Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,399
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,399 results for “fragmenter”
Table ¹: Comparison of analysis of variance results for skull (occlusal view) and mandible (side view) shape in Rhipidomys mastacalis from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Object asymmetry and correspondence methods were employed to assess asymmetry for skulls and mandibles, respectively. in Morphological symmetry of Rhipidomys mastacalis (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) in fragmented habitats of the Atlantic Forest in Northeastern Brazil: a study on the influence of the environment on an endemic species
<p><b>Table ¹:</b> Comparison of analysis of variance results for skull (occlusal view) and mandible (side view) shape in <i>Rhipidomys mastacalis</i> from three vegetation classes in Brazil.Object asymmetry and correspondence methods were employed to assess asymmetry for skulls and mandibles,respectively.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Shape procrustes ANOVA</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Effect Sum of squares</b></th><td><b>Mean squares</b></td><td><b>Degrees of freedom</b></td><td><i>F statistic</i></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td><td><b>Pillai tr.</b></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td></tr><tr><th><b>Skulls</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.19908517</td><td>0.0004253957</td><td>468</td><td>22.36</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00366522</td><td>0.0002036232</td><td>18</td><td>10.70</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.00890443</td><td>0.0000190266</td><td>468</td><td>2.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.00825565</td><td>0.0000084935</td><td>972</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.37829478</td><td>0.0003965354</td><td>954</td><td>18.57</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00547536</td><td>0.0003041869</td><td>18</td><td>14.25</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.02037065</td><td>0.0000213529</td><td>954</td><td>1.89</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.02201359</td><td>0.0000113239</td><td>1944</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0645902300</td><td>0.0001302222</td><td>496</td><td>5.18</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0113531900</td><td>0.0007095741</td><td>16</td><td>28.23</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0124666800</td><td>0.0000251344</td><td>496</td><td>1.88</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0136608800</td><td>0.0000133407</td><td>1024</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Mandibles</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.70443879</td><td>0.0012579264</td><td>560</td><td>8.10</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.16</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00549957</td><td>0.0002749783</td><td>20</td><td>1.77</td><td>0.0207</td><td>0.0207</td><td>0.0069</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.08696012</td><td>0.0001552859</td><td>560</td><td>2.46</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.75</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.07312665</td><td>0.0000387718</td><td>1160</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>1.19843989</td><td>0.0011984399</td><td>1000</td><td>8.16</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.70</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.01169771</td><td>0.0005848855</td><td>20</td><td>3.98</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.14685738</td><td>0.0001468574</td><td>1000</td><td>3.03</td><td><0.0001</td><td>11.21</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.09880745</td><td>0.0000484350</td><td>2040</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.3269927600</td><td>0.0004808717</td><td>680</td><td>4.52</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.14</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0143644400</td><td>0.0007182221</td><td>20</td><td>6.75</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.0017</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0723474900</td><td>0.0001063934</td><td>680</td><td>2.39</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.41</td><td>0.0017</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0622041800</td><td>0.0000444316</td><td>1400</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table ²: Comparison of the results of analysis of variance on the shape of scapulae (occlusal view) and pelvis (side view) in Rhipidomys mastacalis from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Correspondence asymmetry was the only method used for asymmetry analysis. in Morphological symmetry of Rhipidomys mastacalis (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) in fragmented habitats of the Atlantic Forest in Northeastern Brazil: a study on the influence of the environment on an endemic species
<p><b>Table ²:</b> Comparison of the results of analysis of variance on the shape of scapulae (occlusal view) and pelvis (side view) in <i>Rhipidomys mastacalis</i> from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Correspondence asymmetry was the only method used for asymmetry analysis.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Shape procrustes ANOVA</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Effect Sum of squares</b></th><td><b>Mean squares</b></td><td><b>Degrees of freedom</b></td><td><i>F statistic</i></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td><td><b>Pillai tr.</b></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td></tr><tr><th><b>Scapulae</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0941373400</td><td>0.0010459705</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0100439600</td><td>0.0010043960</td><td>2.88</td><td>0.0037</td><td>0.0003</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0314069500</td><td>0.0003489662</td><td>90</td><td>5.89</td><td><0.0001</td><td>4.91</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0118544100</td><td>0.0000592721</td><td>200</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.2064168200</td><td>0.0010320841</td><td>200</td><td>4.82</td><td><0.0001</td><td>7.15</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0262808000</td><td>0.0026280796</td><td>10</td><td>12.28</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.0022</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0428160400</td><td>0.0002140802</td><td>200</td><td>2.68</td><td><0.0001</td><td>4.98</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0335675700</td><td>0.0000799228</td><td>420</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.2508635400</td><td>0.0009291242</td><td>270</td><td>4.07</td><td><0.0001</td><td>7.11</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0256608100</td><td>0.0025660812</td><td>10</td><td>11.