Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2023View details →

Fig. 2 in Exploring the diversity of the Malagasy Ponera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) fauna via integrative taxonomy

Fig. 2 Phylogeny of the Malagasy Ponera fauna. Bayesian inference phylogeny of Ponera COI sequences. Numbers associated to branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities and maximum likelihood bootstrap values. Only values greater than 50% are shown. Scale bar represents the

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2015View details →

Figure 2. Taxonomy of the educational technologies for children with ASC-Gestalt Processing in Human-Robot Interaction: A Novel Account for Autism Research

learner (Perlin, 1997). MOSOCO is an emergent technology implemented in a smartphone called “Mobile Social Compass” (Escobedo et al., 2012). Six basic social skills are being encouraged by prompting the user to initiate social contact. The menu displays symbols for the basic social skills – eye contact, space and proximity, start an interaction, asking questions, sharing interests and finish an interaction. The MOSOCO application has turned out to be an extremely useful tool as an online prompt in starting, maintaining and finishing social interaction for both typical and autistic students, as well as to anyone that feels need for improving their social competence.

Fig. 4 in Taxonomy of the poorly known Quedius mutilatus group of wingless montane species from Middle Asia (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylinini)

Fig. 4. Aedeagi in the Quedius mutilatus group. A–B. Quedius mutilatus Eppelsheim, 1888. C–D. Quedius kalabi Smetana, 1995. E–F. Quedius kungeicus sp. nov. G–N. Quedius equus Smetana, 2014 (Karkara Valley, Kazakhstan), variability of the structure of the aedeagus. A, C, E, G, I, K, M = median lobe, laterally. B, D, F, H, J, L, N = paramere (dissected from median lobe), underside (side facing median lobe). Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 3 in Taxonomy of the poorly known Quedius mutilatus group of wingless montane species from Middle Asia (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylinini)

Fig. 3. Holotype of Quedius kalabi Smetana, 1995. A. Habitus. B. Permanent preparation of the aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Taxonomy of the poorly known Quedius mutilatus group of wingless montane species from Middle Asia (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylinini)

Fig. 5. Quedius kungeicus sp. nov. A. Habitus. B. Aedeagus, laterally. C. Median lobe, in parameral view (paramere detached). D. Paramere, underside (side facing median lobe). Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 2 in Taxonomy of the poorly known Quedius mutilatus group of wingless montane species from Middle Asia (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylinini)

Fig. 2. Lectotype of Quedius mutilatus Eppelsheim, 1888. A. Habitus. B. Permanent preparaion of the aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 1 in Taxonomy of the poorly known Quedius mutilatus group of wingless montane species from Middle Asia (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylinini)

Fig. 1. Distribution and aedeagus variability of the Quedius mutilatus group in the Tien-Shan Mountains. Numbers are specified in Table 1. Empty symbols = type spcimens (for Q. kalabi precise locality of the holotype unknown);? = ambiguously labelled or undetermined material. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.

RAGE - Data Evaluation Taxonomy Manager

General description: Data from the evaluation of the Taxonomy Manager in the RAGE Ecosystem Topic ACM CSS 2012: Human-centered computing - Human computer interaction (HCI) - User studies, Usability testing Name entitites Organizational information: Graz University of Technology, Forschungsinstitut für Telekommunikation und Kooperation Geographical information: Europe Time information: 2017 Types: SPSS data file RAGCS target group: target groups - supply side - research institutions, industry participants Evaluation dimensions Evaluation object: Taxonomy Manager in RAGE Ecosystem portal Evaluation variables: usability, usefulness, tutorial quality, experience with taxonomies, version control, export/import quality Instruments: UMUX - usability metric for user experience (Finstad, 2010); USE questionnaire - Usefulness, Satisfaction, Ease of use; subscale usefulness; questionnaire items adapted from Papadakis, Andreou & Chrissykopoulus (2002), Thielsch & Stegemöller (2012); questionnaire items defined for the purpose of the evaluation Relationships: D8.3 - First RAGE Evaluation Report Related datasets: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1209192">10.5281/zenodo.1209192</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2578728">10.5281/zenodo.2578728</a>

Fig. 3 in Three new species of Anacharis Dalman, 1823 (Hymenoptera: Figitidae), with revised taxonomy and distribution records of Palaearctic and Indomalayan species

Fig. 3. Anacharis belizini sp. nov. A. Head in front view. B. Mesosoma in lateral view. C. Mesosoma in dorsal view. D. Propodeum.

