Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 2 in New olenelline trilobites from the Northwest Territories, Canada, and the phylogenetic placement of Judomia absita Fritz, 1973

FIGURE 2. Schematic cross-section of the Sekwi Formation, from Dilliard et al. (2010). Specimens in this study came from the Nevadella zone at sections 1, 2, 3, and 14 (63° 26' 22.2"N, 129° 22' 20.4"W; 63° 24' 27.4"N, 129° 7' 31. 8"W; 63° 33' 3.8"N, 129° 11' 51.2"W; 63° 37' 3.6"N, 128° 37' 32.2"W, respectively).

FIGURE 5 in New olenelline trilobites from the Northwest Territories, Canada, and the phylogenetic placement of Judomia absita Fritz, 1973

FIGURE 5. Bradyfallotaspis sekwiensis sp. nov., 1,2—holotype PWNHC-2009.20.18, X1.8; 3—KUMIP 320708, X2.1; 4— PWNHC-2009.20.19, X3.6; 5—PWNHC-2009.20.20 (latex cast), X2.5; 6—KUMIP 320709 (latex cast), X3.3; 7—KUMIP 320710 (latex cast), X2.5.

FIGURE 6. Ateleidea spinosa spinnerets. A, female right spinning field. B, female ALS. C, female PMS. D, female PLS. E, epiandrous fusules. F in Phylogenetic placement and redescription of the spider genus Atelidea Simon, 1895 (Araneae, Tetragnathidae)

FIGURE 6. Ateleidea spinosa spinnerets. A, female right spinning field. B, female ALS. C, female PMS. D, female PLS. E, epiandrous fusules. F, male PLS.

FIGURE 5 in Phylogenetic placement and redescription of the spider genus Atelidea Simon, 1895 (Araneae, Tetragnathidae)

FIGURE 5. Ateleidea spinosa and Leucauge venusta (D), male genitalic morphology. A, A. spinosa pedipalp ectal view. B, A. spinosa paracymbium and CDBP. C, A. spinosa conductor. D, L. venusta pedipalp ectal view. E, A. spinosa pedipalp mesal view. F, A. spinosa pedipalp ventral view.

FIGURE 4. A in Phylogenetic placement and redescription of the spider genus Atelidea Simon, 1895 (Araneae, Tetragnathidae)

FIGURE 4. A. spinosa and Leucauge venusta (Walckenaer, 1841) (C, D) genitalic morphology. A, A. spinosa epigynum anterior view. B, A. spinosa accessory glands over the copulatory ducts. C, L. venusta epigynum dorsal view. D, L. venusta accessory glands over the copulatory ducts. E, A. spinosa male pedipalp apical view. F, A. spinosa embolus and conductor.

FIGURE 3 in Phylogenetic placement and redescription of the spider genus Atelidea Simon, 1895 (Araneae, Tetragnathidae)

FIGURE 3. Ateleidea spinosa and Opadometa sp. (B, I). cephalothorax and legs morphology. A, female cephalothorax dorsal view. B, Opadometa sp female cephalothorax tangential view. C, female metatarsus I. D, male metatarsus I. E, female femur IV trichobothria at the base. F, male metatarsus I spine. G, femur IV trichobothria detail. H, male tarsus I. I, Opadometa sp., male tarsus I.

FIGURE 2. Ateleidea spinosa, genital morphology. A, epigynum ventral view. B, epigynum ventral view cleared. C, epigynum dorsal view cleared. D, male pedipalp ventral view cleared. E male pedipalp expanded. Scale bars 0.2 in Phylogenetic placement and redescription of the spider genus Atelidea Simon, 1895 (Araneae, Tetragnathidae)

FIGURE 2. Ateleidea spinosa, genital morphology. A, epigynum ventral view. B, epigynum ventral view cleared. C, epigynum dorsal view cleared. D, male pedipalp ventral view cleared. E male pedipalp expanded. Scale bars 0.2 mm, A–C same scale, D– E same scale.

FIGURE 1. Ateleidea spinosa, somatic morphology. A, female habitus. B, male habitus. C, female lateral view. D, male cephalothorax frontal view. E, female cephalothorax frontal view. F male femur and metatarsus I. Scale bars 0.5 in Phylogenetic placement and redescription of the spider genus Atelidea Simon, 1895 (Araneae, Tetragnathidae)

FIGURE 1. Ateleidea spinosa, somatic morphology. A, female habitus. B, male habitus. C, female lateral view. D, male cephalothorax frontal view. E, female cephalothorax frontal view. F male femur and metatarsus I. Scale bars 0.5 mm, A–C same scale, D–E same scale.

FIGURE 7. Cladograms from the equal and implied weights analyses. A in Phylogenetic placement and redescription of the spider genus Atelidea Simon, 1895 (Araneae, Tetragnathidae)

FIGURE 7. Cladograms from the equal and implied weights analyses. A, strict consensus (1074 steps, CI 25, RI 57) of 12 MPTs (1043 steps, CI 26, RI 59) obtained by equal weights. B, strict consensus of all the topologies obtained by the implied weights analyzes concavities 1 to 100. Numbers under nodes Jackknife and Symmetric Resampling values respectively, arrows indicate the position of Atelidea.

