Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,788
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
3,788 results for “indicators”
Global Fire Weather Indices - DC using overwintered DC start-up
<p>This dataset was developed by Natural Resources Canada using the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ERA5-HRS Reanalysis product (C3S, 2017) as inputs to the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System R Package (Wang et al. 2017). The dataset provides gridded values of the Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI) System indices of fuel moisture and fire behaviour, including the Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC), Duff Moisture Code (DMC), Drought Code (DC), Initial Spread Index (ISI), Build-Up Index (BUI), Fire Weather Index (FWI), and Daily Severity rating (DSR). Each of these indices are produced using two calculation methods applied at the beginning of fire season start-up. The first method used the default DC value (DC=15) to start-up the FWI System calculation and only accounted for the longest stretch of active fire season each year (as determined by Wotton and Flannigan, 1993). The second method used the overwintered DC value, calculated from the DC value of the last day of the previous fire season and a percentage of overwinter precipitation, and accounted for all periods of fire season throughout the year. We recommend users of this data use indices where DC has been overwintered in regions where the fire season shuts off for winter and where low overwinter precipitation occurs (eg. parts of western Canada, the western US and the Siberian Boreal forest).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) (2017): ERA5: Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate . Copernicus Climate Change Service Climate Data Store (CDS), Accessed June 20<sup>th</sup> 2019. <a href="https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/home">https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/home</a></p> <p>Wang, X., Wotton, B. M., Cantin, A. S., Parisien, M. A., Anderson, K., Moore, B., & Flannigan, M. D. (2017). cffdrs: an R package for the Canadian forest fire danger rating system. Ecological Processes, 6(1), 5.</p> <p>Wotton, B. M., & Flannigan, M. D. (1993). Length of the fire season in a changing climate. The Forestry Chronicle, 69(2), 187-192.</p>
Global Fire Weather Indices - DSR using overwintered DC start-up
<p>This dataset was developed by Natural Resources Canada using the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ERA5-HRS Reanalysis product (C3S, 2017) as inputs to the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System R Package (Wang et al. 2017). The dataset provides gridded values of the Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI) System indices of fuel moisture and fire behaviour, including the Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC), Duff Moisture Code (DMC), Drought Code (DC), Initial Spread Index (ISI), Build-Up Index (BUI), Fire Weather Index (FWI), and Daily Severity rating (DSR). Each of these indices are produced using two calculation methods applied at the beginning of fire season start-up. The first method used the default DC value (DC=15) to start-up the FWI System calculation and only accounted for the longest stretch of active fire season each year (as determined by Wotton and Flannigan, 1993). The second method used the overwintered DC value, calculated from the DC value of the last day of the previous fire season and a percentage of overwinter precipitation, and accounted for all periods of fire season throughout the year. We recommend users of this data use indices where DC has been overwintered in regions where the fire season shuts off for winter and where low overwinter precipitation occurs (eg. parts of western Canada, the western US and the Siberian Boreal forest).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) (2017): ERA5: Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate . Copernicus Climate Change Service Climate Data Store (CDS), Accessed June 20<sup>th</sup> 2019. <a href="https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/home">https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/home</a></p> <p>Wang, X., Wotton, B. M., Cantin, A. S., Parisien, M. A., Anderson, K., Moore, B., & Flannigan, M. D. (2017). cffdrs: an R package for the Canadian forest fire danger rating system. Ecological Processes, 6(1), 5.</p> <p>Wotton, B. M., & Flannigan, M. D. (1993). Length of the fire season in a changing climate. The Forestry Chronicle, 69(2), 187-192.</p>
Internet use: participating in social networks [percentage of individuals] processed Eurostat data [CEEMID indicator]
<p>The indicator '<strong>Internet use: participating in social networks (creating user profile, posting messages or other contributions to facebook, twitter, etc.) [percentage of individuals]</strong>' from the Eurostat statistical product <em>Individuals who used the internet, frequency of use and activities.</em></p> <p>- NUTS2013 regional codes are recoded to NUTS2016<br> - missing data is handled with last observation carry forward, next observation carry back, linear interpolation<br> -NUTS2 areas are imputed when only NUTS1 level data is available. <br> <br> The original dataset is available here:<br> <a href="https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=isoc_r_iuse_i&lang=en">https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=isoc_r_iuse_i&lang=en</a></p> <p>More about CEEMID: <a href="http://ceemid.eu">www.ceemid.eu</a><br> Get in touch: <a href="http://danielantal.eu/#contact">danielantal.eu/#contact</a></p>
Habitat suitability predictions for a boreal forest indicator species, the northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis), in Central Finland
