Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,185
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,185 results for “integrated taxonomy”
FIGURE 14 in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383
FIGURE 14. Male Boophis obscurus (UADBA uncatalogued) from Ranomafanakely.
FIGURE 2 in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383
FIGURE 2. Male holotype of Boophis piperatus sp. nov. (ZSM 377/2004) from Ranomafana.
FIGURE 13 in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383
FIGURE 13. Male holotype of Boophis spinophis sp. nov. (ZSM 376/2004) from Ambatolahy.
FIGURE 17 in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383
FIGURE 17. Female holotype of Boophis praedictus sp. nov. (ZMA 20131) from Vevembe.
Fig. 5 in Integrating UCE Phylogenomics With Traditional Taxonomy Reveals a Trove of New World Syscia Species (Formicidae: Dorylinae)
Fig. 5. Mesosomal structure of fully alate (A) vs. brachypterous (B) queen.
Supplementary material 1 from: Colgan DJ, Ahyong ST, Mardon K, Brereton IM (2021) Rare specimen identification in an un-integrated taxonomy: implications of DNA sequences from a Taiwanese Philine (Mollusca, Philinidae). ZooKeys 1060: 93-110. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1060.28809
Reconstructed micro-CT scan of C.559479
Figure 4 from: Colgan DJ, Ahyong ST, Mardon K, Brereton IM (2021) Rare specimen identification in an un-integrated taxonomy: implications of DNA sequences from a Taiwanese Philine (Mollusca, Philinidae). ZooKeys 1060: 93-110. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1060.28809
Figure 4 Phylogenetic relationships of C.559479 based on maximum likelihood analysis of the reduced 16S rRNA dataset. More distant outgroups have been removed and the topology rooted on Philine scabra + P. indistincta. Numbers near nodes refer to bootstrap percentages above 70%. The scale bar indicates 0.05 changes per site. Sequences are identified by accession number and species name or informal designation recorded in GenBank except those labelled P. quadripartita for which the species names have been changed for reasons outlined in the text. Accessions with an sp. number designation followed by a space and "TO" with a one or two digit designation refer to sequences from Oskars et al. (2015). Note that this article refers to the undescribed species in alphabetical rather than numerical order so that sp. 4 in GenBank is identified as sp. D in Oskars et al. (2015).
Supplementary material 2 from: Colgan DJ, Ahyong ST, Mardon K, Brereton IM (2021) Rare specimen identification in an un-integrated taxonomy: implications of DNA sequences from a Taiwanese Philine (Mollusca, Philinidae). ZooKeys 1060: 93-110. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1060.28809
Figure S1. Image from the reconstructed micro-CT scan of C.559479
Figure 3 from: Colgan DJ, Ahyong ST, Mardon K, Brereton IM (2021) Rare specimen identification in an un-integrated taxonomy: implications of DNA sequences from a Taiwanese Philine (Mollusca, Philinidae). ZooKeys 1060: 93-110. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1060.28809
Figure 3 C.559479, outer surface of gizzard plates from the micro-CT reconstruction A paired plate, left B unpaired plate C paired plate, right. Scale bar: 2 mm (A–C).
Figure 2 from: Colgan DJ, Ahyong ST, Mardon K, Brereton IM (2021) Rare specimen identification in an un-integrated taxonomy: implications of DNA sequences from a Taiwanese Philine (Mollusca, Philinidae). ZooKeys 1060: 93-110. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1060.28809
Figure 2 Micro-CT reconstruction images of C.559479 A ventral view of the shell B–D three perspectives from the reconstruction. Scale bar: 5 mm (A–D).
