Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

1,104

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

1,104 results for “morphological variation”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo40/100

Figure 5 in Morphological variation of pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) with emphasis on allometry

Figure 5. Five times exaggerated deformation grids from reference specimen to group means (before standardization).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in Morphological variation of pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) with emphasis on allometry

Figure 2. Landmarks used in study: 1- tip of mouth; 2- middle of the eye; 3- preoperculum and operculum intersection; 4- posterior edge of preoperculum; 5- interoperculum and suboperculum intersection; 6- posterior tip of operculum; 7- anterior base of first dorsal fin ray; 8- posterior base of dorsal fin; 9- dorsal base of caudal fin; 10-last scale of lateral line; 11- ventral base of caudal fin; 12- posterior base of anal fin; 13-anterior base of first anal fin ray; 14- anterior base of first pelvic fin ray; 15- ventral base of pectoral fin; 16- dorsal base of pectoral fin.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4. The 3D in Morphological variation of pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) with emphasis on allometry

Figure 4. The 3D plot of first three principal components with five times exaggerated deformation grids along principal components (deformation grid on the left illustrates the negative side of the axis, whereas right illustration is the positive side of the axis.)

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 3 in Morphological variation of pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) with emphasis on allometry

Figure 3. Regression of shape versus centroid size logarithm (logCSize) (significant changes observed at landmarks, which are highlighted in black).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 6 in Morphological variation of pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) with emphasis on allometry

Figure 6. Five times exaggerated deformation grids from reference specimen to group means (after standardization).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in The Black Sea Flexopecten species-complex (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Pectinidae): Shell morphology and 16S rDNA variation

Figure 2. Frequency of occurrence depicted for 16S ribosomal DNA variants among individuals of Flexopecten glaber. A: Black Sea population, B: Mediterranean population.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 7 in Genetic and morphological variation of metacercariae of Microphallus piriformes (Trematoda, Microphallidae): Effects of paraxenia and geographic location

Fig. 7. Variability of metacercarial body shape within hemipopulations and infrapopulations of M. piriformes. A: Absolute and relative morphological disparity (MD) of metacercariae within hosts of the same species. B: Distribution of morphological disparity (MD) within individual snails grouped by host species and sampling location.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 4 in Genetic and morphological variation of metacercariae of Microphallus piriformes (Trematoda, Microphallidae): Effects of paraxenia and geographic location

Fig. 4. Haplotype networks, COI sequence (369 bp); TCS algorithm; dashes correspond to mutations. A: color reflects sampling location. B: color reflects host species.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 5 in Genetic and morphological variation of metacercariae of Microphallus piriformes (Trematoda, Microphallidae): Effects of paraxenia and geographic location

Fig. 5. PCA-ordination of individual M. piriformes metacercariae body shapes grouped by host species. PC1 can be interpreted as a deepness of a "waist" between locomotory and generative body parts; PC2 can be interpreted as a width of locomotory body part. B: Pairwise post-hoc comparison; significant value are shown as bold (considering Holmes correction for multiple comparison); host species: sax – L. saxatilis; obt – L. obtusata; sampling site: Kib - Barents Sea, Kiberg; Kor – White Sea, Korga-Islet; Zel – Barents Sea, Dalnie Zelentsy.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1 in Genetic and morphological variation of metacercariae of Microphallus piriformes (Trematoda, Microphallidae): Effects of paraxenia and geographic location

Fig. 1. The map of the study region (image: TerraMetrics, map data: Google). Sample collection sites (Tromsø city, Kiberg settlement, Dalnie Zelentsy settlement, Sredny Island) are shown.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 8 in Genetic and morphological variation of metacercariae of Microphallus piriformes (Trematoda, Microphallidae): Effects of paraxenia and geographic location

Fig. 8. Body size of M. piriformes metacercariae from different host species and sampling locations. Mean centroid size and 95% confidence interval obtained via bootstrap.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 3 in Genetic and morphological variation of metacercariae of Microphallus piriformes (Trematoda, Microphallidae): Effects of paraxenia and geographic location

