Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
534
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
534 results for “inclusion”
← Fig. 16. Liscocephala gen.n. and Triunfus gen.n. ♀: L. fumosa: A, C: female terminalia. T. carvalhoi: B, D: female terminalia; E, F: female receptaculum seminis and ausenwand. T. incarnatus: G: female receptaculum seminis and ausenwand. Scale bars = 0.5 mm. in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
← Fig. 16. Liscocephala gen.n. and Triunfus gen.n. ♀: L. fumosa: A, C: female terminalia. T. carvalhoi: B, D: female terminalia; E, F: female receptaculum seminis and ausenwand. T. incarnatus: G: female receptaculum seminis and ausenwand. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 17 in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
Fig. 17. Map of geographical distribution. — Colors: yellow – Chimerocoris luridus sp.n.; purple – Hypanthracos meridionalis; red – Liscocephala fumosa sp.n.; green – Ogmocoris Mayr, 1864; blue – Triunfus gen. n.
Fig. 13 in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
Fig. 13. Liscocephala fumosa sp.n. ♀: A: dorsal; B: ventral; C: lateral; D: head and pronotum, lateral view, antennomere 3 grooved (red arrow); E: pro- and mesosternum, ventral view, showing the carina mesosternal (red arrow); F: abdomen, lateral view, showing the ab- dominal groove (red arrow). Scale bars: A– C, F = 2.0 mm; D – E = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 15 in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
Fig. 15. Triunfusincarnatus sp.n. ♀: A: dorsal; B: ventral; C: lateral; D: head and pronotum; E: antenna; F: external scentefferent system. Scalebars: A– C = 2.0 mm; D = 1.0 mm; E – F = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 10 in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
Fig. 10. Ogmocoris hypomelas (Burmeister, 1835): A – C: male terminalia: A: dorsal; B: posterior: C: ventral; D – H: paramere: D: left paramere, original position; E – H: right paramere, different views; I – K: segment X, different views; L– N: male genitalia; L: dorsal; M: lateral; N: ventral. Scalebars: A– C = 1.0 mm; D – H: 0.5 mm; I – N = 0.25 mm.
Fig. 21 in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
Fig. 21. Comparative figure of Ogmocoris species, and some male genitalia characters. A–B: pronotum, dorsal view; C–E: hemelytra; F– G: abdomen, lateral view; H – K: male genitalia. — (A, C, F, H – J): Ogmocoris hypomelas; (B, D, G): Ogmocoris paranaensis; (E, K): Paramecocephala foveata; (I), Tibraca limbativentris. Scale bars: A– B = 1.0 mm; C – G = 2.0 mm; H – K = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 20 in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
Fig. 20. Comparative figure of Liscocephala and Triunfus. A–B: habitus dorsal (antennomeres and legs not showing due to edition of photo); C – D: head and pronotum, dorsal view; E – F: head and prothorax, lateral view; G – H: right antenna; I – J: pronotum, dorsal view; K–L: hemelytra. — (A, C, E, G, I, K): Liscocephala fumosa; (B, D, F, H, J, L): Triunfus carvalhoi. Scale bars: A–C, K–L = 2.0 mm; C – F, I – J = 1.0 mm; G – H = 0.5 mm.
→ Fig. 5. Hypanthracos meridionalis Grazia & Campos, 1996: A–F: male terminalia: A – D: dorsal; B – E: posterior: C – F: ventral; G – I: male genitalia: G: dorsal; H: lateral; I: ventral; J: female terminalia; K: female receptaculum seminis and ausenwand. Scale bars: A – F = 1.0 mm; G – I: 0.01 mm; J – K = 0.5 mm. in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
→ Fig. 5. Hypanthracos meridionalis Grazia & Campos, 1996: A–F: male terminalia: A – D: dorsal; B – E: posterior: C – F: ventral; G – I: male genitalia: G: dorsal; H: lateral; I: ventral; J: female terminalia; K: female receptaculum seminis and ausenwand. Scale bars: A – F = 1.0 mm; G – I: 0.01 mm; J – K = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 4 in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
Fig. 4. Hypanthracos meridionalis Grazia & Campos, 1996: A: dorsal; B: ventral; C: lateral. Scalebars = 2.0 mm.
