Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,654
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
1,654 results for “Automation”
Dataset: Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) Stock Performance
This dataset provides historical stock market performance data for specific companies. It enables users to analyze and understand the past trends and fluctuations in stock prices over time. This information can be utilized for various purposes such as investment analysis, financial research, and market trend forecasting.
Dataset: Presto Automation Inc. (PRST) Stock Performance
This dataset provides historical stock market performance data for specific companies. It enables users to analyze and understand the past trends and fluctuations in stock prices over time. This information can be utilized for various purposes such as investment analysis, financial research, and market trend forecasting.
Dataset: Presto Automation Inc. (PRSTW) Stock Performance
This dataset provides historical stock market performance data for specific companies. It enables users to analyze and understand the past trends and fluctuations in stock prices over time. This information can be utilized for various purposes such as investment analysis, financial research, and market trend forecasting.
Dataset: Hollysys Automation Technologies Ltd. (HOLI) Stock Performance
This dataset provides historical stock market performance data for specific companies. It enables users to analyze and understand the past trends and fluctuations in stock prices over time. This information can be utilized for various purposes such as investment analysis, financial research, and market trend forecasting.
Lost in Translation? Not for Large Language Models: Automated Divergent Thinking Scoring Performance Translates to Non-English Contexts (Datasets)
<p>Datasets for: Zielińska, A., Organisciak, P., Dumas, D., & Karwowski, M. (2023). Lost in translation? Not for large language models: Automated divergent thinking scoring performance translates to non-English contexts. <em>Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50</em>, 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101414</p>
Fully-Automated Multicolour Structured Illumination Module for Super-resolution Microscopy
<p> </p> <p>In the rapidly advancing field of biological imaging, high-resolution techniques that are cost-effective and accessible are essential for observing and understanding intracellular dynamics. Structured illumination microscopy (SIM) is a preferred method for achieving high axial and lateral resolution in living samples due to its optical sectioning and minimal phototoxicity. However, the high cost and complexity of conventional SIM systems limit their widespread use. In our work, we present an open-source, fully-automated, two-color structured illumination module that is compatible with commercially available microscope stands. The compact design, which includes low-cost single-mode fiber-coupled lasers and a digital micromirror device (DMD), is integrated into the open-source acquisition and control software ImSwitch to facilitate real-time super-resolution imaging. This system achieves up to a 1.55-fold improvement in lateral resolution compared to conventional wide-field microscopy. </p> <p>To ensure optimal DMD diffraction performance, we developed a model using tilt and roll pixels, enabling the use of low-cost video projectors in coherent SIM setups. Our aim is to democratize SIM-based super-resolution microscopy by providing comprehensive open-source documentation and a modular software framework compatible with various hardware components (e.g., cameras, stages) and reconstruction algorithms. </p> <p>All datasets generated and analyzed during this study are openly available and can be accessed through our public repository <a href="https://opensimmo.github.io/">[repository link]</a>. The datasets include raw and processed images, calibration files, and software scripts, enabling replication and further innovation. This approach will help upgrade as many devices as possible to the super-resolution realm, fostering greater accessibility and collaboration in the scientific community</p>
Combining Bayesian optimization and automation to simultaneously optimize reaction conditions and routes
<p>Yield and Conversion measurements for iodoalkylation reaction of four different terminal alkynes. The reaction conditions as well as the equivalent of the reactants and reagents for each of the three optimizers are listed in the corresponding JSON file. </p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 20. Overview about which Binding Mechanisms Work at what Hierarchical Levels and Development Stages of the Brain
<p>As a result of our research, in [60], a solution to the binding problem for perception was suggested by<br> combining the already existing binding hypotheses in a conclusive way, supplementing them with<br> other insights about the perceptual system of the brain, and translating them into a technically<br> implementable model. It was demonstrated via computational simulations that different binding<br> mechanisms proposed in literature are not mutually inclusive. On the contrary! At different<br> hierarchical levels and in different development stages, different binding mechanisms are acting in<br> perception. An overview about these circumstances is given in Figure 20. A detailed description can<br> be found in.</p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 19. AnyLogic Implementation of Decision-Making Architechture in an Virtual Autonomous Agent Environment