Fig. 3. Bayesian inference based on COI sequence (369 bp); 15000000 generation; GTR + I + G substitution model; A posteriori probabilities are indicated by node shapes; sample name includes parasite species (pir – M. piriformes, pyg – M. pygmaeus, tri – M. triangulatus, sim – M. similis), sample number, geographic region and location (WSk – White Sea, Korga-Islet; WSy – White Sea, Yakovleva; DZe – Barents Sea, Dalnie Zelentsy; Kib - Barents Sea, Kiberg; Tro - Norwegian Sea, Tromsø), host species (sax – L. saxatilis; arc – L. arcana; comp – L. compressa; obt – L. obtusata; fab – L. fabalis). Identical haplotypes and the FST-value of differentiation between populations (Weir, and Cockerham, 1984) are shown in Supplementary Table 1. Branch color reflects geographic region.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figs. 3–13. Synopia ultramarina Dana, 1853 in Redescription and new records of Synopia ultramarina Dana (Amphipoda: Synopiidae) from off the northeastern Brazil, with comments on its morphological variations

Figs. 3–13. Synopia ultramarina Dana, 1853: 3, head; 4, 5, antennae 1–2; 6, lower lip; 7, upper lip; 8, 9, maxillae 1–2; 10, 11, left and right mandibles; 12, maxilliped (UERJ 542); 13, palp of mandible (MOUFPE 19642). Scale bars: 0.2 mm for Figs 4, 5; 0.1 mm for the remains.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1 in Redescription and new records of Synopia ultramarina Dana (Amphipoda: Synopiidae) from off the northeastern Brazil, with comments on its morphological variations

Fig. 1. Sampling site of Synopia ultramarina Dana, 1853, rodolith bedin Ressureta Channel, 03°49'2,51"S - 32°23'34,10"W, 12 m deep, Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, Brazil. Photo by Zaira Matheus/All Angle.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figs. 18–23. Synopia ultramarina Dana, 1853 in Redescription and new records of Synopia ultramarina Dana (Amphipoda: Synopiidae) from off the northeastern Brazil, with comments on its morphological variations

Figs. 18–23. Synopia ultramarina Dana, 1853: 18–20, pereopods 5–7; 21–23, epimeral plates 1–3 (UERJ 542). Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 30 in Redescription and new records of Synopia ultramarina Dana (Amphipoda: Synopiidae) from off the northeastern Brazil, with comments on its morphological variations

Fig. 30. Distribution of Synopia ultramarina Dana, 1853: A, Tropical Atlantic (DANA,1853); B, Tropical Atlantic (SCHELLENBERG, 1926); C, Bermuda (SHOEMAKER, 1945); D, Tulear Reef, South Madagascar (LEDOYER, 1986); E, Tomioka Bay, Japan (HIRAYAMA, 1988); F, Florida Keys and Grand Bahama Island (BARNARD & TOMAS, 1989); G, EspÍrito Santo state coast, Brazil (WAKABARA et al., 1991); H, Coroa Vermelha, Abrolhos Bank, and California Reef, Parcel of Abrolhos, Bahia state, Brazil (YOUNG & SEREJO, 2005); I, Lizard Island, Australia (HUGHES, 2009); J, Fernando de Noronha Archipelago (current study); K, off Ceará State coast (current study); L, off Pernambuco State coast (current study).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figs. 14–17. Synopia ultramarina Dana, 1853 in Redescription and new records of Synopia ultramarina Dana (Amphipoda: Synopiidae) from off the northeastern Brazil, with comments on its morphological variations

Figs. 14–17. Synopia ultramarina Dana, 1853: 14, 15, gnathopods 1–2; 16, 17, pereopods 3–4 (MOUFPE 19642). Scale bars: 0.3 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figs. 24–29. Synopia ultramarina Dana, 1853 in Redescription and new records of Synopia ultramarina Dana (Amphipoda: Synopiidae) from off the northeastern Brazil, with comments on its morphological variations

Figs. 24–29. Synopia ultramarina Dana, 1853: 24–26, uropods 1–3; 28, telson (MOUFPE 19642); 27, telson (UERJ 542); 29, telson (MOUFPE 14566). Scale bars: 0.3 mm for Figs 24, 25; 0.1 for Fig. 27; 0.2 mm for the remains.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

FIGURE 4 in Morphological variations in Cycloclypeus carpenteri: Multiple embryos and multiple equatorial layers

FIGURE 4. Relative position of embryos and secondary equatorial layers: 1) Specimen A2; 2) specimen A3; 3) specimen A6; 4) specimen A14.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

FIGURE 1. Specimen A1 in Morphological variations in Cycloclypeus carpenteri: Multiple embryos and multiple equatorial layers

FIGURE 1. Specimen A1: 1) equatorial and axial sections of one specimen.; 2) equatorial view of the test; 3) lateral view of the test; 4) close-up to the nepiont and the first chambers in equatorial section; 5) segmentation of the entire nepiont. For more information, refer to text.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2016View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record