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.87</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0616394000</td><td>0.0002282941</td><td>270</td><td>3.10</td><td><0.0001</td><td>5.72</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0412323300</td><td>0.0000736292</td><td>560</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Pelvis</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0543411200</td><td>0.0004312787</td><td>126</td><td>4.63</td><td><0.0001</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0043155600</td><td>0.0003082544</td><td>14</td><td>3.31</td><td>0.0002</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0117297800</td><td>0.0000930935</td><td>126</td><td>2.31</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.07</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0112943700</td><td>0.000040337</td><td>280</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.1059661700</td><td>0.0003440460</td><td>308</td><td>4.42</td><td><0.0001</td><td>9.69</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0049395300</td><td>0.0003528236</td><td>14</td><td>4.53</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.85</td><td>0.0311</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0239852500</td><td>0.0000778742</td><td>308</td><td>2.00</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.64</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0251368400</td><td>0.0000390324</td><td>644</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.1292837500</td><td>0.0003420205</td><td>378</td><td>5.68</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.51</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0043550500</td><td>0.0003110747</td><td>14</td><td>5.17</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.0016</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0227608400</td><td>0.0000602139</td><td>378</td><td>2.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.17</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0210413800</td><td>0.0000268385</td><td>714</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>
Supporting data for Liquid fragmentation induced by particle aggregation during two-phase flow in 3D porous media
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
DigFrag as a digital fragmentation method used for artificial intelligence-based drug design
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Rapid evolution accelerates plant population spread in fragmented experimental landscapes
Predicting the speed of biological invasions and native species migrations requires an understanding of the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of spreading populations. Theory predicts that evolution can accelerate species' spread velocity, but how landscape patchiness—an important control over traits under selection—influences this process is unknown. We manipulated the response to selection in populations of a model plant species spreading through replicated experimental landscapes of varying patchiness. After six generations of change, evolving populations spread 11% farther than nonevolving populations in continuously favorable landscapes and 200% farther in the most fragmented landscapes. The greater effect of evolution on spread in patchier landscapes was consistent with the evolution of dispersal and competitive ability. Accounting for evolutionary change may be critical when predicting the velocity of range expansions.
Data From: Genetic structure of recently fragmented suburban populations of European stag beetle
<p>Habitat loss and fragmentation due to urbanisation can negatively affect metapopulation persistence when gene flow among populations is reduced and population sizes decrease. Inference of patterns and processes of population connectivity derived from spatial genetic analysis has proven invaluable for conservation and management. However, a more complete account of population dynamics may be obtained by combining spatial and temporal sampling. We, therefore, performed a genetic study on European stag beetle (<i>Lucanus cervus</i> L.) populations in a suburban context using samples collected in three locations and during the period 2002-2016. The sampling area has seen recent landscape changes which resulted in population declines. Through the use of a suite of FST, clustering analysis, individual assignment, and relatedness analysis we assessed fine scale spatiotemporal genetic variation within and among habitat patches using 283 individuals successfully genotyped at 17 microsatellites. Our findings suggested the three locations to hold demographically independent populations, at least over time scales of relevance to conservation, though with higher levels of gene flow in the past. Contrary to expectation from tagging studies, dispersal appeared to be mainly female-biased. Although the life cycle of stag beetle suggests its generations to be discrete, no clear temporal structure was identified, which could be attributed to the varying duration of larval development. Since population bottlenecks were detected and estimates of effective number of breeders were low, conservation actions are eminent which should include the establishment of suitable dead wood for oviposition on both local and regional scales to increase (re)colonisation success and connectivity among current populations.</p>
Supplementary material 1 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Table S1. Sampling localities visited in this study, with associated coordinates and elevation
Figure 3 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Figure 3 Amphibians of the mantellid subfamily Mantellinae identified in this study. Sampling localities for each photographed individual are provided. ANP ES – Andringitra National Park Eastern Slopes; ANP WS – Andringitra National Park Western Slopes (Fig. 1; Suppl. material 1: Table S1). A.Mantidactylus (Bryogoomantis) bourgati from Namoly; B.Mantidactylus (Bryogoomantis) betsileanus from Namoly; C.Mantidactylus (Chonomantis) delormei from Imaitso (ANP ES); D.Mantidactylus (Ochthomantis) femoralis from Asaramanitra (ANP ES); E.Mantidactylus (Bryogoomantis) sp. Ca14 from Tsaranoro; F.Mantidactylus (Hylobatrachus) sp. Ca48 from Fivahona–Velotsoa; G.Gephyromantis (Gephyromantis) blanci from Imaitso (ANP ES); H.Gephyromantis (Phylacomantis) corvus from Sakaviro; I.Mantella betsileo from Ambatomainty; J. Subadult and tadpoles of Spinomantis elegans from Imaitso (ANP ES). Photographs by Javier Lobón-Rovira.