<p>This repository contains files that show optimal sites in Central Finland for the northern goshawk (<em>Accipiter gentilis</em>, hereafter goshawk), an indicator species of boreal forests with conservation values. The optimal sites were derived from the habitat suitability model outputs included in the following publication:</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Björklund Heidi<sup>a</sup>, Parkkinen Anssi<sup>b</sup>, Hakkari Tomi<sup>c</sup>, Heikkinen Risto K.<sup>d</sup>, Virkkala Raimo<sup>d</sup>, Lensu Anssi<sup>b</sup> (2020): Predicting valuable forest habitats using an indicator species for biodiversity. Biological Conservation, </strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108682">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108682</a> . </p> <p> </p> <p><sup>a</sup> Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus, P.O. Box 17, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland</p> <p><sup>b</sup> University of Jyvaskyla, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyvaskyla, Finland</p> <p><sup>c</sup> Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment Central Finland, P.O. Box 250, FI-40101 Jyväskylä, Finland</p> <p><sup>d</sup> Finnish Environment Institute, Biodiversity Centre, Latokartanonkaari 11, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland</p> <p> </p> <p>The files are ArcGIS compatible shape files which indicate the spatial location of the 160 m × 160 m grid cells which include forest stands projected to be either highly suitable or suitable as a nesting site for the goshawk in Central Finland. The habitat suitability models and values were developed across the study area using Maxent software. The files show those 160-m grid cells from the study area which were included in one of the following two categories: (i) cells deemed as the most optimal (with high probability of suitable conditions) for goshawk nesting with suitability index values in Maxent outputs varying between 0.92–1.00 (‘best’ goshawk squares), and (ii) cells deemed as ‘good’ goshawk squares (with Maxent suitability index values of ≥ 0.69 and < 0.92). The coordinate system for the data files is: ETRS-TM35FIN (EPSG: 3067) (or YKJ Finland/Finnish Uniform Coordinate System (EPSG: 2393)). </p> <p>Summarization of the key settings and elements of the study are provided below. A detailed treatment can now be found in the article published in Biological Conservation (Björklund et al.) for which the link is the following: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108682">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108682</a> .</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Summary of the study</strong></p> <p>Intensive commercial use of boreal forests is an accelerating threat to forest biodiversity, highlighting the development of cost-effective tools to detect the locations valuable for conservation. We applied species distribution models (SDMs) in our study area, Central Finland, to locate the optimal nesting sites for the goshawk, an indicator bird species for biodiversity hotspots in mature boreal forests. The optimal sites (here, 160 x 160 m grid squares) for the goshawk were determined using the Maxent software. Optimal squares for the goshawk had forests with considerably high volumes of Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em>, hereafter spruce) covering only 3.4% of the boreal landscape, and they were located mostly outside protected areas. Many of the squares with optimal nesting forests appeared to be under threat due to recently intensified logging operations. Half of the squares were logged to some extent and 10% were already lost or notably deteriorated due to logging after 2015 for which our models were calibrated. Threats to biodiversity of mature boreal spruce forests are likely to accelerate with increasing logging pressures. Thus, there is an urgent need to secure the continuous supply of mature spruce forests in the landscape by developing a denser network of protected areas and applying measures that aid in sparing large entities of mature forest on privately-owned land. Our modelled optimal squares can be used for selection of potential areas with biodiversity values in conservation prioritization.</p> <p><strong>The study species</strong></p> <p>The goshawk is a raptor species which prefers mature forests for nesting in Europe. Old forests dominated by spruce are considered as important for the breeding success of the species particularly in northern latitudes. Thus, intensive forest management can impair the breeding possibilities of the goshawk, and changes in forest landscapes are likely to contribute to the decline of the species. For example, in Finland, the goshawk is classified as nearly threatened species. In our study, we used the goshawk as an indicator species to model the spatial locations of boreal forest with much potential for including biodiversity values. The indicator species status of the goshawk is based on earlier studies showing the close association of the goshawk with various taxa of mature spruce forest, as well as the reported declines of both the goshawk and associated species due to loggings.</p> <p><strong>Developing Maxent models for the goshawk</strong></p> <p>The location data on occupied nests of the goshawk gathered in spring and summer 2015 and 2016 in Central Finland – as a part of the Finnish Common Birds of Prey Monitoring – were related to a set of environmental predictor variables using a maximum entropy method, Maxent software, which is considered particularly useful for modelling presence-only data (such as our goshawk nest site data). In our case, the data on forest stand and tree characteristics were related using Maxent to the known nesting sites to predict suitable conditions for the species across the Central Finland. The forest data used in the modelling were extracted from the multi-source national forest inventory (MS-NFI) data sources governed by the Natural Resources Institute Finland. The MS-NFI data used in our modelling are based on field data of the 11th and 12th NFIs from 2009 to 2016 and satellite images from 2015 and 2016.</p> <p>Prior modelling, Pearson correlations were calculated between the continuous environmental variables at the nest sites. Of the highly (|r| ≥ 0.7) correlated variables, we chose those variables which are known to be important for the goshawk, which are useful for generalization in other areas, or whose impact was of specific interest. Our final selected set of predictor variables included one class variable, site fertility class, and nine continuous variables: growing stock volume of the spruce, pine, birches and other hardwood, canopy cover, canopy cover of broad-leaved trees, saw timber of other broad-leaved trees than birches, pulpwood volume of the birches, and the biomass of the stem residual of the spruce. The original MS-NFI data recorded at the resolution of 16 × 16 m were resampled to the resolution of 160 × 160 m for the Maxent models, to represent one potential nesting forest stand.