Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2024View details →

Fig 3 in Growth performance of shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei under different carbon: Nitrogen (C/N) ratios of Bioflocs system

Fig 3: Growth Performance details – Gross Feed Conversion Efficiency (GFCE) recorded in L.vannamei under different C/N ratios

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2024View details →

Fig 2 in Growth performance of shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei under different carbon: Nitrogen (C/N) ratios of Bioflocs system

Fig 2: Growth Performance details – Specific Growth Rates (SGR) and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) recorded in L.vannamei under different C/N ratios

Fig. 7 in Sexually dimorphic ornamentation in modern spinicaudatans and the taxonomic implications for fossil clam shrimps

Fig. 7. Ornamentations on the growth bands in extant spinicaudatans species of Cyzicus Audouin, 1837, Ozestheria Schwentner, Just, and Richter, 2015, and Diestheria longinqua Chen in Zhang et al., 1976. A. Carapace of Ozestheria pilosa (Rogers, Thaimuangphol, Saengphan, and Sanoamuang, 2013), from Thailand (after Rogers et al. 2013: fig. 3A). B. Cyzicus gifuensis (Ishikawa, 1895), from Anhui, China, NIPG Cr.121, male; ornamentation in the ventral part of the carapace (B1) and near the ventral margin of carapace (B2); radial lirae along the lower margin of each growth band (B3). in ornamentations might suggest a close affinity between The carapaces of the family Limnadiidae are thin and hermaphroditic Cyzicus and Aquilonoglypta as suggested by lightly mineralized, which commonly resulted in a reticulate Astrop and Hegna (2015). depressiononthecarapacesurface, suchas Eulimnadiatexana The transition pattern from reticulation to lirae in the Packard, 1871 (Astrop 2014). However, the carapace surfaces ventral part of the carapace in the Ozestheria differs from of most species of Eulimnadia are unornamented (smooth the Cyzicus which has the large undeveloped reticulation. surface pattern). This pattern also occurs in Metalimnadia Australian species of Ozestheria had reticulation, granulated serratus Mattox, 1952, Paralimnadia badia (Wolf, 1911) and ornaments, or a combination of punctae and lirae (Timms some Triassic fossil species of Paleolimnadiidae (Table 1). 2018). The ornamentation pattern of O. pilosa was similar The fossil family Palaeolimnadiopsidae is characterized by to species of Diestheriidae, in which transversely enlarged the recurvature of growth lines to form carinate at the posreticulation overlapped on the lirae ornamentation of each terior-dorsal marginal junction of the carapace. This feature growth band of the carapace (Rogers et al. 2013). The larger has also been observed in living species of Limnadopsis. secondary reticulation was likely originated from the in- The ornamentation documented for Palaeolimnadiopsidae tra-cuticular layer rather than the reticulation from procuti- ranged from reticulation to reticulation-lirae combination. cle (Astrop 2014). The ornamentation pattern in Ozestheria However, the ornamentation possessed by Limnadopsis ocsp. (males, Fig. 1A5), including punctae-reticulation-lirae cidentalis Timms, 2009, is nodular (Astrop 2014). Imnadia combination, the transition from reticulation to lirae, and yeyetta Hertzog, 1935, was reported to exhibit punctae ornathe larger undeveloped reticulation, is in line with that of mentation (Astrop 2014). Nevertheless, this pattern was not fossil species Triglypta yabraiensis Wang, 2014 (Wang 2014: mentioned in the original descriptions of the fossil families pl. 2: 2). The close morphological resemblance of ornamen- Paleolimnadiidae, Palaeolimnadiopsidae or Perilimnadiidae. tations and carapace shape suggests that Ozestheria might The phenotypic differentiation of ornamentation pattern is be closely related to Triglypta or Tianzhuestheria. a model to investigate morpho-functional adaptation to some

Fig. 6 in Sexually dimorphic ornamentation in modern spinicaudatans and the taxonomic implications for fossil clam shrimps

Fig. 6. Carapaces and ornamentations of representatives of the extant spinicaudatan family Leptestheriidae. A. Leptestheria kawachiensis Uéno, 1927, from Hubei, China, NIGP Cr. 101, male, lateral view; left valve, oval outline (A1); growth bands in the upper part of carapace with wide radial fringes pattern (A2). B. Eoleptestheria ticinensis (Balsamo-Crivelli, 1859), from Jiangsu, China, NIGP Cr. 61, male, lateral view; right valve, oval outline (B1); growth bands in the ventral part of carapace with shallow fringes pattern, never developing reticulation or punctae between fringes (B2); details of ventral growth bands with shallow fringes pattern separated with smooth surface (B3, B4).