Fig. 2 in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
Fig. 2. Representation of male terminalia of genera of Mecocephala group. A–B: pygophore, dorsal view. A: showing the geni- tal cup narrow and absence of parameres; B: showing the geni- tal cup broad and reduced para- meres; C: pygophore, posterior view, showing the layers of ven- tral rim, the carina between lay- ers (blue arrow), the area between layers (green arrow), and lateral margins of projections of supe- rior layer of ventral rim notched (red arrow). — (A): Hypatropis inermis; (B): Tibraca similima; (C): Tibraca limbativentris. The red line showing the distance between the lateral margin of pygophore and the lateral rim of pygophore. Scalebars = 1.0 mm.
Fig. 11 in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
Fig. 11. Ogmocoris hypomelas (Burmeister, 1835): A – B: female terminalia: A: posteroventral view; B: lateral view; C – D: female recep- taculum seminis and ausenwand. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 19 in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
Fig. 19. Comparative figure of Chimerocoris, Paramecocephala and Tibraca. A– C: habitus dorsal (antennomeres and legs not showing due to edition of photo); D–E: head and pronotum; F–G: habitus ventral; H–I: habitus lateral; J–R: male terminalia: J, M, P: dorsal view; K, N, Q: posterior view; L, O, R: ventral view. — (A, D, F, H, J – L): Chimerocoris luridus; (B, I, M – O): Paramecocephala fusca; (C, E, G, P– R): Tibraca exigua. Scale bars: A– C, F – I = 2.0 mm; D – E = 0.5 mm; J – R = 1.0 mm.
Fig. 7 in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
Fig. 7. Chimerocoris luridus sp.n. ♂: Male terminalia: A – D: dorsal; B – E: posterior; C – F: ventral. Scale bars = 1.0 mm.
Fig. 3 in Systematics of the Mecocephala group (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) based on a phylogenetic perspective: Inclusion of Hypanthracos, description of three new genera, and redescription of Ogmocoris
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relations of genera of Mecocephala group. A: tree resulting from implied weighting scheme. Jackknife support values mapped above represent absolute frequencies and GC values, respectively. Number in capital letters indicated the target clades. B – C: exclusive synapomorphies of the clade III (labiomere 2 flattened laterally, blue arrow, and longitudinal groove on abdominal sternites, red arrow). — (B): Paramecocephala bergrothi Frey-da-Silva & Grazia, 2002; (C): Mecocephala magna. Scalebars = 2.0 mm.
Data from: Accurate predictions of coexistence in natural systems require the inclusion of facilitative interactions and environmental dependency
1. Coexistence between plant species is well known to depend on the outcomes of species interactions within an environmental context. The incorporation of environmental variation into empirical studies of coexistence are rare, however, due to the complex experiments needed to do so and the lack of feasible modelling approaches for determining how environmental factors alter specific coexistence mechanisms. 2. In this paper, we present a simple modelling framework for assessing how variation in species interactions across environmental gradients impact on niche overlap and fitness differences, two core determinants of coexistence. We use a novel formulation of an annual plant population dynamics model that allows for competitive and facilitative species interactions, and for variation in the strength and direction of these interactions across environmental gradients. Using this framework, we examine outcomes of plant-plant interactions between four commonly co-occurring annual plant species from Western Australian woodlands. We then determine how niche overlap and fitness differences between these species vary across three environmental gradients previously identified as important for structuring diversity patterns in this system: soil phosphorus, shade and water. 3. We found facilitation to be a wide-spread phenomenon and that interactions between most species pairs shift between competitive and facilitative across multiple environmental gradients. Environmental conditions also altered the strength, direction and relative variation of both niche overlap and fitness differences in non-linear and unpredictable ways. Synthesis We provide a simple framework for incorporating environmental heterogeneity into explorations of coexistence mechanisms. Our findings highlight the importance of the environment in determining the outcome of species interactions and the potential for pairwise coexistence between species. The prevalence of facilitation in our system indicates a need to improve current theoretical frameworks of coexistence to include non-competitive interactions, and ways of translating these effects into explicit predictions of coexistence. Our study also suggests a need for further research into determining which factors result in consistent responses of niche overlap and fitness differences to environmental variation. Such information will improve our ability to predict outcomes of coexistence, invasion events and responses of whole communities to future environmental change.
