Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in The complete mitochondrial genome of Platygaster robiniae (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae): A novel tRNA secondary structure, gene rearrangements and phylogenetic implications

Fig. 5. Phylogenetic tree Note: (A): Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree inferred from the mitochondrial genome based on the 13 PCGs dataset; (B): Bayesian inference (BI) phylogenetic tree inferred from the mitochondrial genome based on the 13 PCGs dataset.

Fig. 4 in The complete mitochondrial genome of Platygaster robiniae (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae): A novel tRNA secondary structure, gene rearrangements and phylogenetic implications

Fig. 4. Mitochondrial genome organization of Platygaster robiniae and 11 species of Platygastroidea, compared with the ancestral pancrustacean mt genome organization. Note: tRNA genes are indicated by single letter amino acid codes, L1, L2, S1 and S2 denote tRNALeu(CUN), tRNALeu(UUR), tRNASer(AGN) and tRNASer(UCN), respectively. Genes are transcribed from left to right except those indicated by underlining. Gene movements, relative to the ancestral organization, are indicated with arrows.

Fig. 2 in The complete mitochondrial genome of Platygaster robiniae (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae): A novel tRNA secondary structure, gene rearrangements and phylogenetic implications

Fig. 2. Amino acids (A) and relative synonymous codons (B) of protein-coding genes of the mitochondrial genome of Platygaster robiniae.

Fig. 1 in The complete mitochondrial genome of Platygaster robiniae (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae): A novel tRNA secondary structure, gene rearrangements and phylogenetic implications

Fig. 1. Genetic map of the complete mitochondrial genome of Platygaster robiniae. Notes: the blue arrow represents the direction of gene transcription; the black peak represents the deviation of GC%; the purple and green peaks represent the deviation in GC skew; green refers to positive skew, and purple indicates negative skew. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 1 in Cortical fibrils and secondary deposits in periderm of the hemichordate Rhabdopleura (Graptolithoidea)

Fig. 1. Inner secondary deposits in zooidal tubes of fossil Rhabdopleuroidea. A–C. Rhabdopleura kozlowskii Kulicki, 1969; Bathonian and Callovian of Poland. After Kulicki 1971, modified; A, ZPAL Pb.II/8; B, ZPAL Pb.II/9; C, ZPAL Pb.II/10. D. Rhabdopleurites primaevus Kozłowski, 1967; Lower Ordovician of Öland, Sweden. After Skevington 1965, modified.

Fig.7. Rhabdopleura normani Allman,1869 in Cortical fibrils and secondary deposits in periderm of the hemichordate Rhabdopleura (Graptolithoidea)

Fig.7. Rhabdopleura normani Allman,1869,Recent(ZPALPb.5/4).SEMmicrographs. A.Fragmentofcoeneciumcomposedofanerecttubeconnected withabranchedcreepingtube. B.Connectionofcreepingtubewitherecttube. C.Erecttube. D.Outersurfaceofcreepingtubedevoidofpellicle. E.Details ofbrokenperidermshowingarrangementoffusellarfibrils. F.Shortverticalfibrilsonperidermoferecttube. G.Peridermofthesameerecttubedevoidof verticalwrinkles.Abbreviations:b,band−likestructurecomposedofcorticalfibrils;c,creepingtube;co,fusellarcollar;e,erecttube;ff,fusellarfibrils;m, foreign material; o, oblique suture; v, wrinkle.

Fig. 4. Rhabdopleura compacta Hincks, 1880 in Cortical fibrils and secondary deposits in periderm of the hemichordate Rhabdopleura (Graptolithoidea)

Fig. 4. Rhabdopleura compacta Hincks, 1880, Recent (ZPALPb.5/1). SEM micrographs. Micromorphology of outer surface of creeping tubes. A. Fragmentofcreepingtubewithprominentzig−zagsuture. B–D.Corticalfibrilsinfusellarcollars.Abbreviations:c,fusellarcollar;cf,corticalfibril;fm,foreign material; p, fusellar pellicle.

Fig. 6. Rhabdopleura compacta Hincks, 1880 in Cortical fibrils and secondary deposits in periderm of the hemichordate Rhabdopleura (Graptolithoidea)

Fig. 6. Rhabdopleura compacta Hincks, 1880, Recent (ZPALPb.5/3). SEM micrographs. Secondary inner deposits in erect tubes. A. Growing end of an erect tube with inner cortical deposits. B. Detail of Fig. 5A showing an arrangement of cortical fibrils. C. Broken erect tube near its base showing membraneousinnerdeposits. D.Multilayeredstructureofinnermembraneousdeposits.Abbreviations:cf,corticalfibril;i,interfusellarsuture;id,innerdeposit; l, last fusellus; n, next to the last fusellus; o, outer edge of an erect tube.

Fig.8. Rhabdopleura kozlowskii Kulicki,1969 in Cortical fibrils and secondary deposits in periderm of the hemichordate Rhabdopleura (Graptolithoidea)

Fig.8. Rhabdopleura kozlowskii Kulicki,1969;CallovianofPoland(ZPAL Pb.5/5). SEM micrographs. A. Fragment of erect tube with inner deposits. B.Fibrillarnatureoftheinnerdepositmaterial. C.Pitsinthefusellartissue. Abbreviations: f, fusellar layer; s, secondary inner deposits.

