Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,940
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,940 results for “data sample”
Sampled ΔH/Δλ and ΔH data from ABFE calculations of 10 ligands bound to Cyclophilin D
<p>Supplementary Information: "Evaluating the use of absolute binding free energy in the fragment optimization process"</p> <p>Included are the ABFE raw free energy samples for multiple replicates (labelled by `run` number) of 10 ligands bound to Cyclophilin D. These ligands are originally detailed by Grädler et al. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.126717). Unlike the other Cyclophilin D<br> dataset provided in this work, simulations for these ABFE calculations were carried out using hydrogen mass repartitioning (HMR). The MCL-1, HSP90, and PWWP1 also used HMR.</p> <p>All samples are provided as a set of `.xvg` files as generated by GROMACS 2021 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5849961). The `.xvg` files are labelled as dhdl.N.xvg where N represents the λ state the free energy values were sampled from. The `.xvg` files contain both ΔH/Δλ and ΔH values, please see the header of each files for more information.</p> <p>Samples detailing the partial decoupling of the ligand from the protein-ligand complex are contained within the `complex` folder. These consist of an orientational restraint addition step (found within the `restraints-xvg` folders), charge annihilation step (found within the `coul-xvg` folders), and Van der Waals decoupling step (found within the `vdw-xvg` folders).</p> <p>Samples detailing the partial decoupling of the ligand from solvent are contained within the `ligand` folder and consist of a charge annihilation step (found within the individual `coul-xvg` folders) and a Van der Waals decoupling step (found within the individual `vdw-xvg` folders).<br> </p>
Sampled ΔH/Δλ and ΔH data from ABFE calculations of 18 ligands bound to HSP90
<p>Supplementary Information: "Evaluating the use of absolute binding free energy in the fragment optimization process"</p> <p>Included are the ABFE raw free energy samples for multiple replicates (labelled by `run` number) of 18 ligands bound to HSP90. These ligands are originally detailed by Murray et al. (https://doi.org/10.1021/jm100059d).</p> <p>All samples are provided as a set of `.xvg` files as generated by GROMACS 2021 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5849961). The `.xvg` files are labelled as dhdl.N.xvg where N represents the λ state the free energy values were sampled from. The `.xvg` files contain both ΔH/Δλ and ΔH values, please see the header of each files for more information.</p> <p>Samples detailing the partial decoupling of the ligand from the protein-ligand complex are contained within the `complex` folder. These consist of an orientational restraint addition step (found within the `restraints-xvg` folders), charge annihilation step (found within the `coul-xvg` folders), and Van der Waals decoupling step (found within the `vdw-xvg` folders).</p> <p>Samples detailing the partial decoupling of the ligand from solvent are contained within the `ligand` folder and consist of a charge annihilation step (found within the individual `coul-xvg` folders) and a Van der Waals decoupling step (found within the individual `vdw-xvg` folders).</p>
Supporting publication for 'Prevalence sample-based guidance for reporting 2021 data'
<p>The record is aimed at helping the reporting countries to submit their sample-based level data to the EFSA Data Collection Framework. We include here two excel files and one XML file, and we give below specific information on their use.</p> <p>The two Excel documents help in mapping terms from the matrix catalogue ZOO_CAT_MATRIX used in the aggregated prevalence data model to FoodEx2 codes, and offer examples on how prevalence data can be reported using SSD2 and how data are aggregated afterwards. The XML file is the same example as in the Excel file with similar title but in the XML format that allows for it be uploaded in the Data Collection Framework.</p>
FIGURE 3 Morphological trait sampling for all bird families. AVONET contains 718,662 in AVONET: morphological, ecological and geographical data for all birds
FIGURE 3 Morphological trait sampling for all bird families. AVONET contains 718,662 individual trait measurements, all of which are used to calculate species averages. However, sampling per species varies across families depending on taxonomy. Upper phylogram shows sampling under BirdLife International (11,009 species in 243 families). Families where sampling completeness is below 75% indicated by lighter shading. Most families with lower sampling are species poor (numbers in black circles show species richness). Lower panels show that sampling improves under more conservative taxonomic treatments of eBird (10,661 species in 249 families) and BirdTree (9993 species in 194 families). Coloured bars indicate the proportion of species in each family measured to different levels of completeness. 'Complete set' means a full set of all 9 core morphological traits (not necessarily from the same individual). 'Individuals' means any individual bird with one or more traits measured