Figure 8 from: Renner M, Devos N, Patino J, Brown E, Orme A, Elgy M, Wilson T, Gray L, von Konrat M (2013) Integrative taxonomy resolves the cryptic and pseudo-cryptic Radula buccinifera complex (Porellales, Jungermanniopsida), including two reinstated and five new species. PhytoKeys 27: 1-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.27.5523
Figure 8 - Radula australiana line drawings 1: A Five lobules from primary shoots showing size and shape variation, with broadly ampliate free interior margin and drawn-out apex B Five lobules from secondary shoots showing size and shape variation C Cellular detail of interior free lobule margin D Ventral shoot E Dorsal shoot F Cellular detail of lobule apex G Transverse stem section from primary shoot. Scale bars: A–B: 240 µm, D–E: 600 µm, C, F: 60 µm, G: 40 µm. All from NSW273911.
Figure 7 from: Renner M, Devos N, Patino J, Brown E, Orme A, Elgy M, Wilson T, Gray L, von Konrat M (2013) Integrative taxonomy resolves the cryptic and pseudo-cryptic Radula buccinifera complex (Porellales, Jungermanniopsida), including two reinstated and five new species. PhytoKeys 27: 1-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.27.5523
Figure 7 - Radula anisotoma pictures A Ventral view of shoot B Mature perianth. C–E Ventral view of shoots and lobules F Gynoecium G Androecium H–I Transverse sections of stems from primary shoot J Leaf-lobe marginal cells. All from CANB650459.
Figure 5 from: Renner M, Devos N, Patino J, Brown E, Orme A, Elgy M, Wilson T, Gray L, von Konrat M (2013) Integrative taxonomy resolves the cryptic and pseudo-cryptic Radula buccinifera complex (Porellales, Jungermanniopsida), including two reinstated and five new species. PhytoKeys 27: 1-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.27.5523
Figure 5 - Majority Rule tree from posterior probability distribution sample taken by MrBayes, shown as a modified proportional tree, with some branch lengths shortened, for presentation purposes, with morphological groups identified. Tree topology, rather than branch length is emphasized in this tree, the branches are not to any scale. For branch lengths proportional to substitution rate refer to Figure 4 which is a phylogram with identical topology. Support values associated with each branch are parsimony bootstrap / likelihood bootstrap / posterior probability. Asterisks indicate full support. Only values for supported branches associated with the Radula buccinifera species complex are shown.
Figure 33 from: Renner M, Devos N, Patino J, Brown E, Orme A, Elgy M, Wilson T, Gray L, von Konrat M (2013) Integrative taxonomy resolves the cryptic and pseudo-cryptic Radula buccinifera complex (Porellales, Jungermanniopsida), including two reinstated and five new species. PhytoKeys 27: 1-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.27.5523
Figure 33 - Scatterplot of perianth vs capsule valve length in three individuals of Radula strangulata from New Zealand. The red line shows the regression slope from the general linear model explaining the relationship between the two variables.
Figure 32 from: Renner M, Devos N, Patino J, Brown E, Orme A, Elgy M, Wilson T, Gray L, von Konrat M (2013) Integrative taxonomy resolves the cryptic and pseudo-cryptic Radula buccinifera complex (Porellales, Jungermanniopsida), including two reinstated and five new species. PhytoKeys 27: 1-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.27.5523
Figure 32 - Radula strangulata Pictures 2. A–D Perianths showing variation in size and shape associated with development A youngest D oldest and mature E–F ventral view of lobules on primary shoots illustrating more inter-individual variation in size and shape of lobules and leaf-lobes E NSW896405 F NSW895357. Others NSW970841.
Figure 31 from: Renner M, Devos N, Patino J, Brown E, Orme A, Elgy M, Wilson T, Gray L, von Konrat M (2013) Integrative taxonomy resolves the cryptic and pseudo-cryptic Radula buccinifera complex (Porellales, Jungermanniopsida), including two reinstated and five new species. PhytoKeys 27: 1-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.27.5523
Figure 31 - Radula strangulata Pictures 1. A–B Ventral view of shoots showing variation in size, leaf-lobe spacing and colour between individuals C–D Ventral view of lobules on primary shoots showing variation in size and shape between individuals E Gynoecium F Androecium G Transverse sections of stems from primary shoot H Leaf-lobe marginal cells. B, D: NSW909416, F NSW896405, others: NSW970841.