FIGURE 72 in Systematic review of the Dasymutilla monticola species-group (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae): using phylogenetics to address species-group placement and sex associations

FIGURE 72: Bayesian phylogeny reconstructed using ITS1 and ITS2 sequences and including members of 15 Dasymutilla species-groups, a Traumatomutilla outgroup, and all available unassigned species.

FIGURE 73 in Systematic review of the Dasymutilla monticola species-group (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae): using phylogenetics to address species-group placement and sex associations

FIGURE 73: Bayesian phylogeny reconstructed using ITS1 and ITS2 sequences and only including members of the Dasymutilla monticola species-group and three outgroups from other Dasymutilla species-groups.

FIGURES 24–35. 24–35 in Systematic review of the Dasymutilla monticola species-group (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae): using phylogenetics to address species-group placement and sex associations

FIGURES 24–35. 24–35, Habitus, lateral view, 3. 24. Dasymutilla archboldi; 25. D. arenneronea (D. chattahoochei); 26. D. birkmani; 27. D. birkmani (D. arcana); 28. D. bonita; 29. D. canella; 30. D. fasciventris sensu Manley & Pitts; 31. D. gibbosa; 32. D. macilenta; 33. D. monticola; 34. D. saetigera (D. polia); 35. D. vesta.

FIGURES 9–23 in Systematic review of the Dasymutilla monticola species-group (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae): using phylogenetics to address species-group placement and sex associations

FIGURES 9–23. Habitus, dorsal view, Ƥ. 9. Dasymutilla archboldi; 10. D. arenneronea (D. chattahoochei); 11. D. birkmani; 12. D. bonita; 13. D. campanula; 14. D. canella; 15. D. chalcocephala; 16. D. birkmani (D. corcyra); 17. D. eurynome; 18. D. macilenta; 19. D. monticola; 20. D. radkei; 21. D. saetigera; 22. D. spilota; 23. D. vesta.

FIGURES 36–71 in Systematic review of the Dasymutilla monticola species-group (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae): using phylogenetics to address species-group placement and sex associations

FIGURES 36–71. Male genitalia: dorsal view, ventral view, lateral view, and penial valve. 36–39. Dasymutilla archboldi; 40–43. D. arenneronea; 44–47. D. birkmani; 48–51. D. bonita; 52–55: D. canella; 56–59. D. macilenta; 60–63. D. monticola; 64–67. D. saetigera; 68–71. D. vesta.

FIGURES 1–8. 1, 2 in Systematic review of the Dasymutilla monticola species-group (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae): using phylogenetics to address species-group placement and sex associations

FIGURES 1–8. 1, 2, Habitus, lateral view, Ƥ. 1. Dasymutilla canella; 2. D. spilota. 3, 4, Mesosoma, dorsal view, male. 3. D. saetigera; 4. D. vesta. 5–8, Head, dorsal view, female. 5. D. arenneronea (D. chattahoochei); 6. D. birkmani; 7. D. birkmani (D. corcyra); 8. D. macilenta (D. chattahoochei).

FIGURE 15 in Te rn atu s, a new spider genus from China with a cladistic analysis and comments on its phylogenetic placement (Araneae: Linyphiidae)

FIGURE 15. The single most parsimonious tree (Matrix 2) under equal weights (L = 930, CI = 0.23, RI = 0.58). Thicker lines indicate presence of tegular sac. Black square indicates the only clade within the "Distal erigonines" having embolic membrane with thread-like projections and no protegulum; black circles indicate the three clades having distal tibial apophysis. Numbers at notes indicate Jacknife support values (only those above 50% are reported).

FIGURE 16 in Te rn atu s, a new spider genus from China with a cladistic analysis and comments on its phylogenetic placement (Araneae: Linyphiidae)

FIGURE 16. Collecting localities in China of Ternatus malleatus n. sp. (triangle: Huaping, Guangxi Province) and Ternatus siculus n. sp. (circle: Zhangjiajie, Hunan Province).

FIGURE 12 in Te rn atu s, a new spider genus from China with a cladistic analysis and comments on its phylogenetic placement (Araneae: Linyphiidae)

FIGURE 12. The strict consensus cladogram (= nelsen consensus; Matrix 1) under equal weights. Numbers above branches indicate Bremer support values; numbers below branches indicate jacknife support values (only those above 50% are reported). Thicker lines indicate the Ternatus clade.

FIGURE 13 in Te rn atu s, a new spider genus from China with a cladistic analysis and comments on its phylogenetic placement (Araneae: Linyphiidae)

FIGURE 13. Character optimizations for the single most parsimonious tree (Matrix 2) under equal weights (L = 930, CI = 0.23, RI = 0.58). Ambiguous character changes optimized as in Figure 11(continued in Figure 14).

FIGURE 14 in Te rn atu s, a new spider genus from China with a cladistic analysis and comments on its phylogenetic placement (Araneae: Linyphiidae)

FIGURE 14. Character optimizations for the single most parsimonious tree (Matrix 2) under equal weights (continued from Figure 13). Ambiguous character changes optimized as in Figure 11. Thicker lines indicate Ternatus clade.