Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2021View details →

Figure 1 in Population structure and spatial distribution of the tiger (Panthera tigris, Felidae, Carnivora) in Southwestern Primorye (Russian Far East)

Figure 1. Census routes and places of encounters of tiger tracks in study area: blue dots, during the expedition surveys; red dots, during monitoring of the model site.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2021View details →

Figure 4 in Population structure and spatial distribution of the tiger (Panthera tigris, Felidae, Carnivora) in Southwestern Primorye (Russian Far East)

Figure 4. Distribution of tigers in the Amba, Barabashevka, and Narva River watersheds according to photoidentification results.

Fig. 6 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 6. Grouping of assemblies Dolichopodidae flies in different habitats: vegetables, fallow, agroforestry, and native vegetation based on coefficient similarity (Bray-Curtis) on organic farms cultivating vegetables in the Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 5 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 5. Number of exclusive and shared (intersections) Dolichopodidae species in vegetable crops and fallow habitats, agroforestry, and native vegetation.

Fig. 2 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 2. Mean abundance (± SE) of Dolichopodidae flies collected in different rural properties with vegetable crops, fallow, agroforestry, and native vegetation in the Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 1 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 1. Organic vegetable farms sampled in Ceilândia (I), Taguatinga (II), Paranoá (III), and Lamarão (IV), Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 4 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 4. Adjustment to the log normal distribution model of the Dolichopodidae assembly per habitat on organic farms producing vegetable in the Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 3 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 3. Distribution of relative abundance by species of Dolichopodidae flies collected on organic farms producing vegetables in the Federal District, Brazil.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Spatial distribution of Listroderes costirostris and Hypera postica (Curculionidae: Cyclominae, Hyperinae) on a celery crop in Mexico's Northwest Region

Fig. 1. Weevil species collected on Apium graveolens in Baja California, Mexico: (A) Hypera postica and (B) Listroderes costirostris.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →

Fig. 2 in South American Sea Lions Otaria flavescens, a good indicator of relative spatial and temporal changes in the distribution and abundance of marine resources?

Fig. 2. Frequency of occurrence of the main prey taxa in the diet of Otaria flavescens (Shaw, 1800) from the San MatÍas Gulf, Argentina.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in The importance of considering small-scale variability in macrobenthic distribution: spatial segregation between two fiddler crab species (genus Leptuca) (Decapoda, Ocypodidae)

Fig. 2. NMDS ordination (stress = 0.16) of sites based on similarity of group composition. Leptuca leptodactyla (Rathbun in Rankin, 1898): JLM (juvenile males), JLF (juvenile females), ALM (adult males) and ALF (adult females). Leptuca uruguayensis (Nobili, 1901): JUM (juvenile males), JUF (juvenile females), AUM (adult males) and AUF (adult females).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in The importance of considering small-scale variability in macrobenthic distribution: spatial segregation between two fiddler crab species (genus Leptuca) (Decapoda, Ocypodidae)

Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the sampling design, with subarea separation and the six random replicates. (Area=10 m²).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2018View details →

Fig. 3 in Spatial distribution and egg production in squat lobsters (Decapoda: Munididae, Munidopsidae) from the collection of the Museu de Zoologia of the Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil

Fig. 3. Fecundity relationships involving number of eggs (EN) vs. carapace length (CL) in six squat lobsters of Munididae from the coast of Brazil.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in Spatial distribution and egg production in squat lobsters (Decapoda: Munididae, Munidopsidae) from the collection of the Museu de Zoologia of the Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil

Fig. 2. BathYmetric distribution of ovigerous females in eleven squat lobster species (Munididae and Munidopsidae) from the Brazilian coast. Depth range for each species is shown within brackets.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Spatial distribution and egg production in squat lobsters (Decapoda: Munididae, Munidopsidae) from the collection of the Museu de Zoologia of the Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil

Fig. 1. Latitudinal distribution in squat lobsters (Munididae and Munidopsidae) along the Brazilian coast. Spatial distribution in Paramunida scabra from the Pacific Ocean waters is also shown. In legend box, sYmbol '?' indicates absence of information on specific spatial distribution in archives of the Museu de Zoologia of the Universidade de São Paulo (MZUSP), Brazil. ES, RJ, SP, PR, SC, RS, represent the Brazilian states of Espirito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná and Rio Grande do Sul, respectively.