</p> <p>The accuracy of Maxent models were assessed with cross-validation and associated averaged AUC-values. The relative importance of the variables was measured by variable contribution and model deterioration measures provided by Maxent. The cloglog-transformed output index values ranging from 0 to 1 described the relative suitability of the 160-m squares to goshawk nesting. Based on the index values, the squares were classified as ‘optimal’ (with index values of 0.69–1.00), ‘typical’ (0.46– <0.69) and ‘poor’ (<0.46). In addition, we divided optimal squares into ‘best’ goshawk squares (index values of 0.92–1.00 corresponding to a high probability of suitable conditions), and ‘good’ goshawk squares (index values ≥ 0.69 and < 0.92).</p> <p><strong>Maxent model outputs</strong></p> <p>Spruce volume was the most important variable in defining habitat suitability for goshawk nesting, but hardwood cover, other hardwood logs and site fertility class contributed also to some extent to habitat suitability. In Maxent outputs, the set of 160-m squares deemed as optimal for goshawk nesting included 6 895 (cover 0.9% of the study area) best goshawk squares and 19 421 (cover 2.5%) good goshawk squares. The projected best and good goshawk squares were mostly located in unprotected areas: 95.0% of the best and 96.0% of the good goshawk squares occurred completely outside protected areas. For further details concerning the data and the model outputs, see the referred article Björklund et al. (2020).</p> <p><strong>State of the optimal goshawk squares</strong></p> <p>In total, 11% of best and over 9% of good goshawk squares were severely altered due to recent harvesting, typically clear-cutting, of the forests during the time period between 2015 and 2019. Altogether, some level of logging occurred in 3 062 (44%) of best goshawk and 9 846 (51%) of good goshawk squares during the recent years. However, many of the squares still included enough unlogged area for the goshawk in 2019.</p> <p>In our article, we conclude that while most of the optimal squares for the goshawk were still preserved in 2019, they are under risk as they are mainly situated outside protected area network. This stresses the importance of conserving biodiversity with complementary measures in privately-owned managed forests. In conclusion, a denser network with more PAs for forest-dwelling species should be secured in areas with intensive forestry, e.g. in southern Finland where PAs currently cover a smaller proportion of land compared to northern Finland.</p>
Dataset for the paper "Prolonged prothrombin time as an early prognostic indicator of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19 related pneumonia"
<p>The dataset contains the data on ICU-transferred (N=100) and Stable (N=131) patients with COVID-19 (N=156) and Non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia (N=75). Among COVID-19 patients of this study, 82 patients developed Refractory Respiratory Failure (RRF) or Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (SARDS) and were transferred to Intensive Care Unit (ICU), 74 patients had a Stable course of disease and were not transferred to ICU. Collected data are presented as a table with columns:<br> - Gender;<br> - Age (years);<br> - SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing results;<br> - Time between the disease onset and admission to the hospital (days);<br> - Time between admission to the hospital and transfer to ICU (days);<br> - Artificial lung ventilation in ICU needed;<br> - C-reactive protein (CRP) upon admission (mg/L);<br> - International Normalized Ratio (INR) upon admission;<br> - Prothrombin Time (PT) upon admission (sec.);<br> - Fibrinogen upon admission (mg/L);<br> - Chest Computed Tomography (CT) upon admission: lung tissue affected (%);<br> - Platelet count upon admission (10^9/L);<br> - Chest CT, 1 week after admission: lung tissue affected (%);<br> - CRP, 1 week after admission (mg/L);<br> - Platelet count, 1 week after admission (10^9/L).</p>
Data relating to Chiedozie et al. How many medications do doctors in primary care use? An observational study of the DU90% indicator in primary care in England.
<p>Data in .csv format relating to the paper Chiedozie et al. 2020 "How many medications do doctors in primary care use? An observational study of the DU90% indicator in primary care in England." Also contains eTables 5-8 in Excel format, and Stata do file for deriving the DU90% indicator.</p>
Dataset: Brain negativity as an indicator of predictive error processing: The contribution of visual action effect monitoring
<p>There are two files for each subject:</p> <p>1. sub##_error.dat -> Contains EEG Segments, that were recorded while the subject executed a clear target miss (minimal distance between the center of the ball and target > 12 cm) in the task (segment and electrode information can be found below).</p> <p>2. sub##_hit.dat -> Contains EEG Segments, that were recorded while the subject executed a clear target hit (minimal distance between the center of the ball and the target < 7 cm) in the task (segment and electrode information can be found below).</p> <p><br> The data in the *.dat-files are stored in a two dimensional matrix: n*1400 datapoints x 15 electrodes</p> <p>n represents the number of segments. 1400 datapoints per segment translate to a segment length of 2800 ms (from 600 ms before to 2200 ms after ball release). The ball´s release is located at the 301st datapoint and the feedback was presented at datapoint 726 (850 ms after ball release) in every segment.</p> <p>datapoints: The first dimension (rows) includes the measured neural activations in microvolts. The data is stored vectorized,<br> i.e. hit/error #1 -> row 1 to 1400, hit/error #2 -> row 1401 to 2800, ..., hit/error #n -> (n-1) * 1400 + 1 to n * 1400</p> <p>electrodes: The second dimension (columns) consists of the 15 different electrodes that were used during data recording in this exact order: [F3 Fz F4 C4 Cz C3 P3 Pz P4 VEOGu VEOGo HEOGre HEOGli FCz Mastre]</p>
