Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in Calliptamus italicus at 3050 m: a first evidence of dispersal across the Alps? (Orthoptera: Acrididae)

Fig. 2 – The female Calliptamus italicus (Linnaeus, 1758) observed at Punta Losetta (3050 m, Cottian Alps) on 27 Aug 2020 (body length = 28.5 mm).

Fig. 4 in Calliptamus italicus at 3050 m: a first evidence of dispersal across the Alps? (Orthoptera: Acrididae)

Fig. 4 – Landscape on the Italian slope of Punta Losetta (3050 m, Cottian Alps). The Alpine grassland in the lower part of the picture is the habitat were the female C. italicus was observed the 27 Aug 2020.

Fig. 3 – Plots representing the 23-27 Aug 2020 in Calliptamus italicus at 3050 m: a first evidence of dispersal across the Alps? (Orthoptera: Acrididae)

Fig. 3 – Plots representing the 23-27 Aug 2020 trends of the meteorological parameters considered in order to describe the weather conditions in the days just before the observation of the female Calliptamus italicus on Punta Losetta (3050 m, Cottian Alps). The trend of each parameter is better visualized with a Loess curve (blue line; grey area = 95% confi- dence interval): a, atmospheric pressure; b, precipitations; c, wind speed (solid lines) and wind gust (dotted lines); d, wind direction (origin); e, air temperature. The data collected in each weather station are reported in different colours. Sources: ARPA Piemonte and Météo France.

Fig. 1 in Calliptamus italicus at 3050 m: a first evidence of dispersal across the Alps? (Orthoptera: Acrididae)

Fig. 1 – Map of the study area (Monviso massif, Cottian Alps, France-Italy border). The yellow point identifies the locality where the female Calliptamus italicus was observed on 27 Aug 2020 (Punta Losetta, 3050 m), while the position of the weather stations considered in this short note is reported by red dots.

Figure 7 in Harbor seal pup dispersal and individual morphology, hematology, and contaminant factors affecting survival

Figure 7. Association between the survival probability estimate and mass (kg) at the time of release from rehabilitation from the best supported TMMC model: {Φ(mass)}.

Figure 3 in Harbor seal pup dispersal and individual morphology, hematology, and contaminant factors affecting survival

Figure 3. Map of the tracks taken by seals that traveled the greatest distance from their capture or release location for each of the three groups of seals. SF = San Francisco Bay, TB = Tomales Bay, and TMMC = The Marine Mammal Center. The TMMC seal that traveled the furthest was released from Cypress Point, Monterey.

Figure 6. Association between survival probability estimates with circulating T4 in Harbor seal pup dispersal and individual morphology, hematology, and contaminant factors affecting survival

Figure 6. Association between survival probability estimates with circulating T4 (nmol/L) at the time of capture/release from the best supported model: {Φ(g + T4)}.

Figure 5 in Harbor seal pup dispersal and individual morphology, hematology, and contaminant factors affecting survival

Figure 5. The last day of satellite tag transmission for each seal (circles) modeled by two exponential curves (solid lines) with 95% confidence intervals (dotted lines). Data and estimates are in black for the wild (SF and TB) seals and blue for the rehabilitated (TMMC) seals. The gray line represents tag survival based on a normal distribution. The dashed lines display the effect of tag loss on the two survival curves.

Figure 1 in Harbor seal pup dispersal and individual morphology, hematology, and contaminant factors affecting survival

Figure 1. Relationship between standard length and summed organohalogen contaminants (OH) for the three groups: San Francisco Bay [logOH = (length) × (−0.05) + 13.76, F = 6.117, df = 17, R2 = 0.2646, P = 0.024], Tomales Bay [logOH = (length) × (−0.05) + 24.45, F = 10.3, df = 5, R2 = 0.6733, P = 0.023], and The Marine Mammal Center (not significant).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2015View details →

Fig. 2 in Evaluation of field dispersal and survival capacity of the genetic sexing strain Tapachula-7 of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Fig. 2. General displacement of Anastrepha ludens SMR strain (solid line) and Tap-7 strain (broken line) in a Cartesian plane.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2015View details →

Fig. 1 in Evaluation of field dispersal and survival capacity of the genetic sexing strain Tapachula-7 of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Fig. 1. Contours of displacement of the SMR strain (lef) and Tap-7 strain (right) of Anastrepha ludens inside the field plot. The density of the flies at each contour is indicated by the number.

Fig. 4 in Seasonal and spatial dispersal patterns of select ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from forest habitats into production nurseries

Fig. 4. Mean (± SE) captures of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. cra`ssiusculus, and X. germanus in ethanol-baited Baker traps deployed at various distances from the nursery–forest interface at 2 sites in South Carolina in 2011 and 2012.

Fig. 3 in Seasonal and spatial dispersal patterns of select ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from forest habitats into production nurseries

Fig. 3. Mean captures of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. crassiusculus, and X. germanus in ethanol-baited Baker traps at 2 sites in Louisiana and Mississippi in 2013 and 2014.

Fig. 1 in Seasonal and spatial dispersal patterns of select ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from forest habitats into production nurseries

Fig. 1. Satellite image of the Mississippi research site (Google, Mountain View, California, USA) with an overlay showing a randomized complete block design of 5 blocks. Representing the 2013 test, each block shown here had a trap placed at −25, 25, 50, 100, and 200 m from the nursery–forest interface.

Fig. 5 in Seasonal and spatial dispersal patterns of select ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from forest habitats into production nurseries

Fig. 5. Mean (± SE) captures of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. crassiusculus, and X. germanus in ethanol-baited Baker traps deployed at various distances from the nursery–forest interface at 2 sites in Louisiana and Mississippi in 2013 and 2014.

Fig. 2 in Flight ability and dispersal of European grapevine moth gamma-irradiated males (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the vineyard and the pheromone traps positions at the experimental plot where the marked male moths were released.

Fig 1 in Flight ability and dispersal of European grapevine moth gamma-irradiated males (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Fig 1. Schematic representation of the flight assessment cage used to measure the flight responses of Lobesia botrana males to calling females. In the female compartment, 2-day-old virgin females were confined inside a small cylindrical plastic mesh box with a 5% sucrose-wetted wick. Males irradiated either with 150 Gy or with 350 Gy and untreated males differentially marked with variously colored fluorescent powders were introduced into the male compartment. The number of males of each of the 3 kinds that flew through the open slit at the 45 cm height [the 2 lower openings (slits) were sealed] into the female compartment were recorded at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. Air was drawn into the female compartment and exhausted from the male compartment.

Fig. 2 in Influence of gamma-irradiation on flight ability and dispersal of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 2. Numbers of adult Conopomorpha sinensis males recaptured in traps deployed at various distances (m) from the release point in 2 release/recapture experiments in a litchi orchard of the South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. The males were either non-irradiated or irradiated either with 150 or 200 Gy. A: First release, B: Second release.

Fig. 1 in Influence of gamma-irradiation on flight ability and dispersal of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 1. Survival (days) of non-irradiated Conopomorpha sinensis males either dyed with 1 of 3 different fluorescent colors or undyed (control) in the laboratory. Each treatment involved 30 males.

Fig. 3 in Influence of gamma-irradiation on flight ability and dispersal of Conopomorpha sinensis (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 3. Frequency distributions of the dispersal directions of adult Conopomorpha sinensis males in 2 release/recapture experiments in a litchi orchard of the South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. The males were either non-irradiated or irradiated either with 150 or 200 Gy. A: First release, B: Second release.