Fig.3. Rhabdopleura compacta Hincks,1888 in Cortical fibrils and secondary deposits in periderm of the hemichordate Rhabdopleura (Graptolithoidea)

Fig.3. Rhabdopleura compacta Hincks,1888,Recent(ZPALPb.5/1).Surface micromorphology of prosicula. SEM micrographs. A. Distal part of prosicula connected with proximal part of metasicula. B. Outer surface of prosicula near boundary with metasicula. C. Arrangement of prosicular large pits. D–E. Details of foreiign material covering the outer surface of prosicula.F.Arragementofprosiculatinypitsonlargepitbottoms. G.Details of tiny pits. Abbreviations: c, creeping tube; e, erect tube; fm, foreign material; lp, prosicular large pit; m, metasicula; p, prosicula; r, rim of tiny pit; tp, prosicular tiny pit.

Fig. 2. Rhabdopleura compacta Hincks, 1888 in Cortical fibrils and secondary deposits in periderm of the hemichordate Rhabdopleura (Graptolithoidea)

Fig. 2. Rhabdopleura compacta Hincks, 1888, Recent. SEM micrographs of complete coenecia. A. Young coenecium composed of a sicula and two zooids (ZPAL Pb.5/1). B. Adult coenecium consisting of a sicula and a dozenorsozooids(ZPALPb.5/2). C.Youngcoeneciumbuiltofasiculaand three zooids (ZPALPb.5/3). Abbreviations: c, creeping tube; e, erect tube; m,metasicula;mm,marginalmembrane;p,prosicula;x,boundarybetween prosicula and metasicula.

FIGURE 7 in Dispersion of hooks on the anal fins of primary and secondary males in Brycon orbignyanus (Characiformes: Bryconidae): a secondary sexual trait for breeder selection

FIGURE 7 | Correlation between total length and number of rays with hooks in males of Brycon orbignyanus. X axis: total length in cm. Y axis: number (n°) of anal fin rays that developed hooks.

FIGURE 4 in Dispersion of hooks on the anal fins of primary and secondary males in Brycon orbignyanus (Characiformes: Bryconidae): a secondary sexual trait for breeder selection

FIGURE 4 | Anal fin of Brycon orbignyanus with hooks. b: base of the hook. fr: first ray. lr: last ray. s: hooks. sg: rays segment. sr: second ray. st: hook cusp. Scales: A and B. 1.0 cm; C and D. 200 µm; E. 100 µm.

FIGURE 5 in Dispersion of hooks on the anal fins of primary and secondary males in Brycon orbignyanus (Characiformes: Bryconidae): a secondary sexual trait for breeder selection

FIGURE 5 | Phases of testes maturation in Brycon orbignyanus. A. Immature. B. Immature intersex. C. Regressing. D. Regenerating. E. Spawning Capable (primary male). F. Spawning Capable (secondary male). bv: blood vessels. cy: germ cell cysts. dge: discontinuous germinal epithelium. in: interstice. pg: primary growing oocyte. sg: spermatogonia. s: Sertoli cell. sz: sperm. tw: testis wall. va: vacuoles. Scales: A, C, D, E. 20 µm; B, F. 50 µm. Staining: Hematoxylin and Eosin.

FIGURE 3 in Dispersion of hooks on the anal fins of primary and secondary males in Brycon orbignyanus (Characiformes: Bryconidae): a secondary sexual trait for breeder selection

FIGURE 3 | Anal fin of Brycon orbignyanus without hooks. ca: callosity. fb: first fork. fr: first ray. sg: rays segment. sr: second ray. tb: terminal bifurcation. Scales: A. 0.5 cm; B. 200 µm; C. 100 µm.

FIGURE 6 in Dispersion of hooks on the anal fins of primary and secondary males in Brycon orbignyanus (Characiformes: Bryconidae): a secondary sexual trait for breeder selection

FIGURE 6 | Correlation between stages of the reproductive cycle and the number of rays with hooks in males of Brycon orbignyanus. X axis: Stages of the reproductive cycle, being, 0 – Immature specimens, 1 – Regressing, 2 – Regenerating specimens, 3 – Developing specimens, 4 – Spawning Capable specimens. Y axis: number (n°) of anal fin rays that developed hooks.

FIGURE 1 in Dispersion of hooks on the anal fins of primary and secondary males in Brycon orbignyanus (Characiformes: Bryconidae): a secondary sexual trait for breeder selection

FIGURE 1 | Anal fins in Brycon orbignyanus. A. Specimen of B. orbignyanus. B. Anal fin regions. C. Rays (r). D. Anal fin rays. af: anal fin. bi: bifurcation of rays. ca: caudal region. cr: cranial region. fr: first ray. im: interradial membrane. me: medial region. sg: radius segment. Scales: A. 5 cm; B and D. 1 cm; C. 200 µm.

FIGURE 2 in Dispersion of hooks on the anal fins of primary and secondary males in Brycon orbignyanus (Characiformes: Bryconidae): a secondary sexual trait for breeder selection

FIGURE 2 | Details regarding the fins of Brycon orbignyanus. A, C and E. Rays without hooks. B, D and F. Rays with hooks. b: base. fb: first fork. r: rays. rs: rays with hooks. s: hooks. sg: rays segment. st: hooks cusp. tb: terminal bifurcation. Scales: A and B. 1 cm; C and D. 200 µm; E. 100 µm; F. 50 µm.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2023View details →

Extended dataset and Coreq Checklist for 'Teaching critical thinking about health information and choices in secondary schools: human-centred design of digital resources"

Individual user test interview guides and group interview guides for multiple stakeholders Coreq checklist Design reporting checklist