Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 6. Dinoflagellates from USGS Paleobotan. loc. R6234H in Cephalopods From The Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary Interval On The Atlantic Coastal Plain, With A Description Of The Highest Ammonite Zones In North America. Part 2. Northeastern Monmouth County, New Jersey

Fig. 6. Dinoflagellates from USGS Paleobotan. loc. R6234H, Tinton Formation, Hochhockson Brook, 0.2 km north of the intersection of Water Street and Tinton Avenue, northeastern Monmouth County, New Jersey. A–E. Isabelidinium cooksoniae (Alberti, 1959) Lentin & Williams, 1977 sensu lato.

Fig. 5 in Cephalopods From The Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary Interval On The Atlantic Coastal Plain, With A Description Of The Highest Ammonite Zones In North America. Part 2. Northeastern Monmouth County, New Jersey

Fig. 5. Composite stratigraphic section of the Tinton, New Egypt, and Hornerstown Formations near Eatontown, northeastern Monmouth County, showing the distribution of cephalopods and dinoflagellates (nonreworked) with respect to the standard zonation of foraminifera, nannofossils, and ammonites.

Fig. 3 in Cephalopods From The Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary Interval On The Atlantic Coastal Plain, With A Description Of The Highest Ammonite Zones In North America. Part 2. Northeastern Monmouth County, New Jersey

Fig. 3. Detailed locality map of northeastern Monmouth County, New Jersey, showing the areal extent of the New Egypt Formation (Kne) and its contact with the underlying Tinton formation (Kt) and overlying Hornerstown Formation (Tht). Numbers correspond to those in the list of localities.

Fig. 2 in Cephalopods From The Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary Interval On The Atlantic Coastal Plain, With A Description Of The Highest Ammonite Zones In North America. Part 2. Northeastern Monmouth County, New Jersey

Fig. 2. Standard stratigraphic sequence of part of the Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary succession in Monmouth County, New Jersey (reproduced from Olsson, 1987). In earlier interpretations (Olsson, 1963), the New Egypt Formation was also considered to be equivalent to parts of the Hornerstown and Navesink formations.

opencc-zeroSep 2012View details →

FIG. 3 in Hypsodont Myomiminae (Gliridae, Rodentia) from five new localities in the Lower Miocene Tudela Formation (Bardenas Reales, Ebro Basin, Spain) and their bearing on the age of the Agenian-Ramblian boundary

FIG. 3. — Distribution chart of the Myomiminae species studied in this paper and in Daams (1990). The succession of the localities from Daams (1990) is, though in stratigraphical order, not calibrated.

Fig. 15 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species

Fig. 15. Differences in the posterior part of the surstylus among species of the M. avidus complex. A. UPGMA phenogram constructed using squared Mahalanobis distances. B. Thin-plate spline deformation grids showing overall shape differences between analysed species.

Fig. 14 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species

Fig. 14. Differences in the posterior part of the surstylus among species of the M. avidus complex. A. Scatter plot of individual scores of CV1 vs CV2. B. Scatter plot of individual scores of CV2 vs CV3.

Fig. 11 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species

Fig. 11. UPGMA phenogram constructed using the squared Mahalanobis distances of wing shape for species of the M. avidus complex.

Fig. 12 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species

Fig. 12. Thin-plate spline deformation grids showing wing shape differences between analysed species. Differences between the species have been exaggerated five-fold to make them more visible.

Fig. 10 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species

Fig. 10. Differences in wing shape among species of the M. avidus complex. A. Scatter plot of individual scores of CV1 vs CV2. B. Scatter plot of individual scores of CV2 vs CV3.

Fig. 9 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species

Fig. 9. UPGMA tree based on pairwise genetic distances for four species from the Merodon avidus complex.

Fig. 8 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species

Fig. 8. Median-joining network of the mtDNA 5'-end of the COI gene. Circle sizes are proportional to haplotype frequencies. Each branch represents one mutational step; if more than one mutational step is present, it is denoted by the given number.

Fig. 6 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species

Fig. 6. Maximum parsimony strict consensus tree based on DNA barcode COI sequences. Length 136 steps, Consistency Index (CI) = 93, Retention Index (RI) = 95. Filled circles denote unique changes, open circles non-unique.

Fig. 4 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species

Fig. 4. Merodon megavidus Vujić & Radenković sp. nov., head, antero-lateral view. A. Ƌ. B. ♀. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 3. Hind leg, lateral view. A–B in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species

Fig. 3. Hind leg, lateral view. A–B. Merodon avidus (Rossi, 1790). A. Ƌ. B. ♀. — C–D. M. megavidus Vujić & Radenković sp. nov. C. Ƌ. D. ♀. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 2 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species

Fig. 2. Merodon megavidus Vujić & Radenković sp. nov., male genitalia. A. Epandrium, lateral view. B. Left surstylus, anterior view. C. Hypandrium, lateral view. Abbreviations: psl = posterior surstylus lobe; asl = anterior surstylus lobe; c = cercus; ae = aedeagus; ea = ejaculatory apodeme. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →

Рис. 1. Карта района иссΛеΑований. 1 – граница зон раститеΛьности; 2 – граница поΑзон раститеΛьности; 3 – места сбора материаΛа; I – южная тайга; II – среΑняя тайга; III – северная тайга; IV – крайнесеверная тайга; V – ΛесотунΑра; VI – южная тунΑра; VII – северная тунΑра. Fig. 1. Map of the studied area. 1 – boundary of vegetation zones; 2 – boundary of vegetation subzones; 3 – collection points; I – southern taiga; II – middle taiga; III – northern taiga; IV – extremely northern taiga; V – forest tundra; VI – southern tundra; VII – northern tundra. in Fauna and landscape-zonal distribution of Orthoptera in the Komi Republic (Russia)

Рис. 1. Карта района иссΛеΑований. 1 – граница зон раститеΛьности; 2 – граница поΑзон раститеΛьности; 3 – места сбора материаΛа; I – южная тайга; II – среΑняя тайга; III – северная тайга; IV – крайнесеверная тайга; V – ΛесотунΑра; VI – южная тунΑра; VII – северная тунΑра. Fig. 1. Map of the studied area. 1 – boundary of vegetation zones; 2 – boundary of vegetation subzones; 3 – collection points; I – southern taiga; II – middle taiga; III – northern taiga; IV – extremely northern taiga; V – forest tundra; VI – southern tundra; VII – northern tundra.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2023View details →

Tropical cyclone low-level wind speed, shear, and veer: sensitivity to the boundary layer parameterization in WRF

This repository contains namelists needed to reproduce the WRF(V4.4) simulations analyzed in "Tropical cyclone low-level wind speed, shear, and veer: sensitivity to the boundary layer parameterization in WRF"