Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
667
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
667 results for “distinguishability”
On following pages: 626. Niceforo Maria's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys nicefori); 627. Popayan Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys popayanus); 628. Short-faced Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys baeops); 629. Snow-footed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys niveipes); 630. Principal Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys princeps); 631. Silky Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys bombycinus); 632. Red Andean Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys auricularis); 633. Cinnamon-colored Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys cinnameus); 634. Central Andes Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys contradictus); 635. Ashy-bellied Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys cinereiventen; 636. Colombian Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys dispar); 637. Soft-furred Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys lanigen); 638. Ash-colored Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys cinereus); 639. Wandering Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys erro); 640. Paramo Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys paramorum); 641. Forest Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomyssilvestris); 642. Smoky Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys fumeus); 643. Pichincha Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys vulcani); 644. Ucucha Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys ucucha); 645. Taczanowski's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys taczanowskii); 646. Golden Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys aureus); 647. White-tipped Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys caudivarius); 648. Hudson's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys hudsoni); 649. Reddish-backed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys pyrrhonotus); 650. Montane Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys oreas); 651. Cajamarca Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys praetor; 652. Distinguished Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys notatus); 653. Apeco Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys apeco); 654. Peruvian Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys eleusis); 655. Strong-tailed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys ischyrus); 656. Reddish-nosed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys rosalinda); 657. Large-eared Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys macrotis); 658. Ashaninka Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys onkiro); 659. Inca Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys incanus), 660. Kalinowski's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys kalinowskii); 661. Slender Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys gracilis); 662. Daphne's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys daphne); 663. Anderson's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys anderson); 664. Austral Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys australis); 665. Ladew's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys ladewi). in Cricetidae
On following pages: 626. Niceforo Maria's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys nicefori); 627. Popayan Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys popayanus); 628. Short-faced Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys baeops); 629. Snow-footed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys niveipes); 630. Principal Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys princeps); 631. Silky Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys bombycinus); 632. Red Andean Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys auricularis); 633. Cinnamon-colored Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys cinnameus); 634. Central Andes Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys contradictus); 635. Ashy-bellied Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys cinereiventen; 636. Colombian Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys dispar); 637. Soft-furred Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys lanigen); 638. Ash-colored Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys cinereus); 639. Wandering Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys erro); 640. Paramo Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys paramorum); 641. Forest Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomyssilvestris); 642. Smoky Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys fumeus); 643. Pichincha Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys vulcani); 644. Ucucha Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys ucucha); 645. Taczanowski's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys taczanowskii); 646. Golden Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys aureus); 647. White-tipped Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys caudivarius); 648. Hudson's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys hudsoni); 649. Reddish-backed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys pyrrhonotus); 650. Montane Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys oreas); 651. Cajamarca Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys praetor; 652. Distinguished Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys notatus); 653. Apeco Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys apeco); 654. Peruvian Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys eleusis); 655. Strong-tailed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys ischyrus); 656. Reddish-nosed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys rosalinda); 657. Large-eared Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys macrotis); 658. Ashaninka Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys onkiro); 659. Inca Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys incanus), 660. Kalinowski's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys kalinowskii); 661. Slender Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys gracilis); 662. Daphne's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys daphne); 663. Anderson's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys anderson); 664. Austral Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys australis); 665. Ladew's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys ladewi).
Figure 1 in First use of acoustic calls to distinguish cryptic members of a fish species complex
Figure 1. Background shading indicates the geographical distribution of the three populations (Liu et al., 2014) from the Dascyllus aruanus complex. A, in each geographical area, dots correspond to sampling locations. B, scatterplot of principal component PC1 versus PC2, performed with individual mean values of the six acoustic properties of calls corresponding to the signal jump for the three suggested species: D. abudafur (blue ●), D. aruanus (turquoise +) and D. emamo (pink▲). Ellipses correspond to 90% of the observations, dots correspond to the ellipse centra.
Kintsugi Imaging of Battery Electrodes: Distinguishing Pores from the Carbon Binder Domain using Pt Deposition (Data)
<p>Figures and data files used to construct the figures in the 2022 paper "Kintsugi Imaging of Battery Electrodes: Distinguishing Pores from the Carbon Binder Domain using Pt Deposition."</p> <p> </p>
Data from: The effect of the intensity of the element that distinguishes flavor on the memory and perception of Peruvian millennials and centennials
<p>Globalization has facilitated a lot the access to all kinds of products and brands from different parts of the world, which has increased consumer choice and also competition among packaged products. For this reason, the package design of a brand to attract<br> consumers must be able to stand out among so much supply, especially if it is a new product or a new flavor. The packaging of the product has a strong direct influence on consumers and therefore it becomes necessary to explore dimensions of packaging design that allow a high degree of differentiation or at least enough to differentiate from the competition and the same product line. In this line, there are very efficient strategies and approaches used in the literature to perform this exploration in packaging, such as evaluations of perception measured with attributes and the use of eye-tracking technology that records direct information about visual attention on the most distinctive elements. Thus, this study aims to determine the impact of the presentation of a new flavor on the packaging by varying the intensity of the stimulus that represents it according to the Weber-Fechner law, using the three main elements of the packaging: text, color and image. The experiment exposed three groups of participants (n=30) to 3 stimuli, which were based on the addition of an element as the intensity of the flavor description of three products from three different food categories was intended to increase. This study used the eye-tracking platform via RealEye webcam to measure attention, and a self-administered questionnaire was used to examine perception and recall.</p>
Bangassou near Lake Maboké (near Mongoumba), Central African Republic. Based on proodont incisors, considered to be part of the M. sorella species group, from which it can be distinguished based on its reddish-brown dorsal coloration and blackish, slightly pointed ears. Monotypic. Distribution. Known from just three locali-ties in S Central African Republic. in Muridae
Bangassou near Lake Maboké (near Mongoumba), Central African Republic. Based on proodont incisors, considered to be part of the M. sorella species group, from which it can be distinguished based on its reddish-brown dorsal coloration and blackish, slightly pointed ears. Monotypic. Distribution. Known from just three locali-ties in S Central African Republic.