Dataset for the paper "Historical model biases in monthly high temperature anomalies indicate under-projection of future temperature extremes"
<div> <div>This repository holds data and scripts related to the revision of the paper entitled: <span>"Historical model biases in monthly high temperature anomalies indicate under-projection of future temperature extremes" </span>by Lei Duan, Lyssa M. Freese, Govindasamy Bala, and Ken Caldeira. <span>The paper is currently submitted for peer review. </span>Any questions regarding the data and paper could be sent to the corresponding author: Lei Duan (leiduan@carnegiescience.edu). </div> </div>
Landsat-based Spectral Indices for pan-EU 2000-2022
<h2><strong>Description</strong></h2> <h3><strong>General description</strong></h3> <p>Here, we present the ARCO (analysis-ready and cloud-optimized) Landsat-based Spectral Indices data cube. Available at 30m resolution from 2000 to 2022, it includes multiple spectral indices and multi-tier predictors (bimonthly, annual, and long-term) for continental Europe, including Ukraine, the UK, and Turkey (excluding Svalbar). This data cube has a broad coverage of indices, each providing unique insights into different aspects, including: surface reflectance, vegetation, water, soil and crop. All data layers are cloud-masked and then gap-filled, ready for analysis, modeling, and mapping applications. Technical details:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Coordinate reference system:</strong> EPSG:3035</li> <li><strong>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax):</strong> (900,000, 899,000, 7,401,000, 5,501,000)</li> <li><strong>Spatial resolution:</strong> 30m</li> <li><strong>Image size:</strong> 216,700P x 153,400L</li> <li><strong>File format:</strong> Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li> </ul> <p>Considering the data volume, only bimonthly data layers for the years 2000 and 2022 are uploaded. However, all annual and long-term layers are available. For the full data cube, please visit this <a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QTA6OkkYlZljfHst_inCrkC7DJcMAyHnM9k0iHulwpg/edit?usp=sharing">catalog</a>. Due to Zenodo's storage limits, the data layers are stored in different buckets. Use the identifier-navigation list below to access the bucket of your interest and download the corresponding layers.</p> <h3><strong>Identifier navigation list</strong></h3> <p>This data cube includes 4 tiers of data, depending on the processing extend in the temporal scale:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Tier-1: Bimonthly Landsat reflectance bands</strong><br>2000 (<a href="../records/12805260">Jan</a> <a href="../records/12806079">Mar</a> <a href="../records/12803844">May</a> <a href="../records/12805020">Jul</a> <a href="../records/12915187">Sep</a> <a href="../records/12804826">Nov</a>) 2022 (<a href="../records/12805807">Jan</a> <a href="../records/12804063">Mar</a> <a href="../records/12911628">May</a> <a href="../records/12805508">Jul</a> <a href="../records/12805649">Sep</a> <a href="../records/12804421">Nov</a>)</li> <li><strong>Tier-2: Bimonthly spectral indices</strong><br>2000 (<a href="../records/10884234">Jan</a> <a href="../records/10884272">Mar</a> <a href="../records/10884296">May</a> <a href="../records/10884311">Jul</a> <a href="../records/10884340">Sep</a> <a href="../records/10884358">Nov</a>) 2022 (<a href="../records/10884387">Jan</a> <a href="../records/10884406">Mar</a> <a href="../records/10884419">May</a> <a href="../records/10884447">Jul</a> <a href="../records/10884482">Sep</a> <a href="../records/10884503">Nov</a>)</li> <li><strong>Tier-3: Annual predictors<br></strong> <ul> <li>Reflectance bands, NDVI and NDWI P25<br><a href="../records/10777969">2000</a> <a href="../records/10777971">2001</a> <a href="../records/10777973">2002</a> <a href="../records/10777975">2003</a> <a href="../records/10777977">2004</a> <a href="../records/10777979">2005</a> <a href="../records/10777981">2006</a> <a href="../records/10777983">2007</a> <a href="../records/10777985">2008</a> <a href="../records/10777987">2009</a> <a href="../records/10777989">2010</a> <a href="../records/10777991">2011</a> <a href="../records/10777993">2012</a> <a href="../records/10777995">2013</a> <a href="../records/10777997">2014</a> <a href="../records/10777999">2015</a> <a href="../records/10778001">2016</a> <a href="../records/10778003">2017</a> <a href="../records/10778005">2018</a> <a href="../records/10778007">2019</a> <a href="../records/10778009">2020</a> <a href="../records/10778011">2021</a> <a href="../records/10778013">2022</a></li> <li>Reflectance bands, NDVI and NDWI P50<br><a href="../records/10851076">2000</a> <a href="../records/10864828">2001</a> <a href="../records/10864838">2002</a> <a href="../records/10864852">2003</a> <a href="../records/10864874">2004</a> <a href="../records/10864896">2005</a> <a href="../records/10864952">2006</a> <a href="../records/10865027">2007</a> <a href="../records/10865253">2008</a> <a href="../records/10865315">2009</a> <a href="../records/10865398">2010</a> <a href="../records/10865486">2011</a> <a href="../records/10865536">2012</a> <a href="../records/10865630">2013</a> <a href="../records/10865721">2014</a> <a href="../records/10865803">2015</a> <a href="../records/10865857">2016</a> <a href="../records/10865905">2017</a> <a href="../records/10865920">2018</a> <a href="../records/10865948">2019</a> <a href="../records/10865973">2020</a> <a href="../records/10865992">2021</a> <a href="../records/10851078">2022</a></li> <li>Reflectance bands, NDVI and NDWI P75<br><a href="../records/10851080">2000</a> <a href="../records/10866025">2001</a> <a href="../records/10866071">2002</a> <a href="../records/10866095">2003</a> <a href="../records/10866108">2004</a> <a href="../records/10866121">2005</a> <a href="../records/10866153">2006</a> <a href="../records/10866194">2007</a> <a href="../records/10866224">2008</a> <a href="../records/10866256">2009</a> <a href="../records/10866294">2010</a> <a href="../records/10866319">2011</a> <a href="../records/10866337">2012</a> <a href="../records/10866367">2013</a> <a href="../records/10866410">2014</a> <a href="../records/10866436">2015</a> <a href="../records/10866474">2016</a> <a href="../records/10866496">2017</a> <a href="../records/10866514">2018</a> <a