<p>Figure 19 shows a screenshot of the test implementation. The picture in the middle shows the modules and interfaces<br> of the decision-making architecture which were realized by so-called “active objects” and “ports”.<br> On the left side, the implemented modules are listed. In the right lower corner of the figure, the<br> agents and the virtual environment are displayed. The environment comprises different “objects”<br> (food sources, obstacles, predators, other agents, etc.). In order to survive, the agents have to access<br> food sources. However, the accessing of food sources bears difficulties and risks.</p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 16. Architecture for Affective Situation Assessment of Perceptual Images (Internal Connections between Emotions are not Depicted for Better Clarity of the Graphic)
<p>Based on the concept of affective neuro-symbols, a model was developed according to<br> which emotions can be represented by affective neuro-symbolic networks (see right half of Figure<br> 16, referred to as architecture of “internal perception” in contrast to the “external perception”<br> architecture of the left half of Figure 16, which has already been presented in Section 4.2).<br> The individual affective neuro-symbols (depicted as circles) represent different emotions<br> (fear, anger, guilt, joy, rage, panic, love, happiness, etc.).</p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 13. Implementation of Neuro-Symbols and their Communication in AnyLogic
<p>Figure 13 and Figure 14 show screenshots of the model implementation in AnyLogic. Figure<br> 13a shows how individual neuro-symbols were implemented. Neuro-symbols are realized by socalled<br> active objects with an input port and an output port via which information is exchanged with<br> other elements. Additionally, variables are used for calculating the activation of the neuro-symbols<br> (not depicted) and for storing properties of neuro-symbols (e.g., the location property). Timers and<br> state charts serve for processing information that arrives in a certain time window or in a certain<br> temporal succession at the input port. Whenever new input information arrives at the input port, the<br> activation degree of the neuro-symbol is recalculated and checked against the threshold value.<br> Based on this, the neuro-symbol is either activated or deactivated and the corresponding<br> information is sent via the output port by using “message objects” (see Figure 13b).</p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 17. Autonomous Decision-Making Architecture
<p>An overview of the decision-making architecture is presented in Figure 17. The architecture was<br> guided by two core concepts. The first core concept is that human intelligence bases on a<br> combination of low-level and high-level mechanisms. Low-level mechanisms are mainly<br> predefined. They are not in all situations completely accurate but have the advantage of being fast.<br> High-level mechanisms are not predefined and thus slower but more accurate. The second core<br> concept concerns the use of so-called emotions as mechanism for the evaluation of information</p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 15. Input Sources of an Affective Neuro-Symbol Representing an Emotion
<p>Based on the descriptions given above and the concept of neuro-symbolic information<br> processing outlined in Section 4.2, so-called “affective neuro-symbols” were defined for the<br> affective situation assessment architecture (see Figure 15). These affective neuro-symbols can<br> principally receive information from four different sources: (1) body states, (2) objects and events<br> perceived in the environment (external perception), (3) from other emotions and (4) cognitive<br> (reasoning) processes. An input from one of these sources can in certain circumstances already be<br> sufficient to activate an affective neuro-symbol. Different sources can either have an exhibitory or<br> inhibitory effect on the activation of an affective neuro-symbol.</p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 14. Implementation of Overall Architecture of the Perception Model in AnyLogic 4.3
<p>To perform complex functions, individual neuro-symbols are then connected to networks.<br> Figure 14 shows a screenshot of the AnyLogic implementation of the overall system at the<br> beginning of the learning phase. The lowest neuro-symbolic levels receive the direct sensor<br> information as input. The higher neuro-symbolic levels are originally not interconnected amongst<br> each other. Instead, they are connected to so-called “learning ports”, which additionally receive<br> control information needed for the supervised learning process. Details about the multi-stage multilevel<br> learning process can be found in.</p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 12. Affinities and Differences of Neuro-Symbolic Networks in Comparison to Classical Neural Networks
