Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 4 from: Mitrović M, Starý P, Jakovljević M, Petrović A, Žikić V, Pérez Hidalgo N, Tomanović Ž (2019) Integrative taxonomy of root aphid parasitoids from the genus Paralipsis (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Aphidiinae) with description of new species. ZooKeys 831: 49-69. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.831.31808

Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationship inferred using the maximum parsimony (MP) method. The consistency index is (0.533333), the retention index is (0.681818), and the composite index is 0.476540 (0.363636) for all sites and parsimony-informative sites. The MP tree was obtained using the subtree-pruning-regrafting (SPR) algorithm with search level 1, in which the initial trees were obtained by the random addition of sequences (10 replicates). The percentage of replicate trees in which >50% of the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) is shown next to the branches (in red color). Since the topology is identical, the bootstrap support of branches obtained by the maximum likelihood method is presented in black color as well. Barcoding haplotypes of the analyzed archival Paralipsis specimens are designated with codes from PH1 to PH14, species name, host aphid and host plant. Abbreviations for the countries of origin are as follows: GER – Germany; FRA – France; SRB – Serbia; LIT – Lithuania; CR – Czech Republic; MOL – Moldova; MOR – Morocco; and ESP – Spain.

Figure 5 from: Mitrović M, Starý P, Jakovljević M, Petrović A, Žikić V, Pérez Hidalgo N, Tomanović Ž (2019) Integrative taxonomy of root aphid parasitoids from the genus Paralipsis (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Aphidiinae) with description of new species. ZooKeys 831: 49-69. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.831.31808

Figure 5 Median-joining network obtained for 14 ParalipsisCOI barcoding haplotypes. Green circles represent group 1 (P.enervis), with haplotypes PH1, PH2, PH4, PH5, PH9, PH11, and PH13; yellow circles represent group 2 (P.tibiator), with haplotypes PH10, PH12, and PH14; the black circle represents the single haplotype PH7 from Moldova within group 3 (P.rugosa sp. n.); blue circles represent group 4 (P.brachycaudi sp. n.), consisting of haplotypes PH3, PH6, and PH8. Circle size reflects the number of individuals with that haplotype (not to scale). Red dots are median vectors. Black dots are mutational steps.

Figure 3 from: Mitrović M, Starý P, Jakovljević M, Petrović A, Žikić V, Pérez Hidalgo N, Tomanović Ž (2019) Integrative taxonomy of root aphid parasitoids from the genus Paralipsis (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Aphidiinae) with description of new species. ZooKeys 831: 49-69. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.831.31808

Figure 3 Distribution of the primers used in retrieving short overlapping barcode fragments of COI from dry Paralipsis specimens.

Figures 22- 23 from: Mitrović M, Starý P, Jakovljević M, Petrović A, Žikić V, Pérez Hidalgo N, Tomanović Ž (2019) Integrative taxonomy of root aphid parasitoids from the genus Paralipsis (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Aphidiinae) with description of new species. ZooKeys 831: 49-69. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.831.31808

Figures 22- 23 Paralipsistibiator, female 22 second-fourth segments of fore tarsus, dorsal view 23 hind tibia and femur, lateral view.

Figures 15-21 from: Mitrović M, Starý P, Jakovljević M, Petrović A, Žikić V, Pérez Hidalgo N, Tomanović Ž (2019) Integrative taxonomy of root aphid parasitoids from the genus Paralipsis (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Aphidiinae) with description of new species. ZooKeys 831: 49-69. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.831.31808

Figures 15-21 Paralipsisrugosa sp. n., female 15 head, anterior view 16 antennae, lateral view 17 scutellum, dorsal view 18 propodeum, dorsal view 19 second-fourth segments of fore tarsus, dorsal view 20 hind leg, lateral view 21 fore wing.

Figures 6-14 from: Mitrović M, Starý P, Jakovljević M, Petrović A, Žikić V, Pérez Hidalgo N, Tomanović Ž (2019) Integrative taxonomy of root aphid parasitoids from the genus Paralipsis (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Aphidiinae) with description of new species. ZooKeys 831: 49-69. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.831.31808

Figures 6-14 Paralipsisbrachycaudi sp. n., female 6 head, anterior view 7 antennae, lateral view 8 scutellum, dorsal view 9 propodeum, dorsal view 10 second-fourth segments of fore tarsus, dorsal view 11 hind leg, lateral view 12 fore wing 13 petiole, dorsal view 14 ovipositor sheath, lateral view.

Citizen science meets integrated taxonomy to uncover the diversity and distribution of Corallimorpharia in Singapore

<p>Phylogenetic datasets and trees</p>

opencc-zeroJun 2019View details →

Supplementary material 1 from: Guimarães EC, Silva de Brito P, Feitosa LM, Carvalho Costa LF, Ottoni FP (2019) A new cryptic species of Hyphessobrycon Durbin, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) from the Eastern Amazon, revealed by integrative taxonomy. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 345-360. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34069

: Data type: DOCX file

Figure 6 from: Guimarães EC, Silva de Brito P, Feitosa LM, Carvalho Costa LF, Ottoni FP (2019) A new cryptic species of Hyphessobrycon Durbin, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) from the Eastern Amazon, revealed by integrative taxonomy. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 345-360. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34069

Figure 6 Species delimitation tree generated by the Bayesian Poisson Tree Processes (bPTP) model, using a fragment of the mitochondrial gene COI. The blue lines indicate branching processes among species, while red lines indicate branching processes within species.