Sample Inventory Data
<p>This is an experimental publication of a sample data set. The goal is to test out low-threshold options for university collections to generate persistent identifiers in situations where no formal digital infrastructure is available.</p>
TELL sample output data
<p>This dataset contains sample output data for TELL. The sample dataset includes four years of sample future data (2039, 2059, 2079, and 2099) that comes from IM3's future WRF runs under the RCP 8.5 climate scenario with SSP5 population forcing. Note that the GCAM-USA output used in this simulation is sample data only. As such the quantitative results from this set of sample output should not be considered valid.</p>
Two fish in a pod. Data from a self-sampling pilot program to separate between black hake species in W-Africa
<p>Data from self-sampling pilot trial in Senegal and Mauritanian waters where two species of black hake were separated manually onboard fishing vessels and the results then validated by genetic analysis. </p>
DeMeGRaS_samples_data_2022-04
<p>DeMeGRaS_samples_data_2022-04</p> <p>Layouts, fabrication steps, optical- and SEM pictures</p>
Data from: Skyline fossilized birth-death model is robust to violations of sampling assumptions in total-evidence dating
<p>Several total-evidence dating studies under the fossilized birth-death (FBD) model have produced very old age estimates, which are not supported by the fossil record. This phenomenon has been termed "deep root attraction (DRA)". For two specific datasets, involving divergence time estimation for the early radiations of ants, bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) and of placental mammals (Eutheria), it has been shown that the DRA effect can be greatly reduced by accommodating the fact that extant species in these trees have been sampled to maximize diversity, so called diversified sampling. Unfortunately, current methods to accommodate diversified sampling only consider the extreme case where it is possible to identify a cut-off time such that all splits occurring before this time are represented in the sampled tree but none of the younger splits. In reality, the sampling bias is rarely this extreme, and may be difficult to model properly. Similar modeling challenges apply to the sampling of the fossil record. This raises the question of whether it is possible to find dating methods that are more robust to sampling biases. Here, we show that the skyline FBD (SFBD) process, where the diversification and fossil-sampling rates can vary over time in a piecewise fashion, provides age estimates that are more robust to inadequacies in the modeling of the sampling process and less sensitive to DRA effects. In the SFBD model we consider, rates in different time intervals are either considered to be independent and identically distributed, or assumed to be autocorrelated following an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) process. Through simulations and reanalyses of the Hymenoptera and Eutheria data, we show that both variants of the SFBD model unify age estimates under random and diversified sampling assumptions. The SFBD model can resolve DRA by absorbing the deviations from the sampling assumptions into the inferred dynamics of the diversification process over time. Although this means that the inferred diversification dynamics must be interpreted with caution, taking sampling biases into account, we conclude that the SFBD model represents the most robust approach available currently for addressing DRA in total-evidence dating.</p>
Environmental data at the sampling event level collected with Inline instruments, almanach, models and satellites during the Tara Pacific Expedition 2016-2018
<p>The Tara Pacific expedition (2016-2018) sampled coral ecosystems around 32 islands in the Pacific Ocean, and sampled the surface of oceanic waters at 249 locations, resulting in the collection of nearly 58,000 samples. The expedition was designed to systematically study corals, fish, plankton, and seawater, and included the collection of samples for advanced biogeochemical, molecular, and imaging analysis. Here we provide at the sampling event level, the environmental data originating from all instruments acquiring continuously during the full course of the campaign. This dataset is augmented with the addition of variables originating from almanach (local sun/moon set/rise, local zenith), from operational models obtained from Copernicus Marine Services, but also <strong>f</strong>rom satellite imagery (MODIS-AQUA satellite - Level 3 mapped product, 8 day average, 4km resolution) at <a href="https://oceandata.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov">https://oceandata.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov</a>. The zone corresponding to the station position and date was recovered either by taking a two pixel buffer around the given location (total zone being a 5 by 5 pixels square of 20 km side) and in order to propose an alternative measure in the inevitable case where clouds were present an alternative 12 pixels buffer was taken (total zone being a 25 by 25 pixels square of 100 km side). All data were provided as mean, standard deviation (sd) together with 0.05, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 0.95 quartiles</p>