href="../records/10866533">2019</a> <a href="../records/10866572">2020</a> <a href="../records/10866603">2021</a> <a href="../records/10851082">2022</a></li> <li>Aggregated spectral indices<br><a href="../records/10777868">2000</a> <a href="../records/10777870">2001</a> <a href="../records/10777872">2002</a> <a href="../records/10777874">2003</a> <a href="../records/10777876">2004</a> <a href="../records/10777878">2005</a> <a href="../records/10777880">2006</a> <a href="../records/10777882">2007</a> <a href="../records/10777884">2008</a> <a href="../records/10777886">2009</a> <a href="../records/10777888">2010</a> <a href="../records/10777890">2011</a> <a href="../records/10777892">2012</a> <a href="../records/10777894">2013</a> <a href="../records/10777896">2014</a> <a href="../records/10777898">2015</a> <a href="../records/10777900">2016</a> <a href="../records/10777902">2017</a> <a href="../records/10777904">2018</a> <a href="../records/10777906">2019</a> <a href="../records/10777908">2020</a> <a href="../records/10777910">2021</a> <a href="../records/10777912">2022</a></li> <li>Cumulative spectral indices<br>2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Tier-4: Long-term predictors 2000-2022</strong><br><a href="../records/10776891">trend</a> <a href="../records/12805999">P25</a> <a href="../records/12804351">P50</a> <a href="../records/12805181">P75</a></li> </ul> <h3><strong>Name convention</strong></h3> <p>To ensure consistency and ease of use across the data layers, we follow the standard Ai4SoilHealth and Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describe important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:</p> <ol> <li><strong>generic variable name:</strong> ndti.min.slopes = the long term slope of minNDTI</li> <li><strong>variable procedure combination:</strong> glad.landsat.ard2.seasconv.yearly.min.theilslopes - theil slopes calculated from yearly minimum values of NDTI</li> <li><strong>Position in the probability distribution/variable type:</strong> m = mean | sd = standard deviation | n = number of observations | qa = quality assessment</li> <li><strong>Spatial support:</strong> 30m</li> <li><strong>Depth reference:</strong> s = surface</li> <li><strong>Time reference begin time:</strong> 20000101 = 2000-01-01</li> <li><strong>Time reference end time:</strong> 20221231 = 2022-12-31</li> <li><strong>Bounding box:</strong> eu = europe (without Svalbar)</li> <li><strong>EPSG code:</strong> epsg.3035</li> <li><strong>Version code:</strong> v20231218 = 2023-12-18 (creation date)</li> </ol> <h3><strong>Citation</strong></h3> <p>Please cite this dataset using the DOI: [<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10776891">10.5281/zenodo.10776891</a>], which represents all versions of this dataset. This ensures your citation remains up to date with the latest version.</p> <h3><strong>Support</strong></h3> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question, please raise a <a href="https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/issues">GitHub issue</a>!</p> <h2><strong>Long-term spectral indices trend</strong></h2> <p>On this landing page of the <a href="../records/10776892">Time-series of Landsat-based Spectral Indices (EU, 30m) data cube</a>, four long-term spectral indices trend data are stored, as Zenodo doesn't allow empty buckets. Therefore, this page serves not only as the landing page for the entire dataset but also as the bucket for the long-term trend of spectral indices.</p>
Plant diversity and indicator values within 200m radius of the Landklif plots
<p><span>Species numbers of vascular plants as assessed in vegetation surveys inside and within 200m radius of the Landklif plots. Vegetation inside the plots was sampled between mid-May and end of July 2019 (seven subplots, 10m2 sampling area per plot). Cover values for each species were estimated following the Braun-Blanquet scale. Species pools within 200m radius around the plot were assessed between mid-May and begin of August 2020 by standardized transect walks (walking time proportional to area percentages of dominant habitat types within 200m radius, 60 minutes total walking time in each circle). The dataset contains average species numbers of the subplots, total species numbers of the plots, and total species numbers within 200m radius of the plots, as well as mean Ellenberg indicator values on plot and 200m scale.</span></p> <p><span>LandKlif is funded by the Bavarian State Ministry of Science and the Arts within the Bavarian Climate Research Network (bayklif). Within the five year funding period of bayklif, five interdisciplinary senior research associations and five junior research groups are be financed with a total sum of 18 million Euro. LandKliF, as one of the five interdisciplinary senior research associations, addresses the effects of climate change on biodiversity and ecosystem services in semi-natural, agricultural and urban landscapes.</span></p> <p> </p>
Estimated life-cycle-based environmental indicators and social indicators for companies and investment funds
<p>The data files represent the 26 estimated life-cycle-based indicators for a sample of companies and funds, obtained using the methodology described in the linked journal article. The files SD1 and SD2 contain the individual values estimated for the fund and company samples. These estimates are based on the methodology described in the linked article. The data herein is the source for producing all figures of the paper. All companies and funds have been anonymized, as the data is sourced from proprietary databases. At the same link, supplementary file SD3 contains the summary statistics and comparison of sustainable funds versus conventional funds sample. The file SD4 contains the data used to create Figure 4. The file SD5 contains sample data to create Figure 5. The file SD6 contains sample data to create Figure 6. Additional more detailed data can be provided upon reasonable request, but cannot be publicly disclosed as it contains data from licenced databases. </p>
Landsat-based Spectral Indices for pan-EU 2000-2022 - Annual predictor (2019): BSF, minNDTI, and NOS