<p>After having briefly illustrated the basic function principle of neuro-symbolic networks, this<br> section aims at reviewing their affinities and differences to standard neural networks like for<br> example multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) [58]. A summary of these affinities and differences is<br> given in Figure 12. The affinities concern certain functions of individual nodes of the networks. In<br> both cases, weighted input information is summed up and an activation function is applied to this<br> sum. In both cases, the individual nodes are interconnected to form networks. Much larger than the<br> number of affinities between neuro-symbolic networks and neural network is however the number<br> of differences. The first difference consists in the application domain. Neuro-symbolic networks<br> have so far mainly been applied for complex, large-scale sensor data processing of multimodal data<br> – an application which can so far barely be handled by neural networks.</p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 11. Activated Neuro-Symbols for Detecting that a Person walks around in the Room
<p>With the example of Figure 11, also the function of feedback connections can be explained.<br> According to the existing feedforward connections, the neuro-symbol “object stands” would be<br> activated together with the neuro-symbol “object moves” whenever the neuro-symbols “motion”<br> and “object moves” are active, because it is activated by a subset of the neuro-symbols that activate<br> the neuro-symbol “object moves”. This activation would however be undesired in this concrete<br> case. For this reason, an inhibitory feedback connection exists from the neuro-symbol “object<br> moves” to the neuro-symbol “object stands” that inhibits the activation of the neuro-symbol “object<br> stands”.</p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 10. Meeting Room Equipped with Different Sensors
<p>To illustrate the basic working principle of a perceptual neuro-symbolic network in a concrete application, a simplified, concrete example is given in the following. In this example, office meeting room is equipped with different sensors (tactile floor sensors, motion detectors, light barriers, a door contact sensor, a camera, and a microphone) as sketched in Figure 10.</p>
BRAIN Journal-Brain-Like Artificial Intelligence for Automation-Figure 18. Different Modules involved in the Autonomous Decision-Making Process
<p>The basic functioning of this architecture is now described in the following step by step<br> using Figure 18a-f, where always the relevant modules of the model are highlighted for better<br> comprehension.</p>
Figure 2. Overall process of the system -An Optimized Clustering Approach for Automated Detection of White Matter Lesions in MRI Brain Images
<p>This paper mainly focuses on automated detection of White Matter Lesions of brain using<br> fast and efficient clustering algorithms. The goal of clustering a medical image is to simplify the<br> representation of an image into a meaningful image and makes it easier to analyze. As a first step,<br> MRI brain image is pre-processed using Contrast Stretching technique which is one of the efficient<br> image enhancement techniques. The pre-processed image is subjected to clustering. The clustering<br> algorithms include Fuzzy c-means Clustering (FCM), Geostatistical Possibilistic Clustering (GPC)<br> and Geostatistical Fuzzy Clustering Model (GFCM). However clustering techniques are sensitive to<br> initialization and are easily trapped in local optima. In order to obtain an optimized result, the<br> clustered images are undergone optimization. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is a stochastic<br> global optimization tool which is used in many optimization problems. Figure 2 represents overall<br> process of automatic detection of WMLs of brain. Since MS lesions present different characteristics<br> from lesions in elderly individuals there are many clustering models to determine the accuracy but<br> those methods are not directly applicable to predict the accurate lesions because of the decreased<br> contrast between White Matter and Grey Matter in elderly people. The proposed clustering models<br> are derived by extending the objective functions of FCM and Possibilistic clustering with a<br> Geostatistical (spatial) model. These algorithms are applied to real magnetic resonance images and<br> is shown to be more robust to noise and other artifacts than competing approaches.</p>
Figure 9. Performance analysis of FCM-PSO, GPC-PSO and GFCM-PSO-An Optimized Clustering Approach for Automated Detection of White Matter Lesions in MRI Brain Images
<p>All scans obtained from different image clustering models are manually ranked based on<br> values in table 1. Table 2 represents WML detection rates of optimized images. FCM, GPC and<br> GFCM clustering methods and hybrid optimized methods (FCM-PSO, GPC-PSO and GFCM-PSO)<br> are applied on a dataset of 208 images and ranking is done in terms of under detected, over<br> detected, properly detected as shown in figure 8 and figure 9.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.