Enzymatic digestion method development for long-term stored chitinaceous planktonic samples - Data
<table> <tbody> <tr> <td>Data for Carrillo-Barragán, Priscilla, Heather Sugden, Catherine Scott, and Clare Fitzsimmons. 2022.<br> “Enzymatic Digestion Method Development for Long-Term Stored Chitinaceous Planktonic Samples.”<br> Marine Pollution Bulletin. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
Data from: eDNA metabarcoding of log hollow sediments and soils highlights the importance of substrate type, frequency of sampling and animal size, for vertebrate species detection
<p>Fauna monitoring often relies on visual monitoring techniques such as camera trappings, which have biases leading to underestimates of vertebrate species diversity. Environmental DNA (eDNA) has emerged as a new source of biodiversity data that may improve biomonitoring; however, eDNA based assessments of species richness remain relatively untested in terrestrial environments. We investigated the suitability of fallen log hollow sediment as a source of vertebrate eDNA, across two sites in south-western Australia - one with a Mediterranean climate and the other semi-arid. We compared two different approaches (camera trapping and eDNA metabarcoding) for monitoring of vertebrate species, and investigated the effect of other factors (frequency of species, timing of visits, frequency of sampling, body size) on vertebrate species detectability. Metabarcoding of hollow sediments resulted in the detection of higher species richness in comparison Hollow sediment detected higher species richness (29 taxa: six birds, three reptiles and 20 mammals) to metabarcoding of soil at the entrance of the hollow (13 taxa: three birds, two reptiles and eight mammals). We detected 31 taxa in total with eDNA metabarcoding and 47 with camera traps, with 14 taxa detected by both (12 mammals and two birds). By comparing camera trap data with eDNA read abundance, we were able to detect vertebrates through eDNA metabarcoding that had visited the area up to two months prior to sample collection. Larger animals were more likely to be detected, and so were vertebrates that were identified multiple times in the camera traps. These findings demonstrate the importance of substrate selection, frequency of sampling, and animal size, on eDNA based monitoring. Future eDNA experimental design should consider all these factors as they affect detection of target taxa. </p>
Test data for jga-analysis per-sample workflow
<p>Test data for jga-analysis per-sample workflow.</p> <p>Please see:</p> <p>- <a href="https://github.com/biosciencedbc/jga-analysis">https://github.com/biosciencedbc/jga-analysis</a></p> <p>- <a href="https://github.com/biosciencedbc/jga-analysis/blob/main/per-sample/Workflows/per-sample.cwl">https://github.com/biosciencedbc/jga-analysis/blob/main/per-sample/Workflows/per-sample.cwl</a></p>
Data of FigS2, "The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples"
<p>Data of FigS2, “The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples”</p> <p>The Dataset (original publication: doi: 10.3390/cancers14133074) contains the original figure as PNG-format (10.3390-cancers14133074_FigS2.PNG). The corresponding raw data and subsequent data analysis obtained from proteomics analysis are provided as nine files in CSV format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SS_SA_DHRS7_5_1-3_M1-3.csv). All further experiment related information provided as one meta-data-file (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SS_SA_DHRS7_5_1_M .txt) in txt format.</p>
Data of FigS4, "The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples"
<p>Data of FigS4, “The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples”</p> <p>The Dataset (original publication: doi: 10.3390/cancers14133074) contains the original figure as PNG-format (10.3390-cancers14133074_FigS4.PNG). The Corresponding raw data and subsequent data analysis obtained from western blot analysis contains the original figures of the raw blots and antibody dilutions as PDF-format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_2_6_M1.pdf), data analysis (densitometry) and all further experiment related information provided as one meta-data-file in txt format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_2_6_M.txt) and three files in CSV-format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_2_6_1-3.csv).</p>
Data of Fig7, "The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples"