<h2><strong>Data information</strong></h2> <p>This dataset provides annual aggregated predictors BSF, minNDTI, and NOS for the year 2019. They are calculated as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>minNDTI (minimum NDTI)</strong> is determined as the minimum value of the six NDTI values over a year (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425711003439?casa_token=5P1XeaRMuT4AAAAA:8VyzOkBJb_gbpap0uzjuT6YoYhylvqc_vY2-AOX2KCsZGrwQw1jySGd4Ox9JFz55TPQmF231IQ">Zheng et al., 2012</a>).</li> <li><strong>BSF (bare soil fraction)</strong> is calculated by dividing the number of pixels classified as bare surface within a year's time series (identified by the criterion of NDVI values below 0.35) by the total number of pixels analyzed in that year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2121">Castaldi et al., 2019</a>).</li> <li><strong>NOS (number of seasons)</strong> indicates the frequency of cropping cycles within a year, calculated by counting NDVI peaks throughout the year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/3/2473">Li et al., 2014</a>, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425720304685?casa_token=u4YFBsBotd4AAAAA:TgMiw5E7HNA9-oSF-oszmaRLzLPQJJmV-I13lvdkog1ibfEIZoPxJ3jA4F8Jcu5eXpzVBOyjew">Liu et al., 2020</a>). </li> </ul> <h2><strong>As a part of a Data Cube</strong></h2> <p>This data represents a subset of the <a href="../records/10776892">Time-series of Landsat-based Spectral Indices (EU, 30m) data cube</a>. For a comprehensive overview and full dataset information, please visit the landing page of this data cube using the provided link.</p> <ul> <li>To cite this dataset, refer to the DOI available on the landing page.</li> <li>To access other data layers in the data cube, use the navigation catalog on the landing page as well.</li> </ul> <h2><strong>Support</strong></h2> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question, please raise a <a href="https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/issues">Github Issue</a>!</p>
Landsat-based Spectral Indices for pan-EU 2000-2022 - Annual predictor (2020): BSF, minNDTI, and NOS
<h2><strong>Data information</strong></h2> <p>This dataset provides annual aggregated predictors BSF, minNDTI, and NOS for the year 2020. They are calculated as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>minNDTI (minimum NDTI)</strong> is determined as the minimum value of the six NDTI values over a year (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425711003439?casa_token=5P1XeaRMuT4AAAAA:8VyzOkBJb_gbpap0uzjuT6YoYhylvqc_vY2-AOX2KCsZGrwQw1jySGd4Ox9JFz55TPQmF231IQ">Zheng et al., 2012</a>).</li> <li><strong>BSF (bare soil fraction)</strong> is calculated by dividing the number of pixels classified as bare surface within a year's time series (identified by the criterion of NDVI values below 0.35) by the total number of pixels analyzed in that year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2121">Castaldi et al., 2019</a>).</li> <li><strong>NOS (number of seasons)</strong> indicates the frequency of cropping cycles within a year, calculated by counting NDVI peaks throughout the year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/3/2473">Li et al., 2014</a>, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425720304685?casa_token=u4YFBsBotd4AAAAA:TgMiw5E7HNA9-oSF-oszmaRLzLPQJJmV-I13lvdkog1ibfEIZoPxJ3jA4F8Jcu5eXpzVBOyjew">Liu et al., 2020</a>). </li> </ul> <h2><strong>As a part of a Data Cube</strong></h2> <p>This data represents a subset of the <a href="../records/10776892">Time-series of Landsat-based Spectral Indices (EU, 30m) data cube</a>. For a comprehensive overview and full dataset information, please visit the landing page of this data cube using the provided link.</p> <ul> <li>To cite this dataset, refer to the DOI available on the landing page.</li> <li>To access other data layers in the data cube, use the navigation catalog on the landing page as well.</li> </ul> <h2><strong>Support</strong></h2> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question, please raise a <a href="https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/issues">Github Issue</a>!</p>
Landsat-based Spectral Indices for pan-EU 2000-2022 - Annual predictor (2015): BSF, minNDTI, and NOS
<h2><strong>Data information</strong></h2> <p>This dataset provides annual aggregated predictors BSF, minNDTI, and NOS for the year 2015. They are calculated as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>minNDTI (minimum NDTI)</strong> is determined as the minimum value of the six NDTI values over a year (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425711003439?casa_token=5P1XeaRMuT4AAAAA:8VyzOkBJb_gbpap0uzjuT6YoYhylvqc_vY2-AOX2KCsZGrwQw1jySGd4Ox9JFz55TPQmF231IQ">Zheng et al., 2012</a>).</li> <li><strong>BSF (bare soil fraction)</strong> is calculated by dividing the number of pixels classified as bare surface within a year's time series (identified by the criterion of NDVI values below 0.35) by the total number of pixels analyzed in that year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2121">Castaldi et al., 2019</a>).</li> <li><strong>NOS (number of seasons)</strong> indicates the frequency of cropping cycles within a year, calculated by counting NDVI peaks throughout the year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/3/2473">Li et al., 2014</a>, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425720304685?casa_token=u4YFBsBotd4AAAAA:TgMiw5E7HNA9-oSF-oszmaRLzLPQJJmV-I13lvdkog1ibfEIZoPxJ3jA4F8Jcu5eXpzVBOyjew">Liu et al., 2020</a>). </li> </ul> <h2><strong>As a part of a Data Cube</strong></h2> <p>This data represents a subset of the <a href="../records/10776892">Time-series of Landsat-based Spectral Indices (EU, 30m) data cube</a>. For a comprehensive overview and full dataset information, please visit the landing page of this data cube using the provided link.</p> <ul> <li>To cite this dataset, refer to the DOI available on the landing page.</li> <li>To access other data layers in the data cube, use the navigation catalog on the landing page as well.</li> </ul> <h2><strong>Support</strong></h2> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question, please raise a <a href="https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/issues">Github Issue</a>!</p>
Landsat-based Spectral Indices for pan-EU 2000-2022 - Annual predictor (2011): BSF, minNDTI, and NOS