Fig. 4 in Mapping a brain parasite: occurrence and spatial distribution in fish encephalon

Fig. 4. Transmission electron micrographs showing the tegument and capsule walls of metacercariae of Cardiocephaloides longicollis. A and F illustrate the capsule wall of monocyst and multicyst metacercariae; B and I represent diagrams of monocyst and multicyst metacercariae showing the location of the following TEM micrographs. C – E Longitudinal section through the capsule wall and tegument of a monocyst. G, H, J-M Longitudinal section through the inner capsule wall and tegument of a multicyst metacercaria. D, E, J-M Detail of necrotic material accumulated on the capsule wall surrounding the metacercaria. K, Detail of inner capsule walls merging together within a multicyst. CW, capsule wall; F, fibrocyte; Gx, glycocalyx; GxF, glycocalyx filaments; ICW, inner capsule wall; M, metacercaria; M1- M3 number of metacercaria in a multicyst; MA, macrophage; Mt, metacercarial tegument; N, nucleus; NC, necrotic cells. Head arrows indicate glycocalyx filaments, asterisks (*) outside of the cyst, (**) inside of the cyst, (***) inside of the cyst when encysted with more than one capsule wall. Scale bars: D, E = 1 μm; C, G, H, J, L, M = 5 μm; K = 10 μm.

Fig. 3 in Mapping a brain parasite: occurrence and spatial distribution in fish encephalon

Fig. 3. Occupation of the fish brain by Cardiocephaloides longicollis in fresh (A, B) and histological samples (C–F). Cardiocephaloides longicollis metacercariae within (A) the PGZ and (B) the medulla oblongata in experimentally-infected fish one month after infection. Asterisks indicate the position of metacercariae. Cardiocephaloides longicollis metacercariae are found at 6 dpi in the tectal ventricle (C), and as they grow (D, 21 dpi; E, 8 mpi; F, 15 mpi) they occupy larger part of the tectal ventricle, and also the PGZ. The representations of brains indicate the sections and positions (yellow square) where metacercariae have been found. Legend: TeO striped, cerebellum in dots and Mo squared. ICL, inferior cerebellar lobe; Mo, medulla oblongata; PGZ, periventricular gray zone of optic tectum; TeO, tectum opticum; TV, tectal ventricle. Scale bars: A = 300 μm; B = 450 μm; C–F = 200 μm. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 1 in Mapping a brain parasite: occurrence and spatial distribution in fish encephalon

Fig. 1. Distribution of metacercariae of Cardiocephaoides longicollis in the different fish brain regions, i.e., olfactory bulbs (Olf-B), olfactory lobes (Olf-L), optic lobe region (Op-L), inferior and superior cerebellar lobes (ICL, SCL), medulla oblongata (Mo), and spinal cord (SC). Metacercarial distribution in different fish species sampling locations are provided. N, number of infected brains used for metacercarial distribution; P, prevalence (based on total number of fish, see Table 1); MI, mean intensity. Note that the number of metacercariae in the brain of fish from the marine pond is based only of half brain (see Materials and methods).

Fig. 2 in Mapping a brain parasite: occurrence and spatial distribution in fish encephalon

Fig. 2. Variation in the number of metacercariae of Cardiocephaloides longicollis encysted in different fish groups. Box plots represent the median number of metacercariae per brain region, upper and lower quartile (box) with maximum and minimum ranges (whiskers). Olfactory bulbs (Olf-B), olfactory lobes (Olf-L), optic lobe region (Op-L), inferior and superior cerebellar lobes (ICL, SCL), medulla oblongata (Mo), and spinal cord (SC). Y-axis is represented in logarithmic scale, and dots represent jittered raw data.