<p>Data of Fig7, “The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples”</p> <p>The Dataset (original publication: doi: 10.3390/cancers14133074) contains the original figure as PNG-format (10.3390-cancers14133074_Fig7.PNG). The Corresponding raw data and subsequent data analysis obtained for TCGA analysis contains one file in txt-format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_23_1_M.txt), and all further related information provided as one meta-data-file in pdf-format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_23_1_M1.pdf)</p> <p> </p>
Data of Fig8, "The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples"
<p>Data of Fig8, “The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples”</p> <p>The Dataset (original publication: doi: 10.3390/cancers14133074) contains the original figure as PNG-format (10.3390-cancers14133074_Fig8.PNG). The Corresponding raw data and subsequent data analysis obtained for immunohistochemistry contains one file in txt-format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_12_1_M .txt) and one file in csv-format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_12_1.csv), and all further related information provided as one meta-data-file in pdf-format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_12_1_M1 .pdf)</p> <p> </p>
Data of Fig4, "The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples"
<p>Data of Fig4, “The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples”</p> <p>The Dataset (original publication: doi: 10.3390/cancers14133074) contains the original figure as PNG-format (10.3390-cancers14133074_Fig4.PNG). The Corresponding raw data and subsequent data analysis obtained from western blot analysis contains the original figures of the raw blots and antibody dilutions as PDF-format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_2_3_M_1.pdf), data analysis (densitometry) and all further experiment related information provided as one meta-data-file in txt format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_2_3_M.txt). Corresponding raw data and subsequent data analysis obtained from RT-PCR analysis provided as one files in TXT format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_1_4_M.txt), all further experiment related information provided as one meta-data-file in pdf format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_1_4_M_1.pdf).</p>
Data of Fig2, "The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples"
<p>Data of Fig2, “The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples”</p> <p>The Dataset (original publication: doi: 10.3390/cancers14133074) contains the original figure as PNG-format (10.3390-cancers14133074_Fig2.PNG). The corresponding raw data and subsequent data analysis obtained from proteomics analysis are provided as three files in CSV format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SS_SA_DHRS7_5_1-3.csv). All further experiment related information provided as one meta-data-file (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SS_SA_DHRS7_5_1_M .txt) in txt format. Corresponding raw data and subsequent data analysis obtained from western blot analysis contains the original figures of the raw blots and antibody dilutions as PDF-format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_2_1_M_1 .pdf), data analysis (densitometry) and all further experiment related information provided as one meta-data-file in txt format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_2_1_M.txt). Corresponding raw data and subsequent data analysis obtained from RT-PCR analysis provided as one files in TXT format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_1_2_M.txt), all further experiment related information provided as one meta-data-file in pdf format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_1_2_M_1.pdf).</p>
Data of Fig5, "The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples"
<p>Data of Fig5, “The Potential Tumor-Suppressor DHRS7 Inversely Correlates with EGFR Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells and Tumor Samples”</p> <p>The Dataset (original publication: doi: 10.3390/cancers14133074) contains the original figure as PNG-format (10.3390-cancers14133074_Fig5.PNG). The Corresponding raw data and subsequent data analysis obtained from western blot analysis contains the original figures of the raw blots and antibody dilutions as PDF-format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_2_4_M_1.pdf), data analysis (densitometry) and all further experiment related information provided as one meta-data-file in txt format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_2_4_M.txt) and three files in CSV-format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_2_4_3.csv). Corresponding raw data and subsequent data analysis obtained from RT-PCR analysis provided as one files in TXT format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_1_5_M .txt) and three files in CSV format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_1_5-1-3.csv), all further experiment related information provided as three meta-data-files in pdf format (31003A-179400_10.3390-cancers14133074_SSDHRS7_1_5_M_1-3.pdf).</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.