Figure 2 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Figure 2 Hyperoliid, microhylid, ptychadenid and mantellid (subfamilies Boophinae and Laliostominae) species identified in this study. Sampling localities for each photographed individual are provided. ANP ES – Andringitra National Park Eastern Slopes; ANP WS – Andringitra National Park Western Slopes (Fig. 1; Suppl. material 1: Table S1). A.Boophis (Boophis) ankaratra from Imaitso (ANP ES); B.Boophis (Boophis) boppa from Iantaranomby (ANP WS); C.Boophis (Sahona) doulioti from Ambalavao; D.Boophis (Boophis) laurenti from Iantaranomby (ANP WS); E.Boophis (Boophis) luteus from Fivahona–Velotsoa; F.Boophis (Boophis) majori from Asaramanitra (ANP ES); G.Boophis (Boophis) obscurus from Imaitso (ANP ES); H.Boophis (Boophis) occidentalis from Andramena (ANP WS); I.Boophis (Boophis) popi from Imaitso (ANP ES); J.Boophis (Boophis) sp. Ca33 from Asaramanitra (ANP ES); K.Boophis (Boophis) rhodoscelis from Fivahona–Ambavanala; L.Heterixalus betsileo from Sakaviro; M.Heterixalus luteostriatus from Anja; N.Scaphiophryne (Scaphiophryne) madagascariensis from Andramena (ANP WS); O.Scaphiophryne (Pseudohemisus) calcarata from Ambalavao; P.Laliostoma labrosum from Anja; Q.Aglyptodactylus madagascariensis from Namoly; R.Ptychadena sp. aff. mascareniensis "OTU1" from Iantaranomby (ANP WS). Photographs by Javier Lobón-Rovira (A–J, L–R) and Francesco Belluardo (K).
Supplementary material 5 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Table S5. Within taxa uncorrected p–distances (16S) of amphibian taxa identified in this study
Figure 7 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Figure 7 Psammophiid, pseudoxyrhophiid and sanziniid snakes identified in this study. Sampling localities for each photographed individual are provided. ANP ES – Andringitra National Park Eastern Slopes; ANP WS – Andringitra National Park Western Slopes (Fig. 1; Suppl. material 1: Table S1). A.Compsophis infralineatus from Namoly; B.Leioheterodon modestus from Antanifotsy 1; C.Madagascarophis meridionalis from Anja; D.Thamnosophis lateralis from Anja; E.Pseudoxyrhopus sp. Ca2 from Ambatomainty; F.Liophidium torquatum from Anja G.Mimophis mahfalensis from Sakaviro; H.Sanzinia cf. volontany from Anja; I.Acrantophis dumerili from Sakaviro. Photographs by Javier Lobón-Rovira (A–E, G, I), Gonçalo M. Rosa (F) and Franco Andreone (H).
