Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-byOct 2019View details →

Pol III modeling data and scripts using the Integrative Modeling Platform

<p>This repository contains the data obtained running the Integrative modeling platform with crosslinks and cryoem data, on the RNA Pol III system.</p>

Fig. 12 Supratidal limestones. a in Microfacies Analysis And Depositional Environments Of The Tithonian-Valanginian Limestones From Dâmbovicioara Gorges (Cheile Dâmbovicioarei), Getic Carbonate Platform, Romania

Fig. 12 Supratidal limestones. a Algal-microbial mats; they contain alternations of calcified cyanobacteria and very fine micritic lamine. b Detail from the image a; the cyanobacteria laminae with agglutinated fine peloids and ostracods (indicated by arrows). c, d Fenestral algal/cyanobacterial bindstone; micro-lamination is formed by calcified cyanobacteria filaments; the lower part is composed of rivulariacean-type cyanobacteria; detail at left;

Fig. 5 Pedogenetically altered granular limestones. a, b in Microfacies Analysis And Depositional Environments Of The Tithonian-Valanginian Limestones From Dâmbovicioara Gorges (Cheile Dâmbovicioarei), Getic Carbonate Platform, Romania

Fig. 5 Pedogenetically altered granular limestones. a, b Peloidal-bioclastic grainstone bearing vadoids and black pebbles, micritised intraclasts and meniscus cements. c-d Dissolution features associated with microstalactitic and equigranular cements which are developed arround cavities and grains; cavities are filled with vadose silt in association with large crystals of equigranular calcite.

Fig. 8 a-d in Microfacies Analysis And Depositional Environments Of The Tithonian-Valanginian Limestones From Dâmbovicioara Gorges (Cheile Dâmbovicioarei), Getic Carbonate Platform, Romania

Fig. 8 a-d Normal marine subtidal limestones. Bioturbated bioclastic packstone with dasycladalean algae [Selliporella neocomiensis (Radoičić), Terquemella sp.]; miliolids, ostracods and bivalve fragments.

Fig. 3 in Microfacies Analysis And Depositional Environments Of The Tithonian-Valanginian Limestones From Dâmbovicioara Gorges (Cheile Dâmbovicioarei), Getic Carbonate Platform, Romania

Fig. 3 Intraclastic/bioclastic-dominated shoals. a-f Coarse intraclastic-bioclastic grainstone and rudstone containing intraclasts, oncoids, peloids, normal and incipient ooids. g-h Intraclastic-bioclastic grainstone and rudstone with vadoids. Bioclasts are represented by large benthic foraminifera (a, c-d), coral fragments (b, d-e), rivulariacean-type cyanobacteria (e.g. Diversocalis sp.) (c), bivlave fragments, echinoderm fragments, dasycladalean algae [Clypeina sulcata (Alth)] (a) and gastropods (f); intraclasts and blackened bioclasts (black pebbles) (a, c, d, f, h).

Fig. 15 in Microfacies Analysis And Depositional Environments Of The Tithonian-Valanginian Limestones From Dâmbovicioara Gorges (Cheile Dâmbovicioarei), Getic Carbonate Platform, Romania

Fig. 15 Limestones from the Padina Brașoavei outcrop (Urdărița horst). The arrows indicate the discontinuity surface.

Fig. 4 in Microfacies Analysis And Depositional Environments Of The Tithonian-Valanginian Limestones From Dâmbovicioara Gorges (Cheile Dâmbovicioarei), Getic Carbonate Platform, Romania

Fig. 4 Contact between the intraclastic/bioclastic-dominated shoals (A) and peritidal limestones (B) in the Dâmbovicioara Gorges.

Fig. 11 a in Microfacies Analysis And Depositional Environments Of The Tithonian-Valanginian Limestones From Dâmbovicioara Gorges (Cheile Dâmbovicioarei), Getic Carbonate Platform, Romania

Fig. 11 a Intertidal carbonates (micro-cycles delimitated by firmground type surfaces) (thin section in panorama). Fenestral peloidal-oncoidic grainstone; Millimeter-scale firmgrounds are composed of micritic laminae (arrowed).

Fig. 7 a, b in Microfacies Analysis And Depositional Environments Of The Tithonian-Valanginian Limestones From Dâmbovicioara Gorges (Cheile Dâmbovicioarei), Getic Carbonate Platform, Romania

Fig. 7 a, b Well bedded, decimetre- to meter-thick limestones from the peritidal succession of the Cheile Dâmbovicioarei; c fenestral structures and millimeter to centimeter-thick sets of laminae are present.