Supplementary data and files for: The importance of contact zones for distinguishing interspecific from intraspecific geographic variation
<p>With limited sampling, geographic variation within a single species can be difficult to distinguish from interspecific variation, confounding our ability to draw accurate species boundaries. We argue that thorough sampling and analysis of contact zones between putative taxa can determine if assortative mating or selection against hybrids exists (supporting the presence of two distinct species), or alternatively if mating is random among genotypes and admixture among adjacent populations is gradual and continuous (supporting geographic variation within a single species). Here, we test two alternative hypotheses for two pairs of named taxa at contact zones within the American milksnake (<em>Lampropeltis triangulum</em>) complex. A prior morphological analysis found areas of gradual intergradation among named taxa, and concluded that the taxa represented geographical races of a single polytypic species. In contrast, a subsequent analysis of gene sequence data, but with limited sampling near the contact zones, hypothesized distinct boundaries between species at the contact zones. At the contact zone between proposed species <em>L. triangulum </em>and <em>L. gentilis</em>, we examined a ~700 km-wide transect across the states of Kansas and Missouri, with thorough sampling and reduced-representation genomic-level sequencing, to test the two opposing taxonomic hypotheses. Our transect analyses included examinations of population structure, fixed differences, cline-fitting, and an admixture index analysis. These analyses all supported a gradual and continuous geographic cline across a broad intergrade zone between two geographic forms of <em>L. triangulum</em>, thus providing strong support for a single species in this region (and no support for the recognition of <em>L. gentilis </em>as a distinct species). At a second contact zone between proposed species <em>L. triangulum </em>and <em>L. elapsoides </em>(but variously treated as species or subspecies by different researchers) in Kentucky and Tennessee, we re-evaluated morphological data. In this case, the contact zone analysis indicated sympatry and reproductive isolation of the two taxa, and thus strongly supported <em>L. triangulum </em>and <em>L. elapsoides </em>as distinct species. We conclude that detailed studies of contact zones, based on either genetic or morphological data, are essential for distinguishing intraspecific from interspecific variation in the case of widely and continuously distributed taxa.</p>
A distinguished Etruscan
A distinguished Etruscan, 530 B.C., Etrusce, Nye Carlsberg Glyptotek (Copenhagen, Denmark). Made with Memento Beta (now ReMake) from Autodesk. The Etruscan were skilled at fashioning sculptures in clay, which was painted in bright colours. The statue of a distinguished Etruscan in a white toga with purple border may have been placed in a tomb pouring libation to a god in the underworld. For more updates, please follow @GeoffreyMarchal on Twitter. Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Supplementary material 2 from: Thiel R, Knebelsberger T (2016) How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods. ZooKeys 617: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
Table S2 : Explanation note: Museum IDs and collection data for specimens of Ammodytes tobianus used for morphological analyses only.
Supplementary material 1 from: Thiel R, Knebelsberger T (2016) How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods. ZooKeys 617: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
Table S1 : Explanation note: Supplementary metadata for specimens used for both morphological and genetic analyses; Museum and Sample IDs are specimen identifiers, BOLD Process IDs are unique codes automatically generated for each record on BOLD, GenBank Accession NOs represent sequence identifiers.
FIGURE 7 in Rhigognostis senilella (Zetterstedt, 1839) and R. marmorosella (Wocke, 1849): two valid species distinguishable in genitalia (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae)
FIGURE 7. Rhigognostis marmorosella adult male, Tatra Mts: 1 male, Sarnia Skała, 8.06.1980, E. Baraniak, leg., FIGURE 8. Rhigognostis marmorosella adult female, Tatra Mts: 1 female, Giewont, 26.09.1981, J. Buszko, leg.,
FIGURE 11 in Rhigognostis senilella (Zetterstedt, 1839) and R. marmorosella (Wocke, 1849): two valid species distinguishable in genitalia (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae)
FIGURE 11. Male genitalia: a—general without valva, b—separated valva, c—apodeme, d—aedeagus, e—tip of edeagus, faedeagus base with ductus ejaculatorius.