Figure 5 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Figure 5 Geckos species identified in this study. Sampling localities for each photographed individual are indicated. ANP ES – Andringitra National Park Eastern Slopes; ANP WS – Andringitra National Park Western Slopes (Fig. 1; Suppl. material 1: Table S1). A.Hemidactylus mercatorius from Tsaranoro; B.Lygodactylus pictus from Belambo (ANP ES); C.Lygodactylus sp. aff. pictus Ca01 "Isalo" from Ambatomainty; D.Paragehyra felicitae from Anja; E.Paragehyra sp. aff. felicitae "Tsaranoro" from Tsaranoro; F.Paroedura rennerae from Anja; G.Paroedura sp. aff. bastardi Lineage D from Anja; H.Phelsuma barbouri from Belambo (ANP ES); I.Phelsuma gouldi from Tsaranoro; J.Phelsuma lineata elanthana from Fivahona–Velotsoa. Photographs by Javier Lobón-Rovira (A–G, I–J) and Gonçalo M. Rosa (H).
Supplementary material 6 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Table S6. Within taxa uncorrected p–distances (COI) of reptile taxa identified in this study
Supplementary material 9 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Table S7. Locality records of amphibian and reptile species identified in this study
Figure 6 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Figure 6 Scincid, gerrhosaurid and oplurid species identified in this study. Sampling localities for each photographed individual are provided. ANP ES – Andringitra National Park Eastern Slopes; ANP WS – Andringitra National Park Western Slopes (Fig. 1; Suppl. material 1: Table S1). A.Oplurus grandidieri from Anja; B.Oplurus quadrimaculatus from Anja; C.Zonosaurus laticaudatus from Anja; D.Zonosaurus ornatus from Antanifotsy 2; E.Zonosaurus aeneus from Namoly; F.Trachylepis elegans from Iantaranomby (ANP WS); G.Trachylepis gravenhorstii from Anja; H.Trachylepis sp. aff. vato from Asaramanitra (ANP ES); I.Trachylepis boettgeri from Antanifotsy 3. Photographs by Javier Lobón-Rovira.
Figure 1 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Figure 1 Map of the study area and sampling sites. The borders of Andringitra National Park (red) and Paysage Harmonieux Protégé du Corridor Forestier Ambositra–Vondrozo (Ambositra–Vondrozo Forest Corridor) (blue) are shown. See Suppl. material 1: Table S1 for more details on the sampled localities. Map data ©2015 Google (QGIS Development Team 2020). ANP ES – Andringitra National Park Eastern Slopes; ANP WS – Andringitra National Park Western Slopes. A. Anja; B. Sakaviro; C. Ambatomainty; D. Western slopes of the Andringitra Massif from Iantaranomby (ANP WS); E. Imaitso (ANP ES); F. Belambo (ANP ES); G. Fivahona–Velotsoa; H. Map with sampling sites. Photographs by Javier Lobón-Rovira.
Figure 4 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Figure 4 Chameleonid species identified in this study. The picture of the individual identified as Furcifer willsii from Fivahona–Velotsoa, found within the stomach content of a Mimophis mahfalensis, is not shown. Sampling localities for each photographed individual are provided. ANP ES – Andringitra National Park Eastern Slopes; ANP WS – Andringitra National Park Western Slopes (Fig. 1; Suppl. material 1: Table S1). A.Brookesia brunoi from Anja; B.Calumma andringitraense from Imaitso (ANP ES); C.Calumma crypticum from Imaitso (ANP ES); D.Calumma fallax from Asaramanitra (ANP ES); E.Palleon nasus from Namoly; F.Furcifer lateralis from Iantaranomby (ANP WS); G.Furcifer major from Anja; H.Furcifer nicosiai from Tsaranoro; I.Furcifer oustaleti from Anja. Photographs by Javier Lobón-Rovira.
Supplementary material 3 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Table S3. Amphibian samples identified in this study
Supplementary material 8 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Reptiles Neighbor joining tree of the cytochrome oxidase I gene
Supplementary material 4 from: Belluardo F, Quirós DD, Lobón-Rovira J, Rosa GM, Rasoazanany M, Andreone F, Crottini A (2021) Uncovering the herpetological diversity of small forest fragments in south-eastern Madagascar (Haute Matsiatra). Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(2): 315-343. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.63936
Table S4. Reptile samples identified in this study
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.