Fig. 9 Restricted marine subtidal limestones. a-d in Microfacies Analysis And Depositional Environments Of The Tithonian-Valanginian Limestones From Dâmbovicioara Gorges (Cheile Dâmbovicioarei), Getic Carbonate Platform, Romania

Fig. 9 Restricted marine subtidal limestones. a-d Oncoidal-bioclastic packstone with cyanobacteria nodules.

Fig. 17 Carbonate facies from the breccia levels. a-d in Microfacies Analysis And Depositional Environments Of The Tithonian-Valanginian Limestones From Dâmbovicioara Gorges (Cheile Dâmbovicioarei), Getic Carbonate Platform, Romania

Fig. 17 Carbonate facies from the breccia levels. a-d Peloidal-bioclastic packstone with cyanobacteria, ostracods and foraminifera (d); cavities are filled with vadose silt and gravitational terrigenous material. e-f Breccia with horizontal (e), circumgranular and vertical (f) cracks. Scale-bar = 1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2011View details →

Text-fig. 1. "Plant screen" scheme of complete results of the IPR-vegetation analysis derived from the database. in The Integrated Plant Record Vegetation Analysis: Internet Platform And Online Application

Text-fig. 1. "Plant screen" scheme of complete results of the IPR-vegetation analysis derived from the database.

Fig. 9 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of Paleogene sponge fauna of the East European Platform through reassessment of the record of isolated spicules

Fig. 9. Spicule morphotypes from south-central Ukraine (A–V, X–Z) and Lithuania (W); Markovka, middle Eocene (A, D, E), Verhnee, lower Eocene (B, Z), Glâdov Âr, Upper Creatceous (C, J, K, P, Q, T, U, V, Y), Pesčanoe, upper Eocene (F, O), Kiselevka, middle Eocene (G, L, R), Markovka, upper Eocene (H, X), Nikol'skoe, upper Eocene (I, S), Lipcy, middle Eocene (M), Monastyrek, lower Eocene (N), and Neravai borehole, Paleocene (W). A, C, E, H, L, O, P, R. Phyllotriaenes. B. Sphaeroclone. D, F, G. Discotriaenes. I. Anchorate spicule. J, K, N, Q, S–W, Y. Megaclones. M. Siliceous plate. X, Z. Tetracrepid desmas. After Ivanik (2003); modified.

Fig. 10 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of Paleogene sponge fauna of the East European Platform through reassessment of the record of isolated spicules

Fig. 10. Spicule morphotypes from south-central Ukraine; Kiselevka, middle Eocene (A, F, H, I, L), Staroverovka, middle Eocene (B), Nikol'skoe, upper Eocene (C, D, E, J, M), Russkie Tiŝki, upper Eocene (G), and Russkie Tiŝki, middle Eocene (K). A, B. Pentactines. C–F, H, I. Pinnular hexactines. G. Smooth hexactine. J. Tautactine. K, L, Hexactines. M. Stauractine. After Ivanik (2003); modified.

Fig. 6 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of Paleogene sponge fauna of the East European Platform through reassessment of the record of isolated spicules

Fig. 6. Spicule morphotypes from south-central Ukraine; Russkie Tiŝki, Middle Eocene (A, H, O, Y, Z), Kiselevka, upper Eocene (B, C), Markovka, middle Eocene (D), Russkie Tiŝki, upper Eocene (E), Kiselevka, upper Eocene (F, G, M), Pogonovka borehole, upper Eocene (I), Markovka, upper Eocene (J, K, N), Nikol'skoe, upper Eocene (L, P), Grigorevka borehole, upper Eocene (Q, R, S, T), Melovoe, upper Eocene (U, V), and Kiselevka, middle Eocene (W, X). A. Spherostyle. B–D. Tylostyles. E, F, I–K, M. Acanthostyles. G, H. Exotyles. L. Clavidisc. N, O. Acanthoxeas. P–R. Acanthostrongyles. S, T. Sigmas. U, V. Anisochelae. W. Isochela. X. Spheraster. Y, Z. Tylotes. After Ivanik (2003); modified.

Fig. 8 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of Paleogene sponge fauna of the East European Platform through reassessment of the record of isolated spicules

Fig. 8. Spicule morphotypes from south-central Ukraine; Verhnee, lower Eocene (A, K, L, P), Russkie Tiŝki, middle Eocene (B, D, N, Q), Nikol'skoe, upper Eocene (C, E, G, J), Markovka, upper Eocene (F, O), Lipcy, middle Eocene (H), Melovoe, upper Eocene (I), and Kantemirovka, upper Eocene (M). A.?Fragment of dictional skeleton. B. Pentactine. C. Hexactine. D, E.?Oxeas. F, G, O. Amphiclads. H. Broken lophodiactine. I, J. Lophocalthrops. K.?Lophocalthrop. L. Spicule fragment. M.?Spicule fragment. N. Dichotriaene. P. Calthrop. Q. Fragment of a diatom. After Ivanik (2003); modified.