FIGURE 9 in Rhigognostis senilella (Zetterstedt, 1839) and R. marmorosella (Wocke, 1849): two valid species distinguishable in genitalia (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae)
FIGURE 9. Rhigognostis marmorosella labial palp, Tatra Mts: 1 male, Sarnia Skała, 8.06.1980, E. Baraniak, leg.,
FIGURE 5 in Rhigognostis senilella (Zetterstedt, 1839) and R. marmorosella (Wocke, 1849): two valid species distinguishable in genitalia (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae)
FIGURE 5. Male genitalia: a—general without valva, b—separated valva, c—apodeme, e— aedeagus, f— tip of aedeagus, g— aedeagus base with ductus ejaculatorius.
FIGURE 3. Rhigognostis senilella labial palp, V in Rhigognostis senilella (Zetterstedt, 1839) and R. marmorosella (Wocke, 1849): two valid species distinguishable in genitalia (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae)
FIGURE 3. Rhigognostis senilella labial palp, V. Grønland, Narssarssuaq, 31.08.1962, Niels L. Wolff, leg.
FIGURE 6. Female a in Rhigognostis senilella (Zetterstedt, 1839) and R. marmorosella (Wocke, 1849): two valid species distinguishable in genitalia (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae)
FIGURE 6. Female a—general view, b—antrum, c—inception to corpus bursae, d—denticles on corpus bursae.
Data from: Body size evolution in otters distinguished from terrestrial mustelids
<p>Some taxa of mammals live in water, all of which evolved from land-dwelling ancestors. In the family Mustelidae (Mammalia: Carnivora), most species live on land, while otters, comprising the subfamily Lutrinae, inhabit aquatic environments, which include the almost exclusively aquatic sea otters (<em>Enhydra lutris</em>). Thus, the transition from a terrestrial to an aquatic lifestyle has occurred within this family. Despite potentially different selection pressures on body size in aquatic and terrestrial habitats, no divergence in the evolutionary pattern of body size between otters and other mustelids has previously been shown using models of trait evolution on a phylogeny. We applied models that explicitly incorporated lineage-specific directional selection to the evolution of body mass in living mustelids. Using a simulation-based likelihood and approximate Bayesian computation approach, we demonstrated lineage-specific directional selection for larger body mass in otters, which is distinct from other mustelids. There was no evidence of a difference between sea otters and other otters in the strength of directional selection for larger body mass. Additionally, our analyses supported no difference in the rate at which body mass evolves in both directions between otters and other mustelids. These findings suggest that the evolution of body mass in otters is associated with selective advantages of larger size rather than the relaxation of constraints on body size in aquatic habitats, like other aquatic mammals such as sirenians, cetaceans, and pinnipeds.</p>
Data to "Distinguishing mirror from glass: A 'big data' approach to material perception"
<p>This record contains images, models, and analysis scripts written in MATLAB.</p> <p>Tamura, Prokott, Fleming. "Distinguishing mirror from glass: A ‘big data’ approach to material perception." in preparation.</p>
FIGURE 5. Principal components analysis depicting morphometric variables distinguishing northern subspecies, H. l in Phylogenetic structure of Holbrookia lacerata (Cope 1880) (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae): one species or two?
FIGURE 5. Principal components analysis depicting morphometric variables distinguishing northern subspecies, H. l. lacerata (green), from southern subspecies, H. l. subcaudalis (purple).
INDICATORS TO DISTINGUISH SYMPTOM ACCENTUATORS FROM SYMPTOM PRODUCERS IN INDIVIDUALS WITH A DIAGNOSED ADJUSTMENT DISORDER: A PILOT STUDY ON INCONSISTENCY SUBTYPES USING SIMS AND MMPI-2-RF
<p>In the context of legal damage evaluations, evaluees may exaggerate or simulate symptoms in an attempt to obtain greater economic compensation. To date, practitioners and researchers have focused on detecting malingering behavior as an exclusively unitary construct. However, we argue that there are two types of inconsistent behavior that speak to possible malingering—accentuating (i.e., exaggerating symptoms that are actually experienced) and simulating (i.e., fabricating symptoms entirely)—each with its own unique attributes; thus, it is necessary to distinguish between them. The aim of the present study was to identify objective indicators to differentiate symptom accentuators from symptom producers and consistent participants. </p>
Fig. 5. Characters distinguishing Selatosomus and Pristilophus. P in Generic Changes for Some Nearctic Prosternini (Coleoptera: Elateridae: Dendrometrinae: Neopristilophus Buysson, 1894 and Pristilophus Latreille, 1834) to Align with Palearctic Concepts
Fig. 5. Characters distinguishing Selatosomus and Pristilophus. P. suckleyi suckleyi, Washington, USA: A) Dorsal habitus, D) Elytra, dorsal view, showing supplemental stria (white arrow) on ninth interval, with intervals labeled. P. festivus: B) Scutellar shield, dorsal view. S. semimetallicus: C) Scutellar shield, dorsal view, E) Elytra, dorsal view, with intervals labeled. Not to scale.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.