Data from: Appearance of an early closure of the Isthmus of Panama is the product of biased inclusion of data in the metaanalysis
In their PNAS article "Biological evidence supports an early and complex emergence of the Isthmus of Panama," Bacon et al. (1 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423853112) use data from molecular comparisons of terrestrial and marine organisms taken from the literature to estimate dates of rate shifts in migration. One of their conclusions is that "events separating marine organisms in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans [occurred] at ca. 23 and 7 Ma" (1). The authors base this conclusion on two kinds of molecular dating: (i) 31 dates from phylogenies with evolutionary rates calibrated from fossils at one or more nodes, and (ii) 52 dates from mitochondrial divergence between sister species on either side of the Isthmus taken from the review by Lessios (2) (note: complete data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository at http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6m653). For the latter, divergence was converted to time by assuming a mitochondrial DNA divergence rate of 2% per million years. Unfortunately, Bacon et al.'s metaanalysis of separations of marine organisms contains unexplained omissions of data and mistakes.
Data from: Inclusive fitness benefits mitigate costs of cuckoldry to socially paired males
Background: In socially monogamous species, reproduction is not always confined to paired males and females. Extra-pair males commonly also reproduce with paired females, which is traditionally thought to be costly to the females' social partners. However, we suggest that when the relatedness between reproducing individuals is considered, cuckolded males can suffer lower fitness losses than otherwise expected, especially when the rate of cuckoldry is high. We combine theoretical modeling with a detailed genetic study on a socially monogamous wild fish, Variabilichromis moorii, which displays biparental care despite exceptionally high rates of extra-pair paternity. Results: We measured the relatedness between all parties involved in V. moorii spawning events (i.e. between males and females in social pairs, females and their extra-pair partners, and paired males and their cuckolders), and we reveal that males are on average more related to their cuckolders than expected by chance. Queller–Goodnight estimates of relatedness between males and their cuckolders are on average r = 0.038 but can range up to r = 0.64. This also increases the relatedness between males and the extra-pair offspring under their care. These intriguing results are consistent with the predictions of our mathematical model, which shows that elevated relatedness between paired males and their cuckolders can be adaptive for both parties when competition for fertilizations is strong. Conclusions: Our results show how cuckoldry by relatives can offset males' direct fitness losses with inclusive fitness gains, which can be substantial in systems where males face almost certain paternity losses.
Crack nucleation using combined crystal plasticity modelling, HR-DIC and HR-EBSD in a superalloy containing non-metallic inclusions under fatigue
<p>The uploaded data are required to reproduce the experimental results in the paper. </p> <p>To replicate figure 4, both GID.mat and thermal_E11.mat should be loaded into matlab. </p> <p>To replicate figure 6, strain_11.mat should be uploaded. Then fDIC_GB.m should be executed. </p> <p>If the reader has further questions, please contact Tiantian Zhang at tiantian.zhang08@imperial.ac.uk or tzhang6@wpi.edu</p>
FIGURE 20 in Redefinition of Mesoleptobasis Sjöstedt 1918 with the inclusion of Metaleptobasis cyanolineata (Wasscher 1998) comb. nov. and description of a new species, Mesoleptobasis elongata (Odonata: Coenagrionidae)
FIGURE 20. Male habitus, lateral view (to scale). (a) Mesoleptobasis elongata, holotype; (c) M. incus, Brazil, Porto Velho.
FIGURE 17. Male S10 in Redefinition of Mesoleptobasis Sjöstedt 1918 with the inclusion of Metaleptobasis cyanolineata (Wasscher 1998) comb. nov. and description of a new species, Mesoleptobasis elongata (Odonata: Coenagrionidae)
FIGURE 17. Male S10, medio-dorsal view. (a) Mesoleptobasis acuminata, Peru, Explorama Lodge; (b) M. cantralli, paratype, Brazil, Porto Velho; (c) M. cyanolineata, paratype, Surinam, Mungatapoe; (d) M. elongata, holotype; (e) M. incus, lectotype, Brazil, Rio Autaz.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.