Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 12 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 12. — Geographic range of Molossus rufus (E. Geoffroy, 1805) in Brasil. The numbers represent the localities described in Appendix 1.

FIG. 10 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 10. — Molossus rufus (E. Geoffroy, 1805). Photo courtesy of Dr Marco A. R. Mello (https://marcoarmello.wordpress.com).

FIG. 11 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 11. — Skull of Molossus rufus E. Geoffroy, 1805: A, dorsal view; B, posterior view; C, lateral view; D, frontal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 2 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 2. — Variable characters in skull morphology within Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Pallas, 1766): A, B, lateral views; C, D, ventral views; E, F, posterior view; H, G, frontal view. Numbers represents characters described in the text: 1, skull robustness; 2, sagittal crest; 3, basioccipital pits; 4, projection of the canines; 5, lambdoidal crest and occipital complex; 6, mastoid process; 7, rostrum shape; 8, infraorbital foramen; 9, upper incisors; 10, nasal process. Not to scale.

FIG. 8 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 8. — Ventral view of skull of Molossus coibensis Allen, 1904. The arrow shows the absence of the basioccipital pits.

FIG. 6 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 6. — Molossus aztecus Saussure, 1860 skull: A, ventral view; B, posterior view; C, lateral view; D, frontal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 5. — Strict consensus tree from eight most parsimonious trees recovered for Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 5. — Strict consensus tree from eight most parsimonious trees recovered for Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805. Numbers above the branches indicate Bootstrap values and bottom numbers indicate Bremer support values.

FIG. 3 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 3. — Principal Components Analysis plot of PC1 and PC2 based on 13 cranial and external variables of Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805: A, females, B, males. Symbols: ■, M. pretiosus Miller, 1902; ■, M. rufus (E. Geoffroy, 1805); ▲, M. currentium Thomas, 1901; +, M. molossus (Pallas, 1766); X, M. coibensis Allen, 1904; ▲, M. aztecus Saussure, 1860;, M. sinaloae Allen, 1906; *, and Molossus sp.

FIG. 1 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 1. — Definition of skull measurements used in this study of Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805. Abbreviations: see Material & Methods. Reprinted from Loureiro

FIG. 7 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 7. — Geographic range of Molossus aztecus Saussure, 1860 in Brazil (Gregorin et al. 2011). -, represents new records for the country, the numbers represent the localities described in Appendix 1.

FIG. 4 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 4. — Principal component analysis of the first two main components (PC1 and PC2) based on 13 cranial and external variables of Molossus molossus: A, males,B, females.Symbols:■, Rio de Janeiro; ▲, Ceará; ▼, Pará; +, Rio Grande do Sul; ▲, Piauí; ●, Mato Grosso do Sul; O, Minas Gerais; *, Bahia; ◆, Amazonas; ●, Paraíba;, São Paulo; ❚, Mato Grosso; x, Paraiba, ▼, Acre; ●, Piaui.

FIG. 19 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 19. — Geographic range of Molossus pretiosus Miller, 1902 in Brasil. The numbers represent the localities described in Appendix 1.

FIG. 17 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 17. — Geographic range of Molossus currentium Thomas, 1901 in Brasil: -, represents new records for the country. The numbers represent the locality described in Appendix 1.

FIG. 9 in Diversity, morphological phylogeny, and distribution of bats of the genus Molossus E. Geoffroy, 1805 (Chiroptera, Molossidae) in Brazil

FIG. 9. — Geographic range of Molossus coibensis Allen, 1904 in Brazil: -, Represents new records for the country. The numbers represent the localities described in Appendix 1.

Supplementary Figure S7 in Mitogenomic phylogeny of the Asian colobine genus Trachypithecus with special focus on Trachypithecus phayrei (Blyth, 1847) and description of a new species

Supplementary Figure S7 Infant Trachypithecus popa sp. nov. with creamy white fur coloration at Popa Mountain Park, Myanmar (Photo: Thaung Win).

Supplementary Figure S5 in Mitogenomic phylogeny of the Asian colobine genus Trachypithecus with special focus on Trachypithecus phayrei (Blyth, 1847) and description of a new species

Supplementary Figure S5 Dorsal (A), lateral (B), and ventral (C) view of skull and mandible of holotype (NHMUK ZD.1914.7.19.3) of Trachypithecus popa sp. nov. (Photo: Courtesy of the Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London).

Supplementary Figure S6 in Mitogenomic phylogeny of the Asian colobine genus Trachypithecus with special focus on Trachypithecus phayrei (Blyth, 1847) and description of a new species

Supplementary Figure S6 Ventral view of skull without mandible (A), and dorsal (B), lateral (C), and ventral (D) views of mandible of holotype (NHMUK ZD.1914.7.19.3) of Trachypithecus popa sp. nov. (Photo: Courtesy of the Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London).

Figure 6 in Mitogenomic phylogeny of the Asian colobine genus Trachypithecus with special focus on Trachypithecus phayrei (Blyth, 1847) and description of a new species

Figure 6 Photos of Trachypithecus phayrei (A, B), Trachypithecus popa sp. nov. (C, D) and Trachypithecus melamera (formerly T. p. shanicus) (E, F) A: Adult female T. phayrei at Yangon Zoo, Myanmar (photo by Tilo Nadler); B: Adult male T. phayrei from Lawachara National Park, Bangladesh (photo by Tanvir Ahmed); C, D: Subadult male T. popa from Mount Popa, Myanmar (photo by Lay Win); E: Adult female T. melamera at Mandalay Zoo, Myanmar (photo by Tilo Nadler), F: Adult female T. melamera with offspring from Gaoligong Mountains National Park, China (photo by Chi Ma).

Supplementary Figure S1 in Mitogenomic phylogeny of the Asian colobine genus Trachypithecus with special focus on Trachypithecus phayrei (Blyth, 1847) and description of a new species

Supplementary Figure S1 Ultrametric tree showing phylogenetic relationships and divergence times among all investigated taxa inferred from BEAST analysis (node bars indicate 95% HPDs and node supports of <100% ML BS and <1.0 BI PP are given at respective nodes).

Figure 5 in Mitogenomic phylogeny of the Asian colobine genus Trachypithecus with special focus on Trachypithecus phayrei (Blyth, 1847) and description of a new species

Figure 5 Geographical distribution of mitochondrial clades found in Trachypithecus phayrei Sample locations are numbered as in Figures 1, 2 (see also Supplementary Table S1) and colored according to their mitochondrial clade assignment. Limits of the Central clade to the northeast and East clade to the southwest, depicted in light green, are not yet firmly resolved. Samples from locations 6–9 form Central clade A, while those from locations 10–12 cluster in Central clade B. Note, at location 10, haplotypes of the Central and East clades were found. Museum specimen from location 13 cluster unexpectedly with Central clade A (see Results).