Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

205

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

205 results for “wing pattern”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 2 from: Jin S, Parks KS, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Dyer LA, Whitfield JB (2023) The wing interference patterns (WIPs) of Parapanteles (Braconidae, Microgastrinae): demonstrating a powerful and accessible tool for species-level identification of small and clear winged insects. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 96: 967-982. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.96.111382

Qualitative descriptions and materials examined for Parapanteles species included in this study

opencc-zeroNov 2023View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Jin S, Parks KS, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Dyer LA, Whitfield JB (2023) The wing interference patterns (WIPs) of Parapanteles (Braconidae, Microgastrinae): demonstrating a powerful and accessible tool for species-level identification of small and clear winged insects. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 96: 967-982. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.96.111382

Taxonomic summary of published wing interference pattern images and/or descriptions

opencc-zeroNov 2023View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 7 from: Conrow RT, Gelhaus JK (2022) Wing interference patterns are consistent and sexually dimorphic in the four families of crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea). ZooKeys 1080: 135-163. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.69060

Figure 7 Wing Interference Pattern on excised wings of male/ female pair of two species of TipuloideaANephrotoma ferruguina female BNephrotoma ferruguina male CNephrotoma macrocera female DNephrotoma macrocera male ENephrotoma virscens female FNephrotoma virscens male. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 9 from: Conrow RT, Gelhaus JK (2022) Wing interference patterns are consistent and sexually dimorphic in the four families of crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea). ZooKeys 1080: 135-163. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.69060

Figure 9 Images showing WIP on several species of crane fly in nature A male Tipula (Yamatotipula) aprilina Alexander, 1918 displaying WIP in nature B female Tipula (Yamatotipula) aprilina displaying WIP in nature C pair of Gnophomyia tristissima perched on a leaf in copula. Both flies are displaying their sexually dimorphic WIP. The female (bottom) has a blue WIP while the male (top) displays a green WIPD an individual of Elliptera clausa Osten Sacken, 1877 displaying a WIP with wings folded. Sex unknown. Copyright (A, B) 2021, photograph JK Gelhaus; (C) 2020, photograph Katja Schulz, used with permission by the artist and under a creative commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) with alterations limited to cropping and resizing of this image; (D) 2016, photograph JK Gelhaus. Images are not to scale.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 6 from: Conrow RT, Gelhaus JK (2022) Wing interference patterns are consistent and sexually dimorphic in the four families of crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea). ZooKeys 1080: 135-163. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.69060

Figure 6 Wing Interference Pattern on excised wings of male/ female pair of two species of TipuloideaABrachypremna dispellens female BBrachypremna dispellens male CHolorusia hespera female DHolorusia hespera male. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, B), 1.0 cm (C, D).

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Conrow RT, Gelhaus JK (2022) Wing interference patterns are consistent and sexually dimorphic in the four families of crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea). ZooKeys 1080: 135-163. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.69060

Figure 5 Wing Interference Pattern on excised wings of male/ female pair of two species of TipuloideaATricyphona inconstans inconstans female BTricyphona inconstans inconstans male CDolichopeza obscura female DDolichopeza obscura male. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Conrow RT, Gelhaus JK (2022) Wing interference patterns are consistent and sexually dimorphic in the four families of crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea). ZooKeys 1080: 135-163. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.69060

Figure 4 Wing Interference Pattern on excised wings of male/ female pair of two species of TipuloideaADactylolabis cubitalis female BDactylolabis cubitalis male CDicranomyia liberta female DDicranomyia liberta male. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Conrow RT, Gelhaus JK (2022) Wing interference patterns are consistent and sexually dimorphic in the four families of crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea). ZooKeys 1080: 135-163. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.69060

Figure 3 Wing Interference Pattern on excised wings of male/ female pair of two species of Tipuloidea. Excised wings of a male/ female pair of two species of crane flies. Wings were excised, flattened between a glass slide and cover slip, and photographed under a microscope using transmitted light ACylindrotoma distinctissima female BCylindrotoma distinctissima male CGnophomyia tristissima female DGnophomyia tristissima male. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Conrow RT, Gelhaus JK (2022) Wing interference patterns are consistent and sexually dimorphic in the four families of crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea). ZooKeys 1080: 135-163. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.69060

Figure 1 Comparison of the variation in WIP of three female and three male specimens of Gnophomyia tristissima. Females examined in this study were found to have a range of WIP from A dark blue/ purple B blue with mottled yellow C green/yellow with hints of blue which appeared most like the male WIP. Males examined also had a range of WIP from D green with mottled blue which appeared most like the female WIPE solidly green F green with mottled magenta. Patterns B and E were the most encountered patterns for females and males, respectively. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Conrow RT, Gelhaus JK (2022) Wing interference patterns are consistent and sexually dimorphic in the four families of crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea). ZooKeys 1080: 135-163. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.69060

Figure 2 Excised wing of a male specimen of Dolichopeza obscura against a white background with notations of wing veins and cells used in this study. Veins are noted in blue with uppercase letters while cells are noted in red with lowercase letters; naming and notations follow those of Saigusa (2006). Abbreviations: A/a: anal vein/cell, bm: basal medial cell, br: basal radial cell, C/c: costal vein/cell, CuA/cua: anterior cubitus vein/cell, CuP/cup: posterior cubitus vein/cell, d: discal cell, M/m: Medial vein/cell, R/r: radial vein/cell, Rs: radial sector vein, Sc/sc: subcostal vein/cell. Image not to scale.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Conrow RT, Gelhaus JK (2022) Wing interference patterns are consistent and sexually dimorphic in the four families of crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea). ZooKeys 1080: 135-163. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.69060

