Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,908
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
1,908 results for “Reptilia”
Fig. 1 in Daboia russelii (Reptilia: Squamata) in remote parts of Gujjar Village Miandam, Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Fig. 1. Map of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, red circle shows the study area in the District Swat within the province.
Fig. 3 in Daboia russelii (Reptilia: Squamata) in remote parts of Gujjar Village Miandam, Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Fig. 3. Photos of the dead Daboia russelii specimens from Gujjar village Miandam, Swat, KP, Pakistan. (A, B) Dorsal views, (C, D) Fangs, (E) Black spots on ventral side, (F) Anal orifice with tail showing a zip-like structure.
Figure 1 in Molecular identification of mimetic Mock Viper, Psammodynastes pulverulentus (Boie, 1827) (Reptilia: Squamata: Lamprophiidae) from Northeast India
Figure 1. (A) Map showing the distribution of P. pulverulentus in South and Southeast Asian countries. Green circle indicates the collection locality of P. pulverulentus from Mizoram state in northeast India. (B) Live photographs of P. pulverulentus collected from northeast India andthe processed hemipenis showing its sulcal (left) and asulcal (right) surfaces. (C) Bayesian phylogeny based on partial mtCytb gene inferred the phylogenetic relationship of P. pulverulentus with all extant Ophidian families and subfamilies. Numbers at internal branches indicate posterior probabilities support. (D) TCS networks showed distinct haplotype of P. pulverulentus collected from northeast India, compared with other collection localities (China and Myanmar). The estimated haplotypes are shown in different colors as represent by collection sites marked in the phylogeny.
Figure 1 in The common wall lizard Podarcis muralis (Reptilia: Lacertidae) shows diverse food preferences and intraspecific differences: a study case from Bulgaria
Figure 1. Percentage share of the OTUs according to: number of faecal samples of P. muralis in which the OTU was found (Fr.); number of specimens registered in the faecal samples (N); number of specimens, collected by pit-fall traps (Tr.).
Figure 3 in The common wall lizard Podarcis muralis (Reptilia: Lacertidae) shows diverse food preferences and intraspecific differences: a study case from Bulgaria
Figure 3. Percentage share of the categories of evasiveness (E1, E2, and E3) and hardness (H1, H2, and H3) according to the number of categorized prey items from the faecal samples of P. muralis (Ad. = adults; Imm. = immatures; M = males; F = females; Tot. = the entire sample).
Figure 2 in The common wall lizard Podarcis muralis (Reptilia: Lacertidae) shows diverse food preferences and intraspecific differences: a study case from Bulgaria
Figure 2. Diversity profiles of the diet of P. muralis based on the faecal samples from the study sites (Ad. = adults; Imm. = immatures; M = males; F = females).
Figure 2 in On the occurrence of ectoparasite ticks on Trachylepis and Eumeces (Reptilia: Scincidae) in Iran
Figure 2. Haemaphysalis parva (Family: Ixodidae), collected from the underarm region of Trachylepis aurata transcaucasica and Eumeces schneideri princeps; dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views.
Figure 1 in On the occurrence of ectoparasite ticks on Trachylepis and Eumeces (Reptilia: Scincidae) in Iran
Figure 1. Map of sampling localities (grey areas) for the collected parasites (Haemaphysalis parva). (1) Ghotur, (2) Bukan, (3) Baneh, (4) Marivan, (5) Sarvabad, (6) Esalm Abad-e-Gharb, (7) Kermanshah, (8) Poldokhtar, (9) Dezful and Andimeshk, (10) Masjed solaiman and Haft Gel.
Figure 2 in Distribution of Hemidactylus geckos (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) in Fars Province, Southern Iran
Figure 2. One of the three collected specimens of Hemidactylus turcicus from southwestern regions of Fars Province.
Figure 1 in Distribution of Hemidactylus geckos (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) in Fars Province, Southern Iran
Figure 1. Location of Fars Province on the Iranian Plateau. The black circle, red quadrangular and blue polygon indicate the previous and new locality records for H. persicus, H. flaviviridis, and H. turcicus, respectively.