Figure 6 from: Renner M, Devos N, Patino J, Brown E, Orme A, Elgy M, Wilson T, Gray L, von Konrat M (2013) Integrative taxonomy resolves the cryptic and pseudo-cryptic Radula buccinifera complex (Porellales, Jungermanniopsida), including two reinstated and five new species. PhytoKeys 27: 1-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.27.5523
Figure 6 - Radula anisotoma line drawings A Dorsal shoot B Ventral shoot C Archegonia D Ten haphazardly selected lobules, showing size and shape variation E Lobule showing cellular detail F Cells of leaf lobe margin showing initiation of shoot primordia G Medial leaf-lobe cells H Marginal leaf-lobe cells I Female bract showing narrow elliptical lobe J Stem transverse section K Dorsal stem surface showing leaf-free dorsal cortical cell rows L Ventral stem surface. Scale bars: A–B: 600 µm, C, F: 40 µm, D, I: 240 µm, E, G, H, J–L: 60 µm. All from CANB650459.
Figure 3 from: Renner M, Devos N, Patino J, Brown E, Orme A, Elgy M, Wilson T, Gray L, von Konrat M (2013) Integrative taxonomy resolves the cryptic and pseudo-cryptic Radula buccinifera complex (Porellales, Jungermanniopsida), including two reinstated and five new species. PhytoKeys 27: 1-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.27.5523
Figure 3 - Morphological variation expressed by individuals included in this study, showing variation in shoot size, branching pattern, and lobule shape. All species represented by the individuals shown belong to the Radula buccinifera species complex A Radula strangulata de Lange 10167 B Radula demissa NSW895246 C Radula strangulata NSW875811 D Radula mittenii NSW875805 E Radula australiana NSW909252 F Radula demissa NSW895267 G Radula demissa NSW970835 H Radula strangulata NSW970841 I Radula anisotoma CANB650458 J Radula buccinifera NSW895271 K Radula demissa NSW895272 L Radula demissa NSW909292 M Radula strangulata NSW909416 N Radula demissa NSW909424 O Radula buccinifera NSW909436 P Radula demissa NSW895397 Q Radula demissa NSW895439 R Radula demissa NSW896177 S Radula notabilis NSW896419 T Radula imposita NSW896812 U Radula mittenii NSW897206 V Radula notabilis NSW909500 W Radula demissa NSW909482 X Radula mittenii NSW896672. Scale bars 0.5 mm in all images.
Figure 28 from: Renner M, Devos N, Patino J, Brown E, Orme A, Elgy M, Wilson T, Gray L, von Konrat M (2013) Integrative taxonomy resolves the cryptic and pseudo-cryptic Radula buccinifera complex (Porellales, Jungermanniopsida), including two reinstated and five new species. PhytoKeys 27: 1-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.27.5523
Figure 28 - Radula strangulata line drawings 1. A Female bracts B Archegonium C Dorsal view of shoot D Perianth transverse section E Perianth F Ventral view of shoot G Cellular detail of stem perigynium wall H Perianth I Detail of perianth mouth. Scale bars: A, D: 240 µm. B, G: 60 µm, I: 40 µm. C, E, F, H: 600 µm. All from CHR579214.
Figure 27 from: Renner M, Devos N, Patino J, Brown E, Orme A, Elgy M, Wilson T, Gray L, von Konrat M (2013) Integrative taxonomy resolves the cryptic and pseudo-cryptic Radula buccinifera complex (Porellales, Jungermanniopsida), including two reinstated and five new species. PhytoKeys 27: 1-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.27.5523
Figure 27 - Radula pugioniformis pictures. A Ventral view of shoot. B-E: Ventral view of lobules on primary shoots F Gynoecium G Androecium H Transverse sections of stems from primary shoot I Leaf-lobe marginal cells. All from NSW770504.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.