Fig. 5 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of Paleogene sponge fauna of the East European Platform through reassessment of the record of isolated spicules

Fig. 5. Spicule morphotypes from south-central Ukraine; Kiselevka, upper Eocene (A, E, N, V, X), Russkie Tiŝki, middle Eocene (B, C, F, G, I, J, M, AA), Markovka, middle Eocene (D, H, Q, R, W), Melovoe, upper Eocene (K), Nikol'skoe, upper Eocene (L, P, AF), Staroverovka, middle Eocene (O, Y, AI), Markovka, upper Eocene (S, U, AD, AE, AG), Pesčanoe, upper Eocene (T), Harkov region, middle Eocene (Z), Kantemirovka, upper Eocene (AB), Russkie Tiŝki, upper Eocene (AC), and Kiselevka, middle Eocene (AH). A–D, V–X. Strongyles. E. Exotyle. F–K. Acanthostrongyles. L–N. Acanthostyles. O, P. Ophirhabds. Q–T. Flexuous oxeas. U. Acanthostrongyle. Y. Oxyspheraster. Z. Oxyaster. AA–AD. Microstrongyles. AE, AG. Oxyasters. AF. Oxyaster. AH, AI. Spherasters. After Ivanik (2003); modified.

Fig. 3 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of Paleogene sponge fauna of the East European Platform through reassessment of the record of isolated spicules

Fig. 3. Spicule morphotypes from south-central Ukraine; Černoleska, upper Eocene (A), Pesčanoe, upper Eocene (B), Russkie Tiŝki, middle Eocene (C, I, Q), Verhnee, lower Eocene (D, F, H, J, K, O, P), Nikol'skoe, upper Eocene (E, L), Staroverovka, middle Eocene (G), Markovka, upper Eocene (M), Kiselevka, lower Eocene (N), Grigorevka, middle Eocene (R), Kiselevka, middle Eocene (S), Markovka, middle Eocene (T), and Pesčanoe, upper Eocene (U). A, C. Anatriaenes. B. Orthodichotriaene. D, I–K, O, P. Mesotriaenes. E. Prodichotriaene. F, T. Calthrops. G, H. Dichotriaenes. L. Tylostyle. M, N. Mesodichotriaenes. Q, R. Triods. S.?Plesiaster. U. Oxyaster. After Ivanik (2003); modified.

Fig. 1 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of Paleogene sponge fauna of the East European Platform through reassessment of the record of isolated spicules

Fig. 1. Spicule morphotypes from south-central Ukraine; Grigorevka borehole, upper Eocene (B), Glâdov Âr, Upper Cretaceous (A, G, J), Pogonovka borehole, upper Eocene (C), Russkie Tiŝki, middle Eocene (D, F, I, O, W, X, Z, AA), Markovka, upper Eocene (E, H, N), Nikol'skoe, upper Eocene (K, L, Q, T, U, V), Pesčanoe, upper Eocene (M, AB), Kantemirovka, upper Eocene (P), Harkov region, middle Eocene (S), Verhnee, lower Eocene (R), and Staroverovka, middle Eocene (Y). A, G, H. Aspidasters. B. Spheraster. C, E, J, N. Sterrasters. D, F. Selenasters. I. Triaene. K, X. Mesotriaene. L, O. Anatriaenes. M, AB. Dichotriaenes. Q. Centrotylote?oxea. R.?Triaene. S. Plagiotriaene. P, T, U. Triaenes. V. Irregular triaene. W. Style. Y– AA. Diaenes. After Ivanik (2003); modified.

Fig. 2 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of Paleogene sponge fauna of the East European Platform through reassessment of the record of isolated spicules

Fig. 2. Spicule morphotypes from south-central Ukraine; Čečva, lower Oligocene (A, B), Staroverovka, middle Eocene (C, L), Verhnee, lower Eocene D), Russkie Tiŝki, middle Eocene (E, H, R, Z), Nikol'skoe, upper Eocene (F, I, J, K, M, T), Černoleska, upper Eocene (G), Markovka, upper Eocene (N), Melovoe, middle Eocene (O), Glâdov Âr, Cretaceous (P), Markovka, lower Oligocene (Q), Lipcy, middle Eocene (S), Pogonovka, upper Eocene (U), Melovoe, upper Eocene (V), Pesčanoe, upper Eocene (W, Y), and Kiselevka, upper Eocene (X). A–E, G. Protriaenes. F, H, J, K, M, U, V. Anatriaenes., L, P. Prodichotriaenes. N, O. Oxeas. Q. Orthotriaene. R. Diaene. S.?Triaene. T. Orthodichotriaene. W–Y. Pinakids. Z. Dichotriaene. After Ivanik 2003); modified.