Movie S1

opencc-zeroJan 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 8 from: Conrow RT, Gelhaus JK (2022) Wing interference patterns are consistent and sexually dimorphic in the four families of crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea). ZooKeys 1080: 135-163. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.69060

Figure 8 Wing Interference Pattern on excised wings of male/ female pair of two species of TipuloideaATipula (Beringotipula) borealis female BTipula (Beringotipula) borealis male CTipula (Yamatotipula) sayi female DTipula (Yamatotipula) sayi male. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2022View details →
dryad28/100

Relating wing morphology and immune function to patterns of partial and differential bat migration using stable isotopes

<p>Migration is energetically expensive and is predicted to drive similar morphological adaptations and physiological trade-offs in migratory bats and birds. Previous studies suggest that fixed traits like wing morphology vary among species and individuals according to selective pressures on flight, while immune defenses can vary flexibly within individuals as energy is variably reallocated throughout the year.</p> <p>We assessed intraspecific variation in wing morphology and immune function in silver-haired bats (<em>Lasionycteris noctivagans)</em>, a species that follows both partial and differential migration patterns. We hypothesized that if bats experience energy constraints associated with migration, then wing morphology and immune function should vary based on migratory tendency (sedentary or migratory) and migration distance. We predicted that long-distance migrants would have reduced immune function and more migration-adapted wing shapes compared to resident or short-distance migrating bats.</p> <p>We estimated breeding latitude of spring migrants using stable hydrogen isotope techniques. Our sample consisted primarily of male bats, which we categorized as residents, long-distance northern migrants, short-distance northern migrants, and southern migrants (apparent breeding location south of capture site). Controlling for individual condition and capture date, we related wing characteristics and immune indices among groups.</p> <p>Some, but not all, aspects of wing form and immune function varied between migrants and residents. Long-distance northern migrants had larger wings than short-distance northern migrants and lower wing loading than southern migrants. Compared with resident bats, short-distance northern migrants had reduced IgG while southern migrants had heightened neutrophils and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios. Body fat, aspect ratio, wing tip shape, and bacteria killing ability did not vary with migration status or distance.</p> <p>In general, male silver-haired bats do not appear to mediate migration costs by substantially downregulating immune defenses or to be under stronger selection for wing forms adapted for fast, energy-efficient flight. Such phenotypic changes may be more adaptive for female silver-haired bats, which migrate farther and are more constrained by time in spring than males. Adaptations for aerial hawking and the use of heterothermy by migrating bats may also reduce the energetic cost of migration and the need for more substantial morphological and physiological trade-offs.</p>

opencc-zeroFeb 2022View details →
dryad28/100

Data in support of Patterns of parental care and movement in divided broods of Golden-winged Warblers

<p>This dataset contains observations of parental care and movement for divided broods of Golden-winged Warblers tracked from fledging until indpendence at three sites in Minnesota and Manitoba. Movement data consists of minimum daily distance (i.e., the linear distance between daily locations) and daily change in azimuth (i.e., the daily change in direction traveled relative to the previous day). Parental care data includes, parental attendance, provisioning rate, unattended begging rate (i.e., fledgling begging without a parent present), and total begging rate. We also include spatial data in the form of distance between sub-broods and within sub-broods. These data can be used to replicate the findings of the publication "Patterns of Parental Care and Movement in Divided Broods of Golden-winged Warblers", published in the Journal of Avian Biology. Detailed methodology may be found in that manuscript.</p>

opencc-zeroMar 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Mikitová B, Šemeláková M, Panigaj Ľ (2022) Wing morphology and eyespot pattern of Erebia medusa (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) vary along an elevation gradient in the Carpathian Mountains. Nota Lepidopterologica 45: 233-250. https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.45.68624

Supplementary File 1

opencc-zeroJul 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 3 from: Mikitová B, Šemeláková M, Panigaj Ľ (2022) Wing morphology and eyespot pattern of Erebia medusa (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) vary along an elevation gradient in the Carpathian Mountains. Nota Lepidopterologica 45: 233-250. https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.45.68624

Supplementary File 3

opencc-zeroJul 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 2 from: Mikitová B, Šemeláková M, Panigaj Ľ (2022) Wing morphology and eyespot pattern of Erebia medusa (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) vary along an elevation gradient in the Carpathian Mountains. Nota Lepidopterologica 45: 233-250. https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.45.68624

Supplementary File 2

opencc-zeroJul 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Winterton SL, Wang Y (2016) Revision of the genus Gryposmylus Krüger, 1913 (Neuroptera, Osmylidae) with a remarkable example of convergence in wing disruptive patterning. ZooKeys 617: 31-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.10165

Figure 2 - Gryposmylus pennyi sp. n., male, Sabah, Malaysia (photograph credit: Stephen D. Gaimari).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Winterton SL, Wang Y (2016) Revision of the genus Gryposmylus Krüger, 1913 (Neuroptera, Osmylidae) with a remarkable example of convergence in wing disruptive patterning. ZooKeys 617: 31-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.10165

Figure 3 - Gryposmylus spp.: A Gryposmylus pubicosta (Walker) (pale form) (Forewing length 16.5 mm) B Gryposmylus pennyi sp. n. (Forewing length 16.0 mm).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Winterton SL, Wang Y (2016) Revision of the genus Gryposmylus Krüger, 1913 (Neuroptera, Osmylidae) with a remarkable example of convergence in wing disruptive patterning. ZooKeys 617: 31-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.10165

Figure 1 - Gryposmylus pubicosta (Walker), male (dark form) Sabah, Malaysia (photograph credit: Stephen D. Gaimari).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record