Fig. 4 in Sexually dimorphic ornamentation in modern spinicaudatans and the taxonomic implications for fossil clam shrimps

Fig. 4. Ornamentations on the growth bands in the extant spinicaudatan branchiopod Eulimnadia sp. and the extant laevicaudatan branchiopod Lynceus sp. A, B. Eulimnadia sp., from Jiangxi, China. A. NIGP Cr. 161, male, carapace in lateral view. B. NIGP Cr. 162, female, unornamented area near the ventral margin. C, D. Lynceus sp., from Heilongjiang, China. C. NIGP Cr. 173, male, carapace in lateral view. D. NIGP Cr. 174, female, isogonal reticulate ornamentation in the valve.

Fig. 3 in Sexually dimorphic ornamentation in modern spinicaudatans and the taxonomic implications for fossil clam shrimps

Fig. 3. Ornamentations on the growth bands of carapace of the extant spinicaudatan branchiopod Eocyzicus orientalis Daday, 1913, from Xinjiang, China. A. NIGP Cr. 1, male, ornamentation in the upper to middle parts of the carapace (A1), reticulate ornaments in the ventral part of the carapace (A2), dense pilosity on the growth lines near the edge of the carapace (A3). B. NIGP Cr. 2, female, ornamentation in the upper to middle parts of the carapace (B1), rows of nodular ornaments in the ventral part of the carapace (B2), stout setae on the growth lines near the edge of the carapace (B3).

Fig. 2 in Sexually dimorphic ornamentation in modern spinicaudatans and the taxonomic implications for fossil clam shrimps

Fig. 2. Ornamentation on the growth bands of carapaces of the extant spinicaudatan branchiopod Cyzicus sp., from Jilin, China. A. NIGP Cr. 141, male, ornamentation in the larval valve (A1), in the middle part of the carapace (A2), large reticulation and the radial lirae along the lower margin of the growth band (A3). B. NIGP Cr. 142, female, ornamentation in the larval valve (B1) and in the middle part of the carapace (B2), weakly ornamented area near the ventral margin (B3).

Figure 1 in Victoriasquilla poorei, a new genus and species of mantis shrimp from southern Australia, and a range extension for Hadrosquilla edgari Ahyong, 2001 (Crustacea: Stomatopoda: Nannosquillidae)

Figure 1. Victoriasquilla poorei gen et sp. nov., male holotype, TL 17 mm (NMV J53108). A, anterior cephalothorax. B, right eye, lateral view. C, right antennal protopod, lateral view. D, right raptorial claw, lateral view. E, thoracic somites 5–8, right dorsal view. F–H, right pereopods 1–3, respectively, posterior view. I, posterior abdomen, telson and right uropod, dorsal view. J, posterior abdomen and telson, right lateral view. K, right uropod, ventral view. L, telson, ventral view. Scale 1.0 mm

Figure 9 in Population biology of the ghost shrimps, Trypaea australiensis and Biffarius arenosus (Decapoda: Thalassinidea), in Western Port, Victoria.

Figure 9. Relationships between embryo volume (mm3) and body size (CL3 = carapace length3) for females of Trypaea australiensis and Biffarius arenosus. Embryos were from females collected from March 2006 to May 2007 at Warneet and Crib Point, Western Port.

Figure 8 in Population biology of the ghost shrimps, Trypaea australiensis and Biffarius arenosus (Decapoda: Thalassinidea), in Western Port, Victoria.

Figure 8. Carapace length (CL) size frequency distributions for Biffarius arenosus collected at Crib Point, Western Port in 2006-2007. Non-ovigerous females are shown by black bars, ovigerous females by grey bars and males by open bars (n = number of shrimp collected). Individuals are grouped into size classes by rounding to the closest mm from two decimal places. Arrows show mean CL for cohorts as calculated in FISAT II.

Figure 7 in Population biology of the ghost shrimps, Trypaea australiensis and Biffarius arenosus (Decapoda: Thalassinidea), in Western Port, Victoria.

Figure 7. Carapace length (CL) size frequency distributions for Biffarius arenosus collected at Warneet, Western Port in 2006-2007. Non-ovigerous females are shown by black bars, ovigerous females by grey bars and males by open bars (n = number of shrimp collected). Individuals are grouped into size classes by rounding to the closest mm from two decimal places. Arrows indicate mean CL of cohorts calculated in FISAT II.

Figure 5 in Population biology of the ghost shrimps, Trypaea australiensis and Biffarius arenosus (Decapoda: Thalassinidea), in Western Port, Victoria.

Figure 5. Proportion of ovigerous females for April 2004 to March 2005 (a. Trypaea australiensis, b Biffarius arenosus) and March 2006 to May 2007 (c. T. australiensis, d. B. arenosus) at Warneet, Western Point. Proportion of ovigerous females for April 2006, October 2006 - February 2007 and April 2007 (e. T. australiensis, f. B. arenosus) at Crib Point, Western Port. Solid line is total proportions of ovigerous females, triangles with dashed line is proportion of ovigerous females with uneyed embryos and squares with dashed line is proportion of ovigerous females with eyed embryos.