Fig. 4 in Taxonomic revision of the king cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) species complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae), with the description of two new species
Fig. 4. Plate XII from Cantor (1836), showing head in dorsal and ventral views, scale closeups and the posterior venter and tail of a syntype of Hamadryas hannah Cantor, 1836.
Fig. 6. Plate XVII, figures 8–9 in Taxonomic revision of the king cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) species complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae), with the description of two new species
Fig. 6. Plate XVII, figures 8–9 from Schlegel (1837), showing head in dorsal and lateral views of lectotype of Naja bungarus Schlegel, 1837 (RMNH 1334).
Fig. 9 in Taxonomic revision of the king cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) species complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae), with the description of two new species
Fig. 9. Head in dorsal, ventral and lateral views of respective type specimens of species of Ophiophagus Günther, 1864. A–C. Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836), neotype, ♀ (ZSI 8292). A. Dorsal view of head. B. Ventral view of head. C. Left lateral view of head. D–F. Ophiophagus bungarus (Schlegel, 1837) comb. nov., lectotype, ♂ (RMNH 1334). D. Dorsal view of head. E. Ventral view of head. F. Left lateral view of head. G–I. Ophiophagus kaalinga Gowri Shankar, Das & Ganesh sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (BNHS 3655). G. Dorsal view of head. H. Ventral view of head. I. Left lateral view of head. J–L. Ophiophagus salvatana Gowri Shankar, Das & Wüster sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (CAS 61329). J. Dorsal view of head. K. Ventral view of head. L. Left lateral view of head.
Fig. 1 in Taxonomic revision of the king cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) species complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae), with the description of two new species
Fig. 1. Illustration of morphological characters and measurement landmarks used in the taxonomic descriptions of the Ophiophagus hannah species complex. Sketch by H.Vinod Kumar.
Fig. 3. Plate XI in Taxonomic revision of the king cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) species complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae), with the description of two new species
Fig. 3. Plate XI from Cantor (1836), showing cranium, mandible, dissected head and venom glands of a syntype of Hamadryas hannah Cantor, 1836.
Fig. 2. Plate X in Taxonomic revision of the king cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) species complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae), with the description of two new species
Fig. 2. Plate X from Cantor (1836), showing head with neck expanded in anterior and posterior views of a syntype of Hamadryas hannah Cantor, 1836.
Fig. 5 in Taxonomic revision of the king cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) species complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae), with the description of two new species
Fig. 5. Holotype of Naia vittata Elliot, 1840. Top. Photograph of the preserved holotype specimen BMNH 1996.451. Bottom. Plate I from Elliot (1840).
Fig. 8. Plate 8 in Taxonomic revision of the king cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) species complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae), with the description of two new species
Fig. 8. Plate 8, from Fayrer (1872) depicting the 'Dusky variety' of Ophiophagus elaps (Günther, 1858), and corresponding to Ophiophagus kaalinga Gowri Shankar, Das & Ganesh sp. nov., showing entire body of a hooding adult in mostly a dorsolateral view.
Fig. 15 in Taxonomic revision of the king cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) species complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae), with the description of two new species
Fig. 15. Live unvouchered adults of Ophiophagus kaalinga Gowri Shankar, Das & Ganesh sp. nov. showing variation in colour pattern. A. Kalakkad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India (photo: Naveen Joseph). B–C. Agumbe, Karnataka, India (photo: P. Gowri Shankar). D. Goa, India (photo: P. Gowri Shankar).
Fig. 7. Plate 7, figures 1–4 in Taxonomic revision of the king cobra Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) species complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae), with the description of two new species
Fig. 7. Plate 7, figures 1–4 from Fayrer (1872), depicting Ophiophagus elaps (Günther, 1858), and corresponding to Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) s. str., showing the body in dorsolateral view of an adult with a partially raised forebody. Also shown are line drawings of head in dorsal, ventral and lateral views.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.