Figure 5 from: Guimarães EC, Silva de Brito P, Feitosa LM, Carvalho Costa LF, Ottoni FP (2019) A new cryptic species of Hyphessobrycon Durbin, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) from the Eastern Amazon, revealed by integrative taxonomy. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 345-360. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34069

Figure 5 Phylogenetic tree based on Bayesian Inference (BI). Numbers above branches are posterior probability values. Posterior probability value supporting the Hyphessobryconmicropterus clade is indicated in green (haplotypes marked with a green bar); posterior probability value supporting the H.caru sp. nov. lineage under WP method is indicated in red (haplotypes marked with a red bar); and the other species (lineages) under WP method, within this clade, are indicated in black. b Strict consensus phylogenetic tree based on Maximum Parsimony (MP), obtained from the 38 most parsimonious trees, in which 587 characters were constant, 20 variable but parsimony-uninformative, and 248 parsimony-informative (total length 833, consistency index 0.489, retention index 0.901). The image is focusing on the Hyphessobryconmicropterus clade. Numbers above branch are bootstrap values and letters below branches correspond to nucleotide substitutions, listed in Suppl. material 1: Box 1, corresponding to the CBB method. Green circle indicating Hyphessobryconmicropterus clade, red circle H.caru sp. nov., blue circles the other congeners within the clade, and black circle the clade H.caru sp. nov. + H.piorskii.

Figure 3 from: Guimarães EC, Silva de Brito P, Feitosa LM, Carvalho Costa LF, Ottoni FP (2019) A new cryptic species of Hyphessobrycon Durbin, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) from the Eastern Amazon, revealed by integrative taxonomy. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 345-360. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34069

Figure 3 Hyphessobryconcaru sp. nov., jaw suspensory, CICCAA 00697, paratype, 19.3 mm SL: premaxillary (a), maxillary (b), and dentary (c).

Figure 4 from: Guimarães EC, Silva de Brito P, Feitosa LM, Carvalho Costa LF, Ottoni FP (2019) A new cryptic species of Hyphessobrycon Durbin, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) from the Eastern Amazon, revealed by integrative taxonomy. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 345-360. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34069

Figure 4 Geographical distribution of Hyphessobryconcaru sp. nov. and H.piorskii. Red star denotes Holotype and blue circles denote paratypes of H.caru sp. nov., and white star denotes Holotype and the black circles denote the known distribution of H.piorskii.

Figure 2 from: Guimarães EC, Silva de Brito P, Feitosa LM, Carvalho Costa LF, Ottoni FP (2019) A new cryptic species of Hyphessobrycon Durbin, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) from the Eastern Amazon, revealed by integrative taxonomy. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 345-360. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34069

Figure 2 Humeral spot of: aHyphessobryconcaru, holotype, CICCAA 02286 bH.piorskii, holotype, CICCAA 00695 cH.pyrrhonotus, holotype, MZUSP 45714 dH.werneri, holotype, MZUSP 42365 eH.eques, CICCAA 00300 fH.compressus, paratype, MHNG 2181.076.

Figure 1 from: Guimarães EC, Silva de Brito P, Feitosa LM, Carvalho Costa LF, Ottoni FP (2019) A new cryptic species of Hyphessobrycon Durbin, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) from the Eastern Amazon, revealed by integrative taxonomy. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 345-360. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34069

Figure 1 Hyphessobryconcaru sp. nov., CICCAA 02286, holotype, 22.2 mm SL; Brazil: Maranhão state: Buritizinho River, Pindaré river drainage, Mearim river basin.

Fig. 20 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 20. Male genitalia in dorsal and ventral views. A–B. Lasioglossum medinai (Vachal, 1895) (France: Alpes de Haute-Provence, Manosque). C. L. medinai (Greece: Thessalia, Kalambaka) (explanation of arrows in the text). D–E. L. villosulum (Kirby, 1802) (Belgium).

Fig. 7. Melitta punctulata Kirby, 1802 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 7. Melitta punctulata Kirby, 1802, holotype, ♀. A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, lateral view. C. Labels. D. Scutum and head. E. Propodeum. F. Tergum 1 and 2 (metasoma glued).

Fig. 16 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 16. Punctation of the scutum of females. A. Lasioglossum medinai (Vachal, 1895) (France: Uchaux). B. L. villosulum (Kirby, 1802) (Belgium: Bruges).

Fig. 13. Lasioglossum villosulum arabicum Ebmer, 2008 in Integrative taxonomy resuscitates two species in the Lasioglossum villosulum complex (Kirby, 1802) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Halictidae)

Fig. 13. Lasioglossum villosulum arabicum Ebmer, 2008, ♀ (UAE). A. Head. B. Punctation around ocellus. C. Scutum. D. Propodeum. E. First tergum. F. Metasoma.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2019View details →

Fig. 15 in Integrative taxonomy of five astome ciliates (Ciliophora, Astomatia) isolated from earthworms in Central Europe

Fig. 15. Small subunit rRNA gene phylogenetic trees showing systematic positions of astome ciliates isolated from lumbricid earthworms. Posterior probabilities were mapped onto the 50%-majority rule Bayesian consensus tree (upper panel) and bootstrap values onto the 50%-majority rule neighbor-joining tree (lower panel). Sequences in bold face were obtained during this study. Note that there is a conflict between the Bayesian and the neighbor-joining tree in the position of specimens of Metaradiophrya Jankowski, 2007. However, according to tree topology tests, the branching pattern of the Bayesian tree is not significantly better than that of the neighbor-joining tree. The scale bar denotes fraction of substitutions.