<h2><strong>Data information</strong></h2> <p>This dataset provides annual aggregated predictors BSF, minNDTI, and NOS for the year 2011. They are calculated as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>minNDTI (minimum NDTI)</strong> is determined as the minimum value of the six NDTI values over a year (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425711003439?casa_token=5P1XeaRMuT4AAAAA:8VyzOkBJb_gbpap0uzjuT6YoYhylvqc_vY2-AOX2KCsZGrwQw1jySGd4Ox9JFz55TPQmF231IQ">Zheng et al., 2012</a>).</li> <li><strong>BSF (bare soil fraction)</strong> is calculated by dividing the number of pixels classified as bare surface within a year's time series (identified by the criterion of NDVI values below 0.35) by the total number of pixels analyzed in that year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2121">Castaldi et al., 2019</a>).</li> <li><strong>NOS (number of seasons)</strong> indicates the frequency of cropping cycles within a year, calculated by counting NDVI peaks throughout the year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/3/2473">Li et al., 2014</a>, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425720304685?casa_token=u4YFBsBotd4AAAAA:TgMiw5E7HNA9-oSF-oszmaRLzLPQJJmV-I13lvdkog1ibfEIZoPxJ3jA4F8Jcu5eXpzVBOyjew">Liu et al., 2020</a>). </li> </ul> <h2><strong>As a part of a Data Cube</strong></h2> <p>This data represents a subset of the <a href="../records/10776892">Time-series of Landsat-based Spectral Indices (EU, 30m) data cube</a>. For a comprehensive overview and full dataset information, please visit the landing page of this data cube using the provided link.</p> <ul> <li>To cite this dataset, refer to the DOI available on the landing page.</li> <li>To access other data layers in the data cube, use the navigation catalog on the landing page as well.</li> </ul> <h2><strong>Support</strong></h2> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question, please raise a <a href="https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/issues">Github Issue</a>!</p>
Landsat-based Spectral Indices for pan-EU 2000-2022 - Annual predictor (2005): BSF, minNDTI, and NOS
<h2><strong>Data information</strong></h2> <p>This dataset provides annual aggregated predictors BSF, minNDTI, and NOS for the year 2005. They are calculated as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>minNDTI (minimum NDTI)</strong> is determined as the minimum value of the six NDTI values over a year (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425711003439?casa_token=5P1XeaRMuT4AAAAA:8VyzOkBJb_gbpap0uzjuT6YoYhylvqc_vY2-AOX2KCsZGrwQw1jySGd4Ox9JFz55TPQmF231IQ">Zheng et al., 2012</a>).</li> <li><strong>BSF (bare soil fraction)</strong> is calculated by dividing the number of pixels classified as bare surface within a year's time series (identified by the criterion of NDVI values below 0.35) by the total number of pixels analyzed in that year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2121">Castaldi et al., 2019</a>).</li> <li><strong>NOS (number of seasons)</strong> indicates the frequency of cropping cycles within a year, calculated by counting NDVI peaks throughout the year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/3/2473">Li et al., 2014</a>, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425720304685?casa_token=u4YFBsBotd4AAAAA:TgMiw5E7HNA9-oSF-oszmaRLzLPQJJmV-I13lvdkog1ibfEIZoPxJ3jA4F8Jcu5eXpzVBOyjew">Liu et al., 2020</a>). </li> </ul> <h2><strong>As a part of a Data Cube</strong></h2> <p>This data represents a subset of the <a href="../records/10776892">Time-series of Landsat-based Spectral Indices (EU, 30m) data cube</a>. For a comprehensive overview and full dataset information, please visit the landing page of this data cube using the provided link.</p> <ul> <li>To cite this dataset, refer to the DOI available on the landing page.</li> <li>To access other data layers in the data cube, use the navigation catalog on the landing page as well.</li> </ul> <h2><strong>Support</strong></h2> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question, please raise a <a href="https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/issues">Github Issue</a>!</p>
Landsat-based Spectral Indices for pan-EU 2000-2022 - Annual predictor (2000): BSF, minNDTI, and NOS
<h2><strong>Data information</strong></h2> <p>This dataset provides annual aggregated predictors BSF, minNDTI, and NOS for the year 2000. They are calculated as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>minNDTI (minimum NDTI)</strong> is determined as the minimum value of the six NDTI values over a year (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425711003439?casa_token=5P1XeaRMuT4AAAAA:8VyzOkBJb_gbpap0uzjuT6YoYhylvqc_vY2-AOX2KCsZGrwQw1jySGd4Ox9JFz55TPQmF231IQ">Zheng et al., 2012</a>).</li> <li><strong>BSF (bare soil fraction)</strong> is calculated by dividing the number of pixels classified as bare surface within a year's time series (identified by the criterion of NDVI values below 0.35) by the total number of pixels analyzed in that year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2121">Castaldi et al., 2019</a>).</li> <li><strong>NOS (number of seasons)</strong> indicates the frequency of cropping cycles within a year, calculated by counting NDVI peaks throughout the year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/3/2473">Li et al., 2014</a>, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425720304685?casa_token=u4YFBsBotd4AAAAA:TgMiw5E7HNA9-oSF-oszmaRLzLPQJJmV-I13lvdkog1ibfEIZoPxJ3jA4F8Jcu5eXpzVBOyjew">Liu et al., 2020</a>). </li> </ul> <h2><strong>As a part of a Data Cube</strong></h2> <p>This data represents a subset of the <a href="../records/10776892">Time-series of Landsat-based Spectral Indices (EU, 30m) data cube</a>. For a comprehensive overview and full dataset information, please visit the landing page of this data cube using the provided link.</p> <ul> <li>To cite this dataset, refer to the DOI available on the landing page.</li> <li>To access other data layers in the data cube, use the navigation catalog on the landing page as well.</li> </ul> <h2><strong>Support</strong></h2> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question, please raise a <a href="https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/issues">Github Issue</a>!</p>
Landsat-based Spectral Indices for pan-EU 2000-2022 - Annual predictor (2018): BSF, minNDTI, and NOS