Fig. 2. A–C in Three new species of Anacharis Dalman, 1823 (Hymenoptera: Figitidae), with revised taxonomy and distribution records of Palaearctic and Indomalayan species

Fig. 2. A–C. Mesosoma in dorsal view. A–B. Anacharis eucharoides (Dalman, 1818). C. A. immunis Walker, 1835. – D–F. Mesosoma in lateral view. D. A. eucharoides (Dalman, 1818). E–F. A. immunis Walker, 1835, F is detail of scutellum.

Fig. 4 in Three new species of Anacharis Dalman, 1823 (Hymenoptera: Figitidae), with revised taxonomy and distribution records of Palaearctic and Indomalayan species

Fig. 4. Anacharis fergussoni sp. nov. A. Mesosoma in dorsal view. B. Mesosoma in lateral view. C. Head in dorsal view. – Anacharis norvegica sp. nov. D. Mesosoma in dorsal view. E. Mesosoma in lateral view. F. Petiole.

Fig. 1. A–B. Anacharis antennata Belizin, 1951, mesosoma. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. – C–D. A. parapsidalis Belizin, 1951, mesosoma. C. Dorsal view. D in Three new species of Anacharis Dalman, 1823 (Hymenoptera: Figitidae), with revised taxonomy and distribution records of Palaearctic and Indomalayan species

Fig. 1. A–B. Anacharis antennata Belizin, 1951, mesosoma. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. – C–D. A. parapsidalis Belizin, 1951, mesosoma. C. Dorsal view. D. Lateral view.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2018View details →

NCBI::Taxonomy data set

This is a data set for NCBI::Taxonomy Module. The sizes of the decompressed files are: <pre><code class="language-bash">all_taxonomy.bin 25 GBytes nodes.bin 185 MBytes nucl_est_taxonomy.bin 5.1 GBytes nucl_gb_taxonomy.bin 6.1 GBytes nucl_gss_taxonomy.bin 4.5 GBytes nucl_wgs_taxonomy.bin 14 GBytes pdb_taxonomy.bin 4.2 GBytes prot_taxonomy.bin 13 GBytes ranks.bin 325 Bytes </code></pre>

Fig 9. Top 10 in Publishing trends and productivity in insect taxonomy from 1946 through 2012 based on an analysis of the Zoological Record for four species-rich families

Fig 9. Top 10 of most utilized journals from 1946 to 2012. A. Cicadellidae. B. Miridae. C. Pyralidae. D. Staphylinidae.

Fig 6 in Publishing trends and productivity in insect taxonomy from 1946 through 2012 based on an analysis of the Zoological Record for four species-rich families

Fig 6 (continued from previous page). Number of total articles and co-authored articles from 1946 to 2012. A. Cicadellidae. B. Miridae. C. Pyralidae. D. Staphylinidae.

Fig 6 in Publishing trends and productivity in insect taxonomy from 1946 through 2012 based on an analysis of the Zoological Record for four species-rich families

Fig 6 (continued on next page). Number of total articles and co-authored articles from 1946 to 2012. A. Cicadellidae. B. Miridae. C. Pyralidae. D. Staphylinidae.

Fig 5 in Publishing trends and productivity in insect taxonomy from 1946 through 2012 based on an analysis of the Zoological Record for four species-rich families

Fig 5 (continued on next page). Number of articles published by continent (Europe, North America, South America, Africa, Asia and Australia) between 1946 and 2012. A. Cicadellidae. B. Miridae. C. Pyralidae. D. Staphylinidae.

Fig 2 in Publishing trends and productivity in insect taxonomy from 1946 through 2012 based on an analysis of the Zoological Record for four species-rich families

Fig 2. Average new species described per article (Cicadellidae, Miridae, Pyralidae and Staphylinidae combined) from 1946 to 2012.

Fig 1 in Publishing trends and productivity in insect taxonomy from 1946 through 2012 based on an analysis of the Zoological Record for four species-rich families

Fig 1. Time series of newly described species for the families Cicadellidae, Miridae, Pyralidae and Staphylinidae between 1946 and 2012. A. Number of new species. B. Number of articles with new species.

Fig 4 in Publishing trends and productivity in insect taxonomy from 1946 through 2012 based on an analysis of the Zoological Record for four species-rich families

Fig 4. Total and average article length for for papers on the four families of Cicadellidae, Miridae, Pyralidae and Staphylinidae between 1946 and 2012.