 0.4,&nbsp;<em>p</em>&nbsp;= 0.011 and&nbsp;<em>r</em>&nbsp;= 0.45,&nbsp;<em>p</em>&nbsp;= 0.003, respectively). Correlations of peak velocities between methods were good for CCA (<em>r</em>&nbsp;= 0.56,&nbsp;<em>p</em>&nbsp;&lt; 0.001) and moderate for ECA (<em>r</em>&nbsp;= 0.41,&nbsp;<em>p</em>&nbsp;= 0.008). There was no correlation for ICA (<em>r</em>&nbsp;= 0.04,&nbsp;<em>p</em>&nbsp;= 0.805). Cross-sectional area values between methods showed no significant correlations for CCA (<em>r</em>&nbsp;= 0.18,&nbsp;<em>p</em>&nbsp;= 0.269), ICA (<em>r</em>&nbsp;= 0.1,&nbsp;<em>p</em>&nbsp;= 0.543), and ECA (<em>r</em>&nbsp;= 0.05,&nbsp;<em>p</em>&nbsp;= 0.767). Conclusion: the 4D-flow imaging provided a good correlation of CCA and a moderate correlation of ICA flow rates against 2D-PC, underestimating peak velocities and overestimating cross-sectional areas in all carotid segments.</p>

restrictedFeb 2022View details →
zenodo8/100

Dog visual perception of faces, objects and phase-scrambled images, measured with non-invasive electroencephalography

<p>This is the dataset used in the publication of Kujala MV, Kauppi J-P, T&ouml;rnqvist&nbsp;H, Helle L, Vainio O, Kujala&nbsp;J, Parkkonen&nbsp;L (2020).&nbsp;Time-resolved classification of dog brain signals reveals early processing of faces, species and emotion. Scientific reports 10, 19846 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76806-8.</p> <p>The dataset is electroencephalography data, measured non-invasively from the surface of the head from eight different dogs; and its supporting files. The data has been measured with 7-9 EEG electrodes; only the data from 7 EEG channels were used in the analysis. During the measurement, dogs were free to move; they were not restrained in any way.&nbsp;Instead, they were trained with positive operant conditioning to lie down and lean their head on a chin rest for short periods of time, during which they were shown still images from a computer screen. The stimuli were shown, in pseudo-randomized order, in eight different presentation scenarios, within 5 separate stimulus blocks per scenario,&nbsp;15&ndash;20 stimuli per block. Between the stimulus blocks, dogs were always rewarded with a treat; this has caused major movement artifacts on the data between the stimulus blocks.&nbsp;Different presentation scenarios were shown in different days and repeated twice. Please refer to the above publication for further details of the experiment.</p> <p>The trigger is the same across all the stimuli; thus, separate scenario stimulus identifier lists were used in determining the stimulus order; please refer to the README.txt file and PresentationScenarios.xlsx files for further details.</p> <p>The dataset also contains anatomical magnetic resonance images of one dog, which was used in the aforementioned publication for source localization.</p> <p>If you have further questions regarding the data or the acquisition, please do not hesitate to contact the authors of the original publication.</p>

restrictedNov 2020View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record