Figure 4 in Population biology of the ghost shrimps, Trypaea australiensis and Biffarius arenosus (Decapoda: Thalassinidea), in Western Port, Victoria.

Figure 4. Carapace length (CL) size frequency distributions for Trypaea australiensis collected at Crib Point, Western Port in 2006-2007. Nonovigerous females are shown by black bars, ovigerous females by grey bars and males by open bars (n = number of shrimp collected). Individuals are grouped into size classes by rounding to the closest mm from two decimal places. Arrows show mean CL of the cohorts using FISAT II.

Figure 2 in Population biology of the ghost shrimps, Trypaea australiensis and Biffarius arenosus (Decapoda: Thalassinidea), in Western Port, Victoria.

Figure 2. Carapace length (CL) size frequency distributions for Trypaea australiensis collected at Warneet, Western Port in 2004-2005. Non-ovigerous females are shown by black bars, ovigerous females by grey bars and males by open bars (n = number of shrimp collected). Individuals are grouped into size classes by rounding to the closest mm from two decimal places. Arrows show mean CL length of the cohorts identified using FISAT II

Figure 3 in Population biology of the ghost shrimps, Trypaea australiensis and Biffarius arenosus (Decapoda: Thalassinidea), in Western Port, Victoria.

Figure 3. Carapace length (CL) size frequency distributions for Trypaea australiensis collected at Warneet, Western Port in 2006-2007. Non-ovigerous females are shown by black bars, ovigerous females by grey bars and males by open bars (n = number of shrimp collected). Individuals are grouped into size classes by rounding to the closest mm from two decimal places. Arrows show the mean CL length of cohorts identified using FISAT II.

Figure 8 in New records of the shrimp genus Lissosabinea (Caridea: Crangonidae) from Australia including descriptions of three new species and a key to world species.

Figure 8. Live animal photographs of Lissosabinea copyright CSIRO. A, Lissosabinea beresfordi sp. nov., holotype male J57989, lateral view; B, dorsal view. C, Lissosabinea lynseyae sp. nov. lateral view, holotype female, cl. 5.5 mm, J54492.

Figure 7 in New records of the shrimp genus Lissosabinea (Caridea: Crangonidae) from Australia including descriptions of three new species and a key to world species.

Figure 7. World species of Lissosabinea. Carapace and abdomen (lateral view, setae on abdomen omitted). L. armata redrawn from Komai, 2006 (fig. 7); L. ecarina redrawn from Komai, 2006 (fig. 10); L. tridentata redrawn from Dardeau & Heard, 1983 (fig. 15); L. unispinosa redrawn from Komai, 2006 (fig. 13); L. indica redrawn from Komai, 2006 (fig 1).

Figure 6 in New records of the shrimp genus Lissosabinea (Caridea: Crangonidae) from Australia including descriptions of three new species and a key to world species.

Figure 6. Lissosabinea lynseyae sp. nov., holotype female (cl. 5.5 mm), NMV J55492, Western Australia, off Bunbury. A, subchela of right first pleopod, dorsal view; B, subchela of left first pleopod, lateral view; C, left second pereopod, lateral view; D, left second pereopod, lateral view (magnified x 2.0 relative to D); E, left third pereopod, lateral view; F, left fourth pereopod, lateral view; G, left fifth pereopod, lateral view.

Figure 3 in New records of the shrimp genus Lissosabinea (Caridea: Crangonidae) from Australia including descriptions of three new species and a key to world species.

Figure 3. Lissosabinea arthuri sp. nov., holotype female (cl. 7.3 mm), NMV J59767, Victoria Australia. A, entire animal in lateral view; B, carapace, dorsal view; C, first and second abdominal somites, dorsal view; D, third to sixth abdominal somites, dorsal view; E, telson and uropods, dorsal view; F, telson, dorsal view (magnified x 4.2 relative to F); G, left first pleopod (setae omitted); H, left second pleopod (setae omitted); I, left third pleopod (setae omitted).

Figure 2 in New records of the shrimp genus Lissosabinea (Caridea: Crangonidae) from Australia including descriptions of three new species and a key to world species.

Figure 2. Lissosabinea beresfordi sp. nov., holotype male, (cl. 7.0 mm), NMV J57989, Tasmania, Australia. A, subchela of right first pleopod, dorsal view; B, subchela of left first pleopod, lateral view; C, left second pereopod, lateral view; D, left second pereopod, lateral view (magnified x 2.0 relative to D); E, right third pereopod, lateral view; F, left fourth pereopod, lateral view; G, left fifth pereopod, lateral view.