<h2><strong>Data information</strong></h2> <p>This dataset provides annual aggregated predictors BSF, minNDTI, and NOS for the year 2018. They are calculated as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>minNDTI (minimum NDTI)</strong> is determined as the minimum value of the six NDTI values over a year (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425711003439?casa_token=5P1XeaRMuT4AAAAA:8VyzOkBJb_gbpap0uzjuT6YoYhylvqc_vY2-AOX2KCsZGrwQw1jySGd4Ox9JFz55TPQmF231IQ">Zheng et al., 2012</a>).</li> <li><strong>BSF (bare soil fraction)</strong> is calculated by dividing the number of pixels classified as bare surface within a year's time series (identified by the criterion of NDVI values below 0.35) by the total number of pixels analyzed in that year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2121">Castaldi et al., 2019</a>).</li> <li><strong>NOS (number of seasons)</strong> indicates the frequency of cropping cycles within a year, calculated by counting NDVI peaks throughout the year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/3/2473">Li et al., 2014</a>, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425720304685?casa_token=u4YFBsBotd4AAAAA:TgMiw5E7HNA9-oSF-oszmaRLzLPQJJmV-I13lvdkog1ibfEIZoPxJ3jA4F8Jcu5eXpzVBOyjew">Liu et al., 2020</a>). </li> </ul> <h2><strong>As a part of a Data Cube</strong></h2> <p>This data represents a subset of the <a href="../records/10776892">Time-series of Landsat-based Spectral Indices (EU, 30m) data cube</a>. For a comprehensive overview and full dataset information, please visit the landing page of this data cube using the provided link.</p> <ul> <li>To cite this dataset, refer to the DOI available on the landing page.</li> <li>To access other data layers in the data cube, use the navigation catalog on the landing page as well.</li> </ul> <h2><strong>Support</strong></h2> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question, please raise a <a href="https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/issues">Github Issue</a>!</p>
Landsat-based Spectral Indices for pan-EU 2000-2022 - Annual predictor (2010): BSF, minNDTI, and NOS
<h2><strong>Data information</strong></h2> <p>This dataset provides annual aggregated predictors BSF, minNDTI, and NOS for the year 2010. They are calculated as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>minNDTI (minimum NDTI)</strong> is determined as the minimum value of the six NDTI values over a year (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425711003439?casa_token=5P1XeaRMuT4AAAAA:8VyzOkBJb_gbpap0uzjuT6YoYhylvqc_vY2-AOX2KCsZGrwQw1jySGd4Ox9JFz55TPQmF231IQ">Zheng et al., 2012</a>).</li> <li><strong>BSF (bare soil fraction)</strong> is calculated by dividing the number of pixels classified as bare surface within a year's time series (identified by the criterion of NDVI values below 0.35) by the total number of pixels analyzed in that year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2121">Castaldi et al., 2019</a>).</li> <li><strong>NOS (number of seasons)</strong> indicates the frequency of cropping cycles within a year, calculated by counting NDVI peaks throughout the year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/3/2473">Li et al., 2014</a>, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425720304685?casa_token=u4YFBsBotd4AAAAA:TgMiw5E7HNA9-oSF-oszmaRLzLPQJJmV-I13lvdkog1ibfEIZoPxJ3jA4F8Jcu5eXpzVBOyjew">Liu et al., 2020</a>). </li> </ul> <h2><strong>As a part of a Data Cube</strong></h2> <p>This data represents a subset of the <a href="../records/10776892">Time-series of Landsat-based Spectral Indices (EU, 30m) data cube</a>. For a comprehensive overview and full dataset information, please visit the landing page of this data cube using the provided link.</p> <ul> <li>To cite this dataset, refer to the DOI available on the landing page.</li> <li>To access other data layers in the data cube, use the navigation catalog on the landing page as well.</li> </ul> <h2><strong>Support</strong></h2> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question, please raise a <a href="https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/issues">Github Issue</a>!</p>
Landsat-based Spectral Indices for pan-EU 2000-2022 - Annual predictor (2004): BSF, minNDTI, and NOS
<h2><strong>Data information</strong></h2> <p>This dataset provides annual aggregated predictors BSF, minNDTI, and NOS for the year 2004. They are calculated as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>minNDTI (minimum NDTI)</strong> is determined as the minimum value of the six NDTI values over a year (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425711003439?casa_token=5P1XeaRMuT4AAAAA:8VyzOkBJb_gbpap0uzjuT6YoYhylvqc_vY2-AOX2KCsZGrwQw1jySGd4Ox9JFz55TPQmF231IQ">Zheng et al., 2012</a>).</li> <li><strong>BSF (bare soil fraction)</strong> is calculated by dividing the number of pixels classified as bare surface within a year's time series (identified by the criterion of NDVI values below 0.35) by the total number of pixels analyzed in that year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2121">Castaldi et al., 2019</a>).</li> <li><strong>NOS (number of seasons)</strong> indicates the frequency of cropping cycles within a year, calculated by counting NDVI peaks throughout the year (<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/3/2473">Li et al., 2014</a>, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425720304685?casa_token=u4YFBsBotd4AAAAA:TgMiw5E7HNA9-oSF-oszmaRLzLPQJJmV-I13lvdkog1ibfEIZoPxJ3jA4F8Jcu5eXpzVBOyjew">Liu et al., 2020</a>). </li> </ul> <h2><strong>As a part of a Data Cube</strong></h2> <p>This data represents a subset of the <a href="../records/10776892">Time-series of Landsat-based Spectral Indices (EU, 30m) data cube</a>. For a comprehensive overview and full dataset information, please visit the landing page of this data cube using the provided link.</p> <ul> <li>To cite this dataset, refer to the DOI available on the landing page.</li> <li>To access other data layers in the data cube, use the navigation catalog on the landing page as well.</li> </ul> <h2><strong>Support</strong></h2> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question, please raise a <a href="https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/issues">Github Issue</a>!</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.